The Fleecing Of AMerica

Obadiah Plainman

Potential Star
Registered
I remember back in the 80's and 90's the Pentagon was accused of spending unbelievable amounts of money on simple things. Reports indicate that the American public was paying hundreds of dollars for single items like toilet seats and hammers. It turns out that this Fleecing of America continues, with the story of a company which charged the American people nearly a million dollars to ship two washers to Iraq. Unreal!!!

Pentagon Paid $998,798 to Ship Two 19-Cent Washers (Update3)

6blgoqg.jpg


By Tony Capaccio

Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) -- A small South Carolina parts supplier collected about $20.5 million over six years from the Pentagon for fraudulent shipping costs, including $998,798 for sending two 19-cent washers to an Army base in Texas, U.S. officials said.

The company also billed and was paid $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq, and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Florida, Pentagon records show..........................Full Bloomberg Article
 
Last edited:
VegasGuy said:
And we want those same people in goverment to do universal health care. Fuck that.

-VG

No, send them back to the private sector and put in people that don't hate the government and won't sabotage the it.

If you don’t believe in government, how can you govern?

That's like putting a vegan in charge of a butcher shop.
 
Last edited:
Not to say there isn't waste, but this is how the government often funds Black projects, like the alleged Aurora spyplane or the next generation UAV's.

And universal healthcare doesn't well either.
 
They say the 'Price of freedom is everlasting vigilance' this article proves that someone is and always will be on the case of government corruption it would be better if 'we the people' gave these brave, concientious reporters some help.
 
Fuckallyall said:
Not to say there isn't waste, but this is how the government often funds Black projects, like the alleged Aurora spyplane or the next generation UAV's.

And universal healthcare doesn't well either.

Universal, Single Payer, Socialized or what ever you want to call it is cheaper and more efficient that the health insurance based private system. In fact we already have it for some, there called Medicare and the VA. The Bush régime fucked up Walter Reed, but the VA system has worked. Ask a senior citizen (before the Bush Medicare health plan) and a veteran.
 
thoughtone said:
Universal, Single Payer, Socialized or what ever you want to call it is cheaper and more efficient that the health insurance based private system. In fact we already have it for some, there called Medicare and the VA. The Bush régime fucked up Walter Reed, but the VA system has worked. Ask a senior citizen (before the Bush Medicare health plan) and a veteran.

How do you figure it will be cheaper? Based on what? Political bumper stickers?

Bottom line playa, health care is not free, never was and never will be and somebody has to pay for it. What would work better is to allow people to deduct the cost of their own health care from their taxes, which amounts to the same thing. It comes off the tax base and the government NEVER gets to touch it.

Social Security, is broke and full of IOU's

Medicare is damn near broke

Medicade is on life support.

All run by your people at the federal level. With a track record like this why would anyone in their right mind consider allowing them to control 1/5th of the countries GNP?


But first things first, why do you think it's cheaper?

-VG
 
VegasGuy said:
How do you figure it will be cheaper? Based on what? Political bumper stickers?

Bottom line playa, health care is not free, never was and never will be and somebody has to pay for it. What would work better is to allow people to deduct the cost of their own health care from their taxes, which amounts to the same thing. It comes off the tax base and the government NEVER gets to touch it.

Social Security, is broke and full of IOU's

Medicare is damn near broke

Medicade is on life support.

All run by your people at the federal level. With a track record like this why would anyone in their right mind consider allowing them to control 1/5th of the countries GNP?


But first things first, why do you think it's cheaper?

-VG

Where is your evidence that the government single payer health care is less efficient than the private sector, other than Faux News, Rush Limbaugh and the Heritage Foundation?

According to these stats, things were doing a whole lot better before the right wing, conservative Reagan Revolution kicked in:



National-Debt-GDP.gif


source: ZFacts.com

Question them, look them up and then show me yours.

The private sector is raping America while Bill Frist and others are reaping Billions. Health care is not free, but it can and must be cheaper and more accessible Check out these facts!


source: Connecticut Coalition for Universal Health Care



Why doesn’t the United States have universal health care as a right of citizenship? The United States is the only industrialized nation that does not guarantee access to health care as a right of citizenship. 28 industrialized nations have single payer universal health care systems, while 1 (Germany) has a multipayer universal health care system like President Clinton proposed for the United States.


