"THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcerated

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor

The House I Live In



A brilliant must see film that sadly I'll speculate that 90% of Americans will not see. It exposes the American 'Prison Industrial Complex' which has incarcerated more than 2 Million Americans, the majority Black & Hispanic, on non-violent drug possession charges. Now with crystal rock methamphetamines scourging the suburbs and rural areas white Americans are now beginning to surge into the Prison Industrial Complex in large numbers as they now are being sentenced to decades of imprisonment for possession of small amounts of drugs. This entire madness is comprehensively covered in this film.



23987536-b32.jpg






FULL FILM DOWNLOAD
Code:
http://hugefiles.net/axjfj2c8bda0

OR

http://depositfiles.com/files/9rc7javvv

OR

http://ul.to/d1p9703c


Format/Info : Audio Video Interleave
File size : 985 MiB
Duration : 1h 48mn
Overall bit rate mode : Constant
Overall bit rate : 1 266 Kbps

Video
Width : 744 pixels
Height : 416 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9

Audio
Codec ID/Hint : MP3
Duration : 1h 48mn
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 160 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz



by Roger Ebert

These thoughts occurred as I was watching "The House I Live In," the documentary by Eugene Jarecki about our War on Drugs. Like other American wars, it has not been going so well. Its cost so far is more than $1 trillion dollars. Its effect on American drug consumption has been negligible. Its primary effect has been to assure a steady flow of non-violent, non-dealing drug users to our prisons, many of them for mandated sentences of five, 10, 20 or 40 years — or life. Hearing his sentence of 40 years for using crack, a young offender says flatly, "I messed up." Let that be a lesson to him, although he may be dead by the time he can put it to use.

When I wrote, "young offender," did you have a mental image of a black youth? Yes, 90 percent of those arrested for using crack are black, although only 13 percent of the nation's crack users are black. Why is this so? Could it be that black men dealing crack on street corners are easy pickings for police patrols, but white offenders in affluent suburbs and Wall Street financial firms are not so easy to nab? The sad thing is that white crack users use poor blacks to run the risks for them.

Because of its disproportionate number of minority targets, the War on Drugs has been called a Silent Holocaust against blacks. The irony is compounded because so many prisons (many of them private, profit-making enterprises) are in lower-income white areas with a ready supply of low-salaried guards. The location of prisons is often due to the clout of white legislators.

But now the worm is turning, as Jarecki points out. Although pot and crack use results in mostly black arrests, low-income white areas are showing a dramatic growth in arrests for the manufacture and use of crystal meth.

No politician dares risk seeming soft on drugs, although the Obama administration did mitigate the disparity in sentences for crack (used more by blacks) that were sharply more extreme than powder cocaine (used more by whites) from 100-1 down to 18-1. After all, it's all cocaine.

Is drug abuse a victimless crime? Good question. Libertarians such as Ron Paul argue that what you put into your body is your business. It is the laws that produce victims — and they are the users themselves. Of course many victims result from crimes committed to get money to buy drugs. The libertarian argument is that if you decriminalize drugs, as some European countries have found, you remove the profit motive, and drug use falls. It has been said that the War on Drugs is essentially a price-support system for the drug cartels of Latin America.

Jarecki's film makes a shattering case against the War on Drugs, using street footage, prison footage and the closer-to-home story of Nannie Jeter, the Jarecki family's longtime housekeeper, whose own son was arrested. In poor, jobless neighborhoods, selling drugs is often the only "easy" way to make money. And poor, jobless dealers are easy prey for the police, most of whom realistically believe their efforts are making absolutely no difference.

If we were to expand the War on Drugs to reach into affluent neighborhoods, fashionable clubs, board rooms, movie studios and yacht harbors, how well do you think that would go over? The only rich people who get busted are in show business. If we see even one rich, white executive locked up for several years for smoking pot or inhaling cocaine, that'll be the day.


