>>>Trump Indicted <<<

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Donald Trump indicted; 1st ex-president charged with crime

By MICHAEL R. SISAK, ERIC TUCKER and COLLEEN LONG minutes ago

In a statement, his lawyers, Susan Necheles and Joseph Tacopina, said: “He did not commit any crime. We will vigorously fight this political prosecution in court.”
 
Trump indicted in porn star hush money payment case
The charge against Trump is brought by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

By ERICA ORDEN and MERIDITH MCGRAW
03/30/2023 05:48 PM EDT
Updated: 03/30/2023 05:55 PM EDT
  • NEW YORK — A New York grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump Thursday for his alleged role in a scheme to pay hush money to a porn actress during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The indictment, voted on by the grand jury Thursday afternoon and filed under seal according to the individuals, thrusts the country onto uncharted and uncertain legal and political ground.



The case against Trump, brought by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, is centered on a $130,000 payment to an adult film actress, Stormy Daniels, who claimed she had an affair with Trump. Trump has denied the affair. He is the first former president to ever be criminally charged.

Trump has already tried to use the charges to rally his base, calling on his followers to protest and “take back our nation.” But there’s no precedent for a presidential candidate campaigning during his own criminal trial. And while the case could stretch beyond November 2024, a conviction before then would spark a host of constitutional issues.

Trump’s indictment follows the unrelated December conviction of his family business — the Trump Organization — for tax fraud in a case also prosecuted by Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney.

violations for facilitating the payment to Daniels. That payment came during the heart of the 2016 presidential campaign. And both Cohen and federal prosecutors have said that he acted “in coordination with and at the direction of” the former president.

The indictment of Trump stems from the 2018 federal conviction of his former lawyer Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations for facilitating the payment to Daniels. That payment came during the heart of the 2016 presidential campaign. And both Cohen and federal prosecutors have said that he acted “in coordination with and at the direction of” the former president.


The Trump Organization later reimbursed Cohen for the payment to Daniels, prosecutors said in court filings. The company’s executives authorized $420,000 in payments to Cohen in an effort to cover his original payment and tax liabilities, and to reward him with a bonus, according to prosecutors. The Trump Organization falsely recorded those paymentsin their books as legal expenses, prosecutors said.

Federal prosecutors in the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office subsequently pursued a criminal inquiry into whether those payments violated campaign-finance law, but they later ended the probe without bringing charges.

The company’s former chief financial officer, Allen H. Weisselberg, who was given immunity by federal prosecutors in their investigation of the hush money that led to the charges against Cohen, pleaded guilty to an unrelated tax fraud scheme in August 2022.


Cohen testified before the grand jury in the Manhattan district attorney’s investigation of Trump. It’s unclear if Weisselberg, who is now serving a five-month jail sentence, was also called as a witness.

Though the Manhattan district attorney’s office offered Trump the opportunity to testify before the grand jury prior to his indictment, he declined to do so.

The indictment is sure to cloud Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign and triggers a number of unprecedented scenarios. If Trump pleads not guilty and the case goes to trial, a process that can take many months, he could face the possibility of campaigning for the White House while undergoing a criminal trial. And if he were to win a second term while facing or serving a prison sentence, that would give rise to a host of constitutional issues.

Trump has said an indictment would not stop him from campaigning for another term. When asked if he would stay in the 2024 race if formally charged, Trump told reporters at CPAC in March, “Oh absolutely. I wouldn’t even think about leaving.” He has said his supporters are “very upset” about the multiple investigations he’s facing, and added he thinks the probes will “enhance” his poll numbers.

Throughout his presidency and in his post-White House life, Trump has cast himself as a victim of partisan “witch hunt” investigations targeting him and his business dealings. His fellow Republicans have largely echoed that claim, though it remains to be seen whether those running for the party’s presidential nomination will rally to Trump’s side or cast him off.

At least one potential 2024 Republican rival, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, has said that Trump should end his campaign if charged.

The former president is also facing potential criminal charges on three other fronts — for allegedly attempting to undermine the 2020 election results in Georgia, taking classified documents from the White House (and obstructing efforts to recover them) and for his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.


