The Militarization of the Police

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

Ferguson Protests Met With Heavy Police Response,
2 Reporters And Alderman Arrested​



o-FERGUSON-570.jpg

A device deployed by police goes off in the street as police and protesters clash Wednesday,
Aug. 13, 2014, in Ferguson, Mo. Authorities in the St. Louis suburb where an unarmed black
teen was shot and killed by a police officer have used tear gas to try to disperse protesters
after flaming projectiles were thrown from the crowd. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)


o-REILLY-570.jpg

Huffington Post reporter Ryan J. Reilly is arrested when police officers suddenly closed a
Ferguson McDonald's restaurant on West Florissant Avenue on Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2014. (
Robert Cohen / St. Louis Post-Dispatch)​


A group of at least 70 heavily armed SWAT officers with armored vehicles responded to an apparently peaceful protest Wednesday afternoon and ordered the crowd to disperse, HuffPost’s Ryan Reilly reported. The sight of camouflaged officers training automatic weapons at unarmed civilians focused unprecedented attention on the increasing militarization of policing in America.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/14/ferguson-protests-police-response_n_5677741.html


 

Ferguson and the Militarization of Police

85

A demonstrator pleads with another to walk away during a protest in Ferguson, Mo., on Wednesday.​


An image of a camouflaged man in Ferguson, Missouri, training a sniper rifle on a group of protesters with their hands up has forced Americans to ask themselves what kind of protection they’re willing to tolerate. The growing militarization of domestic police forces has been a concern at home for years, but has risen to the forefront of national debate this week as shocking footage emerges from Ferguson. The St. Louis suburb remains the site of clashes and heated racial tensions between protesters, angered by the shooting death of unarmed teen over the weekend, and the police forces they believe have a history of abusive practices.

At the root of the problem is a country coming home from war, forced over a decade to design and deploy a literal army of 21st-century weapons to fight insurgent masses during protracted Middle East wars. A program that first took off in the early 1990s allows the Department of Defense, yet again downsizing, to reissue billions of dollars of this equipment to domestic security forces, particularly SWAT and other elite units that have traditionally needed tactical gear for high-risk jobs.

“Have no doubt, police in the United States are militarizing, and in many communities, particularly those of color, the message is being received loud and clear: ‘You are the enemy,’” writes Tom Nolan, a 27-year veteran of the Boston Police Department and professor at SUNY Plattsburgh, in an op-ed that appeared in DefenseOne in June, more than a month before the Ferguson riots.


85

A member of the St. Louis County Police Department points his weapon in
the direction of a group of protesters in Ferguson, Mo., on Wednesday.​


The 1033 Program, named for a section of the National Defense Authorization Act, has provided congressional approval for upward of $4.3 billion in military equipment to flow to police forces throughout the country, according to an analysis from Newsweek. The program was originally designed to help outgunned law enforcement officers fight the drug trade, and quickly gained popularity among police chiefs for the high fire power and low costs. Some police forces in communities such as Watertown, Connecticut, have purchased MRAPS, originally priced over $700,000 each, for as little as $2,800, according to the magazine.

The evolution of this program has prompted some in Congress to call for its repeal. Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., distributed a letter to his congressional colleagues Thursday saying he plans to introduce the “Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act,” which would further monitor, limit or eliminate such sales.

“Americans should therefore be concerned, unless they want their main streets patrolled in ways that mirror a war zone,” he wrote with Michael Shank in an op-ed in USA Today. “We recognized that we're not in Kansas anymore, but are MRAPs really needed in small-town America? Are improvised explosive devices, grenade attacks, mines, shelling and other war-typical attacks really happening in Roanoke Rapids, a town of 16,000 people? No.”

Johnson’s legislation would add layers of accountability over these sales and outright ban the sales of MRAPs, armored personnel carriers, drones and other aircraft, and assault weapons, according to the letter.

“Militarizing America's main streets won't make us any safer, just more fearful and more reticent,” he wrote.