 
Last edited:
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer




bump_signs.jpg



 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

41d4cc51-0e5a-475f-947f-f350e6c0d8d5.JPG



Federal Appeals Court:
Drug Sentencing Disparity Is Intentional Racial ‘Subjugation’


by By Nicole Flatow | May 18, 2013

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...-disparity-is-intentional-racial-subjucation/

Since Congress recognized the gaping racial disparity between mandatory minimum sentences for crack offenses and cocaine offenses and reduced the ratio from 100-to-1 to 18-to-1, courts have grappled with when and how to apply the statute to already-decided cases. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the reductions in the Fair Sentencing Act applied to at least those cases decided before the law was passed, but not yet sentenced. But questions remain about whether the statute applies retroactively to tens of thousands of other inmates who might seek reduced sentences.
<br>On Friday, a federal appeals court panel issued a sweeping decision that held the reduced sentencing ratio should apply retroactively to all cases, not just because that was the intent of the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act, but because failure to do so would be unconstitutional. In a powerful statement about the troubling history of drug sentencing, Sixth Circuit Judges Gilbert Merritt and Boyce Martin write:
<blockquote><br><strong>The old 100-to-1 crack cocaine ratio has led to the mass incarceration of thousands of nonviolent prisoners under a law widely acknowledged as racially discriminatory.</strong> There were approximately 30,000 federal prisoners (about 15 percent of all federal prisoners) serving crack cocaine sentences in 2011. Thousands of these prisoners are incarcerated for life or for 20, 10, or 5 years under mandatory minimum crack cocaine sentences imposed prior to the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act. <strong>More than 80 percent of federal prisoners serving crack cocaine sentences are black. In fiscal year 2010, before the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act, almost 4,000 defendants, mainly black, received mandatory minimum sentences for crack cocaine.</strong> […]
<br><strong>The Fair Sentencing Act was a step forward, but it did not finish the job. The racial discrimination continues by virtue of a web of statutes, sentencing guidelines, and court cases that maintain the harsh provisions for those defendants sentenced before the Fair Sentencing Act.</strong> If we continue now with a construction of the statute that perpetuates the discrimination, there is no longer any defense that the discrimination is unintentional. The discriminatory nature of the old sentencing regime is so obvious that it cannot seriously be argued that race does not play a role in the failure to retroactively apply the Fair Sentencing Act. <strong>A “disparate impact” case now becomes an intentional subjugation or discriminatory purpose case. Like slavery and Jim Crow laws, the intentional maintenance of discriminatory sentences is a denial of equal protection.</strong></blockquote>
<br>The two-judge majority opinion also suggests the court would be inclined to strike down other deeply discriminatory and draconian sentencing laws for nonviolent drug offenders, which even the Congressional Research Service has flagged as a cause of the United States’ overwhelming prison population. Unfortunately, the dissenting Judge Ronald Lee Gilman’s opinion may better reflect the view of either a full Sixth Circuit panel or the Supreme Court justices who would review this case on appeal. Gilman puts the onus on Congress to make its law explicitly retroactive, and points to the failure of pre-Fair Sentencing Act constitutional challenges to the crack-cocaine sentencing disparity.
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

young_usage_rates_marijuana.png


marijuana_arrest_rates_by_race_year.png



<object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc10216c"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=52102534&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc10216c" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=52102534&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit NBCNews.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.nbcnews.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer


The corporate media has inculcated the overwhelming majority of Americans to reject any discussion or forum about a serious topic that last more than 3 minutes. Even political debates for high office, which as recently as 40 years ago, offered candidates 5 to 7 minutes to answer a question, have now truncated the allotted amount of time for candidates to answer serious questions down to 90 seconds!

Most of you peeps will not listen to the 59 minute speech below, that lawyer Michelle Alexander, author of the book The New Jim Crow gave over a year ago in Harlem, New York. I heard the audio of this speech 10 days after the actual event, but I see it's on youtube, I stumbled across it.

For those of you who want to "be informed" it is one of the most illuminating and factual speeches I've heard in the last 2 years. It is not a bombastic speech. It has facts & figures & perspectives that you have not heard before. This Black woman is "dangerous" -- you won't see her on a 'Oprah' Special or '60 Minutes' or all the usual 'corporate media' outlets. Give Michele Alexander an hour of your time. Just Listen!!