The New York case against Trump are the outgrowth of years of investigation. Bragg inherited the Trump case from his predecessor, Cy Vance, and both district attorneys initially indicated there wasn’t enough evidence to bring a case against the former president.
Bragg, however, stressed that his investigation remained ongoing even amid the departure of two longtime prosecutors who led the probe and publicly alleged that Bragg had cold feet when it came to charging Trump. After the prosecutors’ departure, Bragg hired a former colleague at the New York attorney general’s office — Matthew Colangelo, who helped lead a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation that led to its demise — and the district attorney’s probe appeared to kick into higher gear.




.
 
Before it goes crazy, the media needs report the facts accurately...

1. Stormy Daniels comes forward speaking about her relationship with President Trump, and being threatened.



2. Michael Cohen gets convicted, takes plea deal under a Republican Attorney General


DANY now has to indict since all this evidence, public statements on national TV and sworn testimony is floating around. It is no different than posting videos showing you selling drugs or pedophilia, the DA is compelled to indict. Finally, man code was broken against Stormy Daniels, threatening her while she was going to some gym class with her infant daughter in 2011.

Collage-Maker-09-Mar-2023-06-40-PM-6865-600x349.jpg


It is time for the white males to step up and drop him off with a note saying he does not represent us like the drug cartels.
 
June 16, 2015 - President Trump announces his Presidency for the United States going down escalators

June 17, 2015 - Dylan Roof starts blasting away in a black church

Dylann_Roof_mugshot.jpg


I always found this odd, I remember this because I was supposed to be at an event on June 16. I don't know his role, but this is an old playbook.



He spoke at CPAC along with Nikki Haley, the next thing I know, I am dealing with a Satanic Tesla that would have obliterated me if I had exited off the freeway. With it huge frunk and rapid acceleration, this might be the weapon of choice to take fools out by them and survive. I am just tired of escaping these assassination attempts by WS.

People attack the Biden administration for having the IRS show up on the day Matt Taibbi was supposed to testify, and nothing suspicious about it, than you need to flag this event. This is why I have become socialist since starting a business is impossible in the U.S., I am going to try in other countries and see how it is before giving up completely.
 
DANY now has to indict since all this evidence, public statements on national TV and sworn testimony is floating around. It is no different than posting videos showing you selling drugs or pedophilia, the DA is compelled to indict. Finally, man code was broken against Stormy Daniels, threatening her while she was going to some gym class with her infant daughter in 2011.

All the public statements in the world can't save the D.A.'s Case or Ass (before the Court or the Public) if he/she can't put on "CREDIBLE & ADMISSIBLE" evidence of wrongdoing to prove the substantive allegations of the case. In a case like this where the REPUTATIONS OF THE LAWYERS ON BOTHS SIDES INVOLVED are at stake, there better be fire, A BLAZE where there's smoke.
 

Donald Trump indicted on 7 counts in classified documents probe


CNN
By Paula Reid, Kristen Holmes,
Jeremy Herb and Evan Perez,
Updated 6:32 AM EDT, Fri June 9, 2023
230608203802-donald-trump-george-conway-split.jpg

02:44 - Source: CNN
'Absolutely historic': George Conway reacts to Trump indictment

CNN —
Former President Donald Trump has been indicted on seven counts in the special counsel’s classified documents probe, a stunning development that marks the first time a former president has faced federal charges.
Trump is facing a charge under the Espionage Act, his attorney Jim Trusty said on CNN Thursday, as well as charges of obstruction of justice, destruction or falsification of records, conspiracy and false statements.

The special counsel has been investigating Trump’s handling of classified documents that were brought to his Mar-a-Lago Florida resort after he left the White House in 2021, as well as possible obstruction of the investigation and government efforts to retrieve the material.




.
 
It looks like they set him up by this bribery scandal that would be difficult to prove. They would have to show that President Biden made policy decisions in favor of a country for money through some verbal statement or document. All this took place overseas so it would be difficult to obtain evidence.

Now they have lured the Republicans to show that you can investigate and prosecute another political party (President) unilaterally. I think President Trump DOJ set a precedent on doing this, chasing after President Biden with the FBI. First he did it as a presidential candidate, then the House Oversight continued this investigation when Biden was elected.

This setup a Democratic DOJ going after President Trump. The optics Biden isn't eliminating a political rival by jailing him, he is investigating and prosecuting in a similar manner to his rival. It would be similar to Navalny attempting an investigation of Putin for some crime than being jailed himself in prison where he will be nerve agent out This is much better look than what went down in real life.

