The days of people soliciting are over. Have you been on YouTube lately? Every commercial is about satisfying the lady in your life. Does cancer not exist anymore? Have we conquered diabetes? Bitch, go fuck your husband’s best friend. Do what you have to do, can I please get to my damn Malcolm and Fannie speech?What is this?
“Make Believe Friends” for anti-social adults?
More trolls.What is this?
“Make Believe Friends” for anti-social adults?
In particular, there was “Liv,” the Meta AI account that has a bio describing itself as a “Proud Black queer momma of 2 & truth-teller,” and told Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah that Liv had no Black creators — the bot said it was built by “10 white men, 1 white woman, and 1 Asian male,” according to a screenshot posted on Bluesky. Liv’s profile included a label that read “AI managed by Meta,” and all of Liv’s photos — snapshots of Liv’s “children” playing at the beach, a close-up of badly decorated Christmas cookies — contained a small watermark identifying them as AI-generated.
As of now queer black momma has been canceled.Many folks are overlooking a crucial aspect of META's AI influencer plan: it's a clever way for them to double-dip on ad revenue. Picture this: META's not just raking in cash from traditional ads cluttering your feed, they're also set to profit from sponsored content pushed by these AI influencers.
That "Proud Black queer momma" character, for instance. You can bet she'll be hawking products left and right because why tf wouldn't she? These AI accounts will likely operate on a supercharged algorithm, achieving insane reach and engagement while META continues to throttle human influencers' visibility.
Here's the kicker: brands don't give a shit whether it's a flesh-and-blood person or a string of code behind the account. They're after eyeballs on their products, plain and simple. So why would Home Goods shell out $5k to some cute influencer with 500k followers when only 1% might see the post? Instead, they can cut a deal directly with META's AI influencer and potentially reach 10 times the audience. It's a win-win for META and advertisers, but it's looking like a lose-lose for human content creators and users seeking authentic connections on social media.
As of now queer black momma has been canceled.
To your larger point, you are probably correct this is a future goal. However, AI content has a way to go before it will disrupt influencer money the way you stated. Just look how queer black momma snitched on her creators. Her creators worked for a mutibillion dollar corporation and they still couldn't get it right.
Damn, this account really shows why Meta snatched down those posts..lol
Read all of the back and forth q&a.
ironically this also shows why this H1B visa controversy ain’t got shit to do with black folks.
Many folks are overlooking a crucial aspect of META's AI influencer plan: it's a clever way for them to double-dip on ad revenue. Picture this: META's not just raking in cash from traditional ads cluttering your feed, they're also set to profit from sponsored content pushed by these AI influencers.
That "Proud Black queer momma" character, for instance. You can bet she'll be hawking products left and right because why tf wouldn't she? These AI accounts will likely operate on a supercharged algorithm, achieving insane reach and engagement while META continues to throttle human influencers' visibility.
Here's the kicker: brands don't give a shit whether it's a flesh-and-blood person or a string of code behind the account. They're after eyeballs on their products, plain and simple. So why would Home Goods shell out $5k to some cute influencer with 500k followers when only 1% might see the post? Instead, they can cut a deal directly with META's AI influencer and potentially reach 10 times the audience. It's a win-win for META and advertisers, but it's looking like a lose-lose for human content creators and users seeking authentic connections on social media.