<img src="http://k.minus.com/jbiwlJ5Htzjffs.jpg" width="400">

Download and read the book, link below, then buy a copy so the author can get paid.


Code:
http://www65.zippyshare.com/v/FVUsJsLg/file.html




<video src="http://cdn.theguardian.tv/mainwebsite/2013/3/27/130327THILIClip3-16x9.mp4" width="620px" controls></video>





 
Last edited:
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

230e8b18-105c-44b4-98df-00a25cb593e2.gif


Watch the Two Videos Below

<table border="8" width="900" id="table2" bordercolorlight="#800080" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" bordercolordark="#800080" bgcolor="#000000" height="450">
<tr><td><center><font face="arial black" size="5" color="#FFFFFF">September 2013</font></center>
<table width="770" id="table1" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" bordercolorlight="#800080" bordercolordark="#FF0000" bgcolor="#000000" class="style1">
<tr>
<td class="style2"><object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc2e6d52"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=53088804&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc2e6d52" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=53088804&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit NBCNews.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.nbcnews.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p></td>
<td class="style3"><object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc743df0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=53098201&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc743df0" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=53098201&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit NBCNews.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.nbcnews.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table></td></tr></table>


us-failed-war-on-drugs.jpg
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer


BUMP:




The House I Live In



A brilliant must see film that sadly I'll speculate that 90% of Americans will not see. It exposes the American 'Prison Industrial Complex' which has incarcerated more than 2 Million Americans, the majority Black & Hispanic, on non-violent drug possession charges. Now with crystal rock methamphetamines scourging the suburbs and rural areas white Americans are now beginning to surge into the Prison Industrial Complex in large numbers as they now are being sentenced to decades of imprisonment for possession of small amounts of drugs. This entire madness is comprehensively covered in this film.



23987536-b32.jpg






FULL FILM DOWNLOAD
Code:
https://www.rapidshare.com/files/3256175774/HILIN.2012.rar


Video Size :703 mb mkv
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L3.1
Duration : 1h 48mn
Width : 852 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Aspect ratio : 16:9
Language : English
Subtitle : UTF-8
Audio
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Format profile : LC
Codec ID : A_AAC
Duration : 1h 48mn
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz



by Roger Ebert

These thoughts occurred as I was watching "The House I Live In," the documentary by Eugene Jarecki about our War on Drugs. Like other American wars, it has not been going so well. Its cost so far is more than $1 trillion dollars. Its effect on American drug consumption has been negligible. Its primary effect has been to assure a steady flow of non-violent, non-dealing drug users to our prisons, many of them for mandated sentences of five, 10, 20 or 40 years — or life. Hearing his sentence of 40 years for using crack, a young offender says flatly, "I messed up." Let that be a lesson to him, although he may be dead by the time he can put it to use.

When I wrote, "young offender," did you have a mental image of a black youth? Yes, 90 percent of those arrested for using crack are black, although only 13 percent of the nation's crack users are black. Why is this so? Could it be that black men dealing crack on street corners are easy pickings for police patrols, but white offenders in affluent suburbs and Wall Street financial firms are not so easy to nab? The sad thing is that white crack users use poor blacks to run the risks for them.

Because of its disproportionate number of minority targets, the War on Drugs has been called a Silent Holocaust against blacks. The irony is compounded because so many prisons (many of them private, profit-making enterprises) are in lower-income white areas with a ready supply of low-salaried guards. The location of prisons is often due to the clout of white legislators.

But now the worm is turning, as Jarecki points out. Although pot and crack use results in mostly black arrests, low-income white areas are showing a dramatic growth in arrests for the manufacture and use of crystal meth.

No politician dares risk seeming soft on drugs, although the Obama administration did mitigate the disparity in sentences for crack (used more by blacks) that were sharply more extreme than powder cocaine (used more by whites) from 100-1 down to 18-1. After all, it's all cocaine.

