Use of word Negro on 2010 census forms raises memories of Jim Crow

MASTERBAKER

MASTERBAKER

DEMOTED MOD
BGOL Investor
alg_2010-census.jpg


BY Katie Mcfadden and Larry Mcshane
DAILY NEWS WRITERS

Wednesday, January 6th 2010, 7:13 AM



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/201...ckles_memories_of_jim_crow.html#ixzz0bpyI1ouT


The census form for 2010 features a word more often heard in 1966: Negro.

For many New York blacks, the word conjures visions of Jim Crow and segregation - even if the Census Bureau says it's included to ensure an accurate count of the nation's minority residents.

"It's a bad vibe word," said Kevin Bishop, 45, a Brooklyn salesman. "It doesn't agree with me, doesn't agree with my heart."

Pamela Reese Smith, visiting the city yesterday from Rochester, said the term was outdated.

"I don't think my ancestors would appreciate it in 2010," said Smith, 56. "I don't want my grandchildren being called Negroes."

Question No. 9 on this year's census form asks about race, with one of the answers listed as "black, African-Am. or Negro."

Census Bureau spokesman Jack Martin said the use of "Negro" was intended as a term of inclusion.

"Many older African-Americans identified themselves that way, and many still do," he said. "Those who identify themselves as Negroes need to be included."

The form was also approved by Congress more than a year ago, and the word has appeared on past forms.

The use of Negro began disappearing elsewhere with the civil rights movement of the 1960s, as black or African-American became the preferred terms.

Although Martin noted that some older blacks still use the term, younger blacks feel it's a term that's passe.

"If you look back in the day when Jackie Robinson was playing, it was called the Negro Leagues," said Ryon Goulbourne, 28, of Mount Vernon.

"The N-word branched out of Negro. ... These days, African-Americans wouldn't like the term."

Greg Melvin, 41, of Queens said he wasn't offended by the word's inclusion on the form - he just didn't think it was proper.

"They don't need it," he said. "It should just be black or African-American. It's definitely unnecessary in this day and age."

lmcshane@nydailynews.com



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/201...ckles_memories_of_jim_crow.html#ixzz0bpwU9qFV
 
Yeah, they should have used the version of the n word used around here. Then black folks would simply say, "so whats wrong with that?".

Seriously, I think it's pretty lame that no one in the census office looked this over and asked about it. But at the same time, there was a time when being called Negro was a big step up especially since it was what we wanted. And we still have no heartburn behind the name NAACP. Well most don't.
But even more strange to me is why this didn't come up before now?

-VG
 
What I think is odd is that we're still having an "identity" conversation. Why is it that what we call ourselves (not what or who, we are -- but what we call, us) seems to be subject to change, every few years? On the one hand, I understand why some would feel the terms "Colored" and "Negro" are antiquated. But, there is also disagreement (or non-agreement) on the use of "Black" and "African-American", and even American.

QueEx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top