AP ran this story about how the poverty rate has dropped from 12.6 to 12.3 percent. Most would think that was a good thing however, the drop under Clinton from 12.7 to 12.6 is seen as better.
How could people making more money be seen as a bad thing but people who are making less touted as a good thing? Is making more money depressing to people but making less money is time to celebrate?
Poverty rate drops for first time under Bush
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The nation's poverty rate dropped last year, the first significant decline since President Bush took office.
The Census Bureau reported today that 36.5 million Americans, or 12.3 percent — were living in poverty last year. That's down from 12.6 percent in 2005.
The median household income was $48,200, a slight increase from the previous year. But the number of people without health insurance also increased, to 47 million.
The last significant decline in the poverty rate came in 2000, during the Clinton administration. In 2005, the poverty rate dipped from 12.7 percent to 12.6 percent, but Census officials said that change was statistically insignificant.
The poverty numbers are good economic news at a time when financial markets have been rattled by a slumping housing market. However, the numbers represent economic conditions from a year ago.
The poverty level is the official measure used to decide eligibility for federal health, housing, nutrition and child care benefits. It differs by family size and makeup. For a family of four with two children, for example, the poverty level is $20,444. The poverty rate — the percentage of people living below poverty — helps shape the debate on the health of the nation's economy.
The figures were released at a news conference by David Johnson, chief of the Census Bureau's Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division.
The poverty report comes five years into an uneven economic recovery, and well into a presidential campaign that still has 14 months to go.
Poverty has not been a big issue in the campaign, and political scientists said they doubted the new numbers would change that.
"The poor are politically mute," said Larry Jacobs, a political scientist at the University of Minnesota. "What rational politician would listen to the poor? They don't vote, they don't write checks, why care?"
Democrat John Edwards has made fighting poverty a centerpiece of his campaign. But, Jacobs noted, "He's struggling to raise money and he's lagging in the polls."
Evelyn Brodkin, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, said she expects the rising number of people without insurance to get more attention in the campaign.
The share of Americans without health insurance hit 15.8 percent last year, up from 15.3 percent the previous year.
"It affects people in the middle, and it affects corporations," Brodkin said. "Especially those who compete globally, they are really hurting because they have to compete with companies that don't have huge health insurance bills for their labor force."
Lyndon Johnson was the last president to launch a major initiative aimed at eradicating poverty, said Sheldon Danziger, co-director of the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan.
Danziger said low unemployment in 2006 helped lower the poverty rate. But, he noted, the rate was slow to drop despite five years of economic growth.
"For three decades we have had an economy where workers with a high school diploma or less have hardly kept up with inflation," Danziger said.
Low-wage workers have been hurt by the nation's declining manufacturing sector, which has lost more than 3 million jobs since Bush took office.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
-VG
How could people making more money be seen as a bad thing but people who are making less touted as a good thing? Is making more money depressing to people but making less money is time to celebrate?
Poverty rate drops for first time under Bush
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The nation's poverty rate dropped last year, the first significant decline since President Bush took office.
The Census Bureau reported today that 36.5 million Americans, or 12.3 percent — were living in poverty last year. That's down from 12.6 percent in 2005.
The median household income was $48,200, a slight increase from the previous year. But the number of people without health insurance also increased, to 47 million.
The last significant decline in the poverty rate came in 2000, during the Clinton administration. In 2005, the poverty rate dipped from 12.7 percent to 12.6 percent, but Census officials said that change was statistically insignificant.
The poverty numbers are good economic news at a time when financial markets have been rattled by a slumping housing market. However, the numbers represent economic conditions from a year ago.
The poverty level is the official measure used to decide eligibility for federal health, housing, nutrition and child care benefits. It differs by family size and makeup. For a family of four with two children, for example, the poverty level is $20,444. The poverty rate — the percentage of people living below poverty — helps shape the debate on the health of the nation's economy.
The figures were released at a news conference by David Johnson, chief of the Census Bureau's Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division.
The poverty report comes five years into an uneven economic recovery, and well into a presidential campaign that still has 14 months to go.
Poverty has not been a big issue in the campaign, and political scientists said they doubted the new numbers would change that.
"The poor are politically mute," said Larry Jacobs, a political scientist at the University of Minnesota. "What rational politician would listen to the poor? They don't vote, they don't write checks, why care?"
Democrat John Edwards has made fighting poverty a centerpiece of his campaign. But, Jacobs noted, "He's struggling to raise money and he's lagging in the polls."
Evelyn Brodkin, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, said she expects the rising number of people without insurance to get more attention in the campaign.
The share of Americans without health insurance hit 15.8 percent last year, up from 15.3 percent the previous year.
"It affects people in the middle, and it affects corporations," Brodkin said. "Especially those who compete globally, they are really hurting because they have to compete with companies that don't have huge health insurance bills for their labor force."
Lyndon Johnson was the last president to launch a major initiative aimed at eradicating poverty, said Sheldon Danziger, co-director of the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan.
Danziger said low unemployment in 2006 helped lower the poverty rate. But, he noted, the rate was slow to drop despite five years of economic growth.
"For three decades we have had an economy where workers with a high school diploma or less have hardly kept up with inflation," Danziger said.
Low-wage workers have been hurt by the nation's declining manufacturing sector, which has lost more than 3 million jobs since Bush took office.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
-VG
