'WELCOME TO OUR WORLD DYKES!' Brittney Griner 20K month Child Support!!!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
shiiiiiiid......you cant make this shit up. i'm laughing and speechless all in one. 18 years with twins.lol. this got all the parts set for a dateline special
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...A-player-texting-ex-boyfriend-engagement.html



2AC83E4500000578-0-image-m-70_1437670473486.jpg


2AC83E5600000578-0-image-a-71_1437670482821.jpg
 
The parties agree that back child support from October 2015 through April 2016 is $2,665.81 per month.

Beginning May 1, 2016, Ms. Griner will pay child support to Ms. Johnson in the amount of $2,516.97 per month.

RULING

For purposes of the following, the Court finds that Ms. Griner’s income is approximately $1,165,000.00 and Ms. Johnson’s income is approximately $125,000.00. The Court believes that it is fair and equitable to utilize a 90% (Griner)/10% (Johnson) ratio.

Ms. Johnson is entitled to child care costs. During the hearing, Ms. Griner did not dispute that she should pay some child care costs. She disputed the amount of child care costs and the percentage she should pay.

Ms. Johnson testified that her family members are helping out with the children. She agreed to pay them a reasonable rate. These family members are providing nanny services and should be reasonably paid.

The Court believes that it is fair and reasonable for Ms. Johnson to be able to pay for one full time nanny and one half-time nanny. The children require around the clock care. While Ms. Johnson can certainly provide some care herself, she needs significant assistance, especially during the upcoming WNBA season. Based on information provided in the exhibits, a reasonable rate for a live-in nanny under these circumstances is $500.00 per week for one nanny, which is $3,150.00 per month for 1.5 nannies.

IT IS ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall pay $2,835.00 per month, commencing April 1, 2016.

The child care costs provided for herein are based on the ages and special needs of the children and all of the relevant circumstances. The amounts are anticipated to decrease significantly as the children stabilize and get older.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the childcare costs shall be reviewed by the parties no later than six months from the date of this Order and every six months thereafter. If they cannot agree at that time, they are required to mediate before coming back to Court. Absent an agreement of the parties, commencing in October of 2016, child care costs shall be reduced to one nanny at $500.00 per week or $2,100.00 per month. Absent an agreement to the contrary, Ms. Griner shall pay to Ms. Johnson $1,890.00 per month for child care costs, commencing in October, 2016.

Ms. Johnson requests three months of back child care expenses. At $3,150.00 per month, the total is $9,450.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall pay $8,505.00 in back child care expenses.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that uncovered medical/dental/vision expenses shall be split on a 90 % (Griner)/10 % (Johnson) ratio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall be entitled to the tax exemption for the two children in four out of five years. If Ms. Griner receives no monetary benefit from the exemption, Ms. Johnson may take the exemption.

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Family Court/042016/m7310461.pdf
 
The parties agree that back child support from October 2015 through April 2016 is $2,665.81 per month.

Beginning May 1, 2016, Ms. Griner will pay child support to Ms. Johnson in the amount of $2,516.97 per month.

RULING

For purposes of the following, the Court finds that Ms. Griner’s income is approximately $1,165,000.00 and Ms. Johnson’s income is approximately $125,000.00. The Court believes that it is fair and equitable to utilize a 90% (Griner)/10% (Johnson) ratio.

Ms. Johnson is entitled to child care costs. During the hearing, Ms. Griner did not dispute that she should pay some child care costs. She disputed the amount of child care costs and the percentage she should pay.

Ms. Johnson testified that her family members are helping out with the children. She agreed to pay them a reasonable rate. These family members are providing nanny services and should be reasonably paid.

The Court believes that it is fair and reasonable for Ms. Johnson to be able to pay for one full time nanny and one half-time nanny. The children require around the clock care. While Ms. Johnson can certainly provide some care herself, she needs significant assistance, especially during the upcoming WNBA season. Based on information provided in the exhibits, a reasonable rate for a live-in nanny under these circumstances is $500.00 per week for one nanny, which is $3,150.00 per month for 1.5 nannies.

IT IS ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall pay $2,835.00 per month, commencing April 1, 2016.

The child care costs provided for herein are based on the ages and special needs of the children and all of the relevant circumstances. The amounts are anticipated to decrease significantly as the children stabilize and get older.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the childcare costs shall be reviewed by the parties no later than six months from the date of this Order and every six months thereafter. If they cannot agree at that time, they are required to mediate before coming back to Court. Absent an agreement of the parties, commencing in October of 2016, child care costs shall be reduced to one nanny at $500.00 per week or $2,100.00 per month. Absent an agreement to the contrary, Ms. Griner shall pay to Ms. Johnson $1,890.00 per month for child care costs, commencing in October, 2016.

Ms. Johnson requests three months of back child care expenses. At $3,150.00 per month, the total is $9,450.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall pay $8,505.00 in back child care expenses.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that uncovered medical/dental/vision expenses shall be split on a 90 % (Griner)/10 % (Johnson) ratio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Griner shall be entitled to the tax exemption for the two children in four out of five years. If Ms. Griner receives no monetary benefit from the exemption, Ms. Johnson may take the exemption.

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Family Court/042016/m7310461.pdf

GY5WR14382082042.gif










and
michael-jordan-laughing.gif

at the same time!
 
Back
Top