A New York Times feature published in June documents the stockpiling of advanced military weapons by police across the country. More than 500 military grade aircraft are now owned and operated, along with 432 MRAPs, 44,900 night vision devices and 93,763 assault weapons. The number of SWAT forces themselves has also skyrocketed during this time.

And many military veterans have come out against the violence they’re seeing at home.



http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...e-shocking-nature-of-us-police-militarization



 

Turning Policemen Into Soldiers,
the Culmination of a Long Trend


Another poisoned fruit of the post-9/11 sensibility



lead.jpg

Ferguson, Mo. police watching over their city (Reuters)



The images from Missouri of stormtrooper-looking police confronting their citizens naturally raises the question: how the hell did we get to this point? When did the normal cops become Navy SEALs? What country is this, anyway?

There will be more and more mainstream coverage of the modern militarization of the police, a phenomenon mainly of the post-9/11 years. For reference/aggregation purposes, here is a guide to further reading:


  1. The Book on this topic: Rise of the Warrior Cop, by Radley Balko. It came out a year ago and is more timely now than ever.

    37090ff48.jpg

  2. "Lockdown Nation," a Peter Moskos review of Balko's book last year in PS magazine.

  3. "How the War on Terror Has Militarized the Police," an Atlantic dispatch by Arthur Rizer and Joseph Hartman three years ago.

  4. "Tanks in Small Towns," a web item I did in 2011 on signs of this trend, including this photo of a police force in South Carolina:

    c36b33da2.jpg

    And this one from a small town in Virginia

    eacd359a2.jpg

    And this from Florida::


    5b180d7af.jpg
READ MORE: http://www.theatlantic.com/national...diers-the-culmination-of-a-long-trend/376052/


 
<iframe width="1000" height="1850" src="http://www.bgol.us/board/showpost.php?p=14641875&postcount=3" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
That store owner/clerk could be a suspect after getting manhandled. I had a run in awhile back with a restaurant serving me seafood when I ordered something else (allergic). I thought he did it on purpose and went off.

The next day I found somebody leaning all over my second car. I than drive out get pulled over by a cop with his hand on his gun, threatening to shoot.

It was an Asian cop, the dispute happened at an Asian restaurant. He had his cop enforcer deliver a message that I could be blown away with no fucks given. The guy leaning on my car was a lookout.
 
Last edited:
local_police_color_2.jpg




America's local and State police forces, nationwide have been pumped-up into paramilitary forces with Federal government money starting in the 1970's under Nixon. This flood of federal money continued under Reagan, the ostensible reason given for the surge was the "crack" epidemic; the ongoing "War-On-Drugs" that Nixon started. Clinton followed Reagan-Bush and increased local and State police funding even further with his so-called COPS program in 1994. But the definitive game changer that put funding of local and State police forces on $$$$$$$$$$$$$ steroids were the events of September 11, 2001. Following 9/11 an entire new "national security state" was created (Dept. of Homeland Security) and existing law enforcement agencies engorged themselves in the bonanza of $$$$$$$$$$$$ that the federal government was providing under the banner of "anti-terrorism". All police departments got some of the money, it didn't matter if it was some 200 member police force in the middle of cow chip fly over country. New York City predictably got the most money. They bought everything, tanks, shoulder fired missiles, submarines, attack helicopters, night vision goggles, nuclear and chemical weapons detection sniffers, robots, etc. The other police departments coast-to-coast tried to emulate New York's 35,000 police forces tactics - even if they had no need for such equipment. This militarization of the nation's police forces will continue because the contractors who sell this stuff to the cops have used their profits to <s>Lobby</s> bribe federal legislators to make sure the federal dollars continue to line their pockets. Unfortunately most police officers are completely untrained on how to handle all this military style equipment, so innocent people will be killed.


<img src="http://www.divshare.com/img/26195787-947.jpg" width="900">

READ The book above, eBook (epub & mobi) Download

Code:
http://www42.zippyshare.com/v/58466791/file.html

Yes the cops on the book cover are real, it is not a movie set.


