Top 10 Racist Rush Limbaugh Quotes

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Top 10 Racist Limbaugh Quotes

PH2009012701302.jpg



by Casey Gane-McCalla

Here’s Our Top 10 Racist Rush Limbaugh Quotes


1. "I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

Okay Rush, slavery was not a good thing for the millions of African Americans who were enslaved, raped and beaten. The streets weren’t at all safe for African Americans. Slavery not a bad thing? Someone should put Rush on a plantation for him to see how great it is. Keep on fear and race mongering Rush, you might get to Goebels status.

2. "You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed."

Martin Luther King is a national hero, not a black hero. Everybody in the United States celebrates his birthday, children are taught to look up to him as a hero in school. He’s earned the respect and admiration of the world and you believe the man who killed him was a hero? This is beyond racist. This is evil, mean spirited, subhuman. Praising the assassin of one of our great American heroes is beyond the scope of regular racism.

3. "Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?"

No but I’ve noticed that all racist bigots think like Rush Limbaugh. Comparing a respected black politician and minister to common criminals is Jim Crow racism. Maybe all black people look alike to him, but I’ve never seen a picture of a wanted criminal that looks like Jesse Jackson. A serial killer that looks like Rush Limbaugh on the other hand.

John Wayne Gacy
gacy-1.jpg
GR2009032502313.jpg



4. "Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing."

The communist connection is an old way of dealing with black leaders. They used it on Martin Luther King, they’re using it on Barack Obama and Limbaugh used it on Nelson Mandela. By siding with the racist apartheid regime over a world-wide symbol of peace and freedom, Limbaugh has shown he’s a global racist.

5. "Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

Limbaugh is once again fear mongering and race baiting by associating professional black athletes with criminals and gangmembers. He continues the fear mongering association of good, decent, hard working African Americans as criminals.

6. "The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."

Now Limbaugh is saying that an organization with a storied tradition of representing the positive black people for change in their communities are criminals and rioters. An organization that has been represented by intelligent professional African Americans, that has played a part in the Civil Rights movement and continues to be an intelligent, concerned voice for the African American community is degraded to common criminals. There you go Rush. Keep racism alive!!!!

7. "Black people, they’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?"

Decent human beings care Rush. Someone out of that 12% may just become President of the United States. Not caring about black people? Even George Bush wouldn’t admit to that.

8. "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back" (to an African American female caller).

Okay Rush that’s classy. The old African bone in the nose stereotype. Wasn’t funny when the racist white school kids called the black kids that and it’s definitely not funny when a grown man with audience of millions of easily influenced dittoheads says it either.

9. "I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve."

I wasn’t super offended by this, the whole black quarterback/coach thing has been going on for years in sports, but the quote was so offensive that Retired General Wesley Clarke said:

There can be no excuse for such statements. Mr. Limbaugh has the right to say whatever he wants, but ABC and ESPN have no obligation to sponsor such hateful and ignorant speech. Mr. Limbaugh should be fired immediately.

When a respected, retired general condemns the statement of a sportscaster, you know he’s gone too far.


10. Limbaugh attacks on Obama. Limbaugh has called Obama a ‘halfrican American’ has said that Obama was not black but Arab because Kenya is an Arab region, even though Arabs are less than one percent of Kenya. Since mainstream America has become more accepting of African-Americans, Limbaugh has decided to play against its new racial fears, Arabs and Muslims. Despite the fact Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law school, Limbaugh has called him an ‘affirmative action candidate.’ Limbaugh even has repeatedly played a song on his radio show ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ using an antiquated Jim Crow era term for black a man who many Americans are supporting for president. Way to go Rush.

So Rush Limbaugh has managed to make racist attacks on four of the most admired and respected people of African descent in the past one hundred years, in Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, Colin Powell and Barack Obama. He has called for the assassin of Martin Luther King to be given a medal, and said slavery was a good thing. He has claimed that Joe the Plumber, who isn’t even a plumber is more important in this election than Colin Powell, a decorated military veteran who has served honorably in three administrations. How can the Republican party stand by this man and let their candidates appear on his show? Rush Limbaugh’s comments are so racist, they’re funny, in a Borat, Archie Bunker kind of way. What is not funny is the millions of dittoheads who listen to him, who take in and re-spout all the racist rhetoric that he spits. Limbaugh’s statements are echoed in the racist, angry Palin/McCain supporters who shout ‘kill him,’ ‘terrorist,’ ‘communist,’ ‘traitor,’ ’socialist’ and ‘off with his head.'

http://newsone.com/obama/top-10-racist-limbaugh-quotes/



nffj3s.jpg


3570634133_3a2eda14e8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Rule 1 in the liberal playbook, discredit your opponent.

