Two Parents Convicted In First Trial Of College Bribery Scandal

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Two wealthy parents have been convicted of buying their kids’ way into school as athletic recruits in the first case to go to trial in the college admissions cheating scandal.

Two wealthy parents were convicted Friday of buying their kids’ way into school as athletic recruits in the first case to go to trial in the college admissions cheating scandal that embroiled prestigious universities across the country.

Gamal Abdelaziz, a former casino executive, and John Wilson, a former Staples Inc. executive, were found guilty after about 10 hours of deliberations in the case that exposed a scheme to get undeserving applicants into college by falsely portraying them as star athletes.

Abdelaziz, of Las Vegas, was charged with paying $300,000 to get his daughter into the University of Southern California as a basketball recruit even though she didn’t even make it onto her high school’s varsity team. Wilson, who heads a Massachusetts private equity firm, was accused of paying $220,000 to have his son designated as a USC water polo recruit and an additional $1 million to buy his twin daughters’ ways into Harvard and Stanford.

Lawyers for the pair argued they believed their payments were legitimate donations and pointed the finger at the admissions consultant at the center of the scheme, Rick Singer. The parents insisted they had no idea that Singer was using their money as bribes and was falsifying or exaggerating athletic credentials on behalf of their kids.

At the center of the case were a series of secretly recorded phone calls between Singer and the parents that prosecutors said proved Abdelaziz and Wilson were in on the scheme. The FBI wiretapped Singer’s calls and then convinced the admissions consultant to begin cooperating with investigators in 2018 in the hopes of getting a lighter sentence.

In one call, Wilson asked Singer which sports “would be best” for his twin daughters. Singer responded that it “doesn’t matter” and that he would “make them a sailor or something” because Wilson lives on Cape Cod.

Wilson laughed and asked: “Is there a two-for-one special? If you got twins?”

In another call, Singer told Abdelaziz that Donna Heinel, former senior associate athletic director at USC, told him Abdelaziz’s daughter’s fake athletic profile was so well done that she wanted him to use that profile going forward for “anybody who isn’t a real basketball player that’s a female.”
“I love it,” Abdelaziz responded.

The defense sought to poke holes in the government’s case by questioning why they chose not to call Singer to the stand. Abdelaziz and Wilson’s lawyers portrayed Singer as a con man who manipulated the parents and assured them his so-called side-door scheme was legitimate and endorsed by the schools.

“He never agreed with Rick Singer to bribe anyone at USC and he never agreed with Rick Singer to defraud USC with some phony profile that he never saw,” Abdelaziz’s attorney, Brian Kelly, told jurors during his closing argument.

Wilson and Abdelaziz were both convicted of fraud and bribery conspiracy charges. Wilson was also convicted of additional charges of bribery, wire fraud and filing a false tax return.

Thirty-three other parents have pleaded guilty in the case, including TV actors Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin and Loughlin’s fashion designer husband, Mossimo Giannulli. The parents have so far received punishments ranging from probation to nine months in prison.

Heinel and two coaches — ex-USC water polo coach Jovan Vavic and former Wake Forest University women’s volleyball coach William Ferguson — are scheduled to stand trial in November. Three other parents are expected to face jurors in January.
 
They knew they were guilty, but thought being able to afford a good attorney that would go to trial for them could get them off. Well it didn't. :yawn:
 
I'm confused though...With the amount they paid to bribe their way in, why didn't they just pay tuition instead of trying to get athletic scholarships
My understanding, though limited, is that their child wouldn't quality academically, unless they were on an athletic scholarship. Some schools make academic exceptions for recruited athletes that other students don't receive.
 
I'm confused though...With the amount they paid to bribe their way in, why didn't they just pay tuition instead of trying to get athletic scholarships
It is not about the scholarship, but the admission. Subpar students who get athelitic scholarships get ADMITTED.
 
I’m confused I thought only Blacks and Latinos are lazy cheaters? Isn’t that what the white monkey always says?
 
It is not about the scholarship, but the admission. Subpar students who get athletic scholarships get ADMITTED.


Not to Stanford.....They don't use NCAA standards for admission

And to be clear NCAA standards require for example a 3.0 student to achieve an 18 on the ACT whereas the normal score maybe a 22.

Northwestern requires a 26.

Many schools also have easier admissions for legacy applicants


But I get your point..
 
Not to Stanford.....They don't use NCAA standards for admission

And to be clear NCAA standards require for example a 3.0 student to achieve an 18 on the ACT whereas the normal score maybe a 22.

Northwestern requires a 26.

Many schools also have easier admissions for legacy applicants


But I get your point..


Even if they meet the academic requirements there are only so many slots...soooooo, if you pay the coach for a scholarship..it ain't about the scholarship but the available slot.

In this instance these girls were admitted as athletes even though they never played the sport in high school.
 
Back
Top