<blockquote>

25% of American adults have not read a single book in the past year; they haven't cracked a paperback, fired up a Kindle, or even hit play on an audiobook while in the car. The number of non-book-readers has nearly tripled since 1978! READ- HERE


</blockquote>



<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="8"></hr>



ap_police_ferguson_van_jc_140814_16x9_992.jpg


Ferguson Missouri Police Department, August 2014
 
Last edited:
The Posse Comitatus Act is the United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) that was passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction and was updated in 1981. Its intent (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) was to limit the powers of Federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce the state laws.

The Act, as modified in 1981, refers to the Armed Forces of the United States. It does not apply to the National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor. The United States Coast Guard, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, is also not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act, primarily because the Coast Guard has both a maritime law enforcement mission and a federal regulatory agency mission.

By the military transferring weapons and training police to act in their capacity, it is a violation of The Posse Comitatus Act
 
Democide is the murder of any person or people by their government, including genocide, politicide and mass murder. Democide is not necessarily the elimination of entire cultural groups but rather groups within the country that the government feels need to be eradicated for political reasons and due to claimed future threats. According to Rummel, genocide has three different meanings. The ordinary meaning is murder by government of people due to their national, ethnic, racial or religious group membership. The legal meaning of genocide refers to the international treaty on genocide, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This also includes nonlethal acts that in the end eliminate or greatly hinder the group. Looking back on history, one can see the different variations of democides that have occurred, but it still consists of acts of killing or mass murder. A generalized meaning of genocide is similar to the ordinary meaning but also includes government killings of political opponents or otherwise intentional murder. In order to avoid confusion over which meaning is intended, Rummel created the term democide for the third meaning.

Mike Brown planned homicide by Darren Wilson and other co conspirators at FPD was state sanctioned murder.
 


“The use of overwhelming force by police
Against unarmed citizens requires our
Urgent attention. It is imperative the
Committee convene to examine these
Issues as soon as possible.”​


- Rep. Conyers, D-Michigan
- Rep. Scott, D-Virginia
- Rep. Cohen, D-Tennessee

Letter to the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
demanding action on the over-policing in America, August 15, 2014


<iframe src='http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_ed_ferg_140815_283034' height='500' width='635' scrolling='no' border='no' ></iframe>




 
I don't mind the weapons the police has. My issue is the fact that there's some states that do not mandate cams on cop vehicles. To me, that's the more appalling fact out of this whole situation.

That should be a part of the law enforcement budget in every state. Hell, they can install some damn gopro cameras if they are bitching about money.
 
I don't mind the weapons the police has. My issue is the fact that there's some states that do not mandate cams on cop vehicles. To me, that's the more appalling fact out of this whole situation.

That should be a part of the law enforcement budget in every state. Hell, they can install some damn gopro cameras if they are bitching about money.



Cams could certainly help and I think we're approaching an era where they will become as much a part of the standard equipment as stun-guns and vests. But, just as in the "Field of Dreams" which coined the phrase "if you build it, they will come" -- if you grossly over-arm police departments, can you be surprised when there are gross over-reactions by the police ???
 
Cams could certainly help and I think we're approaching an era where they will become as much a part of the standard equipment as stun-guns and vests. But, just as in the "Field of Dreams" which coined the phrase "if you build it, they will come" -- if you grossly over-arm police departments, can you be surprised when there are gross over-reactions by the police ???

I think the real issue is the fact that the police feels that they have to use the tactics they're using.

From the facts about this case, it seems to me that the shooter was either poorly trained, or felt that he would get away with such actions.

Either way, I feel that constant monitoring would solve most of these issues.
 
Cams could certainly help and I think we're approaching an era where they will become as much a part of the standard equipment as stun-guns and vests. But, just as in the "Field of Dreams" which coined the phrase "if you build it, they will come" -- if you grossly over-arm police departments, can you be surprised when there are gross over-reactions by the police ???

And that is why I strongly advocate for the repeal of many of the gun laws on the books.
 
