You Might Be A Constitutionalist If . . .

Nat_Turner

Potential Star
Registered
1. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that every congressman, senator, President, and Supreme Court justice is required to obey the U.S. Constitution.

2. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that before the United States invades and occupies another country, Congress must first declare war.

3. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government should live within its means, like everyone else is forced to do.

4. You might be a Constitutionalist if you think that taking away people's liberties in the name of security is not patriotic, nor does it make the country more secure.

5. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see politicians be forced to abide by the same laws they make everyone else submit to.

6. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that we have three "separate but equal" branches of government that are supposed to hold each other in check and balance.

7. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government has no authority to be involved in education or law enforcement, or in any other issue that the Tenth Amendment reserves to the States, or to the People.

8. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that gun control laws do nothing but aid and abet criminals while trampling the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens.

9. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the income tax is both unconstitutional and immoral, and, along with the I.R.S. and the Federal Reserve, should be abolished.

10. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government had no authority to tell former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore that he could not display a monument containing the Ten Commandments in the Alabama Judicial Building in Montgomery; or to tell a Pace, Florida, high school principal that he could not pray before a meal.

11. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that Congress or the White House or any sovereign State is not required to submit to unconstitutional Supreme Court rulings.

12. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that freedom has nothing in common with illegal immigration.

13. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that outsourcing American jobs overseas is not good for America.

14. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the United States should get out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of the United States.

15. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that it is not unconstitutional for children in public schools to pray or read the Bible.

16. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the Boy Scouts are not a threat to America.

17. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government should honor its commitments to America's veterans and stop using U.S. military personnel as guinea pigs for testing drugs and chemicals.

18. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that U.S. troops should never serve under foreign commanders or wear the uniform or insignia of the United Nations, and that they must never submit to illegal orders, such as turning their weapons against American citizens, or confiscating the guns of U.S. citizens.

19. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government has no business bribing churches and faith-based organizations with federal tax dollars.

20. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that federal agents who murder American citizens should be held to the same laws and punishments that any other citizen would be held to. (Can anyone say, "Waco" and "Ruby Ridge"?)

21. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, and the FTAA (and similar agreements) are disastrous compromises of America's national sovereignty and independence.

22. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see congressmen and senators be required to actually read a bill before passing it into law.

23. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that it is the job of government to protect and secure God-given rights, not use its power to take those rights away.

24. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that there is nothing unconstitutional about the public acknowledgement of God and our Christian heritage.

25. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that government bailouts and "stimulus" expenditures defy virtually every principle of free enterprise and are a flagrant leap into socialism.

26. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that airport screeners have no business touching women's breasts, using sophisticated machinery to look through passengers' clothing to see their naked bodies, confiscating fingernail clippers, or denying pilots from carrying handguns.

27. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that many public schools' "zero-tolerance" policies are just plain stupid.

28. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that parents have a right to homeschool their children.

29. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that governmental seizure of private property is plain, old-fashioned thievery.

30. You might be a Constitutionalist if you are personally determined to not submit to any kind of forced vaccination.

31. You might be a Constitutionalist if you oppose any kind of national health insurance.

32. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that U.S. troops are not the world's policemen, that they are not "nation-builders," and that their purpose is only to defend American lives and property, not to be the enforcement arm of international commercial interests or global elitists.

33. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that the county Sheriff is the highest law enforcement officer of his district and that federal law enforcement (much of which is unconstitutionally organized, anyway) is obligated to submit to his authority.

34. You might be a Constitutionalist if you are determined to oppose America's merger with any kind of regional, hemispheric, or international government, such as the North American Union.

35. You might be a Constitutionalist if you oppose sending billions of taxpayer dollars as foreign aid; the U.S. State Department meddling into the private affairs of foreign countries; and ubiquitous foreign entanglements that require vast sums of money, create animosity and hostility towards us, and expose us to foreign wars and conflicts in which we have no national interest.

36. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to meet one single congressman or senator besides Ron Paul who acts as if he or she has ever read the U.S. Constitution.

Well, how did you fare? Are you a Constitutionalist? If so, your country desperately needs you to stand up and fight for freedom's principles before they are forever taken from us. This means never again voting for anyone--from any party--who will not preserve, protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution. So, don't just take the test; make the pledge!

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20091020.html
 
This is ridiculous. That constitution is bullshit and so are the "founding fathers".

I agree the founding racists and slave owners weren't shit but the document they produced if followed would make this a better place over night.

No IRS, no Federal Reserve, no conquering the planet for foreign governments and industry, etc.
 
I agree the founding racists and slave owners weren't shit but the document they produced if followed would make this a better place over night.

No IRS, no Federal Reserve, no conquering the planet for foreign governments and industry, etc.

but the document they produced if followed would make this a better place over night.

Absolute and total bullshit!

I don’t know what republican blog you came from, but this post and this preposterous statement tells me you are either, like quite a few posters who claim right wing points of views on this site, not very informed, receiving your talking points from GOP/libertarian media sources or just ideological set.

The constitution did NOT “make this a better place over night.” You should be embarrassed for stating this lie and banned yourself forever from posting. From its very inception, the constitution had written in to it the oppression of people of African decent. The slaver holders, who were by the very definition a free market, libertarian, little or no government (until it benefitted them) class that believed that any government was a hindrance on their path to making money, their lifestyle and their moral beliefs. Sound like today’s so called “strict constitutionalists”?

In Article 1, Section 9, Congress is limited, expressly, from prohibiting the "Importation" of slaves, before 1808. So from when the constitution was ratified in 1787 until 1808 that document by law, prevented any action on human rights for all people. I say people because the Enumeration Clause, Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, where representatives are apportioned. Each state is given a number of representatives based on its population - in that population, slaves, called "other persons," are counted as three-fifths of a whole person. For 20 years the constitution assured the existence of human exploitation and torture. Overnight?

