Wealth of Black Families Has Disappeared - Feb. 2011

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
ijfzi0.JPG


Wealth of Black Families Has Disappeared

Progress Of A Whole Generation Is Just Gone



nutting_rex.jpg

commentary - by Rex Nutting

Feb. 9, 2011


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wealth-of-black-families-has-disappeared-2011-02-09

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The Great Recession has been hard on almost everyone, but it’s been really tough on Black households, who have seen much of the economic progress of the past generation disappear.

Despite high-profile success stories such as Barack Obama or Oprah Winfrey, the typical Black family is poorer by some standards today than it was nearly 30 years ago. In a country where access to capital is everything, most Blacks have nothing.

Part of the story of the recession is a story about jobs. The unemployment rate for most demographic groups essentially doubled during the recession, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. For Blacks, the jobless rate rose from 7.7% to 16.5%, while the jobless rate for whites went from 3.9% to 9%.

Those disparities in employment are well known. What’s not fully appreciated is how deeply the recession cut into the incomes of Black households, and how the recession devastated the wealth of Black families.

Median net worth for Black households dropped from $9,300 in 2007 to $2,200 in 2009, far less than the $98,000 owned by the typical white household.

Median household income for Blacks fell 7.2% from 2007 to 2009, significantly more than the 4.2% decline for whites or the 4.9% drop in Hispanics’ income, according to the Census Bureau. (The median means half of households had more, half had less.) See the data on median income at the Census Bureau’s website.<div align="right"><!-- MSTableType="layout" --><img src="http://i.min.us/ilwmoY.JPG" width="430" height="403" align="right">
</div>

It’s not until you look at the figures for net worth — assets minus liabilities — that you can understand just how marginalized Blacks are in our capitalist society.
$2,200

Most Blacks really don’t have any capital at all. The average Black person leaves his or her heirs just enough to pay the undertaker, with the typical Black household’s net worth totaling just $2,200, according to the latest data.

Let’s be clear: The vast majority of wealth in this country is owned by a few people, mostly white. It’s estimated that about 80% of all wealth is owned by 20% of the people, while about a third is owned by the top 1%. About 40% have no wealth at all.

What little wealth the typical Black family has is mostly tied up in the house. With housing prices falling for the past five years, Black wealth has been wiped out.

The typical Black family had about three times as much wealth in 1983 than it did in 2009 — $6,300 in inflation-adjusted terms in 1983 compared with just $2,200 in 2009, according to an analysis of the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances. Read more about the survey on the Fed’s website.

The figures are shocking. In 2001, the median net worth of a white family stood at $124,600. For Blacks, the median wealth was $12,500. For every dollar of wealth owned by the typical white family, the typical Black family had 10 cents. Remember, these are figures for middle-class families.

By 2007, the median wealth for white families hit $143,600, thanks to the housing bubble and a stock-market rally. But Blacks were left behind. They don’t own many financial assets, and they missed out on the housing bubble almost completely. Their net worth fell to $9,300. For every dollar of capital owned by middle-class whites, middle-class Blacks had 6 cents.

Then things got even uglier. By 2009, the typical white family had $94,600 in wealth, compared with $2,200 for Blacks, according to an analysis by economist Edward Wolff. Blacks had 2 cents on the dollar.

Hold on a minute. How can it be that Blacks missed out on the housing bubble? According to conventional conservative wisdom, the housing bubble was inflated specifically to help Blacks buy homes through government policies, such as the Community Reinvestment Act that forced banks to lend to Blacks and other poor and undeserving folks.

Yet the facts don’t support that theory. The home-ownership rate for Blacks actually declined during the housing bubble after rising in the late 1990s. After peaking near 50% in 2004, the ownership rate for Blacks fell to 47% by the time the bubble burst in 2006. See home-ownership rates on the Census Bureau’s website.

Black home owners were targeted by predatory lenders in the private sector, though. When it came time to refinance their mortgages to take advantage of lower rates and the opportunity to cash out, Blacks with good credit scores were much more likely to be steered into high-cost, high-risk subprime loans than whites with the same credit scores. Once Black home owners fell behind, they were nearly twice as likely to be foreclosed on as similarly situated whites. Read more about predatory lending at the Center for Responsible Lending.

Wealth is like sourdough

Around the globe, accumulating capital has been seen as the key to economic development. The nations that have grown the fastest have been those with the most equal distribution of wealth. Asia is growing much faster than Latin America, for example.

But wealth is a bit like sourdough bread — you need a starter to get it going.
Home buyers pay cash, sensing a bottom

Mitra Kalita reports more home buyers are selling investments to pay cash for real estate, betting on a bottom in the housing market.

Each generation of Black youth starts out with a deficit, not a legacy. Parents or grandparents don’t have the capital to pass along to the kids to pay for school, buy a home or start a business. Black college graduates carry a heavier student-loan burden than white graduates. White kids backed up by their parents can better afford to work at the unpaid internships that increasingly are crucial to enter certain professions.

Most Black families are caught in a trap, and it’s not any better for millions of working-class families of other races. In a world where wealth begets wealth, upward mobility is a struggle. Poverty is just one layoff or illness away.

Americans like to believe that anyone can make it with hard work. If you are exceptional, hard work and a little luck might be enough. But if you have average talents, like most of us, there’s nothing like a little capital to get you on your way.

Unfortunately for many working-class Blacks, whites, Hispanics and Asians, the Great Recession washed much of the wealth they’d managed to gain. It’ll be very hard to build it back up without a steady and good-paying job.

<hr noshade color="#0000FF" size="10"></hr>
 
The look on his face in the picture says Rex really enjoyed reporting this story. What he don't seem to understand is wealth is as much about values as it is about dollars. Some Black people don't buy big insurance policies because they don't want the family fighting over it. Some of us would rather be unemployed or hustle than go to a white owned job. Many Blacks believe in God and not in material things. We are not white and we have different values and beliefs.
 