Myth One: The United States has the best health care system in the world.
Fact One: The United States ranks 23rd in infant mortality, down from 12th in 1960 and 21st in 1990


Fact Two: The United States ranks 20th in life expectancy for women down from 1st in 1945 and 13th in 1960


Fact Three: The United States ranks 21st in life expectancy for men down from 1st in 1945 and 17th in 1960.


Fact Four: The United States ranks between 50th and 100th in immunizations depending on the immunization. Overall US is 67th, right behind Botswana


Fact Five: Outcome studies on a variety of diseases, such as coronary artery disease, and renal failure show the United States to rank below Canada and a wide variety of industrialized nations.


Conclusion: The United States ranks poorly relative to other industrialized nations in health care despite having the best trained health care providers and the best medical infrastructure of any industrialized nation


Myth Two: Universal Health Care Would Be Too Expensive
Fact One: The United States spends at least 40% more per capita on health care than any other industrialized country with universal health care


Fact Two: Federal studies by the Congressional Budget Office and the General Accounting office show that single payer universal health care would save 100 to 200 Billion dollars per year despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits.



Fact Three: State studies by Massachusetts and Connecticut have shown that single payer universal health care would save 1 to 2 Billion dollars per year from the total medical expenses in those states despite covering all the uninsured and increasing health care benefits


Fact Four: The costs of health care in Canada as a % of GNP, which were identical to the United States when Canada changed to a single payer, universal health care system in 1971, have increased at a rate much lower than the United States, despite the US economy being much stronger than Canada’s.


Conclusion: Single payer universal health care costs would be lower than the current US system due to lower administrative costs. The United States spends 50 to 100% more on administration than single payer systems. By lowering these administrative costs the United States would have the ability to provide universal health care, without managed care, increase benefits and still save money


Myth Three: Universal Health Care Would Deprive Citizens of Needed Services
Fact One: Studies reveal that citizens in universal health care systems have more doctor visits and more hospital days than in the US



Fact Two: Around 30% of Americans have problem accessing health care due to payment problems or access to care, far more than any other industrialized country. About 17% of our population is without health insurance. About 75% of ill uninsured people have trouble accessing/paying for health care.


Fact Three: Comparisons of Difficulties Accessing Care Are Shown To Be Greater In The US Than Canada (see graph)


Fact Four: Access to health care is directly related to income and race in the United States. As a result the poor and minorities have poorer health than the wealthy and the whites.


Fact Five: There would be no lines under a universal health care system in the United States because we have about a 30% oversupply of medical equipment and surgeons, whereas demand would increase about 15%


Conclusion: The US denies access to health care based on the ability to pay. Under a universal health care system all would access care. There would be no lines as in other industrialized countries due to the oversupply in our providers and infrastructure, and the willingness/ability of the United States to spend more on health care than other industrialized nations.
Myth Four: Universal Health Care Would Result In Government Control And Intrusion Into Health Care Resulting In Loss Of Freedom Of Choice
Fact One: There would be free choice of health care providers under a single payer universal health care system, unlike our current managed care system in which people are forced to see providers on the insurer’s panel to obtain medical benefits


Fact Two: There would be no management of care under a single payer, universal health care system unlike the current managed care system which mandates insurer preapproval for services thus undercutting patient confidentiality and taking health care decisions away from the health care provider and consumer


Fact Three: Although health care providers fees would be set as they are currently in 90% of cases, providers would have a means of negotiating fees unlike the current managed care system in which they are set in corporate board rooms with profits, not patient care, in mind


Fact Four: Taxes, fees and benefits would be decided by the insurer which would be under the control of a diverse board representing consumers, providers, business and government. It would not be a government controlled system, although the government would have to approve the taxes. The system would be run by a public trust, not the government.


Conclusion: Single payer, universal health care administered by a state public health system would be much more democratic and much less intrusive than our current system. Consumers and providers would have a voice in determining benefits, rates and taxes. Problems with free choice, confidentiality and medical decision making would be resolved
Myth Five: Universal Health Care Is Socialized Medicine And Would Be Unacceptable To The Public
Fact One: Single payer universal health care is not socialized medicine. It is health care payment system, not a health care delivery system. Health care providers would be in fee for service practice, and would not be employees of the government, which would be socialized medicine. Single payer health care is not socialized medicine, any more than the public funding of education is socialized education, or the public funding of the defense industry is socialized defense.