Rule 2: If your opponent is white, call him/her a racist. If your opponent is black, call him/her an uncle tom. If your opponent is gay, ignore him/her. If your opponent is more attractive, call her a slut. If your opponent is right, become the victim. Should I go any further..?
 
Rule 1 in the liberal playbook, discredit your opponent.

Rule 2: If your opponent is white, call him/her a racist. If your opponent is black, call him/her an uncle tom. If your opponent is gay, ignore him/her. If your opponent is more attractive, call her a slut. If your opponent is right, become the victim. Should I go any further..?

If he indeed made the statemen below, are you defending it

"I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."
 
If he indeed made the statemen below, are you defending it

"I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

I'm not defending anything that I haven't heard for myself. This comment is no different than how black comedians make fun of other races. Should I defend every entertainer who says something abrasive?

The fact that we are talking about this situation is mind numbing as it is. I think the real debate should be about the substance of what's going on, policy wise, of this government. This is my last statement about this situation...
 
The Governing Class

. Twenty men (if they be not all idiots, perhaps if they be) can never come together but there will be such a difference in them, that about a third will be wiser, or at least less foolish than all the rest; these upon acquaintance, though it be but small, will be discovered, and, as stags that have the largest heads, lead the herd; for while the six, discoursing and arguing one with another, show the eminence of their parts, the fourteen discover things that they never thought on; or are cleared in divers truths which had formerly perplexed them. Wherefore, in matter of common concernment, difficulty, or danger, they hang upon their lips, as children upon their fathers; and the influence thus acquired by the six, the eminence of whose parts are found to be a stay and comfort to the fourteen, is the authority of the fathers.

James Harrington (1611-1677), "The Oceana."


or


However big the fool, there is always a bigger fool to admire him.

Nicholas Boileau


What Rush does is called governing. He's is a political tool. Racist only to the extent he believes racism sells. Like Hefner believes sex sells.
 
Well, lets assume for the sake of argument that Limbaugh made the statement,

what says you ? ? ?

QueEx

I really wouldn't care. For the simple fact that, he doesn't make me into the person I am. I would just :smh: ,and disagree with him on that part. I wouldn't stop listening to him when it comes to politics. Reason being, in a large part of what he says, he speaks the truth. If that wasn't the case, he wouldn't be the main opponent of the democratic party.

The only way I would just abandon him all together if he just outright talk down on black people altogether. In which, he will never do.
 
in a large part of what he says, he speaks the truth. If that wasn't the case, he wouldn't be the main opponent of the democratic party.

How have you come to the conclusion that he speaks the truth. I think you are confusing correlation with causation. I do not think he is the main opponent of the democratic party... but he is definitely influential. But popularity does not = truth.
 
I really wouldn't care. For the simple fact that, he doesn't make me into the person I am. I would just :smh: ,and disagree with him on that part. I wouldn't stop listening to him when it comes to politics. Reason being, in a large part of what he says, he speaks the truth. If that wasn't the case, he wouldn't be the main opponent of the democratic party.

The only way I would just abandon him all together if he just outright talk down on black people altogether. In which, he will never do.


There have been books dedicated to exposing his lies and he's exposed as a liar and hypocrite almost nightly on "Countdown with Keith Olbermann". He has no credibility as far as facts and informatin go. But he attracts attention and has a large radio audience, giving him some influence. Not much but some.
He's one of the main opponents of the Democratic Party because he's so divisive and repels moderate voters. He was chosen by the Obama people as the face of the Republican Party as a very shrewd strategy not through any respect for his views.

How have you come to the conclusion that he speaks the truth. I think you are confusing correlation with causation. I do not think he is the main opponent of the democratic party... but he is definitely influential. But popularity does not = truth.


