Producer Explains Star Trek’s Teaser Trailer, New USS Enterprise

Gemini

Rising Star
BGOL Investor


enterprizebig1.thumbnail.jpg


There have been reports that audiences seeing Cloverfield this weekend are going wild for the attached Star Trek teaser trailer, but my screening was dead quiet. And I can’t tell whether the mere four comments /Film received on our post about the bootleg version being on YouTube (still there) are a sign of disinterest, mild disappointment or reservation for the official version. Up until yesterday, I had a bad feeling about J.J. Abrams’s mega-budgeted December vision for Trek. The casting has been all over the place, and the filmmakers’ hardcore need to include Leonard Nimoy and as much canon as possible reminded me of the early warning signs for Superman Returns. But the trailer struck a cord with me.

The steady shot on the U.S.S. Enterprise under construction perfectly evoked how vast, dangerous and mysterious space actually is, and Nimoy’s “final frontier” line didn’t possess the stark confidence I’d expected. Instead, it sounded foreboding and safety belt-worthy. The theme music even had a refreshed alien sophistication. After seeing what J.J. and his team did minutes later with Manhattan and how tiny and disposable humans were in a monster’s wrath, their Star Trek now has my full attention

Producer Roberto Orci spoke with Trekmovie.com to expand on the filmmakers’ intentions for the moderately esoteric and largely eerie teaser. To the Trekkies who remain adamant that the Enterprise must be built in space in accordance with canon, or “fanon” even, rather than on Earth, Orci breaks out the science and “creative license.” This is sort of impressive…


Firstly, there is the notion that there is precedent in the novels, etc that components of the ship can be built on Earth and assembled here or there. And the second thing is that the Enterprise is not some flimsy yacht that has to be delicately treated and assembled. The idea that things have to be assembled in space has normally been associated with things that don’t have to be in any kind of pressure situation and don’t ever have to ever enter a gravity well. That is not the case with the Enterprise. The Enterprise actually has to sustain warp, which we know is not actually moving but more a warping of space around it. And we know that its decks essentially simulate Earth gravity and so its not the kind of gravity created by centrifugal force, it is not artificially created by spinning it. It is created by an artificial field and so it is very natural, instead of having to create a fake field in which you are going to have to calibrate everything, to just do it in the exact gravity well in which you are going to be simulating.
Orci deadens the rumors that the Enterprise is shown being constructed at Area 51, but won’t confirm nor deny that the location is San Francisco. And he doesn’t seemed worried about the film’s title not being included on the teaser, which I found to be an extremely intriguing decision on first view. As for what the trailer is supposed to convey to today’s audiences…

This is who we are. This is real. This is maybe not so far off in the future as it used to be. In the 60s the cell phone was a fantasy. Now the communicator that Kirk had is not as advanced as my iPhone. It is a different millennium for God’s sake. We are literally a century closer than we were before.
What I found most interesting was the following quote, which implies that this Trek is both inspired by JFK’s pivotal role in the space race and hopes to refocus peoples’ attention back on exploration as well.

First of all, it has been written about that Kirk was in a way modeled after JFK. Like being the youngest captain ever, like Kennedy was the youngest President ever. