Wells Fargo rejected nearly half of their black homeowners refinancing applications!

g0nbad real bad

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Mortgage rates hit an all-time low during the pandemic, giving homeowners the chance to refinance and ultimately lower their long term interest costs. However, not everyone had the same level of access to this once in a lifetime opportunity.


Only 47% of the Black homeowners who submitted refinance applications in 2020 were approved by Wells Fargo as opposed to 72% of white homeowners, according to a Bloomberg News analysis published on Mar. 11.

While white applicants had higher approval rates at all major lenders, Wells Fargo in particular, lagged behind other major lenders in their approval rates for minority applicants. Overall, 71% of Black refinancing applicants in the country were approved in 2020, according to Bloomberg’s analysis.

Wells Fargo, the third largest bank in the United States by assets, was the sole lender that rejected more Black applicants than it accepted. Black homeowners faced more refinancing denials than other minority applicants such as Hispanic homeowners and Asian homeowners, who had approval rates from Well Fargo at 53% and 67% respectively. However, Paul Turner, the senior vice president of Consumer Lending Executive Communications at Wells Fargo, disputes Bloomberg's conclusions and told Fortune that Bloomberg's data "relied on an analysis designed to present a skewed picture of our lending efforts," and ignored the bank's "strong track record of lending to Black homeowners."

What were the acceptance odds at other lenders?



JPMorgan Chase accepted 81% of refinancing applications from Black homeowners in 2020 compared with 90% from white ones. Bank of America approved 66% of its Black applicants and 78% of white ones. Rocket Mortgage LLC, approved 79% of Black applicants and 86% of white ones. While most lenders displayed about a ten percent difference in approval rates between white and Black households, Wells Fargo rejected 24% more Black applicants than white ones, according to the Bloomberg data.

Wealthy Black Wells Fargo applicants still have poor approval odds

Wells Fargo’s application approval rates for the lowest income white families—earning a maximum of $63,000 per year—were nearly identical to high income Black families—earning a minimum of $168,000 per year. But when Black and white families had the same low income status of a $63,000 maximum annual income, white families were almost twice as likely to be approved.

How this perpetuates the racial wealth gap

The refinancing gap perpetuates the racial wealth disparity by limiting Black access to resources that could relieve financial burdens. For example, the average refinance reduced the borrower’s monthly payment by $279, leading to a payment reduction of $5.3 billion per year for all households that refinanced, according to The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.


Black and minority borrowers were significantly more likely than white borrowers to miss housing payments due to financial distress, during the pandemic. While unemployment decreased in most racial demographics between October and December of 2021, it increased almost 1% in the Black community. With less liquidity and consistent income than other racial groups, Black mortgage owners were statistically more likely to need the decline in interest rates that comes with refinancing as well as the reduction in the borrower’s monthly payment.

Widespread discrimination from the largest banks in the country

Banking infrastructures have long been accused of discriminatory practices against minority borrowers and homebuyers, from undervaluing homes in Black neighborhoods to denying mortages to Black applicants. Wells Fargo is the most recent bank to draw attention for potentially racially discriminatory lending practices, but ultimately they are a symptom of the financial disenfranchisement that Black people have faced in America versus the sole culprit.

Other banks such as Bank of America and JP Morgan and Chase have also come under fire for racial discrimination and predatory lending practices. For example, Bank of America was fined $335 million for charging over 200,000 Black and Hispanic borrowers with higher interest rates and fees in 2011, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. In 2017, JP Morgan Chase paid over $55 million in a settlement for charging approximately 106,000 minority borrowers higher rates than their white counterparts, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

Banking on accountability


In an effort to close the racial wealth gap, J.P. Morgan Chase, made a $30 billion racial equity commitment in October 2020, and has since invested $100 million into 14 Black, Hispanic, and Latino owned or led institutions and committed $350 million in donations to grow Black, Latino and women-owned small businesses. Bank of America tripled its affordable home ownership commitment to $15 billion through 2025 to assist low-wealth homebuyers and advance racial equality, in February 2021. They also raised their commitment from $1 billion to $1.25 billion over five years, to “support investments to address racial justice, advocacy and equality for people and communities of color, including those of Asian descent,” in Mar. 2021.

