Should Yuri Kochiyama be honored?

Yuri Kochiyama

  • Condemnable

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7

Art Vandelay

Importer/exporter
Registered
Google Doodle- May 19, 2016- Yuri Kochiyama's 95th Birthday:

It’s with great pleasure that Google celebrates Yuri Kochiyama, an Asian American activist who dedicated her life to the fight for human rights and against racism and injustice. Born in California, Kochiyama spent her early twenties in a Japanese American internment camp in Arkansas during WWII. She and her family would later move to Harlem, where she became deeply involved in African American, Latino, and Asian American liberation and empowerment movements. Today's doodle by Alyssa Winans features Kochiyama taking a stand at one of her many protests and rallies.

Kochiyama left a legacy of advocacy: for peace, U.S. political prisoners, nuclear disarmament, and reparations for Japanese Americans interned during the war. She was known for her tireless intensity and compassion, and remained committed to speaking out, consciousness-raising, and taking action until her death in 2014.



Backlash- i.e. The Weekly Standard response:

On Thursday, the homepage of Google featured one of the search engine's doodles honoring the birthday of Yuri Kochiyama, a "civil rights" activist who died two years ago at age 93. After Google drew attention to Kochiyama's life, the Smithsonian highlighted the museum's "digital exhibit" honoring her. Kochiyama was one of the thousands of Japanese-Americans interned during World War II, and she spent the rest of her life speaking out against what she saw as injustice. Aside from supporting various civil rights causes, she was a big advocate for the Civil Liberties Act, legislation signed by President Reagan that approved $20,000 in reparations to the thousands of Japanese-Americans interned during World War II.

However, it's also fair to say that, her unjust internment notwithstanding, Kochiyama harbored an unacceptable degree of contempt for her country. It is appalling that Google would choose to honor her, and even more appalling the Smithsonian would spend taxpayer dollars paying tribute to her. Just to give you a flavor of how bad she was, consider this interview from 2003:

I'm glad that you are curious why I consider Osama bin Laden as one of the people that I admire. To me, he is in the category of Malcolm X, Che Guevara, Patrice Lumumba, Fidel Castro, all leaders that I admire. They had much in common. Besides being strong leaders who brought consciousness to their people, they all had severe dislike for the US government and those who held power in the US.

Bin Laden may have come from a very wealthy family, but by the time he was twenty, he came to loathe the eliteness and class conduct of his family…

…You asked, "Should freedom fighters support him?" Freedom fighters all over the world, and not just in the Muslim world, don't just support him; they revere him; they join him in battle.

…You stated that some freedom fighters responded that bin Laden's agenda is more reactionary and does not speak to the needs of the masses of people who exist under US dominance. bin Laden has been primarily fighting US dominance even when he received money from the US when he was fighting in Afghanistan. He was fighting for Islam and all people who believe in Islam, against westerners, especially the US—even when he was fighting against the Russians.

Giving credit where credit is due, this interview was unearthed by the left-leaning Vox, and even they are queasy about honoring Kochiyama. Aside from praising murderers such as bin Laden, Che, and Castro, Kochiyama was a full-blown Maoist who supported the South American Maoist terrorist organization the Shining Path, which has killed some 30,000 people.

Slightly less controversial, but also worth noting, Kochiyama was close to Malcom X. She was one of the few notable non-black black nationalists who was a big supporter of the Black Panthers, a group liberal America is still trying to canonize despite the inescapable facts illustrating they were a "murderous and totalitarian cult." And naturally, she was an outspoken supporter of a who's who of left-wing fugitives and criminals such as "Mumia Abu-Jamal, Angela Davis, Marilyn Buck, Assata Shakur and the Puerto Rican nationalist activists arrested after opening fire inside the U.S. House of Representatives and injuring five lawmakers in 1954."

