The Official Governor Secessionist (Perry) Thread

It's cool Que, but even you must admit......Ross Perot was correct in his assessment of how NAFTA would affect American jobs. He deserved more credibility than the mainstream media gave him. They ridiculed this man cause he had big ears & a gang of charts tellin Reps & Dems how they were fuckin up......kinda juvenile, don't cha think?

Fast-forward to Ron Paul, who's scenario is a bit different because Ron has a track record of correctly, understanding monetary policy and how it affects the overall economy. Ron Paul was correct in his analysis, the cracka, "pointy-head twerp" was right......And you know it! Which is a lot more than I can say for these "know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos" from Princeton, Yale & Harvard that run the Treasury and Fed Reserve.

Lamar, as you should know, there is some right in most everything. It occurs to me, however, that fact tends to be obscured in the vision of many of the staunchly "Left/Right" ideo's as well as the staunchly ideological libertarians.

It seems that too many times, adherence to ideology or sides (I say sides because some who think they're clinging to ideology are just whoopin it up for their team, which might not even have their asses on the roster - LOL) forecloses the possibility of compromise which should generally always be left an option because none, not got damn one, of the positions espoused by either side today is a panacea.
 
It's cool Que, but even you must admit......Ross Perot was correct in his assessment of how NAFTA would affect American jobs. He deserved more credibility than the mainstream media gave him. They ridiculed this man cause he had big ears & a gang of charts tellin Reps & Dems how they were fuckin up......kinda juvenile, don't cha think?

Fast-forward to Ron Paul, who's scenario is a bit different because Ron has a track record of correctly, understanding monetary policy and how it affects the overall economy. Ron Paul was correct in his analysis, the cracka, "pointy-head twerp" was right......And you know it! Which is a lot more than I can say for these "know-every-fuckin-word in the dictionary backwards mofos" from Princeton, Yale & Harvard that run the Treasury and Fed Reserve.

Ron has a track record of correctly, understanding monetary policy ...

Ron has a track record of hypocrisy, railing against government money but at the same time takin' dem earmarks. You remember those posts, the ones you ignore. He's just a politician just like all the rest.
 
The left brain is associated with logic and reason, the right brain is associated with emotion and creativity. Apropos isn't it?

Here's one for you, like my father, my brother, one of my sisters and one of my sons: I can throw equally well with my left or my right hand (better fastball low 80's right - but better hooks from the left) and I hit from either side of the plate.
 
Here's one for you, like my father, my brother, one of my sisters and one of my sons: I can throw equally well with my left or my right hand (better fastball low 80's right - but better hooks from the left) and I hit from either side of the plate.


Does this make you a switch hitter?:lol:
 
source: Politico

Rick Perry travel bankrolled by activist rabbi Irwin Katsof


Rick Perry is talking up his travels to Israel on the stump — a line that’s likely music to the ears of an activist rabbi who made the governor’s last two trips happen.

The rabbi, Irwin Katsof, has spent years recruiting American officials to participate in lavish trips meant to strengthen U.S.-Israel economic and political ties. Perry’s travel was bankrolled by Katsoff’s investment firm, initially called Global Capital Associates, then Doheny Global Group.


In the run-up to a 2007 trip, Katsof’s firm advertised the jaunt as a networking event with world leaders. For $18,500 — airfare not included— participants could accompany Perry and his fellow travelers, former Bush administration cabinet officers John Ashcroft, John Snow and Gale Norton.

Katsof, who also founded a non-profit group called Honest Reporting that monitors the media for alleged anti-Israeli bias, first agreed to speak with POLITICO, but later declined to answer questions and hung up on a reporter when asked whether the trips were intended to curry favor with Perry.​

The trips, one in 2007 and one in 2009, reportedly included meetings with Israeli business and political leaders like Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert. Participants took a sunset cruise on the Red Sea and enjoyed a “scotch and cigar bar” where participants would admire “a starry Jerusalem,” according to reports.​

Katsof’s companies awarded Perry their “Friend of Zion” and “Defender of Jerusalem” awards during the 2007 and 2009 trips, respectively, in recognition of his efforts to promote the U.S.-Israel alliance.​

Perry spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said the 2007 trip spurred the formation of the Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce and “served as a catalyst to the governor’s support of Texas’ divestment from companies that do business with Iran, a main opponent of Israeli freedom.”​

And she pointed out that “a large delegation” from Texas participated along with Perry (who was joined by his wife Anita Perry, their son, Griffin, and Griffin’s then-fiancé), including chancellors of the University of Texas and Texas Tech University, as well as Railroad Commissioner Victor Carillo, state Sen. Juan Hinojosa, executives from multi-national energy companies and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.).​

Perry recently cited the 2009 trip in bashing Obama’s foreign policy, saying during a July Aspen Institute forum: “When we were in Israel in ‘09 and we met with President Perez and Bibi and talked to the leaders of Israel, it is clear that this administration’s lack of focus – or lack of commitment to having a clear foreign policy – has put America in jeopardy.”​




 
source: Huffington Post


"Perry said he "never used" the term "secession" in discussing the matter and added that he has "no idea" why any report would suggest otherwise."