Fact Two: Repeated national and state polls have shown that between 60 and 75% of Americans would like a universal health care system (see The Harris Poll #78, October 20, 2005)


Conclusion: Single payer, universal health care is not socialized medicine and would be preferred by the majority of the citizens of this country
Myth Six: The Problems With The US Health Care System Are Being Solved and Are Best Solved By Private Corporate Managed Care Medicine because they are the most efficient
Fact One: Private for profit corporation are the lease efficient deliverer of health care. They spend between 20 and 30% of premiums on administration and profits. The public sector is the most efficient. Medicare spends 3% on administration.


Fact Two: The same procedure in the same hospital the year after conversion from not-for profit to for-profit costs in between 20 to 35% more


Fact Three: Health care costs in the United States grew more in the United States under managed care in 1990 to 1996 than any other industrialized nation with single payer universal health care


Fact Four: The quality of health care in the US has deteriorated under managed care. Access problems have increased. The number of uninsured has dramatically increased (increase of 10 million to 43.4 million from 1989 to 1996, increase of 2.4% from 1989 to 1996- 16% in 1996 and increasing each year).


Fact Five: The level of satisfaction with the US health care system is the lowest of any industrialized nation.


Fact Six: 80% of citizens and 71% of doctors believe that managed care has caused quality of care to be compromised


Conclusion: For profit, managed care can not solve the US health care problems because health care is not a commodity that people shop for, and quality of care must always be compromised when the motivating factor for corporations is to save money through denial of care and decreasing provider costs. In addition managed care has introduced problems of patient confidentiality and disrupted the continuity of care through having limited provider networks.
Overall Answer to the questions Why doesn’t the US have single payer universal health care when single payer universal health care is the most efficient, most democratic and most equitable means to deliver health care? Why does the United States remain wedded to an inefficient, autocratic and immoral system that makes health care accessible to the wealthy and not the poor when a vast majority of citizens want it to be a right of citizenship?
Conclusion: Corporations are able to buy politicians through our campaign finance system and control the media to convince people that corporate health care is democratic, represents freedom, and is the most efficient system for delivering health care

I don’t know how old you are, you must have been born in the 1980s. You can’t have a discussion based on GOP talking points. You have to have facts and back them up. Let me spell it out to you. Before GW came in to office, Medicare and Social Security was solvent and due to Clinton’s attempt to pay down the dept, was on its way to solid. The good news is that after 8 years of Bush and Cheney and 6 years of a republican Congress and Senate, the people are feed up. The next President will achieve what Hillary couldn’t, universal, single payer health care.
 
<font size="5"><center>Woman pleads guilty to $20.5 million fraud
Twin Sister Commits Suicide</font size></center>


The State
By CLIF LeBLANC - cleblanc@thestate.com
Fri, Aug. 17, 2007

A Lexington County businesswoman admitted in court Thursday she bilked U.S. taxpayers for $20.5 million in shipping costs for Pentagon supplies, a crime that also led her twin sister to commit suicide.

Charlene Corley, 46, pleaded guilty to a nine-year fraud that included charging the Pentagon $998,798.38 for shipping two 19-cent bolt washers.

Corley and her sister Darlene Wooten created companies to launder the money, then bought four beach homes, 10 luxury cars, boats and jewelry and took expensive vacations, federal prosecutors said.

The company Corley and Wooten owned, C & D Distributors on Augusta Highway, also received $445,640.75 for shipping an $8.75 plumbing tube elbow and $492,096.99 for a $10.99 threaded machine plug, according to the charges.

Pentagon records show C & D received $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Bloomberg news service reported.

Altogether, C & D submitted invoices to the Defense Department for shipping costs that totaled $71,611,296.12, according to the charges released for the first time Thursday.

The sisters are members of well-known Lexington County families — Corley, Roof, Shuler and Sox — that were among the first settlers of the Midlands in the mid-1700s. Relatives are known in banking, retail and land development circles.