And that is why I strongly advocate for the repeal of many of the gun laws on the books.


Hot damn F.A.Y. LOL.

I'm going to have to look back at some of your past positions on the gun issue. This sounds like a bit of a reversal -- but I could be wrong and I wouldn't dare say that until I get a chance to look-back.

But, before I say this might be a reversal, which laws exactly are you in favor of repealing ???



 
I think you all worrying about the wrong thing.

This issue has nothing to do with the equipment the police has. This is all about poor tactics, and understanding of the community.

Plus, there's no ACCOUNTABILITY.

No cams, no threat of being voted out.
 
140822-food-for-thought.jpg


I have been looking at other European - American differences which may due to genetic predisposition to behaviors. The appeal of slavery and other exploitative behaviors is similar to Catch a Predator where certain people drawn to young children become entangled with law. Here they become trapped in North America. Other people were repulsed and stayed behind in these countries.

Britain also used various continents as a penal colony, which after applying an exponential growth rate could represent a significant number of people.

You also have in many cases, immigrants out competed for resources being forced to leave an area and come to North America.

People that engage in risky behaviors and unstable that could pickup and leave to another continent. While the stable risk averse person stayed behind.

Finally, equality is accumulated gradually over time. Starting from the point of slavery significantly delays a society movement to equality. North and South differences are readily apparent when one area engaged in slavery and the other did not. Europeans never started from a point of slavery, as they accumulate equality, they reached a much higher point.

25zgigj.jpg


23iwd2s.jpg



What is left behind is highly planned economies, greater government/business integration, mass transit and building other complex projects, stable employment, better Gini coefficient, high unionization, high usage of renewable energy...

African American

I also look at tribal cultures such as the Aboriginal and African American incarcerated at high rates which did not have a formal penal system that exacts a genetic penalty on anti social behaviors through strict segregation. This genetic penalty would decrease the existence of behaviors in the population. We should study these pre-civilization societies to see if it would predispose people to certain behaviors. If I killed somebody or stole, what would happen to me in these cultures?

In some countries, rape occurs frequently without any incarceration. What if I engaged in slavery and grab those people that were eventually released on a different continent. Would this behavior that is now illegal, occur more frequently? The other racial group heavily penalized this behavior with incarceration, allowing somebody not predisposed to produce more offspring.

Prison is a powerful Eugenics method that can alter genetics in a population.
 
Last edited:

Obama orders review of police militarization
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-orders-review-police-militarization



President Obama has ordered a review of federal programs that help state
and local law enforcement acquire military equipment, a senior administration
official confirmed to NBC News on Saturday. The review comes amid national
outrage at what many see as the growing militarization of policing in America.

The White House-directed review, to be announced in a press conference
Monday, comes in the wake of the massive public outcry over what has been
widely perceived as the excessive use of force by county police in Ferguson,
Missouri, where officers recently deployed military-grade equipment to quell
unrest following the death of Michael Brown, an unarmed teen who was shot
and killed by a police officer.



 
I think you all worrying about the wrong thing.

This issue has nothing to do with the equipment the police has. This is all about poor tactics, and understanding of the community.

Plus, there's no ACCOUNTABILITY.

No cams, no threat of being voted out.

Why is it a case of either/or? Why do small police forces need heavy duty weaponry? Even in big cities, the go out of their way to find usage for the weaponry and equipment they buy.
How about we cut back on police using the weapons of war AND put cameras on each officer?
How did Ferguson afford those weapons but not body cameras?


:smh:
 
Hot damn F.A.Y. LOL.

I'm going to have to look back at some of your past positions on the gun issue. This sounds like a bit of a reversal -- but I could be wrong and I wouldn't dare say that until I get a chance to look-back.

But, before I say this might be a reversal, which laws exactly are you in favor of repealing ???




I don't recall being a big gun control guy on this board. I'll look back at my history. I'm a libertarian, and with that I don't like a lot of laws, but enforce those that are needed.
 
Back
Top