Rush never let truth or facts interfere with his stated opinions. The Republicans will continue to have problems getting elected nationally with people like him and Sarah Palin at the forefront.
 
Rush never let truth or facts interfere with his stated opinions. The Republicans will continue to have problems getting elected nationally with people like him and Sarah Palin at the forefront.

No doubt. I am just trying to get a better understanding of actinanass’ opinion.
 
How have you come to the conclusion that he speaks the truth. I think you are confusing correlation with causation. I do not think he is the main opponent of the democratic party... but he is definitely influential. But popularity does not = truth.

1. I came to the conclusion only because I look at the evidence in front of me. I live in one of the roughest hoods in Fort Worth *the once murder capitol of the US...I'm not bragging*, and I see how people in my community would rather wait for the government *or someone* to give them something, then working to better themselves. Then, I looked at the fact that majority of the people I'm viewing either A) vote democratic straight down, or B) don't vote at all. There's no pride to better oneself around here *unless its for show*. I feel that the democratic party has killed the black family, and black independence we once stride for. What Rush says about Democrats need victims is true. What Rush says about the Democratic party killing the black family with social programs is true. What Rush says about the feminist left killing the black families is true, and has been stated by BLACK MEN. No one can argue those facts, and sound coherent.

Now, do I agree with him on everything, HELL NO! However, if the man's right, I have to give him his credit. That goes for anyone on that level, including Obama.

There have been books dedicated to exposing his lies and he's exposed as a liar and hypocrite almost nightly on "Countdown with Keith Olbermann". He has no credibility as far as facts and informatin go. But he attracts attention and has a large radio audience, giving him some influence. Not much but some.
He's one of the main opponents of the Democratic Party because he's so divisive and repels moderate voters. He was chosen by the Obama people as the face of the Republican Party as a very shrewd strategy not through any respect for his views.




Rush never let truth or facts interfere with his stated opinions. The Republicans will continue to have problems getting elected nationally with people like him and Sarah Palin at the forefront.

You can write a book on any public figure, and find "lies". BTW, you can talk about his credibility all you want. The fact that there's a thread dedicated to him should tell you something.

No doubt. I am just trying to get a better understanding of actinanass’ opinion.

Understand this, I go through life with a view to try to understand persecuted. I have friends from every walk of life. From devout Christians, to devout Satanist *yea I know...* The only reason I was lured towards Rush is because people told me that he was racist. I have trust issues when it comes to people talking down on other people. Thus, why I gave Rush a chance. I learn one thing in Philosophy, listen to a person you more than likely to disagree with. When you listen to that person, either make your belief stronger, criticize your belief, or change it all together. This is how I became the person I am today.

The real question is, how strong is yours?
 
I came to the conclusion only because I look at the evidence in front of me.

The only reason I was lured towards Rush is because people told me that he was racist.

I have trust issues when it comes to people talking down on other people.

Thus, why I gave Rush a chance. I learn one thing in Philosophy, listen to a person you more than likely to disagree with. When you listen to that person, either make your belief stronger, criticize your belief, or change it all together. This is how I became the person I am today.

:(

QueEx
 
1. I came to the conclusion only because I look at the evidence in front of me. I live in one of the roughest hoods in Fort Worth *the once murder capitol of the US...I'm not bragging*, and I see how people in my community would rather wait for the government *or someone* to give them something, then working to better themselves. Then, I looked at the fact that majority of the people I'm viewing either A) vote democratic straight down, or B) don't vote at all. There's no pride to better oneself around here *unless its for show*. I feel that the democratic party has killed the black family, and black independence we once stride for. What Rush says about Democrats need victims is true. What Rush says about the Democratic party killing the black family with social programs is true. What Rush says about the feminist left killing the black families is true, and has been stated by BLACK MEN. No one can argue those facts, and sound coherent.

Most of that is pure nonsense. While I have no love affair with the Democratic Party, Rush should spend just as much time noting how his party, instead of reaching out to Black voters, scapegoats minorities and overtly and covertly appeal to White racists. He would have some real credibility if he did that but being a blowhard and an extremist pays big money.


