They didn't call Anna Nicole Smith a ho

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4"><center?Talk Show Hosts Didn’t Call Anna Nicole Smith a ‘Ho’</font size></center>


51511.jpg

George E. Curry

BLACK PRESS USA
by George E. Curry
NNPA Columnist

In the around-the-clock media coverage of Anna Nicole Smith, I don’t recall one shock jock calling her a ho or a slut. Yet, Don Imus felt emboldened enough to describe the Rutgers basketball team as a bunch of “nappy-headed ho’s.” Never mind that the young women are not whores. Never mind that, courtesy of modern chemicals, they weren’t even nappy-headed.

Never mind that more than half of the predominantly Black team had a grade point average of 3.0 (B) or higher. To Imus, they were simply whores.

If they are ho’s – shorthand for whores – then what in the world was Anna Nicole Smith? The high school drop-out was performing at Gigi’s, a Houston strip club, in October 1991 when she met oil billionaire J. Howard Marshall. Though married since the age of 17, she reportedly began an affair with Marshall. Two years later, she dumped her husband.

On June 27, 1994, Smith, then 26 years old, married Marshall, 89. She denied that she was a gold digger and professed her love for her new husband, reportedly with whom she never lived. Just 13 months after the marriage, Marshall died, touching off a furious fight for his estate, valued at $1.6 billion. The fight over the estate continues to this day.

The other fight – the one ignored by the shock jocks – involved a dispute over who was the biological father of Smith’s daughter, Dannielynn Hope Marshall Stern, born September 7, 2006. This is where you need a program to keep track of the baby’s purported fathers.

The New York Daily News reported that Anna Nicole’s younger half-sister said the former Playboy model had used the frozen sperm of Marshall to conceive the baby, a charge that was later discredited. Howard K. Stern, Anna Nicole Smith’s “personal” attorney, admitted on CNN’s “Larry King Live” that he had been in a secret relationship with his client for “a very long time” and believed he was the father of the baby. Then, ex-boyfriend Larry Birkhead stepped forward to say, surprise, surprise, it was he who was the father.

In perhaps the biggest surprise, Zsa Zsa Gabor’s husband, Frederic Prinz von Anhalt, came forward to say he had been there and done that. Former Smith bodyguard Alexander Smith said he had tapped his former employer and could be the father. Mark “Hollywood” Hatten threw his hat into the fatherhood ring. And those are just the ones who came forward to admit they had slept with Anna Nicole Smith.

DNA tests confirmed that Birkhead, the former boyfriend, is the father of Dannielynn.

With that record, it seems that if anyone would have been called a ho – and I am not saying she should have been described as such – it would have been Anna Nicole Smith, whose photo was used on the cover of a New York magazine issue titled “White Trash Nation.”

Society has a double-standard when it comes to labels. Men who sleep around are described as spreading their oats. But women who do the same thing are called sluts and hos.

Let’s not forget that the Rutgers women are not the only women who have been grossly maligned.

After Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) had a run-in with Capitol Hill police, conservative talk show host Neal Boortz said on a Match 31, 2006 broadcast, “She looks like a ghetto slut.” Referring to McKinney’s hair, he said, “It looks like an explosion in a Brillo pad factory.”

At another point, he said, “She looks like Tina Turner peeing on an electric fence.”

The sexist remarks are not limited to African-American women. According to the Web site mediamatters. org, Glenn Beck, a regular commentator on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” has referred to Hillary Clinton as “the stereotypical bitch.” Michael Savage recently called Barbara Walters a “double-talking slut.” Chris Matthews referred to Clinton as an “uppity” woman.

Even so-called liberal columnists, such as Maureen Dowd of the New York Times have sought to besmirch former Senator John Edwards by calling him the “Breck Girl.”

Rather than addressing these issues, supporters of Don Imus have resorted to attacking Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

We should not be confused by clever effort to switch the focus of this debate. Pat Buchanan calls the firing, “The Imus Lynch Party” and Rush Limbaugh proclaims that “minorities never do anything for which they have to apologize.” Buchanan forgets who were the real lynching victims in America and I could write a separate column chronicling the numerous instances of African-Americans making public apologies.

Let’s stick to the point: Talk radio is dominated by Right-wingers who enjoy hurling racist and sexist barbs. They should follow Imus out of the door.