TELEMMGLPICT000338743913_16863975805950_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqLZ1bJd-I99VgiaPxe-UMcCqxjOYp6jQVimjLmvgWxxw.jpeg
'


Speaking from experience, you can't just live in some middle class neighborhood dealing with threats to your life.

Secret Service job is 10x easier if they protectee has money and can live in a much nicer secluded area. President Trump could have recognized this and used this opportunity to propose legislation.

1. He definitely can't work a regular job where they will have all kinds of opportunies to harm.

2. They will plant all kinds of garbage in your house/apartment and try to bait you into some conflict with some low level peon.
 
Last edited:
Had to move from main board to politics, due to the complexity, it was confusing the feeble minded.

page-8.jpg


It has been awhile since I looked at this case and have better things to do, from my understanding - Michael Cohen took out a Home Equity Line of Credit to pay her off, than was going to get reimburse claiming it was legal billings to the company.

Companies pay for personal expenses of employees for various things, such as to study for the bar exam, housing, pay off student loans. It becomes income to that person. By not having it as some type of reportable income for Trump, I think that is where the business records case comes into play.

This could be considered a business expense if she was an employee and he mounted her on the job causing liability to the company, sexual harassment. Let say Trump tried to rape her on the date, and she was going to come out right before the election, this would be income to Trump for any non-disclosure agreement. The company was not liable for anything, Trump would have to show the company was liable for his action.

im-757397


When an employer pays your student loan balance or makes payments on your behalf, it's considered compensation. The payments will be included in your Form W-2 wages and are subject to payroll taxes.

A loan from a person or committee to a candidate or political committee is a contribution to the extent that it remains unpaid. Once repaid in full, a loan no longer counts against the contributor’s contribution limit.

Whether this was related to a campaign donation, I don't think there is enough evidence to suggest a campaign contribution. Since Trump and his company are inseparable, this could also be seen as a purely business transaction to protect the brand image that he has built up.

If you are the CEO, it is better for you to hire an attractive secretary, than sexually harass her to have sex, if she sues your company, it won't be income to you.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Last edited:
2014-vanity-fair-oscar-party-hosted-by-graydon-carter-inside.jpg


Let say Elon Musk is going to be charged with child pedophilia. This would cause irreparable harm to the brand image of Tesla. The company is not liable for his conduct but would make it virtually impossible to sell cars. You could say this is an expense and not income any non disclosure agreement with the victim, but would need some type of authoritative guidance which does not exist. You would want to obfuscate this payment on the books as legal billings. The IFRS definitely needs to look into this, how much a company can obfuscate a transaction that is personal in nature such as drug treatment, psychiatric, infedility, whatever.

Since Trump was integral to the brand image, any reputational hit would damage the company making it harder to sell properties, hotel, or rent. Losing the election after this porn star revelation came out would make him look like a clown.

This case is real sketchy, and the press has poorly explained everything to just label him a convicted felon. I cringe when lawyers get involved with professional accounting matters, they need to stick to copy and pasting their motion to the court.

A company when paying a personal matter in nature can conceal it not for purposes of fraud but for privacy reasons. Melania an employee was going to get breast enhancement surgery to look like Stormy Daniels paid for by the company which is reportable income.

You don't have to fully put this private health matter on the books where accountants and auditors that have access to these records can find out your personal business to go to the tabloids.
 
There needs to be more authoratative guidance from the accounting community on this matter and case law from the courts. I think I got it wrong initially half looking at the case. I warned these fools not to take these cases and letting a white prosecutor deal with the mess.

Elon Musk is getting drug treatment for his addiction to fentanyl or psychiatric, the company pays for this. Can a company obfuscate this transaction on their records as long as it is properly reported as an expense or income? The company is paying for a personal/confidential matter of the CEO. The entire accounting department and a team of 20 auditors has access to these records.


NY Penal Law § 170.10: Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree​

Under this statute, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree if they, with the intent to defraud, make or cause a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, or alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any such record. The enterprise can be any type of organization, including corporations, partnerships, non-profit organizations, and government agencies.

The statute is designed to protect the integrity of business records and prevent fraudulent activities that could harm individuals, organizations, or the public. Examples of conduct that may be covered under this statute include falsifying financial statements, tampering with accounting records, or concealing information to misrepresent the true financial or operational condition of a business.
 
Back
Top