You can write a book on any public figure, and find "lies". BTW, you can talk about his credibility all you want. The fact that there's a thread dedicated to him should tell you something.
Don't put "lies" in quotations like it's debatable. He's been exposed in print and on television as a professional liar and shill for big business at the expense of the very working people he purports to represents.
He's considered influential due to his following not by the quality of his work, two different things completely.
A thread dedicated to him tells me that he's a polarizing figure taht gets people talking.


Understand this, I go through life with a view to try to understand persecuted. I have friends from every walk of life. From devout Christians, to devout Satanist *yea I know...* The only reason I was lured towards Rush is because people told me that he was racist. I have trust issues when it comes to people talking down on other people. Thus, why I gave Rush a chance. I learn one thing in Philosophy, listen to a person you more than likely to disagree with. When you listen to that person, either make your belief stronger, criticize your belief, or change it all together. This is how I became the person I am today.

The real question is, how strong is yours?

I actually subscribe to a similar thinking. You should listen to people that are more likely to disagree with you. You might mess around and find out you were wrong. That doesn't happen with Rush. Due mainly to his not depending on facts or information but on his opinion and blatant bias.

Sometimes freedom of speech is not a good thing.

This is disagree with. Freedom of speech is a great thing. When people are allowed to air out their views, we get to see who's who.
 
Add to this list his recent statement on his radio show that he believes there should be segregated school buses.

Wow Rush, a public figure that espouses segregation in 2009.
 
Add to this list his recent statement on his radio show that he believes there should be segregated school buses.

Wow Rush, a public figure that espouses segregation in 2009.

He was mocking the whole thing. When dealing with Rush, you have to dissect dry sarcasm with what he really means..

With the "segregation" comment, he was basically mocking how the whole national debate will result back to the old ideas of the past. He also said that America is not ready for a Black president. His reasoning was based on the reaction to people criticizing Obama's policies. He asked the question "why is it racist to criticize Obama, but patriotic to criticize Bush?" That's a legitimate question that I need to know the answer of.

I, for one, in spite of everything I've said, want Obama to do well. IF IT HELPS THE COUNTRY. Personally, I don't think anything he is standing by is really doing much good to our country. Thus, why I call myself the "anti-Obama". It's not because I dislike the dude. Its because I do not agree with how he is governing this country. Does that make me a self-hating coon because I don't agree with him?
 
He was mocking the whole thing. When dealing with Rush, you have to dissect dry sarcasm with what he really means..

With the "segregation" comment, he was basically mocking how the whole national debate will result back to the old ideas of the past. He also said that America is not ready for a Black president. His reasoning was based on the reaction to people criticizing Obama's policies. He asked the question "why is it racist to criticize Obama, but patriotic to criticize Bush?" That's a legitimate question that I need to know the answer of.

I, for one, in spite of everything I've said, want Obama to do well. IF IT HELPS THE COUNTRY. Personally, I don't think anything he is standing by is really doing much good to our country. Thus, why I call myself the "anti-Obama". It's not because I dislike the dude. Its because I do not agree with how he is governing this country. Does that make me a self-hating coon because I don't agree with him?

I've always said that I was against his policies. I stated that when I post the "I can't vote for him" thread. I've stated that he will be a great president *fuck good president because nearly every president was good* if he actually look at both sides of the aisle. Obama is basically going the straight left approach of governing. The same approach that will alienate most Americans *beyond racial, religious, and social lines*.

One thing you tend to forget in your argument is that the economy went down once the far left wing of the Democratic party took control over congress. I might be towards the right slightly, but I do agree with some democrats when it comes to credit, ect. What I can't support is this notion that if ONE person fails, the country fails. This country, nor the economy is based off ONE person. The economy is based on what the American people want to support. From how I see it, THOUGHT, Obama is trying to make the economy HIS economy. So, the American people would look at him in some kinda Father America type way. If what I say is true, then yes I want him to fail on that endeavor.

lol leaning towards the left on this one huh...

I'm curious, do you actually listen to his show, or you just hate that he put "fail" with "Obama" in the same sentence?

busted.jpg
 
He asked the question "why is it racist to criticize Obama, but patriotic to criticize Bush?" That's a legitimate question that I need to know the answer of.

