So pedophilia is a sexual orientation now ???

A study of the history of European male sexuality teaches how sick White Men have been since we taught them how to walk upright (on their feet) and before. All of their ritualistic tendencies and behaviors have never stopped being practiced, only hidden from public knowledge and awareness. The problem for us as African people is that our unfortunate desire to integrate and assimilate with these sick fucks is what will ultimately be our own undoing! You can't be around sick people;e and not become INFECTED!

The only way to deal with an Adult that wants have sex with children is to kill that Adult, PERIOD!
 
Their fetish/illness has become their purpose. They'll play whatever game they'll have to play and involve themselves in every movement that they hide in.

The fact that they women would be used to be the messenger in order to "soften" the message is manipulative and fucked up. Obviously they are saying that if their children were victimazed, they would understand their children's attacker. How wild is that? There is no rational dialogue to have where a pedo is not in the wrong.

With yhe population as big as it is now and growing, the rise of these people and boldness of their action are only gonna get worse. As if hasn't passed the point of vile already. They are trying to get ahead of the curve.

We still got people who suffer from racism saying it doesn't exist, and these folks out here admitting to being pedophiles and saying they just need some understand.

Get the fuck all the way out of here. They only understanding they need is that death for them should be certain.
 
I had to buy the 4th, 5th, & the 5th edition revision versions for grad school. I had the 1st 3 on my book shelf & didnt notice it till i started my masters program.

The difference btwn the 3rd edition & all the rest is the reformulation & reclassification of all aspects / versions of homosexuality & pedophilia in an direct effort to NORMALIZE pedophilia, transgenderisim, man boy love (its also an organization which lobbies to make it legal for grown men to have open same sex relationships with underage / minors & not be classified as pedo faggots.

Basically a small group of gay doctors & psychologist conspired to make the changes that would reflect all forms of faggotry & pedophilia as normal. What they did & how they did it wasnt discovered until it was too late.

The adjustments made & those continuing to be made work in conjunction with many of the provisions numerous colleges & universities have in place specifically for the lgbtq community & all of its variations which most normal / straight students arent aware of.

The university i attend for My grad program provides the equivalent of affirmative action exclusively for the lgbtq population.

Its some real low key type shit but it is maling its way to the public elementary / middle/ high school systems thru out the country.

This is how & why you see the vids of the drag queen trannies doing story time @ ya kids school.

Once this becomes a reality you wont have the social & or legal support to do what a normal person / parent would do.


The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is widely known as the bible of psychiatry and psychology.

But not many people know how this powerful and influential book came to be. Here’s a brief look at the DSM’s evolution and where we are today.

The Need for Classification

The origins of the DSM date back to 1840 — when the government wanted to collect data on mental illness. The term “idiocy/insanity” appeared in that year’s census.

Forty years later, the census expanded to feature these seven categories: “mania, melancholia, monomania, paresis, dementia, dipsomania and epilepsy.”

But there was still a need to gather uniform stats across mental hospitals. In 1917, the Bureau of the Census embraced a publication called the Statistical Manual for the Use of Institutions for the Insane. It was created by the Committee on Statistics of the American Medico-Psychological Association (now the American Psychiatric Association) and the National Commission on Mental Hygiene. The committees separated mental illness into 22 groups. The manual went through 10 editions until 1942.


DSM-I is Born


Before the DSM, there were several different diagnostic systems. So there was a real need for a classification that minimized the confusion, created a consensus among the field and helped mental health professionals communicate using a common diagnostic language.

Published in 1952, DSM-I featured descriptions of 106 disorders, which were referred to as “reactions.” The term reactions originated from Adolf Meyer, who had a “psychobiological view that mental disorders represented reactions of the personality to psychological, social and biological factors” (from the DSM-IV-TR).

The term reflected a psychodynamic slant (Sanders, 2010). At the time, American psychiatrists were adopting the psychodynamic approach.

Here’s a description of “schizophrenic reactions”:

It represents a group of psychotic disorders characterized by fundamental disturbances in reality relationships and concept formations, with affective, behavioral, and intellectual disturbances in varying degrees and mixtures. The disorders are marked by strong tendency to retreat from reality, by emotional disharmony, unpredictable disturbances in stream of thought, regressive behavior, and in some, a tendency to ‘deterioration.’”