In Feb. of 2017, Wells Fargo announced a $60 billion lending commitment to create at least 250,000 Black homeowners by 2027. They are over one third of the way there, according to Turner.

“Through the end of 2021, we have helped 81,756 African-American families become homeowners with $21.4 billion in financing since the commitment was announced in 2017,” Turner told Fortune.

Wells Fargo also alleges that they are “pursuing $185 billion in diverse lending commitments,” which references their $60 billion African American lending commitment and their $125 billion Hispanic lending commitment, which was announced in 2015.
 
JP Morgan was not alone. The predecessors that made up Citibank, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are among a list of well-known US financial firms that benefited from the slave trade.

 
JP Morgan was not alone. The predecessors that made up Citibank, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are among a list of well-known US financial firms that benefited from the slave trade.


Pointless though, show me any company thsat is over 100 years old that did not participate in slavery.
 
You should have been got your fucking money out of there. The bank was started in the 1800s by two homosexuals in "Faggotville" AKA San Francisco.
 
Wells Fargo is the absolute worst insitution there is
in an ocean of racism they are by far the mariana trench

This is the same place that pledged 3b to latin/hispanic home ownership
and found that it was stealing the money in over draft and multiple accounts from black people
 
When I was younger and broker I had Wells Fargo account.

If a check came in the same day as a deposit they would run the checks first overdraft the account then eat up the deposit with fees.
 
There needs to be at law against banks asking a customer's race before they open an account or take out a loan.

At the same time, customers need to be allowed to fill out an application with their first initial.

This would solve a lot of housing inequalities overnight.
 
There needs to be at law against banks asking a customer's race before they open an account or take out a loan.

At the same time, customers need to be allowed to fill out an application with their first initial.

This would solve a lot of housing inequalities overnight.

Never seen this on a loan application before. The only way banks would know is if you went in person or your race comes up in their background check analytics.
 
There needs to be at law against banks asking a customer's race before they open an account or take out a loan.

At the same time, customers need to be allowed to fill out an application with their first initial.

This would solve a lot of housing inequalities overnight.
You don’t have to put your race down you can put prefer not to say, they collect that info in order to try to prevent discrimination which doesn’t work.
 