Is drug abuse a victimless crime? Good question. Libertarians such as Ron Paul argue that what you put into your body is your business. It is the laws that produce victims — and they are the users themselves. Of course many victims result from crimes committed to get money to buy drugs. The libertarian argument is that if you decriminalize drugs, as some European countries have found, you remove the profit motive, and drug use falls. It has been said that the War on Drugs is essentially a price-support system for the drug cartels of Latin America.

Jarecki's film makes a shattering case against the War on Drugs, using street footage, prison footage and the closer-to-home story of Nannie Jeter, the Jarecki family's longtime housekeeper, whose own son was arrested. In poor, jobless neighborhoods, selling drugs is often the only "easy" way to make money. And poor, jobless dealers are easy prey for the police, most of whom realistically believe their efforts are making absolutely no difference.

If we were to expand the War on Drugs to reach into affluent neighborhoods, fashionable clubs, board rooms, movie studios and yacht harbors, how well do you think that would go over? The only rich people who get busted are in show business. If we see even one rich, white executive locked up for several years for smoking pot or inhaling cocaine, that'll be the day.








AND THIS:




A New Development in Prison Reform




01272014_CrimJusticeGuide-thumb-640xauto-10060.jpg



logo.png

by Carla Murphy
Thursday, January 30 2014



There’s not much that Tea Party Republicans and liberal Democrats agree on these days. Surprisingly, one of them happens to bescaling back mass incarceration, the subject of a live-streamed meeting today of the senate judiciary committee.

The motives vary among and between key legislative leaders as ideologically disparate as Republican senators Mike Lee (Utah) and Rand Paul (Ken.) and Democrats Patrick Leahy (Vt.) and Dick Durbin (Ill.). But whether motivated by concern for civil liberties, unsustainable state and federal budgets, or a New Testament-inclination for giving second chances, one fact trumps all differences: The United States houses by far the largest incarcerated population in the world at 2.2 million people as of year-end 2011. That smudge, as well as unsubtle championing of sentencing reform by attorney general Eric Holder, has galvanized a relatively quiet bipartisan effort over the past five years. Advocates say Congress is taking on mass incarceration one reform at a time. The latest are tucked into the 1,582-page FY2014 omnibus spending bill and, other reforms are coming down the pike. Below, a guide to these new developments.

What stands out in the 2014 omnibus spending bill? Advocates are excited about the creation of the $1 million Charles Colson Task Force, an independent, nine-member panel of experts tasked with issuing recommendations on federal prison reform. A similar idea for a bipartisan commission, at least on Capitol Hill, dates back to 2009[/b]. And although the scope of this current incarnation is federal prisons, the bill’s somewhat broad remit suggests that the commission could potentially issue the first comprehensive report since 1965 on criminal justice in America.

“The Bureau of Prisons [now] sucks up 25 percent of the Department of Justice’s budget,” Molly Gill, government affairs counsel at Washington, DC-based Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM), says. “It means more is being spent on prisons and less on prosecution, cops, victim services or rehabilitation—all things that are important for keeping public safety high.”


How will Colson treat nonviolent offenders? Nonviolent offenders make up more than 90 percent of the roughly 215,000-member federal prison population at a cost of $20,000 to $30,000 per inmate. Forty percent are in for drugs and 30 percent for immigration-related offenses. Gill says that the Colson task force will figure out fairer sentences—like, not locking people up for a decade because of a period of drug addiction. The feds are taking the lead from states like Georgia and South Carolina, she says, “who were way ahead in looking at sentencing reform and setting up commissions.

Another plus: The task force will have lots of discretion in deciding what aspects of the system they want to focus on, says Jessica Eaglin, counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law—which means state prisons may get attention, too.


