Sports Legal: FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid more than $82,000 due to line error

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/i...t-honoring-bet-paid-more-82000-due-line-error

FanDuel not honoring bet that would have paid more than $82,000 due to line error
10:00 PM ET
  • i

    David PurdumESPN Staff Writer

For one New Jersey bettor, the Denver Broncos were a long shot too good to be true.

New Jersey bookmaker FanDuel declined to honor a $110 bet on the Broncos on Sunday that would have paid more than $82,000, due to an error in the oddsmaking process, the company said.

"The wager in question involved an obvious pricing error inadvertently generated by our in-game pricing system," a FanDuel spokesperson said in a statement.

The bettor, who identified himself to News 12 New Jersey as Anthony Prince, placed the wager over the counter at the sportsbook at the Meadowlands Racetrack with Denver trailing the Oakland Raiders 19-17 late in the fourth quarter.


Won and done? Sportsbooks banning the smart money
Should bookmakers be allowed to refuse to take bets from customers? It's a growing debate in the legal U.S. sports betting market.


  • How sports betting went mainstream
    Not long ago an NBA ref admitted to betting on games and U.S. sports leagues were suing New Jersey. Now states are legalizing sports betting. How did we get here?
After quarterback Case Keenumcompleted a pass down to the Oakland 18-yard line, putting the Broncos in comfortable field goal range, FanDuel attempted to update the live betting odds to reflect Denver as a -600 favorite. However, according to the company, an error in the live-odds feed caused the Broncos to be posted as 750-1 (+75,000) underdogs to win the game.

Prince went to the counter, bet on the Broncos at the erroneous 750-1 odds and received a ticket that showed a potential payout of $82,610. At the correct odds of -600, he would have won a net $18.35.

Denver kicker Brandon McManus hit the 36-yard winning field goal with 10 seconds to play, giving the Broncos a 20-17 win, but when Prince went to the counter, he was told the bet would not be paid out at the 750-1 odds.

FanDuel instead offered to pay him around $500 and give him tickets to three New York Giants games. Prince declined to take FanDuel's offer and told News 12 New Jersey that he planned to hire an attorney.

"They said their system had a glitch in it and they're not obligated to pay for glitches," Prince told the TV station.


ADVERTISEMENT
"A small number of bets were made at the erroneous price over an 18 second period," FanDuel said. "We honored all such bets on the Broncos to win the game at the accurate market price in accordance with our house rules and industry practice, which specifically address such obvious pricing errors. We have reached out to all impacted customers and apologized for the error."

The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement is investigating the matter. The sports betting regulations that are in place in New Jersey state: "A wagering operator shall not unilaterally rescind any wager ... without the prior approval of the Division."

FanDuel's house rules, however, state that "where a blatant or palpable error is made in offers made, prices offered or bets accepted or in the transmission of any event on which we have purported to offer Live Betting, bets may be settled at the correct price at the time at which the bet was placed, as determined by FanDuel Sportsbook."

Other jurisdictions with legal betting handle the issue differently.

In Nevada, mistakes in the odds are not uncommon and can occur multiple times a month at sportsbooks. If a similar dispute happened in Nevada, the bookmaker would be required to contact the Gaming Control Board in order to investigate the matter.

Some Nevada books have paid off bets that were placed on bad odds but then refused to take action from the bettors who took advantage of the mistakes in the future.

In the United Kingdom, where FanDuel owner Paddy Power-Betfair has operated for decades, mistakes in the odds are called palpable errors or "palps" and generally result in voiding the bet.
 
I've seen (read) this happening a lot with slot machines and the casinos havent lost yet so dont see this being any different. He better off taking the $500 and tickets. Sell the tickets and probably walk away with 1k.
 
Lol he thought he was slick


Anyone paying attention woulda jumped on it.

Imagine winning a 100k scratch off and they say sorry we printed to many winners this month so we will just give u another ticket to scratch. My point is he did nothing wrong.

If they paid him it would be better publicity then a 200k commercial.

IMHO
 
Anyone paying attention woulda jumped on it.

Imagine winning a 100k scratch off and they say sorry we printed to many winners this month so we will just give u another ticket to scratch. My point is he did nothing wrong.

If they paid him it would be better publicity then a 200k commercial.

IMHO
Did you know that some states can continue to sell scratch off tickets even when all of the winning tickets have been sold and cashed in.
 
Dude should have taken the money and the tickets. Here's why.

If there's any disclaimer anywhere in their rules that says that they aren't responsible for errors like this, then he loses a court case. He can threaten to give them a black eye in public opinion over it, but the fact remains they offered him fair market value (and some tickets on top of that). My very small history with courts and judges in particular makes me feel like the average judge looks at this, sees a reasonable attempt to compensate the party was made, and tosses the case.

The only... only way he makes out with anything is if there is a consistent history of mistakes like this happening, and he can prove that it was either preventable or a deliberate scam. And nothing in this explanation tends to show that.

I appreciate a good hustle, but sometimes you just have to take your losses and walk.
 
In my layman eyes, I look at it this way...if he placed the bet and it didn't win, they would have kept his money.

So why the fuck do they decide not to honor it when he wins?

Hope Jersey gets his money.
 
They will take a hit in revenue if they don’t pay him...sometimes you have to charge shit to the game...just fire the person responsible for the error and they can recoup some of the hit there.


Question though....why are they allowed to gamble legally?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top