The Fugitive Slave Clause Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3, which required the return of runaway slaves was strengthened in 1850 with the Fugitive Slave Act and was not rescinded until the emancipation Proclamation in 1863. Overnight?

From the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 until the start of the US Civil War, in 1861, immeasurable amounts of blood, sweat and tears were spent making “this a better place.” Since slavery was an intrinsic part of the US Constitution, with the law of the land solidly behind it, changing the institution of slavery was and remains THE most contentious issue the United States has faced. It rules our conscience, to this day. The slaver owners felt that the ‘government’ was intruding on their Constitutional rights to make money and in today’s political atmosphere, so called constitutionalist and free marketers feel that the government is intruding on their Constitutional rights to make money. From 1787 till the end of the US Civil War in 1865, 98 years passed making “this a better place,” at least for people of African decent. Overnight?

Even after the 14th, 15th and 16th amendments of the Constitution, it took until 1964 almost 100 years, with the Civil Rights Act to outlaw separate but equal or Jim Crow Laws in the United States. Overnight?

I am totally amazed at people who have no knowledge of history parroting talking points on issues they have no knowledge of. Your user name is Nat Turner. Evidently you don’t know that he was executed and dismembered fighting for rights the Constitution did not grant him?
 
Absolute and total bullshit!

I don’t know what republican blog you came from, but this post and this preposterous statement tells me you are either, like quite a few posters who claim right wing points of views on this site, not very informed, receiving your talking points from GOP/libertarian media sources or just ideological set.

The constitution did NOT “make this a better place over night.” You should be embarrassed for stating this lie and banned yourself forever from posting. From its very inception, the constitution had written in to it the oppression of people of African decent. The slaver holders, who were by the very definition a free market, libertarian, little or no government (until it benefitted them) class that believed that any government was a hindrance on their path to making money, their lifestyle and their moral beliefs. Sound like today’s so called “strict constitutionalists”?

In Article 1, Section 9, Congress is limited, expressly, from prohibiting the "Importation" of slaves, before 1808. So from when the constitution was ratified in 1787 until 1808 that document by law, prevented any action on human rights for all people. I say people because the Enumeration Clause, Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3, where representatives are apportioned. Each state is given a number of representatives based on its population - in that population, slaves, called "other persons," are counted as three-fifths of a whole person. For 20 years the constitution assured the existence of human exploitation and torture. Overnight?

The Fugitive Slave Clause Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3, which required the return of runaway slaves was strengthened in 1850 with the Fugitive Slave Act and was not rescinded until the emancipation Proclamation in 1863. Overnight?

From the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 until the start of the US Civil War, in 1861, immeasurable amounts of blood, sweat and tears were spent making “this a better place.” Since slavery was an intrinsic part of the US Constitution, with the law of the land solidly behind it, changing the institution of slavery was and remains THE most contentious issue the United States has faced. It rules our conscience, to this day. The slaver owners felt that the ‘government’ was intruding on their Constitutional rights to make money and in today’s political atmosphere, so called constitutionalist and free marketers feel that the government is intruding on their Constitutional rights to make money. From 1787 till the end of the US Civil War in 1865, 98 years passed making “this a better place,” at least for people of African decent. Overnight?

Even after the 14th, 15th and 16th amendments of the Constitution, it took until 1964 almost 100 years, with the Civil Rights Act to outlaw separate but equal or Jim Crow Laws in the United States. Overnight?

I am totally amazed at people who have no knowledge of history parroting talking points on issues they have no knowledge of. Your user name is Nat Turner. Evidently you don’t know that he was executed and dismembered fighting for rights the Constitution did not grant him?

That was then this is now. The document has evolved slowy but it would correct this governmental leviathan.

I use the name Nat Turner because of what actions he was willing to take to right a wrong, even if it meant death. We are all slaves again. What are you willing to do................

Nuff said.
 
That was then this is now. The document has evolved slowy but it would correct this governmental leviathan.

I use the name Nat Turner because of what actions he was willing to take to right a wrong, even if it meant death. We are all slaves again. What are you willing to do................

Nuff said.

That was then this is now

If you claim to be Constitutionalist, you believe that the original document was perfect. The Constitution 'evolved' not due to the so called Constitutionalist, but despite them, through outside forces, such as wars killing exploitation and discrimination. Slavery was not overturned by the Constitution, but by war.
 
That was then this is now. The document has evolved slowy but it would correct this governmental leviathan.

I use the name Nat Turner because of what actions he was willing to take to right a wrong, even if it meant death. We are all slaves again. What are you willing to do................

Nuff said.

I use the name Nat Turner because of what actions he was willing to take to right a wrong, even if it meant death.

So you are willing to replace the system that gave Turner what he was fighting for with the system that had him executed.:hmm:

We are all slaves again.

Corporate slaves.

What are you willing to do................

I'm very active in my district. I speak to or correspond with my representatives at least once a year. I make sure they are kept honest. They know when I’m coming!
 
So you are willing to replace the system that gave Turner what he was fighting for with the system that had him executed.:hmm:



Corporate slaves.



I'm very active in my district. I speak to or correspond with my representatives at least once a year. I make sure they are kept honest. They know when I’m coming!

Excellent, you do your part and I'll do mine. Maybe we can encourage others to do something vs. nothing.

Good Luck!
 
I agree the founding racists and slave owners weren't shit but the document they produced if followed would make this a better place over night.

No IRS, no Federal Reserve, no conquering the planet for foreign governments and industry, etc.

I'll take the bait but check it: The Constitution didn't give the govt the authority to negotiate "Free Trade" deals with other nations! (NAFTA & CAFTA would be dead)
 
Back
Top