Racist Trump supporters giving Roseanne cover by going after Bill Maher. Ignorant of History

Watcher

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Because Bill Maher says Trump’s father is an Orangutan Republicans say it’s ok for Rosanne to call a Black person a monkey.




Right-wing pundits want revenge for Roseanne’s firing, and they’ve set their sights on, um, Bill Maher
https://news.avclub.com/the-far-right-wants-revenge-for-roseanne-s-firing-and-1826420117



Ignoring the history of calling Black people monkey. Not the same racists assholes.


FOR CENTURIES THE WEST HAS FOUND IT USEFUL TO COMPARE BLACK PEOPLE TO MONKEYS

In the history of European cultures, the comparison of humans to apes and monkeys was disparaging from its very beginning.

When Plato—by quoting Heraclitus—declared apes ugly in relation to humans and men apish in relation to gods, this was cold comfort for the apes. It transcendentally disconnected them from their human co-primates. The Fathers of the Church went one step further: Saint Gregory of Nazianzus and Saint Isidore of Seville compared pagans to monkeys.

In the Middle Ages, Christian discourse recognised simians as devilish figures and representatives of lustful and sinful behaviour. As women were subject to an analogous defamation, things proceeded as one would expect. In the 11th century, Cardinal Peter Damian gave an account of a monkey that was the lover of a countess from Liguria. The jealous simian killed her husband and fathered her child.

Hotbed of monsters
Several centuries later in 1633, John Donne in his Metempsychosiseven let one of Adam’s daughters be seduced by an ape in a sexual affair. She eagerly reciprocated and became helplessly hooked.

From then on, the sexist manifestation of simianization was intimately intertwined with its racist dimension. Already Jean Bodin, doyen of the theory of sovereignty, had ascribed the sexual intercourse of animals and humans to Africa south of the Sahara. He characterized the region as a hotbed of monsters, arising from the sexual union of humans and animals.

The history of a narrative by Antonio de Torquemada shows how in this process Africans became demonised and the demons racialised. In the story’s first version (1570), a Portuguese woman was exiled to Africa where she was raped by an ape and had his babies.

A good century onwards the story had entered the realm of Europe’s great philosophical thought when John Locke in his 1689 essay Concerning Human Understanding, declared that “women have conceived by drills.” His intellectual contemporaries knew well that the stage for this transgressing love-and-rape-story was Africa because, according to the wisdom of the time, drills lived in Guinea.

In the following centuries, simianization would enter into different sciences and humanities. Anthropology, archaeology, biology, ethnology, geology, medicine, philosophy, and, not least, theology were some of the fields.

King Kong’s reel racism
Literature, arts and everyday entertainment also seized on the issue. It popularised its repellent combination of sexist and racist representations. The climax was the hugely successful classic of Hollywood’s horror factory, King Kong.

At the time of King Kong’s production the public in the US was riveted by a rape trial. The Scottsboro Boys were nine black teenagers accused of having raped two young white women. In 1935 a picture story by the Japanese artist Lin Shi Khan and the lithographer Toni Perez was published. ‘Scottsboro Alabama’ carried a foreword by Michael Gold, editor of the communist journal New Masses.

One of the 56 images showed the group of the accused young men beside a newspaper with the headline “Guilty Rape.” The rest of the picture was filled with a monstrous black simian figure baring its teeth and dragging off a helpless white girl.
https://quartzy.qz.com/1179366/hm-m...k-people-been-compared-to-monkeys-by-racists/

1917_Rainbow_Comics-The_Little_Nigs_of_Tiny_Town_UK.jpg

1907

knoml.jpg

1862
 
Last edited:
grasping at straws
there is no racial overtones or problematic history in comparing a white person to an ape

from the same playbook where they went after the MC at the whitehouse correspondence dinner. They tried to turn jokes about Sarah lying and wearing eye shadow to body shaming. Meanwhile those same ppl have nothing to say when Trump attacks women about their looks
 
Last edited:
Bill Mahr already got fired for some BS. Remember when Mahr said that Terrorist running into a crowd strapped with a bomb were brave when compared to the drone pilots shooting people down from 1000 miles away. He got the boot from PBS or whatever he was on. He's on HBO now, he ain't going nowhere til his rating drop. No advertisers to boycott eitehr
 
Look. Another racists doesn’t get the difference




Let’s see if those outraged at Democrats for not caring about Black people step in here.

BGOL TRUMP CHEERLEADERS

CAPTAIN

Megatron X

SQUAD
Entrepronegro --- Aldebaran --- 2 ONE 3 --- Southpaw --- Bumbay Da Dogg --- Mr. Del --- mc2 --- Gametheory --- actinanass --- Floss --- da_monumental --- Osca Lee --- jokekofi --- root69 --- princeprince --- kooper1 -- Complex — DaddyHemlock — Ego-Trip — MCP — play 030 — Autobot8655
 
Maher's comment was made in a completely different context. He attacked Trump's grooming, not his race.

With that said, Firing Bill Maher will cut off moderate Republican's access to liberal voters.
 
I was lmao at the tweets about this last night. Liberals were like "oh well, sorry to see you go Bill". A lot of progressives hate Bill.
Because he clowns Muslims and you know left wing hippies live them some Islam
 
its a bad comparison because the issue is roseanne was fired by ABC for talking shit on social media and as a show executive, the creator of the show and an social influencer is in the very real position of swaying or encouraging society to view blacks as subhuman, she has the means and the platform for doing just that and it reflects on ABC and Disney

Bringing up bill maher on hbo is a bullshit comparison becuz its 2 different networks with 2 difference mission statements. HBO is decidedly NOT family friendly nor has it ever been.

Now when bill maher was on ABC and did his show politically incorrect (a show designed to examine caustic and controversial topics mind you) and he talked shit about how brave the 911 bombers were for having the balls to pull off 911 HE WASN'T JUST FIRED IMMEDIATELY...YOU WOULDN'T SEE MAHER AGAIN UNTIL HE SHOWED UP ON HBO SOME 10 YEARS LATER!

The lesson here...MICKEY DON'T PLAY THAT SHIT!!


giphy.gif



ABC/Disney's action was consistent with how they protect their brand. So rightwing assholes bringing up bill maher talking shit on HBO is bullshit.
 
Now when bill maher was on ABC and did his show politically incorrect (a show designed to examine caustic and controversial topics mind you) and he talked shit about how brave the 911 bombers were for having the balls to pull off 911 HE WASN'T JUST FIRED IMMEDIATELY...YOU WOULDN'T SEE MAHER AGAIN UNTIL HE SHOWED UP ON HBO SOME 10 YEARS LATER!

Not even close...

Politically Incorrect last aired on July 5, 2002

Real Time with Bill Maher started February 21, 2003

He wasn't even off the air for 8 months... :hmm:
 
Not even close...

Politically Incorrect last aired on July 5, 2002

Real Time with Bill Maher started February 21, 2003

He wasn't even off the air for 8 months... :hmm:
well it FELT like 10 years:blush:
in any case the point still stands....ABC/disney doesn't play that shit and they are consistent in it. Comparing any other network to them is just a false equivalency
 
Back
Top