Sirius to Buy XM in a 4.6 Billion Stock Deal

THE GRANDJURY

Rising Star
Registered
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sirius Satellite Radio <SIRI.O> agreed to buy larger U.S. rival XM Satellite Radio <XMSR.O> for $4.6 billion (2.4 billion pounds) in stock on Monday in a deal that gives all subscribers access to entertainers such as Oprah Winfrey and shock-jock Howard Stern.

The transaction, which faces regulatory scrutiny and objections from terrestrial radio companies, gives XM shareholders 4.6 Sirius shares for each XM share held.

The deal has Sirius paying about $4.6 billion in stock for XM, or a 21.7 percent premium to XM's closing share price of $13.98 on Friday, based on shares outstanding in the latest regulatory filings.

Veteran media executive Mel Karmazin, currently Sirius CEO, will lead the new company as CEO, while Gary Parsons, now chairman of XM, will hold the same position in the new company. It said Hugh Panero, XM CEO, will continue in his current role until the merger closes.

The merger would create a company with about $1.5 billion in 2006 revenue and an enterprise value of $13 billion, including $1.6 billion in net debt.

"This combination is the next logical step in the evolution of audio entertainment," said Karmazin in a statement. He said it will create "unprecedented choice for consumers".

The deal will face tough regulatory scrutiny. The satellite radio licenses prevent one entity from owning them, however Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin said last month that its rules are open to change.

"I think it's a close call, but more likely than not I think the Justice Department and the FCC approve it," said Blair Levin, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. and a former FCC chief of staff during the Clinton administration.

The National Association of Broadcasters, which represents local broadcast radio stations, immediately criticised the tie-up because it would concentrate the licenses into one company and accused them of seeking a government bailout.

"When the FCC authorised satellite radio, it specifically found that the public would be served best by two competitive nationwide systems," said NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton.

"Now, with their stock prices at rock bottom and their business model in disarray because of profligate spending practices, they seek a government bailout to avoid competing in the marketplace," he said.

(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky)
 
ucantcme73 said:
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sirius Satellite Radio <SIRI.O> agreed to buy larger U.S. rival XM Satellite Radio <XMSR.O> for $4.6 billion (2.4 billion pounds) in stock on Monday in a deal that gives all subscribers access to entertainers such as Oprah Winfrey and shock-jock Howard Stern.

The transaction, which faces regulatory scrutiny and objections from terrestrial radio companies, gives XM shareholders 4.6 Sirius shares for each XM share held.

The deal has Sirius paying about $4.6 billion in stock for XM, or a 21.7 percent premium to XM's closing share price of $13.98 on Friday, based on shares outstanding in the latest regulatory filings.

Veteran media executive Mel Karmazin, currently Sirius CEO, will lead the new company as CEO, while Gary Parsons, now chairman of XM, will hold the same position in the new company. It said Hugh Panero, XM CEO, will continue in his current role until the merger closes.

The merger would create a company with about $1.5 billion in 2006 revenue and an enterprise value of $13 billion, including $1.6 billion in net debt.

"This combination is the next logical step in the evolution of audio entertainment," said Karmazin in a statement. He said it will create "unprecedented choice for consumers".

The deal will face tough regulatory scrutiny. The satellite radio licenses prevent one entity from owning them, however Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin said last month that its rules are open to change.

"I think it's a close call, but more likely than not I think the Justice Department and the FCC approve it," said Blair Levin, an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Co. and a former FCC chief of staff during the Clinton administration.

The National Association of Broadcasters, which represents local broadcast radio stations, immediately criticised the tie-up because it would concentrate the licenses into one company and accused them of seeking a government bailout.

"When the FCC authorised satellite radio, it specifically found that the public would be served best by two competitive nationwide systems," said NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton.

"Now, with their stock prices at rock bottom and their business model in disarray because of profligate spending practices, they seek a government bailout to avoid competing in the marketplace," he said.

(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky)


This is pure bullshit.

As the article pointed out:
""Now, with their stock prices at rock bottom and their business model in disarray because of profligate spending practices, they seek a government bailout to avoid competing in the marketplace," he said."

Not using advertising as revenue????? In today's world????

Over-paying for content like Howard Stern.

Now what?

It's going to be another welfare handout (the white one called coporate welfare).

:smh::smh::smh:


It will be interesting to see if it will pass FCC.
 
satelite radio found itself in a catch 22. no advertisement revenue. this means they can only make so much money off subscribers. so now what do they do- raise prices? the reason why people like satelite to begin with is the "no commercials" factor, along with the "take my station anywhere i go" factor. but in order to maintain, they are gonna have to sell some advertisement or raise prices (which they may be prevented from doing if the deal goes through). hmmm....
 
wantyme said:
so whose stock is the one to buy and when?

long term investing? SIRIUS all day. XM stock is already inflated. In the short term, XM stock will probably see an increase since their stock will be traded in for SIRIUS stock at the rate of 1 to 4.6 (an 22% premium of current market value).
 
audio syndicate said:
its great for the owners..more channels...use of any receiver....better content..i can't wait


But the goal of the licenses was to create competition so that a monopoly doesn't exist.

That is why the FCC broke up the old Bell companies, to break monopolies not create them.....

Do you think rates will remain competitive with one one company offering service????
 
Don't think this is gonna fly. Maybe if the Republicans were still running the show it would, but since the Dems haven't completely sold out to corporate interests they'll probably block this blatant attempt at monopolizing satellite radio -- one can only hope. :hmm:
 
ronmch20 said:
Don't think this is gonna fly. Maybe if the Republicans were still running the show it would, but since the Dems haven't completely sold out to corporate interests they'll probably block this blatant attempt at monopolizing satellite radio -- one can only hope. :hmm:



CoSignage
 
Here was the trouble with Satellite Radio. It was a concept set in motion over 12 years ago, before the advent of Podcast, Streaming Audio, Wi-Fi, MP3 Cell Phones, Cell Phones with Radio, HD radio, etc. etc.

There's just too much free high quality audio content available now. So much so that two highly capital intensive audio companies couldn't survive by competing with one another ... the only way to survive was to merge.
 
my boy who owns a couple internet radio stations warned me that this might happen. once the internet or wifi becomes standard in the majority of cars manufactured, satellite radio is going to take a hit.
 
Back
Top