Should College Athletes get paid? A very informative prospective. Agree or Disagree?

Should Athletes on Full Scholarship get paid?

  • Agree

    Votes: 5 62.5%
  • Disagree

    Votes: 3 37.5%
  • Don't give a damn!!

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .

TJervey

Star
Registered
Jay Paterno: Pay Student-Athletes? They're Already Getting a Great Deal
June 02, 2011 5:52 AM
by Jay Paterno
At the last meeting of Big Ten coaches, athletic directors and administrators, Big Ten commissioner Jim Delaney threw out an idea that has been tossed around the NCAA for decades: paying college athletes. In light of the recent situations involving players at numerous schools selling personal memorabilia, some have advocated paying the players as a way to avoid such problems in the future.
The idea is that paying an athlete's "cost of attendance" – in some cases up to $10,000 on top of their scholarship – would be fair since big-time football and basketball players generate so much money for their schools.
Let me start the argument by making a proposal to parents and students alike. I am going to ask you to work no more than 20 hours a week for 21 weeks – with at least one mandatory day off every week. For another 23 weeks you'll work no more than eight hours a week. You'll get eight weeks off. (These are all NCAA-mandated time limits).
You will receive fall, spring and both summer sessions of education, plus room, board and all fees paid. For the 604 hours you put in, you'll get an education valued at $33,976 in state and $50,286 out of state (using last year's numbers from Penn State, the latest available). Keep in mind that number does not include several hundred dollars per semester for books and supplies, which are covered under the NCAA scholarship.
At those rates, the student-athlete on full scholarship to Penn State will earn $56.25 per hour if he is an in-state student and $83.25 per hour if he is an out-of-state student.
As a bonus, this full scholarship allows you access to tutors and computer labs and player lounges – all free to you, the student-athlete. Any medical costs incurred beyond your insurance are covered. You can be flown home at the school's expense for funerals or family emergencies. There can be bowl gifts of several hundred dollars as well.
If you and your family have financial difficulties, this scholarship also allows you to receive any Pell Grant money you are qualified for up to the federal maximum of $5,550 per year. There's also a needy student fund allowing for several hundred dollars a year to buy clothes.
When it comes right down to it, this pay package looks pretty good to most of America. An opportunity to attend some of the top universities in the country and graduate with no student loans to pay off looks good when you consider the average college student in this country starts off with $24,000 in debt the day they graduate.
We haven't even begun to discuss the hundreds of thousands of extra earnings you can realize over your lifetime with a college degree that you wouldn't make without one.
Lest we forget, the "job" you'll have is playing football or basketball – a sport you love. If you have the ability and the drive, you will have a chance to play professionally after graduation at a starting salary better than anyone else in your graduating class.
But forget the NFL or NBA for a moment. If I offered that deal to every parent in this country, how many would grumble and say that it isn't enough? But no one discusses this side of the argument. Even members of the media will say this whole thing isn't really about education.
There is the rub. There is the problem. No one sells the student-athletes on the idea that they are getting paid more than $80 an hour for a part-time job. No one tells the student-athlete to go talk to other students on campus who work 30 or 40 hours some weeks and will still owe tens of thousands of dollars when they graduate.
It is all about perspective. The reality is that a few hundred more dollars or even a few thousand dollars to help cover the cost of attendance isn't going to erase the cheating that goes on. The cheating that's going on is for a lot more money than the cost of attendance.
The problem is what society sells to big-time athletes and their families. Society sells lights, camera, the NFL or NBA. Those are sexy products. What isn't being sold is education, studying and a chance to enrich the mind and get rich in the classroom.
While I applaud the idea of evaluating what we can do to help student-athletes, the truth is that the package they are getting is a strong pay structure. Schools, athletes and their families need to be reminded of what they are getting and how they can get the full value of the pay package they're receiving.
If a student-athlete demands the educational opportunity he is entitled to for his work on the field or the court, then he has received the most valuable pay he could get. Ultimately they control how much value they get from the university.
If they fail to see it, they should walk through campus and ask around to see how many other students would gladly take the deal that the full-scholarship student-athlete is getting.
 
Last edited:
Re: Should College Athletes get paid? A very informative prospective. Agree or Disag

the poorest ppl you will ever meet are usually college students :smh:

and being a student athlete is worst...how the fuck do you get penalized for selling you're SHIT, get nothing while the university is getting millions...coaches getting Millions...

but your dead broke...?!

bullshit...they need to give the kids something.....
 
Re: Should College Athletes get paid? A very informative prospective. Agree or Disag

Funny that I see this as a thread, because I just made my final stance on how I view if they should get paid...

I voted yes, but to a different approach...College football and basketball athletes should get paid on top of the supposed "scholarship" they get when they step into campus...Specifically, the college athletes that are playing for the supposed "Division I-A" or "BCS" schools. Why do I say football and basketball? They make the highest revenue of any sport by far...and two main points I have for each sport...

Basketball: The past few years have helped and hurt college basketball, mainly because of the crappy rule they have in conjunction with the NBA requiring players from high school to be in college at least one year before becoming eligible for the draft. While some players could use the experience, others really have no intention at all of being at a university...The difference between college football and basketball in terms of eligibility is that as a b-ball player, all you have to do to be eligible is to have an acceptable GPA for one semester...so if you only want to play college b-ball for one year, all you gotta do is pass classes for the fall semester and you are eligible from December through March, so you don't have to show up for any classes for the spring semester and still play ball...This has happened for those that stayed one year and left (Derrick Rose, anyone?) and felt like "hey, I got my semester in, so I'm gone...I'll see you in the gym" after the second week of December...more to expain here, but I have to get to my other (and bigger) point of...

Football: To me, this is my strongest point of why athletes of major schools should get paid...It's so crazy how schools in the BCS Super Six pull so much profit off of the game itself, I would have to write a thesis-style explanation about what some schools pull in each year. Yet, these athletes just get a college scholarship...50 to 80 dollars per hour for playing?! No sir, it does not work that way...I don't care if it is 30, 50, 80 or 100 dollars an hour that you speak of...come Sunday after a big game, does any of these players get that money in their hand? Nope...if they do, where does it go, to a bank where they can spend it (or more importantly, save it)? Nope. I heard from a legendary coach that back in the day when he played, they got $50 to $100 on top of room and board. They do not get that now as far as I know...

To pile on to the football thing, I will touch on the situation on THE Ohio State University (and to an extent, USC) football program. They "traded" memorabilia and sports jerseys for tatoos, rental/loaner cars, and other things...Here is my gripe(s) with this whole thing...Number one, it's THEIR shit...they should be able to do anything they want with it, sell it, trade it, whatever...the only exception is if they were required not to do that under their "Letter of Intent" or the commitment papers that they signed before they put on the helmet (which if true, is a raw deal). Even so, the players busted their asses off day in and day out, enduring pain, injury, and maybe losing a few good years of their life to bring an exciting sport to the masses. How can you not pay these players? Especially when so many people make money off of them...Need I say anything about the Fiesta Bowl Committee?

Here is the last point that I can fit on here for time...Can anyone here tell me how can the NCAA enforce rules on major college football? I am not certain about this, but that entity does not make any money off of the BCS division (and maybe never has)...I do not notice any signage of the NCAA in any football field for a BCS school, which in turn brings the point that the NCAA has never in the 100 plus year history of major college football crowned a national champion...so again, how can they make and enforce the rules?
 
Back
Top