Shit for brains aka shitty cuz hearing

Can BGOL lawyers explain to me how he can plead not guilty with multiple witnesses and cameras??? I’m sure they also tested his hands for gun residue. So again what the fuck is the point of a not guilty plea?
 
Can BGOL lawyers explain to me how he can plead not guilty with multiple witnesses and cameras??? I’m sure they also tested his hands for gun residue. So again what the fuck is the point of a not guilty plea?
What’s he pleading guilty to. 1st degree,2nd degree or 3rd? What if there’s a technicality. What if he had temporary insanity? Which I’m sure he’s trying to use the latter
 
Yeah but I made an error he's in private practice now as a defense attorney. He has switch sides

Ironic since he was crying at the press conference when OJ was acquitted and those prosecutors always played the moral high ground.

Yet he's now defending a gang banger who appears to have murdered a community activist/investor on video without a problem.
 
Where did Shitty Cuz get a tenth of the money to get him as his lawyer,unless he's trying to get his name back out there and doing it basically for free?

If I was a lawyer I wouldn't touch it,especially if I'm black and live in LA
Yeah I don’t know how but it makes sense if it’s pro bono. Some lawyers would die for this type of press.
 
Darden hasn't had the best relationship with our community since the OJ trial and his contentious relationship with Cochran so I doubt defending this cat affects his business.

Plus I'd be shocked if this made it to trial.

Darden is going to use this to get his name out there again and will eventually arrange a plea deal.
 
Can BGOL lawyers explain to me how he can plead not guilty with multiple witnesses and cameras??? I’m sure they also tested his hands for gun residue. So again what the fuck is the point of a not guilty plea?


He can plead what ever he wants. Ever heard the saying "ride the lie till you die"?
 
Its apparent, some of yall foolz are certified ignorant and can't be rehabilitated! In the US. your are presumed innocent until PROVEN GUILTY!! No matter the crime, cameras, circumstances, victims, etc. etc. Its called A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!

As far as Christopher Darden, he has a right to make a living and can work whatever side he wants provided there is not conflict of law. So yes legally he can defend OJ and then defend EH without it being a conflict. He is arguing the law and how it applies to the FACTS of the case. It is the prosecutor job to convict, not the defense. As far as his decisions about whom to defend, its not much different that what you choose to eat or not eat. A personal decision based on multiple factors. Somme big, some small, some obvious, some not so obvious. Being a lawyer is not always about right or wrong but about the law and how the facts apply in a particular case. That's why lawyers can defend the seemingly indefensible because its not about their client but about the Law & how the facts apply in that particular case.
 
Its apparent, some of yall foolz are certified ignorant and can't be rehabilitated! In the US. your are presumed innocent until PROVEN GUILTY!! No matter the crime, cameras, circumstances, victims, etc. etc. Its called A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!
tenor.gif



As far as Christopher Darden,
giphy.gif

u7vfIi.gif
 
Dude better hope he don't get put in gen pop.

:itsawrap:
He in Jail, so he would be safe. Not many people willing to pop off in jail because they have not been sentenced or even been to trial yet.

Prison is where he will catch it at
 
Can BGOL lawyers explain to me how he can plead not guilty with multiple witnesses and cameras??? I’m sure they also tested his hands for gun residue. So again what the fuck is the point of a not guilty plea?
They have not seen the case from the prosecutors. It would be foolish to plead guilty without knowing what they have against you. If you find later that the evidence is overwhelming then you strike a plea
 
Its apparent, some of yall foolz are certified ignorant and can't be rehabilitated! In the US. your are presumed innocent until PROVEN GUILTY!! No matter the crime, cameras, circumstances, victims, etc. etc. Its called A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!

As far as Christopher Darden, he has a right to make a living and can work whatever side he wants provided there is not conflict of law. So yes legally he can defend OJ and then defend EH without it being a conflict. He is arguing the law and how it applies to the FACTS of the case. It is the prosecutor job to convict, not the defense. As far as his decisions about whom to defend, its not much different that what you choose to eat or not eat. A personal decision based on multiple factors. Somme big, some small, some obvious, some not so obvious. Being a lawyer is not always about right or wrong but about the law and how the facts apply in a particular case. That's why lawyers can defend the seemingly indefensible because its not about their client but about the Law & how the facts apply in that particular case.
Blah blah blah none of what you said is usually applied to black folks unless like jay z said “you got enough money to beat the case”
 
Back
Top