Corley remained calm and controlled in court. She said little beyond answering the judge’s questions and declined comment afterward.

Corley faces up to 40 years and $750,000 in fines, plus forfeiture of the Edisto Beach-area homes, cars and other properties the government said she acquired. She is free until her next court appearance, but is being monitored by the federal probation office. A sentencing date has not been set.

Her lawyer, Greg Harris, said Corley did not submit any invoices and knew little about what Wooten was doing.

“She realizes now that perhaps she turned a blind eye to the activities of her sister,” Harris said. “There were a lot of assets that her sister accumulated ... that she did not know about.”

Harris said Wooten’s Oct. 2 suicide note instructs Corley on how to gain electronic access to the bank accounts that held their profits. Corley already had access at the bank.

He said Wooten told Defense Department investigators on the day she shot herself: “This is my problem. My sister didn’t have anything to do with this.”

But prosecutors said they can show Corley knew the shipping costs, worked with local suppliers to get equipment for the Pentagon, corresponded with the Defense Department and was a contact on the computerized forms used to bid on the contracts.

They called Corley’s role, at minimum, “willful blindness.”

“These twin sisters split these assets,” federal prosecutor Kevin McDonald said. “Charlene Corley and Darlene Wooten equally shared in the proceeds of this fraud.”

The U.S. Attorney’s office said the investigation is not over.

C & D had about five employees, Harris said. Court records show the sisters had five businesses, and six accounts at First Community Bank.

Their businesses date to 1991, when they made and distributed business signs, then began delivering appliances for contractors building new homes, Harris said.

The government said they began defrauding taxpayers by November 1997 and continued until September 2006.

A computer flagged a $968,949.38 cost for shipping two additional 19-cent washers because that expense required a separate authorization that had not been granted, prosecutor Winston Holliday said.

That led to an audit that turned into an investigation.

Holliday said the women had created two shell companies, Industrial Building Materials and United Tech, to launder their profits and pay their personal expenses.

Besides the beach houses, they bought three 2007 Mercedes S and SL models; a 2007 BMW 550i; five slightly older Lexus models, ranging from the flagship LS430 to SUVs and a two-seater.

Their shopping spree extended to a 23-foot outboard Suntracker and a 10-foot inboard Kawaski jet ski.

Prosecutors did not itemize jewelry they said was bought in New York and elsewhere.

The sisters also took a vacation to Alaska, but details were unavailable.

Family members identified Corley as the niece of Jimmy Roof, a former Springdale tire dealer who pleaded guilty in another federal fraud case in 2002.

Roof admitted then he conspired to defraud investors and plotted to launder their investments through offshore bank accounts for an Atlanta-based car-title loan company called Cash 4 Titles.

Federal investigators at the time called it the biggest pyramid scheme in the history of the Security and Exchange Commission.

Friends and relatives thought the sisters were well-respected and hard-working.

Ted Stambolitis, Lexington town councilman and the sisters’ landlord when they ran Nestle Tollhouse Cafe at the Shoppes at Flight Deck, had heard rumors about the federal charges.

Yet, “I thought they were running a legitimate, successful business,” he said.

Robin Bowers, former owner of Tiddlywinks Toys, a neighbor of Nestle Tollhouse Cafe, said she was shocked to hear of the charges.

“They’re well thought of in the community, are well-established in the community,” Bowers said.

Raymond Caughman, a retired local banker, is a first cousin of Corley and Wooten’s mother.

“They were very outgoing people, very forthcoming; had good personalities, good ambitions and business ability.”

Staff writers Tim Flach and Lezlie Patterson contributed. Reach LeBlanc at (803) 771-8664.

http://www.thestate.com/news/story/148373.html
 
QueEx said:
<font size="5"><center>Woman pleads guilty to $20.5 million fraud
Twin Sister Commits Suicide</font size></center>


The State
By CLIF LeBLANC - cleblanc@thestate.com
Fri, Aug. 17, 2007

A Lexington County businesswoman admitted in court Thursday she bilked U.S. taxpayers for $20.5 million in shipping costs for Pentagon supplies, a crime that also led her twin sister to commit suicide.

Charlene Corley, 46, pleaded guilty to a nine-year fraud that included charging the Pentagon $998,798.38 for shipping two 19-cent bolt washers.