Wells Fargo is all the way fucked up. I've heard one person refer to them as a criminal enterprise. This is some of their issues over the years
  • In November 2009 it had to agree to buy back $1.4 billion in auction-rate securities to settle allegations by the California attorney general of misleading investors.
  • In May 2011 it was fined $1 million by FINRA for failing to send disclosure documents to customers. That same month, it agreed to pay up to $16 million to settle charges of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.
  • Wells Fargo agrees to pay $3 billion to resolve criminal and civil investigations into sales practices involving the opening of millions of accounts without customer authorization
  • The FBI and Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York both filed and settled a civil suit against Wells Fargo on Monday. The suit alleged that the bank “violated the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) by fraudulently overcharging hundreds of commercial customers, many of them small and medium-sized businesses and federally-insured financial institutions, who used the Bank’s MTB -1.3% foreign exchange (“FX”) service.
  • In July 2011 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $125 million to settle a lawsuit in which a group of pension funds accused it of misrepresenting the quality of pools of mortgage-related securities. That same month, the Federal Reserve announced an $85 million civil penalty against Wells Fargo for steering customers with good qualifications into costly subprime mortgage loans during the housing boom.
  • In July 2012 the U.S. Justice Department announced that Wells Fargo would pay $175 million to settle charges that it engaged in a pattern of discrimination against African-American and Hispanic borrowers in its mortgage lending during the period from 2004 to 2009.
  • In January 2013 Wells Fargo was one of ten major lenders that agreed to pay a total of $8.5 billion to resolve claims of foreclosure abuses. A few months later, Wells Fargo settled a lawsuit alleging that it neglected the maintenance and marketing of foreclosed homes in black and Latino areas by agreeing to spend at least $42 million to promote home ownership and neighborhood stabilization.
  • In October 2013 Freddie Mac announced that Wells Fargo would pay $869 million to repurchase home loans the bank had sold to the mortgage agency that did not conform to the latter's guidelines.
  • In April 2016 the Justice Department announced that Wells Fargo would pay $1.2 billion to resolve allegations that the bank certified to the Department of Housing and Urban Development that certain residential home mortgage loans were eligible for Federal Housing Administration insurance when they were not, resulting in the government having to pay FHA insurance claims when some of those loans defaulted.
  • Wells Fargo agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the bank overcharged hundreds of thousands of homeowners for appraisals ordered after they defaulted on mortgage loans.
  • In July 2017 it was revealed that more than 800,000 customers who had taken out car loans with Wells Fargo were charged for auto insurance they did not need.
  • In February 2018 the Federal Reserve took the unprecedented step of barring Wells Fargo from growing any larger until it cleaned up its business practices. The agency also announced that the bank had been pressured to replace four members of its board of directors.
  • In April 2018 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau fined Wells Fargo a total of $1 billion for selling unnecessary products to customers and other improper practices.
  • In May 2018 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $480 million to settle a class action lawsuit filed by shareholders accusing the company of making false statements about its business practices.
  • In August 2018 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $2.09 billion to resolve a Justice Department case involving the misrepresentation of the quality of loans used in residential mortgage-backed securities the bank issued in the period leading up to the financial crisis.
  • In December 2019 Wells agreed to provide $10 million for housing programs in Philadelphia to resolve litigation alleging that it violated the Fair Housing Act in the mortgage loans it provided to minority borrowers in the city.
  • In June 2020 Wells agreed to pay $20 million to the State of Maryland in settlement of allegations it misled investors over the safety of its residential mortgage-backed securities.
  • Wells Fargo’s scandals continue to pile up. Most recently, the San Francisco-based institution says that a computer glitch led to more than 600 of its customers losing their homes.The problems stemmed from loan modification applications that the bank directed homeowners to online, the bank revealed in an August 3 filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.The issue, which stemmed from an error in Wells Fargo’s underwriting tool, affected people who were in the foreclosure process from April 2010 to October 2015, the bank said. The bank said more than two-thirds of the customers caught in the computer error ended up losing their homes in foreclosure.
  • Wells Fargo standing accused of overcharging veterans who were refinancing their loans. The bank has agreed to pay refunds to some 60,000 veterans ripped off over the course of more than 6 years. But the problem is that the vets won’t automatically get the money. The Wall Street Journal reports they’ll be notified over the next few months and then they will have to fill out paperwork for the refund.
  • Wells Fargo and its counsel “manipulated” the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s arbitrator selection process and violated the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure, denying investors their contractual right to a neutral, computer-generated list of potential arbitrators.