I, for one, in spite of everything I've said, want Obama to do well. IF IT HELPS THE COUNTRY. Personally, I don't think anything he is standing by is really doing much good to our country. Thus, why I call myself the "anti-Obama". It's not because I dislike the dude. Its because I do not agree with how he is governing this country. Does that make me a self-hating coon because I don't agree with him?


This is the problem with a lot of the reasoning that fuels the anti-Obama side and it's the exact tactic you accuse pro-Obama supporters of doing. Only those on the Right equate criticizing Obama with being a racist, just like to most reasonable people, critical thinking on Obama's policies by a Black person doesn't make them automatically a self-hating coon. With that said, it would be false to act like there is no racial animus directed at the President. Even President Carter didn't say "all" of the criticism is racist but a significant portion is and that's born out by the words and actions of so many of his most vehement detractors. Rush, Beck, and Hannity constantly play on those fears with their only goal being fattening their own pockets.

Was he being sarcastic when he said that Black kids being up White kids on the bus is the face of "Obama's America"? Even if he was, he has to know that not only do his detractors not get or appreciate his "dry humor" but many of his supporters take it as him being serious.
 
This is the problem with a lot of the reasoning that fuels the anti-Obama side and it's the exact tactic you accuse pro-Obama supporters of doing. Only those on the Right equate criticizing Obama with being a racist, just like to most reasonable people, critical thinking on Obama's policies by a Black person doesn't make them automatically a self-hating coon. With that said, it would be false to act like there is no racial animus directed at the President. Even President Carter didn't say "all" of the criticism is racist but a significant portion is and that's born out by the words and actions of so many of his most vehement detractors. Rush, Beck, and Hannity constantly play on those fears with their only goal being fattening their own pockets.

Was he being sarcastic when he said that Black kids being up White kids on the bus is the face of "Obama's America"? Even if he was, he has to know that not only do his detractors not get or appreciate his "dry humor" but many of his supporters take it as him being serious.

So, you do not think changing the whole debate from health care, to racism isn't political? BTW, I agree that there's a small percentage of racist in the Anti-Obama crowd. In fact, I would even say they were anti-Bush when he decided to put Colin, and Condi in his administration. This group isn't in the mainstream conservative debate at all. However, they are the center of attention? I think the left is picking and choosing where they want the debate. In this case, since health care reform *their way* is unpopular, its time to stay on a debate they feel they can win. Playing the racism card.
 
So, you do not think changing the whole debate from health care, to racism isn't political? BTW, I agree that there's a small percentage of racist in the Anti-Obama crowd. In fact, I would even say they were anti-Bush when he decided to put Colin, and Condi in his administration. This group isn't in the mainstream conservative debate at all. However, they are the center of attention? I think the left is picking and choosing where they want the debate. In this case, since health care reform *their way* is unpopular, its time to stay on a debate they feel they can win. Playing the racism card.

"The Left" isn't talking about racism, it's the corporate media seizing on a juicy tangential story. President Carter was asked a question and he answered it honestly and directly. It's the Right wing conservatives who have taken this painted it as "liberals/Democrats/Obama playing the (mythical) race card". The obvious strategy has been to depict it as "Jimmy Carter says all criticism is racist" (which isn't even close to what he said). This helps to marginalize moderate Whites and to force the Administration and Democrats to expend energy on something other than health care.
Most polls show overwhelming support for health care reform and strong support for a public option, so their way isn't unpopular at all. The unpopular aspect as been the handling of it.
 
The issue is another trillion going to insurance companies. This on top of the 27 trillion the govt already gave to the private sector. People will be forced to own insurance whether they want it or not. This isn't socialism, it's slavery. Should healthcare be a bankable industry is the question. If you judge a people by the way they treat the less fortunate the answer is no, healthcare should be a birthright.

There is no left or right in this debate. The lines blur when it comes to public options, single payer etc. Both parties are willing to forget principal for public opinion. There is a gut feeling among the people that this is a trap, something ain't right, so for that reason alone this should be shelved until there is consensus from the public that we want healthcare and we want it to be free and nonprofit.
 