This is just more white boy cheerleading.

The statistics are surprisingly positive for non-whites in this country.

The so-called wealth that whites rely on so much for their identity, self-importance, and hope is actually just promises that can never be realized.

Since black people specifically never expected this wealth to be real, they have spent their entire lives preparing for the inevitable default that is coming, whether they know it or not.

Whites and others who rely on dollar-demoniated promises of retirement, savings, and financial affluence will be devastated when it becomes obvious to everyone that finances are no protection from poverty.

Whites are just fooling themselves. I say, let them indulge in their fantasies of superiority.
 
The title is a little misleading, IMO, everybody's wealth has been wiped-out. These games Bernanke playin with the money supply knows no boundaries. Everyone around the world with dollar-denominated assets is getting wiped-the-fuck-out............and this shit is just getting started

Gold & silver is the only safe-haven to preserve any wealth you may have accumulated but feel free to keep believing the Ben Bernank.

I seem to remember something I posted a long time ago: government cannot create wealth, they only destroy it through Income taxes, Interest on debt & Inflation (the 3 I's) :smh:
 
The median wealth for whites in the US is nearly $142,000. For blacks, it's $11,000.

The median wealth for whites in the US is nearly $142,000. For blacks, it's $11,000.
Vox.com
By Danielle Kurtzleben
December 13, 2014 11:30 AM

Everyone knows inequality is growing in the US, but a new Pew report shows how stark that divide is by race and ethnicity: the median household headed by a white person has a net worth 13 times greater than the median black-headed household. And for whites and Hispanics, the gap is tenfold. In both cases, those gaps are growing.

Pew used data from the Fed's Survey of Consumer Finances, released every three years, to create this report, and it shows some staggering gaps in wealth — notice that the chart above is logarithmic (i.e., it goes $1,000, $10,000, $100,000, etc.). To get a clearer picture of how much white wealth dwarfs the wealth of blacks and Hispanics, see the below chart:

One other upsetting wrinkle: these gaps exist even regardless of income, as Demos' Matt Bruenig showed earlier this year. Likewise, he has shown that racial and ethnic wealth gaps exist regardless of education.

Okay, so why is this happening? 2013 research from Brandeis University (and highlighted in Dean Starkman's June New Republic article) shows that the five biggest components in the growing gap between whites and blacks are (in order, from biggest to smallest) years of homeownership, income, unemployment, college education, and inheritance. Though the report focuses only on blacks and whites without separating out Latinos, it at least provides a window into how whole races or ethnic groups can end up with such huge wealth disparities.

Residential segregation is a big reason homeownership has created a big divide between blacks and whites, the researchers write, as it "artificially lowers demand" and therefore makes building equity tougher in a nonwhite neighborhood. And because whites tend to have more family inheritance and financial help, they also tend to buy homes earlier, giving them more time to build equity. Historic discrimination in mortgage lending added to this gap, as well as the fact that blacks have more of their wealth tied up in their homes than whites do. That means that when the housing crash came, it had a bigger impact on blacks than whites.

The intertwined racial gaps in income, employment, and education all add to this as well, making it harder to get the money with which to build wealth. Add to that the fact that blacks also tend to graduate college with more student debt than whites, and building wealth (even with a good education and a good job) gets all the harder. And as there are also employment, income, and education achievement gaps between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites as well, the same factors might be at work in creating that wealth gap.

Correction: In one instance, this article mistakenly used the word "income" where "wealth" should have been used.

http://news.yahoo.com/median-wealth-whites-us-nearly-163001058.html
 
Why White High School Drop Outs Have More Wealth Than Black College Graduates

Why White High School Drop Outs Have More Wealth Than Black College Graduates
Posted by Matt Bruenig
on October 24, 2014

Earlier, I pointed out that families headed by white high school dropouts have higher net worths than families headed by black college graduates.

Judging by my emails, this struck some as nearly unbelievable. So, I figured an attempted explanation might be in order.

Sadly, data with which to study why this is the case is limited to, essentially, the Panel Study on Income Dynamics, which has its own limitations (particularly around Hispanics and immigrants). Nonetheless, a number of studies have used the PSID to analyze this question (see, e.g., McKernan+, Gittleman & Wolff 2004, Shapiro+). I have not gone into the PSID data myself and so I can't really offer the kind of analysis those who have can. If you are really interested, I'd read that literature.

With that said, there are certain broad points that should at least help to understand how such a reality is possible.

First, understand that blacks and Hispanics have lower incomes than whites up and down the educational spectrum.

On average, black families at a given level of educational attainment receive incomes that are just 66% of what white families at the same level of educational attainment receive. For Hispanic families, that figure is 79%. Naturally, when education-controlled income disparities like this exist, education-controlled wealth disparities will exist.

Second, understand that even blacks, Hispanics, and whites with the same incomes have dramatically different net worths.

On average, black wealth is 26% of white wealth, even controlling for income. For Hispanics, the figure is 31%. Peruse the studies above to try to tease out why. Note here though that, according to Gittelman and Wolff, this is not because blacks have lower savings rates. Inheritance and in-life wealth transfers also appear, in all of the studies, to play a non-trivial role.

In any case, these two facts alone make the education-controlled wealth disparity more than plausible. Blacks and Hispanics coming out of college receive less income than their white peers and that income translates into less wealth than whites with similar incomes. When education-controlled income is lower and income-controlled wealth is lower, there is only one way for that to wind up: a serious racial wealth gap, even among people with similar education.

http://www.demos.org/blog/10/24/14/...outs-have-more-wealth-black-college-graduates
 
Back
Top