  • https://www.corp-research.org/wells-fargo
 
Wells Fargo is all the way fucked up. I've heard one person refer to them as a criminal enterprise. This is some of their issues over the years
  • In November 2009 it had to agree to buy back $1.4 billion in auction-rate securities to settle allegations by the California attorney general of misleading investors.
  • In May 2011 it was fined $1 million by FINRA for failing to send disclosure documents to customers. That same month, it agreed to pay up to $16 million to settle charges of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.
  • Wells Fargo agrees to pay $3 billion to resolve criminal and civil investigations into sales practices involving the opening of millions of accounts without customer authorization
  • The FBI and Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York both filed and settled a civil suit against Wells Fargo on Monday. The suit alleged that the bank “violated the Financial Institutions Reform Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) by fraudulently overcharging hundreds of commercial customers, many of them small and medium-sized businesses and federally-insured financial institutions, who used the Bank’s MTB -1.3% foreign exchange (“FX”) service.
  • In July 2011 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $125 million to settle a lawsuit in which a group of pension funds accused it of misrepresenting the quality of pools of mortgage-related securities. That same month, the Federal Reserve announced an $85 million civil penalty against Wells Fargo for steering customers with good qualifications into costly subprime mortgage loans during the housing boom.
  • In July 2012 the U.S. Justice Department announced that Wells Fargo would pay $175 million to settle charges that it engaged in a pattern of discrimination against African-American and Hispanic borrowers in its mortgage lending during the period from 2004 to 2009.
  • In January 2013 Wells Fargo was one of ten major lenders that agreed to pay a total of $8.5 billion to resolve claims of foreclosure abuses. A few months later, Wells Fargo settled a lawsuit alleging that it neglected the maintenance and marketing of foreclosed homes in black and Latino areas by agreeing to spend at least $42 million to promote home ownership and neighborhood stabilization.
  • In October 2013 Freddie Mac announced that Wells Fargo would pay $869 million to repurchase home loans the bank had sold to the mortgage agency that did not conform to the latter's guidelines.
  • In April 2016 the Justice Department announced that Wells Fargo would pay $1.2 billion to resolve allegations that the bank certified to the Department of Housing and Urban Development that certain residential home mortgage loans were eligible for Federal Housing Administration insurance when they were not, resulting in the government having to pay FHA insurance claims when some of those loans defaulted.
  • Wells Fargo agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the bank overcharged hundreds of thousands of homeowners for appraisals ordered after they defaulted on mortgage loans.
  • In July 2017 it was revealed that more than 800,000 customers who had taken out car loans with Wells Fargo were charged for auto insurance they did not need.
  • In February 2018 the Federal Reserve took the unprecedented step of barring Wells Fargo from growing any larger until it cleaned up its business practices. The agency also announced that the bank had been pressured to replace four members of its board of directors.
  • In April 2018 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau fined Wells Fargo a total of $1 billion for selling unnecessary products to customers and other improper practices.
  • In May 2018 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $480 million to settle a class action lawsuit filed by shareholders accusing the company of making false statements about its business practices.
  • In August 2018 Wells Fargo agreed to pay $2.09 billion to resolve a Justice Department case involving the misrepresentation of the quality of loans used in residential mortgage-backed securities the bank issued in the period leading up to the financial crisis.
  • In December 2019 Wells agreed to provide $10 million for housing programs in Philadelphia to resolve litigation alleging that it violated the Fair Housing Act in the mortgage loans it provided to minority borrowers in the city.
  • In June 2020 Wells agreed to pay $20 million to the State of Maryland in settlement of allegations it misled investors over the safety of its residential mortgage-backed securities.
  • Wells Fargo’s scandals continue to pile up. Most recently, the San Francisco-based institution says that a computer glitch led to more than 600 of its customers losing their homes.The problems stemmed from loan modification applications that the bank directed homeowners to online, the bank revealed in an August 3 filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.The issue, which stemmed from an error in Wells Fargo’s underwriting tool, affected people who were in the foreclosure process from April 2010 to October 2015, the bank said. The bank said more than two-thirds of the customers caught in the computer error ended up losing their homes in foreclosure.
  • Wells Fargo standing accused of overcharging veterans who were refinancing their loans. The bank has agreed to pay refunds to some 60,000 veterans ripped off over the course of more than 6 years. But the problem is that the vets won’t automatically get the money. The Wall Street Journal reports they’ll be notified over the next few months and then they will have to fill out paperwork for the refund.
  • Wells Fargo and its counsel “manipulated” the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s arbitrator selection process and violated the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure, denying investors their contractual right to a neutral, computer-generated list of potential arbitrators.


  • https://www.corp-research.org/wells-fargo
Gotdamn
 
Black folks need to take their money and finances out of Wells Fargo immediately. This along with the bullshit they pulled overcharging and lying to customers.
REAL SHIT BRUH

X2lUTD.jpg
 
Back
Top