Disorders also were split into two groups based on causality (Sanders, 2010):

(a) disorders caused by or associated with impairment of brain tissue function and (b) disorders of psychogenic origin or without clearly defined physical cause or structural change in the brain…. The former grouping was subdivided into acute brain disorders, chronic brain disorders, and mental deficiency. The latter was subdivided into psychotic disorders (including affective and schizophrenic reactions), psychophysiologic autonomic and visceral disorders (psychophysiologic reactions, which appear related to somatization), psychoneurotic disorders (including anxiety, phobic, obsessive–compulsive, and depressivereactions), personality disorders (including schizoid personality, antisocial reaction, and addiction), and transient situational personality disorders (including adjustment reaction and conduct disturbance).

Oddly enough, as Sanders points out: “…learning and speech disturbances are categorized as special symptom reactions under personality disorders.”

A Significant Shift

In 1968, the DSM-II came out. It was only slightly different from the first edition. It increased the number of disorders to 182 and eliminated the term “reactions” because it implied causality and referred to psychoanalysis (terms like “neuroses” and “psychophysiologic disorders” remained, though).

When DSM-III was published in 1980, however, there was a major shift from its earlier editions. DSM-III dropped the psychodynamic perspective in favor of empiricism and expanded to 494 pages with 265 diagnostic categories. The reason for the big shift?

Not only was psychiatric diagnosis viewed as unclear and unreliable but suspicion and contempt about psychiatry started brewing in America. Public perception was far from favorable.

The third edition (which was revised in 1987) leaned more toward German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin’s concepts. Kraepelin believed that biology and genetics played a key role in mental disorders. He also distinguished between “dementia praecox”—later renamed schizophrenia by Eugen Bleuler—and bipolardisorder, which before that were viewed as the same version of psychosis.

(Learn more about Kraepelin hereand here.)

From Sanders (2010):

Kraepelin’s influence on psychiatry reemerged in the 1960s, about 40 years after his death, with a small group of psychiatrists at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, who were dissatisfied with psychodynamically oriented American psychiatry. Eli Robins, Samuel Guze, and George Winokur, who sought to return psychiatry to its medical roots, were called the neo-Kraepelinians (Klerman, 1978). They were dissatisfied with the lack of clear diagnoses and classification, low interrater reliability among psychiatrists, and blurred distinction between mental health and illness. To address these fundamental concerns and to avoid speculating on etiology, these psychiatrists advocated descriptive and epidemiological work in psychiatric diagnosis.

In 1972, John Feighner and his “neo-Kraepelinian” colleagues published a set of diagnostic criteria based on a synthesis of research, pointing out that the criteria were not based on opinion or tradition. In addition, explicit criteria were used to increase reliability (Feighner et al., 1972). The classifications therein became known as the “Feighner criteria.” This became a landmark article, eventually becoming the most cited article pub- lished in a psychiatric journal (Decker, 2007). Blashfield (1982) suggests that Feighner’s article was highly influential, but that the large number of citations (more than 140 per year at that point, compared with an average of about 2 per year) may have been in part due to a disproportionate number of citations from within the “invisible college” of the neo-Kraepelinians.

The change in the theoretical orientation of American psychiatry toward an empirical foundation is perhaps best reflected in the third edition of the DSM. Robert Spitzer, Head of the Task Force on DSM-III, was previously associated with the neo- Kraepelinians, and many were on the DSM-III Task Force (Decker, 2007), but Spitzer denied being neo- Krapelinian himself. In fact, Spitzer facetiously resigned from “the neo-Kraepelinian college” (Spitzer, 1982) on account that he did not subscribe to some of the tenets of the neo-Kraepelinian credo presented by Klerman (1978). Nevertheless, the DSM-III appeared to adopt a neo-Kraepelinian standpoint and in the process revolutionized psychiatry in North America.

It’s not surprising that the DSM-III looked quite different from earlier versions. It featured the five axes (e.g., Axis I: disorders such as anxiety disorders, mood disorders and schizophrenia; Axis II: personality disorders; Axis III: general medical conditions) and new background information for each disorder, including cultural and gender features, familial patterns and prevalence
Damn...this is fucked up
 
A study of the history of European male sexuality teaches how sick White Men have been since we taught them how to walk upright (on their feet) and before. All of their ritualistic tendencies and behaviors have never stopped being practiced, only hidden from public knowledge and awareness. The problem for us as African people is that our unfortunate desire to integrate and assimilate with these sick fucks is what will ultimately be our own undoing! You can't be around sick people;e and not become INFECTED!