Will the Colson task force take on race? “I can’t imagine any objective analysis of incarceration that didn’t take a look at the racial and cultural make-up of who is in prison,” Republican and Justice Fellowship president, Craig deRoche, says. Justice Fellowship is the public policy arm of Prison Fellowship, the prison ministry founded 40 years ago by disgraced Nixon aide-turned-evangelical Christian, Charles “Chuck” Colson. (The task force is named for Colson, who championed prison reform until his death in 2012.) The disparities are staggering. According to Yale professors Jason Stanley’s and Vesla Weaver’s New York Times op-ed this week:

“Just from 1980 to 2006, the black rate of incarceration (jail and prison) increased four times as much as the increase in the white rate. … In 1968, 15 percent of black adult males had been convicted of a felony and 7 percent had been to prison; by 2004, the numbers had risen to 33 percent and 17 percent, respectively.”​

Still, based on his time as speaker of Michigan’s House of Representatives, deRoche argues that racism isn’t the only or main reason producing racially disparate outcomes. Perverse financial incentives built into the criminal justice system itself may play the largest role of all, he says. One example is Michigan’s indigent defense system, which as of 2013 is being overhauled. A perverse financial incentive rewarded underpaid indigent defense attorneys for their volume of clientele, not thier time-consuming trial preparation or competent defense. The racial outcome: guilty rulings for a largely African-American and poor clientele.


What role are conservatives playing? FAMM worked with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to craft legislative language exempting certain offenders from harsh mandatory minimums. That’s ALEC, the conservative group best known for advancing the “Stand your ground” law that helped exonerate George Zimmerman. “So far we haven’t taken a lot of fire and I hope we don’t,” Gill says of FAMM’s bipartisan work with ALEC. “It’s not a bad thing to engage with people from a wide variety of places. That’s what it’s going to take to get anything done and there are people in Congress who know that.”


But don’t conservatives champion mass incarceration? “Traditionally the right was probably the most fervent advocate of ‘tough on crime’ policies that got us to more than two million people in prison,” says David Dagan, freelance journalist and Ph.D. student at Johns Hopkins University. But now, he writes in a January journal article, undoing mass incarceration is becoming as orthodox on the Right as building it was just a few short years ago. And that, Dagan says, “opens up political space that wasn’t there before.”


What else is in the 2014 spending bill? Funding increases went to the Second Chance Act, the 2008 law passed under President George W. Bush that supports re-entry and rehabilitation programming for former prisoners as well as drug courts.


Are there any other reforms coming? The senate judiciary committee met January 30, 2014 to merge three bipartisan bills. Together they currently expand judicial discretion for certain non-violent drug offenses, lower mandatory minimums for the next generation of offenders and incentivize prisoners to tackle addiction. Of particular interest for families of imprisoned men and women is the Smarter Sentencing Act. It takes up retroactive sentence reduction, which the unanimously passed Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 did not address. “More than 9,000 people are still imprisoned simply because of a date,” Gill says of the FSA, which reduced the crack-cocaine sentencing disparity for future but not past offenders. “Getting fair punishment shouldn’t depend on a date that you went to court.”






SOURCE: http://colorlines.com/archives/2014/01/a_new_development_in_prison_reform.html



 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer


Justice Department backs reduced penalties
for low-level drug offenses​


cGqLf.AuSt.91.jpg



Attorney General Eric Holder on Thursday urged the U.S. Sentencing Commission to reduce the recommended prison time for certain low-level drug offenses.

Citing prison overcrowding, and the fact that nearly half of the nation’s 216,000 federal prisoners are incarcerated on drug charges, Holder said sentencing reform is desperately needed.

“ Modestly reducing the quantity-based guideline for drug offenses, while continuing to ensure higher penalties for drug offenders involved violence, or who are career criminals, or who use weapons in their offenses is consistent [with] the Attorney General's Smart on Crime initiative and will help further our current need for efficient and strategic criminal justice reforms,” the Justice Department’s written testimony stated.

The department’s 31-page prepared statement, though spanning a wide array of sentencing topics, placed particular weight on the drug sentencing question. The proposed reform would affect those convicted of possessing 500 grams or more of powdered cocaine or 28 grams or more of crack cocaine.

“ It has become clear that we must find ways to control federal prison spending order to better focus limited resources on combating the most serious threats to public safety,” the department’s statement declared.

The seven-member sentencing commission was also scheduled to hear from other supporters of reform, such as Families Against Mandatory Minimums, as well as a representative of the National District Attorneys Association, who argues against reducing sentences.

