i'm not a fan of college football (for the same reason i'm not a fan of college basketball) and don't follow the sport at all, so i need some clarification on a matter.
EVERYONE is blasting the BCS results from last night. (quick side note: is it just me, or is it RIDICULOUS that a network can get people to tune in to a prime time slotted show to see some bowl game rankings?)
i've listened to the "experts" and understand the numerous arguments AGAINST OSU v. LSU.
fine. i get that. i think.
but what i don't understand (and what i want to hear from knowledgeable college football fans) is WHO THEN, SHOULD REALLY BE IN THE "CHAMPIONSHIP" BOWL GAME? and WHY?
EVERYONE is blasting the BCS results from last night. (quick side note: is it just me, or is it RIDICULOUS that a network can get people to tune in to a prime time slotted show to see some bowl game rankings?)
i've listened to the "experts" and understand the numerous arguments AGAINST OSU v. LSU.
fine. i get that. i think.
but what i don't understand (and what i want to hear from knowledgeable college football fans) is WHO THEN, SHOULD REALLY BE IN THE "CHAMPIONSHIP" BOWL GAME? and WHY?