The only way to deal with an Adult that wants have sex with children is to kill that Adult, PERIOD!
While white people are the only ones in western society with the audacity to try to normalize this abusive behavior please don't try to convince yourself this is a black v white issue. Shit is a mental malformody that isn't race specific although its prevalence based on ethno identifiers is open for debate.
 
Yeah that’s the 1 thing I hate about the liberal left and it’s the one issue I would agree with conservatives and republicans.

You give gay people a inch they will try to take it a extra mile. First it was gay marriage and acceptance to now they want to push non binary bullshit. Men and female should not be labeled. These tranny’s want to push non binary so make it easier for then to date. They don’t have to be labeled a man or women

No wonder trump won.
 
While white people are the only ones in western society with the audacity to try to normalize this abusive behavior please don't try to convince yourself this is a black v white issue. Shit is a mental malformody that isn't race specific although its prevalence based on ethno identifiers is open for debate.

True.

Yeah that’s the 1 thing I hate about the liberal left and it’s the one issue I would agree with conservatives and republicans.

You give gay people a inch they will try to take it a extra mile. First it was gay marriage and acceptance to now they want to push non binary bullshit. Men and female should not be labeled. These tranny’s want to push non binary so make it easier for then to date. They don’t have to be labeled a man or women

No wonder trump won.

The left is definitely having a problem by not checking this shit.
 
damn france. i know you guys were open minded about sexuality, but geez
guess it will keep the ped0s in france instead of them going to 3rd world countries and spreading diseases
 
how many of the mufukkaz here that frequent the dominican republic spend money fucking little girls??? Plenty who wont admit it Im sure.

Them peckerwoods go to Ayiti too under da guise of foreign aid, missionaries and such only to have their way w/lil' girls.
 
If you look at CAC logic, it makes sense.

CAC LOGIC:
1.) Homosexuals are born that way and can't help it.
so that means:
2.) Homosexuality is on the same level as race or gender.
so that means:
3.) Homosexuality should be protected as equal as Racism and Sexism.
so that means:
4.) All 3 must be accepted equally in our society and public opinion of anyone that doesn't accept any of the 3 must be equally negative.

Switch out Homosexuals with people that want to switch genders(Bruce Jenner) and Pedophiles. It is the same logic.

The thing is #2 isn't logical. Neither Race or Gender is based on an action or behavior. Homosexuality(whether someone is born gay or not) is based on an act or behavior. Black folks are black and women are women no matter how they act or what they do. Judging or "discriminating" because of an act is not necessarily wrong and not comparable to discriminating against someone because of race. Personally i'm offended when people compare homosexuality and the "gay rights" struggle to black civil rights. A more accurate comparison of Homosexuals are people that engage in Bestiality. That is alot more accurate than comparing Homosexuals to Race because Bestiality and Homosexuality are both deviant behavior and neither one has a victim. Its just that both are disgusting to the majority of the population.
 
Stupid ass Crakkka logic. :smh:

IvuVmU.jpg
 
Them peckerwoods go to Ayiti too under da guise of foreign aid, missionaries and such only to have their way w/lil' girls.
where da fuck is that??? I never even heard of it before... ( not as a hangout spot :lol::smh: gotta stop that b4 it gets started! shit is real out here on these internets:lol:) Never heard of it period! country / city :dunno: where is it located?
 
By her logic rape should also be considered a sexual orientation. Yet I doubt she'd enjoy being raped daily. Shit is all about the use of force. Forcing anyone to do damn near anything against their will is illegal. End of story.
You can say pedos and rapists have mental disorders or whatever and maybe that's true, but we're talking about actions. You don't go to prison for your thoughts (not yet anyway) you go for your actions.
The reason pedophilia is so abhorrent is that an adult can exert so much control over a child that child may never tell what happened. How then do we lock them up?
To classify, to minimize the filth is a grave mistake. These sickos hardly need more encouragement.
 
They been preaching that shit forever.
They love to move to the Philippines were that shit is condoned.
 
Back
Top