Google should promptly apologize for honoring Kochiyama, and Congress should look into why the Smithsonian is blowing taxpayer dollars creating exhibits venerating this woman. (Senator Pat Toomey has already issued a letter blasting Google for their poor judgment.) More broadly, though, this incident should give liberal America pause.

Certainly, this publication has been on the vanguard of condemning Donald Trump, who has done and said alarming things to stir people up. But if earnest liberals wondering where this reactionary political movement may be coming from, well, take a look in the mirror. Liberal elites have spent decades unfairly discrediting opposing views to the point where the Smithsonian and arguably America's most influential corporation see nothing wrong in paying extensive tribute to an ideologue who spent her life defending mass murderers and is mistakenly regarded as a civil rights icon. And now we wonder why much of the country is tuning out those same liberal elites when they issue warnings about Donald Trump?
 
Just to round this out, here's the Vox article that triggered the backlash against Google (minus the part excerpted above) and one of Kochiyama's last interviews, from 2008, so you can hear her in her own words.

Yuri Kochiyama, today’s Google Doodle, fought for civil rights — and praised Osama bin Laden

Thursday, May 19, this year would've been the 95th birthday of Yuri Kochiyama, a prominent Japanese-American activist who passed away at 93 two years ago. Google is marking the occasion with one of its trademark doodles.

Some of Kochiyama's work was deeply, clearly admirable. As an associate of Malcolm X, she was an important nonblack ally to the more militant end of the civil rights movement. She endured forced internment during World War II, and was an outspoken advocate for reparations to internees, which would eventually be passed in 1988. She was a vocal opponent of the Vietnam War and advocate for inmates she viewed as political prisoners.

But other commitments of hers were more ambiguous. She was an outspoken admirer of Mao Zedong even after the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution. She praised Malcolm X for his "admiration for Mao and Ho Chi Minh," and worked closely with the Revolutionary Action Movement, an "urban guerrilla warfare" organization based on "a synthesis of the thought of Malcolm X, Marx and Lenin, and Mao Zedong." The activist Robert Williams gifted her with a copy of the Little Red Book, and she later thanked him for "the gift of Mao's philosophy."

Yuri Kochiyama was a supporter of the terrorist group Shining Path

Two positions of Kochiyama's stand out as particularly alarming. First, she was an enthusiastic supporter of the Peruvian terrorist group Shining Path, a Maoist organization that has conducted a brutal insurgency killing tens of thousands of people since 1980.Peru's Truth and Reconciliation Commission found that Shining Path personally killed or disappeared at least 30,000.

"Its tactics include the burning of ballot boxes and the public 'executions' of moderate local leaders and others, including nuns and priests, who are seen as rivals for the allegiance of the poor," according to a 1992 New York Times report. "In wildly exaggerated demonstrations of Maoist precepts, children have been killed for political 'crimes.' Amnesty International says the guerrillas routinely torture, mutilate and murder captives."

"We reject and condemn human rights because they are reactionary, counter-revolutionary, bourgeois rights," founder Abimael Guzmán declared in one document. "Rather than concentrate its attacks on the armed forces or police, Shining Path has predominantly singled out civilians," Human Rights Watch noted in 1997. "The Shining Path has pragmatically avoided taking captives unless it intends to execute them … Shining Path has been reported to torture captured civilians before executing them." Shining Path also used rape as a weapon of war.

This did not appear to bother Kochiyama, who joined a delegation to Peru organized by the Maoist Revolutionary Communist Party, which defends the Great Leap Forward andthe Cultural Revolution. She read, in her words, "the kind of reading materials that I could become 'educated' on the real situation in Peru; not the slanted reports of corporate America. The more I read, the more I came to completely support the revolution in Peru." In other words, she read, and believed, Maoist propaganda denying Shining Path's war crimes.

After her return from Peru, she declared, "What has been taking place in both Peru and the US is a serious campaign to discredit Guzmán and the Shining Path movement, tainting them as terrorists, undermining their struggle with lies, isolating them, and intimidating anyone who might support them."

