You sound stupid.FOH R-Kelly has videos.
So you saying just because MJ didn't record his misbehavings that's suppose to mean he not guilty?
You sound stupid.FOH R-Kelly has videos.
Great. So as someone who believes he molested children he spent time with, you admit that he didn't fuck them all.No don't think he molested them all. They only have to interact with one to of been guilty of anything.
Nobody cares what you think.I'm not watching the purposeful destruction of another black legend by cacs.
And 2 FBI investigations turned up nothing
Makes sense
Everybody withheld evidence from the feds for his sake
Im not 100 that he did it,matter of fact I was arguing the other side last week with someone. However with his lifestyle I don't know. I don't feel comfortable saying he's innocent. Of course his family will defend him, that's family. And yes I know celebrities face accusations all the time.Great. So as someone who believes he molested children he spent time with, you admit that he didn't fuck them all.
That being said.. Then why on earth would he pick two that he did fuck to testify on his behalf? He has a pool of untainted children to choose from. But he picks two he molested to take the stand?
Let me tell you how it works when vetting and prepping witnesses for trial.. 1) Attorneys hate putting kids on the stand. They make unpredictable witnesses and can break under pressure. If forced to do so they gonna make sure the kid knows where no bodies are buried and can't and won't hurt their case. 2) Without getting into the guilt or innocence of your client, the attorney will make it abundantly clear to the client to NEVER bring a compromised witness in on your behalf if you have uncompromised witnesses available. Especially when said witness is a child (ie, "Mike only bring forth the kids you didn't fuck ok?").
MJ had the best defense money could buy and access to children who could vouch for him that he did not molest. Yet he sent in two rape victims to swear on a bible and testimony ?
Nah.
You can sell it. But I won't buy it.
Fair enough. Nobody should come to a conclusion of guilt based on that doc tho. Cats acting like that seals it for them are naive.Im not 100 that he did it,matter of fact I was arguing the other side last week with someone. However with his lifestyle I don't know. I don't feel comfortable saying he's innocent. Of course his family will defend him, that's family. And yes I know celebrities face accusations all the time.
I would say these 2 were called because they were the ultimate stans and he had control over them. Im pretty sure it wouldn't be the first time someone that was molested didn't come out about it.
I don't know man. I just know I wouldn't trust him around kids in a one on one situation
Obviously... because he was paying the families off and fucking the kids
All good arguments in his defense yes.Great. So as someone who believes he molested children he spent time with, you admit that he didn't fuck them all.
That being said.. Then why on earth would he pick two that he did fuck to testify on his behalf? He has a pool of untainted children to choose from. But he picks two he molested to take the stand?
Let me tell you how it works when vetting and prepping witnesses for trial.. 1) Attorneys hate putting kids on the stand. They make unpredictable witnesses and can break under pressure. If forced to do so they gonna make sure the kid knows where no bodies are buried and can't and won't hurt their case. 2) Without getting into the guilt or innocence of your client, the attorney will make it abundantly clear to the client to NEVER bring a compromised witness in on your behalf if you have uncompromised witnesses available. Especially when said witness is a child (ie, "Mike only bring forth the kids you didn't fuck ok?").
MJ had the best defense money could buy and access to children who could vouch for him that he did not molest. Yet he sent in two rape victims to swear on a bible and testimony ?
Nah.
You can sell it. But I won't buy it.
Nobody cares what you think.
Mike had phones tapped computers seized and they found nothing.How about the FBI investigated him twice
Not the mom and pop shop
The investigative team that gets their "man" pretty much every time they set out to get their man......IF the person has a hint of guilt ANY dirt they'll find it
They put a white glove to Mike's life twice and it came back spotless in the eyes of the law
Those are the facts
Innuendo be damn
Hypothetical be damn
Also let's attack the ones we know for sure did dirt
R Kelly
Woody Allen
Steve Tyler and Elvis Presley on record with underage women
Hugh hefner putting underage women in his magazines
So, you're not being sarcastic..... Oh
Mike also hadMike had phones tapped computers seized and they found nothing.
I'm sure more people on here respects me more than you.And nobody on this Board REALLY cares what a half breed, self hating coon ass, cac lovin' house nigga like you thinks.
lol he rubbed the little boy head like he was a puppy or something.
I would say the church still has that crownDon't look now but Black Men are the face of Pedophilia,
Sexual Abuse, Physical Abuse and Psychological Abuse
"Mission Accomplished"
- cacs
I would say the church still has that crown
Catholic churches usually say they will handle things internally, same with many Jewish sects.Really so who from the Church is sitting in jail?
I don't see any #MuteCatholicChurch signs
Catholic churches usually say they will handle things internally, same with many Jewish sects.
Just the Vatican has a lot more control over govt than it is perceived to be.
Thieves and Murderers never think they are doing anything wrong until they get caughtOnly thing I have to add is I really think in his mind, he did nothing wrong.
Him jacking a kid off or putting his mouth down there, he thought he wasn't hurting a child, just helping them. So the child or him didn't think anything was wrong.
These parents sight or vision was clouded by the fact of who he was and took his first class tix and hotel suites and loved the showering of gifts. One of the parents he bought a house. Cause he was just a nice guy, yup...
I'm sure more people on here respects me more than you.
You are a nobody.
Obviously the FBI could have found that money and leaned on the family lolObviously... because he was paying the families off and fucking the kids
WTF yeah not watching thisI dont get how anyone who is not gay or a pedo can watch this in its entirety. I watched the first 20 minutes and dude was just talking about how he and Michael would jerk each other off, i had to change the channel, an hour later I came back to see if the topic changed and its another dude going into details about child sex.
How can anyone sit through 2 hours of graphic details of non stop child sex?
Fair enough. Nobody should come to a conclusion of guilt based on that doc tho. Cats acting like that seals it for them are naive.
Mike had phones tapped computers seized and they found nothing.
Yall act like parents don't get paid off. How many parents spoke up about R Kelly before the documentary. How about that kidnapped in plain sight movie where the molester was fucking the mother and the father to get in bed with the daughter. Parents allow a lot of shit to slide when they are being rewarded for the behavior.
He would have kids sleep in his room/hotel rooms. You think he spent all that with the kids playing checkers?But don't let that get in the way of believing white people's words
Funny how that works when you want to believe something lol
Nobody has countered 2 FBI investigations
Present a sound counterargument as to how they came up with nothing twice
You sound stupid.
So you saying just because MJ didn't record his misbehavings that's suppose to mean he not guilty?