Corley and her sister Darlene Wooten created companies to launder the money, then bought four beach homes, 10 luxury cars, boats and jewelry and took expensive vacations, federal prosecutors said.

The company Corley and Wooten owned, C & D Distributors on Augusta Highway, also received $445,640.75 for shipping an $8.75 plumbing tube elbow and $492,096.99 for a $10.99 threaded machine plug, according to the charges.

Pentagon records show C & D received $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Bloomberg news service reported.

Altogether, C & D submitted invoices to the Defense Department for shipping costs that totaled $71,611,296.12, according to the charges released for the first time Thursday.

The sisters are members of well-known Lexington County families — Corley, Roof, Shuler and Sox — that were among the first settlers of the Midlands in the mid-1700s. Relatives are known in banking, retail and land development circles.

Corley remained calm and controlled in court. She said little beyond answering the judge’s questions and declined comment afterward.

Corley faces up to 40 years and $750,000 in fines, plus forfeiture of the Edisto Beach-area homes, cars and other properties the government said she acquired. She is free until her next court appearance, but is being monitored by the federal probation office. A sentencing date has not been set.

Her lawyer, Greg Harris, said Corley did not submit any invoices and knew little about what Wooten was doing.

“She realizes now that perhaps she turned a blind eye to the activities of her sister,” Harris said. “There were a lot of assets that her sister accumulated ... that she did not know about.”

Harris said Wooten’s Oct. 2 suicide note instructs Corley on how to gain electronic access to the bank accounts that held their profits. Corley already had access at the bank.

He said Wooten told Defense Department investigators on the day she shot herself: “This is my problem. My sister didn’t have anything to do with this.”

But prosecutors said they can show Corley knew the shipping costs, worked with local suppliers to get equipment for the Pentagon, corresponded with the Defense Department and was a contact on the computerized forms used to bid on the contracts.

They called Corley’s role, at minimum, “willful blindness.”

“These twin sisters split these assets,” federal prosecutor Kevin McDonald said. “Charlene Corley and Darlene Wooten equally shared in the proceeds of this fraud.”

The U.S. Attorney’s office said the investigation is not over.

C & D had about five employees, Harris said. Court records show the sisters had five businesses, and six accounts at First Community Bank.

Their businesses date to 1991, when they made and distributed business signs, then began delivering appliances for contractors building new homes, Harris said.

The government said they began defrauding taxpayers by November 1997 and continued until September 2006.

A computer flagged a $968,949.38 cost for shipping two additional 19-cent washers because that expense required a separate authorization that had not been granted, prosecutor Winston Holliday said.

That led to an audit that turned into an investigation.

Holliday said the women had created two shell companies, Industrial Building Materials and United Tech, to launder their profits and pay their personal expenses.

Besides the beach houses, they bought three 2007 Mercedes S and SL models; a 2007 BMW 550i; five slightly older Lexus models, ranging from the flagship LS430 to SUVs and a two-seater.

Their shopping spree extended to a 23-foot outboard Suntracker and a 10-foot inboard Kawaski jet ski.

Prosecutors did not itemize jewelry they said was bought in New York and elsewhere.

The sisters also took a vacation to Alaska, but details were unavailable.

Family members identified Corley as the niece of Jimmy Roof, a former Springdale tire dealer who pleaded guilty in another federal fraud case in 2002.

Roof admitted then he conspired to defraud investors and plotted to launder their investments through offshore bank accounts for an Atlanta-based car-title loan company called Cash 4 Titles.

Federal investigators at the time called it the biggest pyramid scheme in the history of the Security and Exchange Commission.

Friends and relatives thought the sisters were well-respected and hard-working.

Ted Stambolitis, Lexington town councilman and the sisters’ landlord when they ran Nestle Tollhouse Cafe at the Shoppes at Flight Deck, had heard rumors about the federal charges.

Yet, “I thought they were running a legitimate, successful business,” he said.

Robin Bowers, former owner of Tiddlywinks Toys, a neighbor of Nestle Tollhouse Cafe, said she was shocked to hear of the charges.

“They’re well thought of in the community, are well-established in the community,” Bowers said.

Raymond Caughman, a retired local banker, is a first cousin of Corley and Wooten’s mother.