George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached at george [at] georgecurry.com or through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com .

http://www.blackpressusa.com/Op-Ed/speaker.asp?SID=16&NewsID=12972
 
true enough.

"After Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) had a run-in with Capitol Hill police, conservative talk show host Neal Boortz said on a Match 31, 2006 broadcast, “She looks like a ghetto slut.” Referring to McKinney’s hair, he said, “It looks like an explosion in a Brillo pad factory.”

At another point, he said, “She looks like Tina Turner peeing on an electric fence.”

dam even though I felt she was in the wrong these comments are uncalled for. They'll do anything to divert the attention away from real problems. That whole genre of radio needs to be addressed. What do you guys think should be done?
 
modified said:
What do you guys think should be done?

I think I'm on record already saying we need to examine whats on the public airwaves on BOTH sides of the fence: White Shock Jocks and other purveyors of hate on one side and those of us destroying our culture on the other. I don't think either side deserves a pass; neither side can afford to point the finger at the other; and neither side should be immune to comment.

I keep hearing people saying its not gansta rap's fault; its not the Imus' of the worlds fault; why are people complaining, ho's are just ho's ... etc., ad infinitum. Hell, tis BOTH sides.


Even more, I keep hearing people say it would be CENSORSHIP to stop either the shock jocks or the gansta rappers.

People need to understand: Freedom of speech has NEVER meant that you can say anything, anywhere at anytime you want. There are and always have been legally recognized limitations on speech. You can't yell FIRE in a crowded theatre to create a panic. That speech is NOT PROTECTED by the Constitution and could get you prosecuted. Ever heard of false advertising? - falsely advertising is nothing more than a form of speech. Is it protected? - I think not.

Somebody will probably call me a right-wing nut on this one - but - there has to be common decency and things that violate common decency ought not have access to the public's airways. I know, I know, ... there's always a problem in defining or determining what is and what isn't "common decency" and its not always a black/white, yea/nay issue. But that shouldn't mean we just give up and allow the public airways to be trashed with trash.

QueEx
 
modified said:
true enough.

"After Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) had a run-in with Capitol Hill police, conservative talk show host Neal Boortz said on a Match 31, 2006 broadcast, “She looks like a ghetto slut.” Referring to McKinney’s hair, he said, “It looks like an explosion in a Brillo pad factory.”

At another point, he said, “She looks like Tina Turner peeing on an electric fence.”

dam even though I felt she was in the wrong these comments are uncalled for. They'll do anything to divert the attention away from real problems. That whole genre of radio needs to be addressed. What do you guys think should be done?

That depends on weather or not you feel the problem begins with Imus and or talk radio. If you do you can't expect to do anything more than making Limbaughs point.

The author of the article did a little two stepping himself as he crafted his column to begin with how the media did not call Anna Nicole a hoe then went on to discuss Imus, Limbaugh and how fucked up right wing radio is. BUT NOT ONCE did he mention BET, VH1, Viacom or Clearchannel inc, the decision makers as to what kinds of pornographic, violent type lyrics they flood the airwaves with.

Now I could give a damn about so-called gangsta rap because jokers have been using profanity since the beginning of time. That's not new. But Viacom and others don't have to glamorize it, promote it or sell it. And since most of these idiots believe if white people thinks it's cute, it must be ok. NONE of this made it into this article. But instead placed all blame on those whites he finds objectionable.

-VG
 
Que

I guess I'm a nut too. I think manners, respect and decency have gone out of favor on mainstream radio/tv. Its a shame. I remember when you didn't hear the kind of words/topic's discussed that you hear on radio now. As far as a standard I think we can all agree when certain words, phrases and topics are out of bounds. It seems like the only way to address the content is to find the people responsible for it or show our displeasure with our spending habits.

VG

I know the issue is deeper than that. It just seems like there is so much to fix and work towards that this particular part of the problem might get lost in the shuffle.
 
Aokenomon said:
On Sirius sat. radio they called here ho everyday

Howard Stern Show

Bubba the Love Sponge

No mention about Howard Stern in this piece either. Amazing because most of these people know they are owned by those same companies.

My feeliing is this...these kinds of stories have a central theme about them, all geared to engage white guilt and black hate at the same time. When that mix happens there is usually a white liberal waiting to grab the issue by the horns and we sit in awe as some white man single handedly by public comment, captures all of our feelings. We feel vindicated and at the same time obligated to support whatever white leading the charge (on our behalf).

-VG
 
Back
Top