Yuri Kochiyama declared Osama bin Laden "one of the people that I admire"

Kochiyama was a thorough-going opponent of what she viewed as American imperialism, and like some radical anti-imperialists this occasionally led her to admiring truly loathsome figures, because she thought they were effective at combating American empire. Abimael Guzmán was one. Osama bin Laden was another.

(Interview excerpt deleted, already posted above. -AV)

To be clear, this is Kochiyama defending bin Laden — who, besides being a mass murderer, was a vicious misogynist and hardly the brave anti-imperial class traitor Kochiyama fancies him as — against other leftists who correctly noted that you can oppose American imperialism without allying or supporting violent jihadism.

Kochiyama's praise for Che Guevara and Fidel Castro is also controversial, and, I think wrong, but is at least somewhat common on the left. Sympathy for Shining Path and bin Laden, by contrast, is not a common left position basically anywhere.


Yuri Kochiyama on Her Internment in WWII Japanese-American Detention Camp & Malcolm X Assassination

 
The critics, the malcontents, the activists.... they're the ones that actually "love" their country. Love means struggle. The folks who prattle on about patriotism and are content to leave things unchanged are more or less useless. History will never remember them and their false piety.
 
The critics, the malcontents, the activists.... they're the ones that actually "love" their country. Love means struggle. The folks who prattle on about patriotism and are content to leave things unchanged are more or less useless. History will never remember them and their false piety.

I think this paragraph shows how easy it is to disqualify critics and activists based on association:

Slightly less controversial, but also worth noting, Kochiyama was close to Malcom [sic] X. She was one of the few notable non-black black nationalists who was a big supporter of the Black Panthers, a group liberal America is still trying to canonize despite the inescapable facts illustrating they were a "murderous and totalitarian cult." And naturally, she was an outspoken supporter of a who's who of left-wing fugitives and criminals such as "Mumia Abu-Jamal, Angela Davis, Marilyn Buck, Assata Shakur and the Puerto Rican nationalist activists arrested after opening fire inside the U.S. House of Representatives and injuring five lawmakers in 1954."​
  • 1. Her relationship with Malcolm X was "slightly less controversial" than her views on bin Laden??? That's just absurd.
  • 2. The Black Panthers are "a group liberal America is still trying to canonize despite the inescapable facts illustrating they were a 'murderous and totalitarian cult.'"
  • 3. "She was an outspoken supporter of a who's who of left-wing fugitives and criminals such as "Mumia Abu-Jamal, Angela Davis, Marilyn Buck, Assata Shakur and the Puerto Rican nationalist activists arrested after opening fire inside the U.S. House."
A liberal publication like Vox would never make these criticisms but it's crazy that a mainstream and influential conservative publication is equating support of Malcolm X to support for Osama bin Laden in 2016. I think that really demonstrates the slippery slope of vilification by association.

I'm not sure if I disagree with Kochiyama about bin Laden. I never heard about "Shining Path" until I read this yesterday, so I'm not equipped to judge. But I know those who work for the interests of Halliburton, Exxon Mobile and the rich generally are never called to task for their associations. It's fine to unflinchingly support George W. Bush, who can be argued to be responsible for more death and destruction than Osama bin Laden, but the opposite view is somehow forever out of bounds and disqualifies one from public honor.
 
As long as one suckles (usually a white male) off of the teat of status quo and practiced inequality for all without realizing it as such, they will always feel that those who wish to overthrow said systems are evil.
 
As long as one suckles (usually a white male) off of the teat of status quo and practiced inequality for all without realizing it as such, they will always feel that those who wish to overthrow said systems are evil.

So you think the statements she is being criticized for were fine?
 
So you think the statements she is being criticized for were fine?

Oh no! I didn't quote sharbaits earlier post. This woman should be canonized, knighted, and given her 32nd degree as a mason with full rights and privileges
 
Back
Top