Will war be good for Trump? Can anybody stop him?

[Art Vandelay]

The American left has shown it can end wars after the body counts get high enough but some of the biggest marches in history opposed the start of the Iraq war and most Americans rallied behind Bush, who was re-elected.

This country loves cowboy foreign policy and I'm not sure Democrats or the left have an answer.

If Trump's approval rating is really going up right now and continues to with what he has done these last two days, we are fucking fucked.

 

[shaddyvillethug]

Colon Powell still the general?

 

[fonzerrillii]

 

[fonzerrillii]

Fake News Alert: Only 60 Latinos Tell Polling Firm They Approve of Trump’s Performance


We don’t know if you have seen the following headlinethat is making the mostly conservative digital media, but a new Zogby poll published this on Tuesday: “Trump approval at 45%; Support among Hispanics, western and union voters jumps double digits.”

“Hispanics” in the headline caught our attention, so we read what Zogby said in the post about tis finding:

Trump saw one the biggest improvements among any sub-group with Hispanics; his approval increased 11% to 42% approval versus 55% who disapprove of Trump’s job as president.

Our initial question, as with most of these polls that very likely don’t include a large sample of U.S. Latinos, was: how many “Hispanics” got polled? So we emailed Jonathan Zogby, the company’s CEO, about the sample size. This is what we asked Zogby: “Good evening, this is the editorial team at LatinoRebels.com. We are doing a story about Trump’s approval ratings going up with Hispanics and we are wondering if you can let us know how many Hispanics were included in the survey? Thank you.”

Here is what Zagby told us:


(Email sent to Latino Rebels)

Following Zogby’s confirmation that 143 Latino respondents were included in the poll, it would mean that 60 respondents would represent the 42% of the 143 who gave Trump a favorable rating in this latest poll. We don’t think that this is a representative sample of anything and we are hoping that Zagby sends us more demographic information about these 60 respondents (we asked, but we haven’t heard yet.)

In addition, the sample is so small that the Latino portion of the poll has a high margin of error. For instance, if you use the following tool and enter 58,600,000 (the estimated number of Latinos living in the U.S. in 2017) along with the 143 sample size from Zogby’s poll, you would get an 8.2% margin or error. In other words, Trump’s approval rating could be as high as 50% with U.S. Latinos (we doubt that) or as low as 32% (more likely).


From American Research Group’s public calculator for margin of error.
"

http://www.latinorebels.com/2017/08...ling-firm-they-approve-of-trumps-performance/

 

[bgbtylvr]

War means the end of the world. We attack, we blow up bunkers and bases, possibly nuclear sites. Once that shit gets into the water, ground, air, etc, we all die slowly. That entire part of the ocean would be contaminated. We'd have blow the entire place off the map, killing millions. But they will get their shit off while its going on, launching nukes miles out into the sea, missing their targets and poisoning fish, wildlife, etc. We would eat and drink that shit and die

 

[darth frosty]

 

[Art Vandelay]

Fake News Alert: Only 60 Latinos Tell Polling Firm They Approve of Trump’s Performance


We don’t know if you have seen the following headlinethat is making the mostly conservative digital media, but a new Zogby poll published this on Tuesday: “Trump approval at 45%; Support among Hispanics, western and union voters jumps double digits.”

“Hispanics” in the headline caught our attention, so we read what Zogby said in the post about tis finding:

Trump saw one the biggest improvements among any sub-group with Hispanics; his approval increased 11% to 42% approval versus 55% who disapprove of Trump’s job as president.

Our initial question, as with most of these polls that very likely don’t include a large sample of U.S. Latinos, was: how many “Hispanics” got polled? So we emailed Jonathan Zogby, the company’s CEO, about the sample size. This is what we asked Zogby: “Good evening, this is the editorial team at LatinoRebels.com. We are doing a story about Trump’s approval ratings going up with Hispanics and we are wondering if you can let us know how many Hispanics were included in the survey? Thank you.”

Here is what Zagby told us:


(Email sent to Latino Rebels)

Following Zogby’s confirmation that 143 Latino respondents were included in the poll, it would mean that 60 respondents would represent the 42% of the 143 who gave Trump a favorable rating in this latest poll. We don’t think that this is a representative sample of anything and we are hoping that Zagby sends us more demographic information about these 60 respondents (we asked, but we haven’t heard yet.)

In addition, the sample is so small that the Latino portion of the poll has a high margin of error. For instance, if you use the following tool and enter 58,600,000 (the estimated number of Latinos living in the U.S. in 2017) along with the 143 sample size from Zogby’s poll, you would get an 8.2% margin or error. In other words, Trump’s approval rating could be as high as 50% with U.S. Latinos (we doubt that) or as low as 32% (more likely).


From American Research Group’s public calculator for margin of error.
"

http://www.latinorebels.com/2017/08...ling-firm-they-approve-of-trumps-performance/

Good.

An increase in white support would still be dangerous, though.

 

[Mr. Met]

 

[Ing4life]

Rachael Maddow just exposed Trump on this fake war talk in the first 5 mins.

 

[SmoothD]

When the South Koreans start worrying, I'll start worrying.
They will kill him before it starts getting serious

 

[moblack]

Rachael Maddow just exposed Trump on this fake war talk in the first 5 mins.

link nigga

 

[Art Vandelay]

Rachael Maddow just exposed Trump on this fake war talk in the first 5 mins.

Just as Keith Olbermann constantly exposed Bush in the same time slot on the same network before the Iraq war.

I think this is going to be so much worse.

 

[Art Vandelay]

Just as Keith Olbermann constantly exposed Bush in the same time slot on the same network before the Iraq war.

I think this is going to be so much worse.

Adding onto that, the Iraq war isn't even a good comparison. Nobody can stop Trump because he's already in office. And if he provokes North Korea into striking first, he's going to have more latitude than Bush ever had.

 

[Ing4life]

link nigga

Damn nigga.....here