where's Al Gore at now?

actinanass

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Conservatives mock Al Gore on snowstorms

By ANDY BARR | 2/10/10 11:36 AM EST

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32783.html#ixzz0fFTuB5Eu


With the nation’s capital buried in several feet of snow and the federal government brought to a halt by Mother Nature, conservatives are mocking former Vice President Al Gore and his crusade to curb global climate change.

The vocal doubters of global warming frequently use any unseasonal snowfall or cold spell to mock Gore, despite the fact that climate scientists study long-term trends and give little weight to one-time occurrences or random meteorological events.

But the historic snowfall in Washington — coinciding with a push from Democrats to enact legislation capping carbon emissions — has left conservatives crowing that fears of environmental catastrophe make no sense.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) jabbed at Gore on Twitter Tuesday, writing that “it’s going to keep snowing in D.C. until Al Gore cries ‘uncle.’”

When Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was asked Tuesday about passing the climate change bill, he quipped, “Where’s Al Gore now?”

Most climate scientists would disagree with the two senators — both of whom are frequent critics of cap-and-trade legislation — pointing to numerous studies indicating that carbon emissions have contributed to rising global temperatures.

The left-leaning group Media Matters wrote in its blog Tuesday that “conservative media figures have used the recent snowstorms in the Washington, D.C., area to level more science-free attacks on global warming.”

But criticism of the position has not deterred global warming deniers from using an unusually snowy winter in Washington to bash Gore.

Conservative talk show host Sean Hannity brought up the former vice president while introducing a story about the massive snowfall during his Fox News show Monday.

“It’s the most severe winter storm in years, which would seem to contradict Al Gore’s hysterical global warming theories,” Hannity said.

And former House Speaker Newt Gingrich mocked Gore on Twitter on Saturday after the first full day of snow.

“Historic snowstorm in Washington — third this year — where is Al Gore to explain it snows this heavily as a sign global warming is imminent,” the former Georgia Republican wrote.

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin also made waves this week for disputing global climate change but without pointing directly to Gore.

During a speech Monday in California, Palin called evidence of global warming a “bunch of snake oil science.”

Palin made the claim during a closed-door speech. The Associated Press bought a ticket to the event and reported on it.

She recalled an episode during her time as governor in which the listing of polar bears as threatened by global warming under the Endangered Species Act disrupted the planning for a gas pipeline through Alaska’s coastal waters.

Palin remembered that the threat to polar bears was going “to shut down a lot of our development.”

“And it didn't make any sense because it was based on these global warming studies that now we're seeing [is] a bunch of snake oil science,” she said.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32783.html#ixzz0fFTzT5R5
 
Idiot conservatives will. :yes: These fuck you America idiots can't seem to recognize that these big ass snows is a result of more moisture in the air. So we ignore these kinds of kindergarten stories. They fit the criminally retarded bunch as fokkk noise.

-VG
 
You have to admit that that bitch mother nature do have cycles, in which, have nothing to do with human interaction whatsoever.

Who knows, maybe its the SUN.....
 
These fuck you America idiots can't seem to recognize that these big ass snows is a result of more moisture in the air.

Is there a quotable study that shows the increase in humidity (moisture) you mention?

People use current weather to suit their agenda. If a one-day heat record is broken the Global Warmers (now Climate Changers?) point to it at as evidence that they are correct. But on the other hand when record cold is brought up they say to look at the "long term trend".
 
<font size="4">
Its been hot as hell, this summer . . .

</font size>

climatechange.jpg
 
A more telling question is where is the individual that started this thread?

source: Guardian News

Global warming pushes 2010 temperatures to record highs
Scientists from two leading climate research centres publish 'best evidence yet' of rising long-term global temperatures


Global temperatures in the first half of the year were the hottest since records began more than a century ago, according to two of the world's leading climate research centres.

Scientists have also released what they described as the "best evidence yet" of rising long-term temperatures. The report is the first to collate 11 different indicators – from air and sea temperatures to melting ice – each one based on between three and seven data sets, dating back to between 1850 and the 1970s.

The newly released data follows months of scrutiny of climate science after sceptics claimed leaked emails from the University of East Anglia (UEA) suggested temperature records had been manipulated - a charge rejected by three inquiries.