“ Despite the myth being promulgated by the U.S. Department of Justice that ‘America’s federal prison system is bloated with first-time, low level drug offenders’, the vast majority of prisoners in the Federal prison system have been very bad actors for a long time,” Raymond F. Morrogh, director at large of the district attorneys association, stated.


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/03/13/221114/justice-department-backs-reduced.html#storylink=cpy


 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer


RE-UP




<img src="http://www.ricesigns.com/real_pictures/bump_signs.jpg" width="250">



The House I Live In



A brilliant must see film that sadly I'll speculate that 90% of Americans will not see. It exposes the American 'Prison Industrial Complex' which has incarcerated more than 2 Million Americans, the majority Black & Hispanic, on non-violent drug possession charges. Now with crystal rock methamphetamines scourging the suburbs and rural areas white Americans are now beginning to surge into the Prison Industrial Complex in large numbers as they now are being sentenced to decades of imprisonment for possession of small amounts of drugs. This entire madness is comprehensively covered in this film.



23987536-b32.jpg






FULL FILM DOWNLOAD
Code:
http://hugefiles.net/axjfj2c8bda0

OR

http://depositfiles.com/files/9rc7javvv

OR

http://ul.to/d1p9703c

Format/Info : Audio Video Interleave
File size : 985 MiB
Duration : 1h 48mn
Overall bit rate mode : Constant
Overall bit rate : 1 266 Kbps

Video
Width : 744 pixels
Height : 416 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9

Audio
Codec ID/Hint : MP3
Duration : 1h 48mn
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 160 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz

 
Last edited:
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

War spending and over incarcerations puts a huge burden on businesses and makes their products over priced versus a competitor overseas. We foot the bill when we buy something here, other countries don't have to pay. Luckily the U.S. has value added technology products that other ccountries don't have but they are catching up.

The U.S. has to run a lean efficient government, otherwise jobs and corporate headquarters are leaving.

We have 2 trillion in offshore profits being held overseas because our tax rates are too high. It also sends good paying jobs to these countries.
 
Last edited:
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

Obama Grants Clemency to
46 Men and Women Serving
Unjust Prison Sentences


The White House announced that President Obama has commuted the
sentences of 46 men and women who were facing lengthy sentences that
they wouldn't have served had they committed the same offenses today.



On Monday, President Barack Obama commuted the sentences of 46 men and women, almost all of whom were serving lengthy sentences for drug crimes.

"Nearly all of these individuals would have already served their time and returned to society if they were convicted of the exact same crime today," the White House wrote on the White House Facebook page.

The move is part of a continuing effort begun by the Obama administration last year to grant clemency to nonviolent drug offenders whose sentences have been deemed too harsh when weighed against today's drug laws.

"So their punishments didn't fit the crimes," Obama said in a video posted to the White House website. "I believe those folks deserve their second chance."

According to the Washington Post, "The latest round of commutations comes days before Obama is set to visit a federal prison in Oklahoma on Thursday in the first such visit by a sitting U.S. president to a federal prison. He is also expected to address his administration's effort to overhaul the criminal justice system in a speech Tuesday at the NAACP's annual conference in Philadelphia."


The Post notes that inmates whose sentences have been recently commuted will have to move to halfway houses to help with their transitions into the community.

Obama has commuted the sentences of some 89 people during his presidency and granted another 64 people full pardons, according to USA Today.

Each prisoner whose sentence was commuted on Monday received a letter from the president notifying the prisoner of his or her release.

"I am granting your application because you have demonstrated the potential to turn your life around," Obama wrote to Jerry Allen Bailey, a federal prisoner in Jessup, Ga., USA Today reports. "Now it is up to you to make the most of this opportunity."​



http://www.theroot.com/articles/new...njust_prison_sentences.html?wpisrc=topstories
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

Outstanding movie!!! Why isn't this on the main board?? Important movies, books, speakers, authors and so on, should be shared with the whole board!!
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

This forum is OPEN to everyone, paying or not.
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

I understand!! Just the visionary in me!!!
 
Re: "THE HOUSE I LIVE IN" - Film About Failed U.S. "War On Drugs" -2 Million Incarcer

Appreciate your comments!
 
Back
Top