Liar!


<script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1174799081001&w=466&h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript>

April, 2009


<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=politics/2009/04/16/sot.perry.texas.tea.party.kxan" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=politics/2009/04/16/sot.perry.texas.tea.party.kxan" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>
 
source: Yahoo News

Rick Perry plans to skip some upcoming debates


Rick Perry, who earlier this week called his participation in recent presidential debates a "mistake," plans to limit his participation in upcoming forums heading into the heat of the primary season.


The Texas governor and 2012 hopeful will participate in a CNBC debate scheduled for Nov. 9 in Michigan, but a top aide told CNN's John King his boss may not commit to many more face-offs after that.

"We're about 60 days away from votes being cast," Ray Sullivan, Perry's communications director, told CNN. "The candidates need to spend time in Iowa doing those town halls and spending a lot more time with the voters, who oftentimes have the best questions and press the candidates the hardest."

On Tuesday, Perry told Fox's Bill O'Reilly that the biggest mistake he's made so far in his campaign was agreeing to participate in debates at all.

<p><iframe frameborder="0" width="576" height="324" src="http://d.yimg.com/nl/ynews/blog/player.html#vid=27063508&browseCarouselUI=hide&thumbnailUrl=http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/e/3b/e3b40ebb3b7ed23f1c75c8e127e4b411.jpeg"></iframe></p>

"These debates are set up for nothing more than to tear down the candidates. It's pretty hard to be able to sit and lay out your ideas and your concepts with a one-minute response," Perry said. "So, you know, if there was a mistake made, it was probably ever doing one of the [debates], when all they're interested in is stirring up between the candidates instead of really talking about the issues that are important to the American people."

Political observers have linked Perry's dramatic drop in the polls in recent weeks to his shaky debate appearances. The governor has openly admitted he's not a skilled debater, and his decision to back off participation in upcoming forums is a return to his political strategy in Texas, where he frequently declined to debate his gubernatorial opponents.

The question is whether Perry's move could backfire on a national stage. The six debates Perry has participated in thus far have received record ratings, and of the 11 debates scheduled between now and the end of January, most are taking place in key primary states, including Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida.

But Sullivan told CNN there are just too many forums scheduled and it's preventing candidates, including his boss, from focusing on traditional campaigning.

'There's no way that the candidates can do all of those debates," Sullivan said. "But look, we're taking each of these as they come, examining the schedule and examining the opportunities and the opportunity costs."
 
Rick Perry plans to skip some upcoming debates

:hmm:

Its

alarm-clock.jpg
a.m.


. . . and the Red Phone rings




<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Kho3rnYsnVc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Where will Rick Perry be ? ? ?


esq-rick-perry-sleeping-102711-th2.jpg



Rick Perry plans to skip some upcoming calls









rick_perry_joker_006.jpg
 
The whole republican field are a bunch of kooks!


source: http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/15906623/perry-to-attend-at-least-5-more-debates


Perry to attend at least 5 more debates


WASHINGTON (AP) - Rick Perry plans to participate in at least five more presidential primary debates, his campaign said Saturday, dismissing speculation that the Texas governor's lackluster performances so far would lead him to skip future Republican debates.

Perry, who has struggled through parts of his first five debates, will attend all of the events currently scheduled in November as well as a December debate, his spokesman, Ray Sullivan, told The Associated Press.

The decision comes after questions over whether Perry would bypass some debates to concentrate on other types of campaigning. He has always conceded he is not a strong debater, and has often avoided the sparring matches in his past campaigns.

But he's not giving up.

"Shoot, I may get to be a good debater before this is all over," Perry joked during a campaign stop in New Hampshire on Friday.

Perry had already committed to a Nov. 9 debate in Michigan. Added to the calendar are debates in South Carolina on Nov. 12; Washington, D.C., on Nov. 15; and Arizona on Dec. 1. He'll also attend an Iowa forum hosted by The Family Leader, a socially conservative group, on Nov. 19.

Sullivan said the campaign will make decisions about future debates on a case-by-case basis.

Perry rival Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, hasn't committed to any debates beyond the Nov. 9 event in Michigan. Romney's campaign didn't immediately say whether he, too, would commit to further debates.
 
source: New York Times


Being Texan Doesn’t Mean You Support Perry for President


Texans have elected Rick Perry governor three times — with almost 55 percent of the vote in 2010 — but that does not mean Texas’ Republican establishment is falling in line to help elect him president.