Publishing the newly collated data in London, Peter Stott, the head of climate modelling at the UK Met Office, said despite variations between individual years, the evidence was unequivocal: "When you follow those decade-to-decade trends then you see clearly and unmistakably signs of a warming world".

"That's a very remarkable result, that all those data sets agree," he added. "It's the clearest evidence in one place from a range of different indices."

Currently 1998 is the hottest year on record. Two combined land and sea surface temperature records from Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) and the US National Climatic Data Centre (NCDC) both calculate that the first six months of 2010 were the hottest on record. According to GISS, four of the six months also individually showed record highs.

A third leading monitoring programme, by the Met Office, shows this period was the second hottest on record, after 1998, with two months this year – January and March – being hotter than their equivalents 12 years ago.


The Met Office said the variations between the figures published by the different organisations are because the Met Office uses only temperature observations, Nasa makes estimates for gaps in recorded data such as the polar regions, and the NCDC uses a mixture of the two approaches. The latest figures will give weight to predictions that this year could become the hottest on record.

Despite annual fluctuations, the figures also highlight the clear trend for the 2000s to be hotter than the 1990s, which in turn were clearly warmer than the previous decade, said Stott.

"These numbers are not theory, but fact, indicating that the Earth's climate is moving into uncharted territory," said Rafe Pomerance, a senior fellow at Clean Air Cool Planet, a US group dedicated to helping find solutions to global warming.


The Met Office published its full list of global warming indicators, compiled by Hadley Centre researcher John Kennedy. It formed part of the State of the Climate 2009 report published as a special bulletin of the American Meteorological Society by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which runs the NCDC temperature series.

Seven of the indicators rose over the last few decades, indicating "clear warming trends", although these all included annual fluctuations up and down. One of these was air temperature over land – including data from the Climatic Research Unit at the UEA, whose figures were under scrutiny after hacked emails were posted online in November 2009, but the graphic also included figures from six other research groups all showing the same overall trends despite annual differences.

The other six rising indicators were sea surface temperatures, collected by six groups; ocean heat to 700m depth from seven groups; air temperatures over oceans (five data sets); the tropospheric temperature in the atmosphere up to 1km up (seven); humidity caused by warmer air absorbing more moisture (three); and sea level rise as hotter oceans expand and ice melts (six).

Another four indicators showed declining figures over time, again consistent with global warming: northern hemisphere snow cover (two data sets), Arctic sea ice extent (three); glacier mass loss (four); and the temperature of the stratosphere. This last cooling effect is caused by a decline in ozone in the stratosphere which prevents it absorbing as much ultraviolet radiation from the sun above.

One key data set omitted was sea ice in the Antarctic, because it was increasing in some areas and decreasing in others, due to reduced ozone causing changes in wind patterns and sea-surface circulation. This data set showed no clear trend, said Stott. These figures were also in the last report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007.

"It's not that the IPCC didn't look at this data, of course they did, but they didn't put it all together in one place," he added.

The cause of the warming was "dominated" by greenhouse gases emitted by human activity, said Stott. "It's possible there's some [other] process which can amplify other effects, such as radiation from the sun, [but] the evidence is so clear the chance there's something we haven't thought of seems to be getting smaller and smaller," he said.
 
I knew this was bound to happen as soon as the summer hit. Heavier than normal snowstorms are part of the climate change problem.
 

Global temperatures hung a U-turn in 1900,
reversing a 5,000-year chill-down


Until recently, orbital changes were driving us toward the next ice age;
Now, scientists Find an Abrupt Warm Jog After a Very Long Cooling


glacier-640x426.jpg

2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png


There’s long been a general picture of the climate of the Holocene, the period of Earth history since the last ice age ended around 12,000 years ago. It goes like this: After a sharp stuttery warm-up following that big chill — to temperatures warmer than today — the climate cools, with the decline reaching bottom around 200 years ago in the period widely called the “little ice age.” (A graph produced by Robert Rohde for his Global Warming Art Web site years ago nicely captures the general picture.)


Global temperatures hung a U-turn in 1900


Scientists Find an Abrupt Warm Jog After a Very Long Cooling


2000 Year Temperature Comparison





 
Back
Top