Star Trek Into Darkness - New International Trailer

A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
 
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.

ibkScHjgUw7rD.gif


They don't hear you.
 
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.


Good - I always wanted to know more about the Earth during that era.
 
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.

Dont get me wrong but I grow up on the past Trek but a movie who's villian is a human, that seems to be a star fleet officer that fucks up star fleets head people would deal more with earth but trust me its not really going to be all on earth from what has been said in screenings of it
 
Could it be the beginning of the eugenics era that bred khan? Just throwing it out there. :rolleyes:

Sent from my VS910 4G using Tapatalk 2
 
Good - I always wanted to know more about the Earth during that era.

maybe so, but the point of star trek is that it's stories are not earth centered.
not knowing much about earth is intentional.
roddenberry said that the star ship enterprise is a metaphor for earth; for what we are capable of while working together; which is why you had, for the era, a controversially diverse crew, including a japanese asian [post ww2], black woman [civil rights/women's rights movement], and a russian [cold war] etc..


Could it be the beginning of the eugenics era that bred khan? Just throwing it out there. :rolleyes:

Sent from my VS910 4G using Tapatalk 2
cant be. the eugenics wars happened in the late 20th early 21 centurys
 
Last edited:
maybe so, but the point of star trek is that it's stories are not earth centered.
not knowing much about earth is intentional.
roddenberry said that the star ship enterprise is a metaphor for earth; for what we are capable of while working together; which is why you had, for the era, a controversially diverse crew, including a japanese asian [post ww2], black woman [civil rights/women's rights movement], and a russian [cold war] etc..



cant be. the eugenics wars happened in the late 20th early 21 centurys

Different time line.;)
 
maybe so, but the point of star trek is that it's stories are not earth centered.
not knowing much about earth is intentional.
roddenberry said that the star ship enterprise is a metaphor for earth; for what we are capable of while working together; which is why you had, for the era, a controversially diverse crew, including a japanese asian [post ww2], black woman [civil rights/women's rights movement], and a russian [cold war] etc..

That might have been cool in the 1960's but we've seen all that already.
 
Different time line.;)

not completely.
the timelines were in synch up until nero arrived from the future.
for the purposes of writing, abram's and roddenberry's continuities
share the same history til that point.


That might have been cool in the 1960's but we've seen all that already.

if you are gonna abandon what makes star trek, star trek;
then why not just make a completely different sci fi movie.

 
None of us have seen the movie so we don't know:

1. How many scenes are on earth.
2. Who other villains might be in it like the Klingons or whatever hell y'all want helping the human.
3. If the villain in the trailer is really human. Y'all don't know what the hell the plot twist is.

Dry the tears until you've seen the flick. :hmm:

Looks dope.
 
not completely.
the timelines were in synch up until nero arrived from the future.
for the purposes of writing, abram's and roddenberry's continuities
share the same history til that point.




if you are gonna abandon what makes star trek, star trek;
then why not just make a completely different sci fi movie.


We already seen those stories already. We saw what happened when every story was a Space Mission, the shit got boring.
 
We already seen those stories already. We saw what happened when every story was a Space Mission, the shit got boring.

star trek was never about missions.
it was always character-driven, philosophical, moral stories,
about exploring humanity and human experience, comparatively. if you missed the nuance of that,
then it probably got boring to you because you didnt get it.
 
the movie didnt come out yet ninja is already judging it.:smh:

None of us have seen the movie so we don't know:

1. How many scenes are on earth.
2. Who other villains might be in it like the Klingons or whatever hell y'all want helping the human.
3. If the villain in the trailer is really human. Y'all don't know what the hell the plot twist is.

Dry the tears until you've seen the flick. :hmm:

Looks dope.

I'm still mad at abrams for the first movie.

Don't worry, when this movie comes out i'll complain and argue with everyone for 20 pages. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.

Just read this article and it made me think of this post. Apparently, it was all by design to appeal more to the international market.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/star-trek-darkness-heading-where-none-gone-foreign-124423696.html
Ditch Spock's ears. Lose the wacky costumes. Don't have characters spend so much time yakking on the bridge of the Enterprise.

That's the sort of advice Paramount is heeding as it prepares to open its sci-fi epic "Star Trek Into Darkness" on Thursday in the U.K., Australia and five other countries. Determined to make its sci-fi epic sequel a global hit -- unlike any of the preceding "Star Trek" movies -- the studio has gone to great lengths to make it more appealing to foreign audiences.

"I guess less Trekkie, more action might be the short story,
" Paramount's head of international distribution Anthony Marcoly told TheWrap Tuesday. "But since I arrived here 18 months ago, a primary part of my mission has been to make sure this movie succeeds at the overseas box office the way it will domestically, and our team has done a great deal to make sure that happens."
 
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
You are absolutely right -

wait didnt we have a Star Trek Movie where they ran around the whole movie trying to get Whales -

star-trek-iv.jpg
 
Klingons Spotted in New ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Viral Video

uhura-klingon-star-trek-into-darkness.jpg

movietalk-startrekintodarknessklingons630-jpg_004950.jpg





Well, at least we now have confirmation on at least one thing about the "Star Trek" sequel: Here there be Klingons, for sure.
Members of arguably the franchise's most popular alien race make fleeting appearances in the third and supposedly final "Distortion" viral video that features the villainous John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) offering a brief character study of a particular Enterprise crew member -- and an ominous foreshadowing of some life-altering decision they'll have to make in the film. This third video focuses on Uhura (Zoe Saldana), the "soul of the Enterprise" and the "force of compassion holding the entire crew together."


http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie...star-trek-darkness-viral-video-005121415.html
 
USS Vengeance is the name of the dreadnought class star ship. looks very cool. :yes:

movies-star-trek-into-darkness-uss-vengeance.jpg


Star+Trek+Into+Darkness+IMAX+poster.jpg

Looks like something from the next generation series. Anyways, they've shown enough to get my dollars one weekend.

Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
 
I stopped looking at the trailers a few months ago

just release this bitch :itsawrap:
 
Got my tix already for Wednesday night's IMAX 3D showing.

Hope this will make up for "IRON MAN 3".
 
Back
Top