Some prominent Texas business executives, Republican members of the state’s Congressional delegation and even university regents whom Mr. Perry appointed have lent their money — if not their endorsements — to other Republican contenders, most notably former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts and the former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

It is a risky endeavor. Whether Mr. Perry makes it to the White House or comes back to the governor’s office, he will wield legislative power, political influence and a veto pen.

“It’s a risk you run when you work against somebody,” said Bill Miller, an Austin-based lobbyist and political consultant, who said some high-dollar donors to Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison’s failed 2010 run for Texas governor were still writing big checks to Mr. Perry to apologize. “If you guess wrong, there’s always a price.”

Among the prominent Texans who have formally endorsed Mr. Gingrich are Representatives Michael Burgess of Lewisville and Joe Barton of Arlington, both Republicans.

Louie Gohmert, a Republican congressman from Tyler, has not endorsed a candidate but has contributed to Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota — and as o the end of September had not reported any contributions to Mr. Perry.

Mr. Romney’s endorsements include those of Representative Lamar Smith, Republican of San Antonio; former Chief Justice Tom Phillips of the Texas Supreme Court; and Scott Caven, a former University of Texas System regent who once served as Mr. Perry’s finance chairman and has contributed more than $18,000 to his re-election bids for governor in the last decade.

Mr. Smith declined to speak with The Texas Tribune, but he said in a statement that he had committed to Mr. Romney three months before Mr. Perry announced his candidacy.

In the current election cycle, Mr. Romney has received campaign contributions in Texas from John Barnhill and Janiece Longoria, former University of Texas System regents; Bob Perry, a billionaire home builder; Larry Kellner, the former Continental Airlines chief executive; and Mayor Mike Rawlings of Dallas, none of whom reported contributions to Mr. Perry in the first 48 days of his presidential campaign.

Mr. Kellner, who has contributed $25,000 to Mr. Perry in past elections, said in an e-mail that Mr. Romney “is the right leader for the country in these challenging economic times.”

Mr. Rawlings said through a spokeswoman that his contribution should not be seen as an endorsement of Mr. Romney and that he made it at the request of his business partner, who is Mr. Romney’s co-chairman for finance in Texas.

A spokesman for Bob Perry (no relation to Rick Perry) — who has given Mr. Perry’s campaigns for governor more than $2.5 million over the last decade — did not respond to questions about whether he endorses Mr. Romney.

Meanwhile, the Dallas real estate magnate Harlan Crow has helped finance the presidential bid of former Gov. Jon Huntsman of Utah, despite having given more than $142,000 to Mr. Perry’s past bids for governor. John Mackey, the chief executive of Whole Foods, based in Austin, has contributed to the long-shot campaign of former Gov. Gary Johnson of New Mexico, a libertarian.

In separate interviews, Dr. Burgess and Mr. Barton, both of whom say they had decided to endorse Mr. Gingrich before Mr. Perry entered the race, said they did not believe that Mr. Perry was the best-qualified Republican candidate.

Mr. Barton said the governor assured him last spring that he had no interest in running for president. He said Mr. Perry is “not quite as well prepared to step into the No. 1 office right off the bat” as Mr. Gingrich, but that he thinks Mr. Perry could “get there” quickly.

Dr. Burgess, who acknowledged he “got on the other side” of Mr. Perry last year by endorsing Ms. Hutchison for governor, said he had personally asked Mr. Gingrich to run in late 2009.

Dr. Burgess said he patched up “a lot of the hurt feelings” with Mr. Perry last spring. But the governor “did not convey to members of the Texas delegation that he was thinking about doing this,” Dr. Burgess said. “Rick never came up here and said, ‘I’ve got to have you guys.’ ”

Mr. Miller, the political consultant, said support for Mr. Perry’s bid in Texas, while widespread, had a far different feel from George W. Bush’s first presidential race. To campaign for Mr. Bush, then the Texas governor, state lawmakers and Austin lobbyists routinely traveled to primary states at their own expense, he said — some of them Democrats.

“Everyone was saying: ‘Have you been to Michigan? To New Hampshire?’ There was a cool factor,” Mr. Miller said.

But the risks of opposing the sitting governor were great then too. When Representative Garnet Coleman, Democrat of Houston, campaigned against Mr. Bush in his first presidential bid, it was unusual; Mr. Coleman and Mr. Bush were friends, and some of Mr. Coleman’s fellow Democrats were on the trail supporting Mr. Bush.

Mr. Coleman was bullied. Lawmakers warned him he was endangering a good political career. They told him he had a target on his back. He worried that his bills would be vetoed, but he was not deterred.

“I thought it was better that we keep him here than send him to the White House, where he could do more harm,” he said.
</NYT_HEADLINE>
 
Back
Top