"The Left" isn't talking about racism, it's the corporate media seizing on a juicy tangential story. President Carter was asked a question and he answered it honestly and directly. It's the Right wing conservatives who have taken this painted it as "liberals/Democrats/Obama playing the (mythical) race card". The obvious strategy has been to depict it as "Jimmy Carter says all criticism is racist" (which isn't even close to what he said). This helps to marginalize moderate Whites and to force the Administration and Democrats to expend energy on something other than health care.
Most polls show overwhelming support for health care reform and strong support for a public option, so their way isn't unpopular at all. The unpopular aspect as been the handling of it.

1. where's the polls that states this?

2. Who do you think wins when the racism card is played?

3. I heard what he *carter* said. I'm still trying to figure out did you actually hear the same thing I heard.
 
The issue is another trillion going to insurance companies. This on top of the 27 trillion the govt already gave to the private sector. People will be forced to own insurance whether they want it or not. This isn't socialism, it's slavery. Should healthcare be a bankable industry is the question. If you judge a people by the way they treat the less fortunate the answer is no, healthcare should be a birthright.

There is no left or right in this debate. The lines blur when it comes to public options, single payer etc. Both parties are willing to forget principal for public opinion. There is a gut feeling among the people that this is a trap, something ain't right, so for that reason alone this should be shelved until there is consensus from the public that we want healthcare and we want it to be free and nonprofit.

Ok, so driving a car should be a birthright too? How about owning a house? Better yet, is it my birthright to not pay taxes?

BTW, when the last time you was turned away from the hospital because you didn't have insurance?
 

How did you bust me? I've always stated that I blame congress more than Obama, and Bush together. I really, truly want to like Obama, however, the policies he is doing *because of this congress* I really disagree with. Thus, my name "the anti-obama".

I think the bigger hypocrisy was the fact that you took the conservative road when you say that the young generation needs to do something worth while. Hell, I thought I was talking to Ross Perot at that moment.
 
The issue is another trillion going to insurance companies. This on top of the 27 trillion the govt already gave to the private sector. People will be forced to own insurance whether they want it or not. This isn't socialism, it's slavery. Should healthcare be a bankable industry is the question. If you judge a people by the way they treat the less fortunate the answer is no, healthcare should be a birthright.

There is no left or right in this debate.

27 trill went to offshore banks, not the private sector! It's true the plan is a mandated Insurance bailout but people are really sleepin'! It will be serfdom once cap-n-trade kicks in with the other taxes and other regulations. And Bernanke tellin me, we're outta the recession :smh:
 
Ok, so driving a car should be a birthright too? How about owning a house? Better yet, is it my birthright to not pay taxes?

BTW, when the last time you was turned away from the hospital because you didn't have insurance?


Are you saying driving a car is the moral equivalent to national healthcare? Thats a stretch don't you think. Healthcare or national health and welfare falls under the moral rights or inalienable rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Driving a car is something totally different. The danger of the current debate on healthcare is the govt using inalienable rights as a scheme to transfer the peoples wealth to the elites.
 
Somebody please post that clip of Jimmy Carter's controversial comments. I think a lot of people who were offended are in denial. :hmm:
 
Are you saying driving a car is the moral equivalent to national healthcare? Thats a stretch don't you think. Healthcare or national health and welfare falls under the moral rights or inalienable rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Driving a car is something totally different. The danger of the current debate on healthcare is the govt using inalienable rights as a scheme to transfer the peoples wealth to the elites.

So, getting welfare checks is constitutional?

Somebody please post that clip of Jimmy Carter's controversial comments. I think a lot of people who were offended are in denial. :hmm:

Yea, and post what he said about jews too..
 
1. where's the polls that states this?

2. Who do you think wins when the racism card is played?

3. I heard what he *carter* said. I'm still trying to figure out did you actually hear the same thing I heard.

1. Damn, since the summer the polls have slipped but it's still heavily favored by those 30 and under, which is telling since they would be most affected. Sort of got me on that one.

2. The Republicans and the anti-reform crowd. When you spend days talking about this, the most divisive of issues, that's time you don't spend on health care reform.
The game,as they play it, is saying Carter said all dissent is racial, show some that blatantly not racially based and then it becomes none of the dissent is racially based.
And let's not act like it's a one sided deal. On one of their newest fliers the Republicans are passing around, they insinuate that they may be medical care rationing based on race.

3. I did hear what Carter said and I've heard what he's said since to make sure he's understood.
 
Back
Top