“They were very outgoing people, very forthcoming; had good personalities, good ambitions and business ability.”

Staff writers Tim Flach and Lezlie Patterson contributed. Reach LeBlanc at (803) 771-8664.

http://www.thestate.com/news/story/148373.html




WOW!! So one sister can't live with the knowledge of what shes done, and kills herself (which is probably what sparked the investigation). Then Corley (the twin) blamed her dead sister, for single handedly stealing $71 million dollars from US. She then claimed she had no idea, and didn't pay close enough attention to what her sister was doing.

Corley had to have seen the bank statements for millions when she knew they weren't doing anything worth millions. I wonder how many other Government contractors have been defrauding the American tax payer so easily.

Isn't someone suppose to read the invoice?
 
Would anyone here participate in a seperate thread discussing the benefits and/or drawbacks of Socialized/Single Payer/Universal Healthcare?
 
Fuckallyall said:
Would anyone here participate in a seperate thread discussing the benefits and/or drawbacks of Socialized/Single Payer/Universal Healthcare?

Why, your augments against it are that government is incompetent. I say it’s the people that hate government that are incompetent.
 
thoughtone said:
Why, your augments against it are that government is incompetent. I say it’s the people that hate government that are incompetent.
Is that a yes or a no from you ?
 
This thread or a new thread makes no difference

It's obvious the current system isn't working and geared toward profit making for the insurance and pharmacuetical industries. Healthcare for the masses is an afterthought in their minds to be managed with political lobbying and massive PR campaigns.

Dollar for dollar or some percentage of your health bill taken off your taxes is just another form of taxpayer subsidy for the insurance and drug industry. Just think about it for a minute......you pay healthcare cost out of pocket then come April you deduct it from your tax liability. For major medical procedures this would in effect break the national treasury having to refund the cost of such things as heart attacks, cancer, major traumatic accidents, long term therapy/rehab and so on. Even for relatively minor injuries this would cost the treasury billions, no doubt more than what a persons yearly tax liability is. And what about minors they pay no taxes will parents be able to deduct their cost also?....How about the unemployed?...The working poor?.....Who pays for them?.....The retired?.........What agency is going to regulate this idea?.....Since it's a tax deduction are you suggesting the IRS be the primary regulatory agency?

After the treasury is raided every April when people in essence pay no taxes. What would be the funding mechanism for government. How to pay for infrastructure improvements?,....Schools?,.....National Defense?,.... and all the other stuff government pays for??

I have more questions for those that toss out the tax deduction canard without seeming to put much thought to it.


PEACE
 
thoughtone said:
Why, your augments against it are that government is incompetent. I say it’s the people that hate government that are incompetent.

That's a silly term to use when it comes to allowing the federal goverment control more of our money. Hate government? It's about looking at their track record but many people who depend on the kindness of strangers would support that kind of a system.

Doesn't mean I don't think people (taxpayers) should not look out for others who have fallen but your answer is to force other to pay for them, and those who can afford to pay their own health care. And using washington politicians, most of whom is beholding to big money interests to run the damn thing.

I would much rather pay for my own using tax write offs to pay for it or a health savings account to pay for my own shit. But Nancy Pelosi and most of the democrat party won't allow it. Hell, that bitch won't even support vouchers to move my kids from a fucked up school for a better one.

And quit posing national debt graphs because it's pure smoke and skirts the issue.

-VG
 
VegasGuy said:
That's a silly term to use when it comes to allowing the federal goverment control more of our money. Hate government? It's about looking at their track record but many people who depend on the kindness of strangers would support that kind of a system.

Doesn't mean I don't think people (taxpayers) should not look out for others who have fallen but your answer is to force other to pay for them, and those who can afford to pay their own health care. And using washington politicians, most of whom is beholding to big money interests to run the damn thing.

I would much rather pay for my own using tax write offs to pay for it or a health savings account to pay for my own shit. But Nancy Pelosi and most of the democrat party won't allow it. Hell, that bitch won't even support vouchers to move my kids from a fucked up school for a better one.

And quit posing national debt graphs because it's pure smoke and skirts the issue.

-VG

Don't blame me, blame the facts. BTW where are yours?
 
Back
Top