A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
Good - I always wanted to know more about the Earth during that era.
cant be. the eugenics wars happened in the late 20th early 21 centurysCould it be the beginning of the eugenics era that bred khan? Just throwing it out there.
Sent from my VS910 4G using Tapatalk 2
maybe so, but the point of star trek is that it's stories are not earth centered.
not knowing much about earth is intentional.
roddenberry said that the star ship enterprise is a metaphor for earth; for what we are capable of while working together; which is why you had, for the era, a controversially diverse crew, including a japanese asian [post ww2], black woman [civil rights/women's rights movement], and a russian [cold war] etc..
cant be. the eugenics wars happened in the late 20th early 21 centurys
cant be. the eugenics wars happened in the late 20th early 21 centurys
Different time line.![]()
maybe so, but the point of star trek is that it's stories are not earth centered.
not knowing much about earth is intentional.
roddenberry said that the star ship enterprise is a metaphor for earth; for what we are capable of while working together; which is why you had, for the era, a controversially diverse crew, including a japanese asian [post ww2], black woman [civil rights/women's rights movement], and a russian [cold war] etc..
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
Different time line.![]()
That might have been cool in the 1960's but we've seen all that already.
not completely.
the timelines were in synch up until nero arrived from the future.
for the purposes of writing, abram's and roddenberry's continuities
share the same history til that point.
if you are gonna abandon what makes star trek, star trek;
then why not just make a completely different sci fi movie.
We already seen those stories already. We saw what happened when every story was a Space Mission, the shit got boring.
the movie didnt come out yet ninja is already judging it.![]()
None of us have seen the movie so we don't know:
1. How many scenes are on earth.
2. Who other villains might be in it like the Klingons or whatever hell y'all want helping the human.
3. If the villain in the trailer is really human. Y'all don't know what the hell the plot twist is.
Dry the tears until you've seen the flick.
Looks dope.
A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
Ditch Spock's ears. Lose the wacky costumes. Don't have characters spend so much time yakking on the bridge of the Enterprise.
That's the sort of advice Paramount is heeding as it prepares to open its sci-fi epic "Star Trek Into Darkness" on Thursday in the U.K., Australia and five other countries. Determined to make its sci-fi epic sequel a global hit -- unlike any of the preceding "Star Trek" movies -- the studio has gone to great lengths to make it more appealing to foreign audiences.
"I guess less Trekkie, more action might be the short story," Paramount's head of international distribution Anthony Marcoly told TheWrap Tuesday. "But since I arrived here 18 months ago, a primary part of my mission has been to make sure this movie succeeds at the overseas box office the way it will domestically, and our team has done a great deal to make sure that happens."
You are absolutely right -A star TREK movie where 90% of it is on earth??? Makes sense since 90% of people who like jj abrams' "star trek" aren't die hard star trek fans.
USS Vengeance is the name of the dreadnought class star ship. looks very cool.![]()
![]()
![]()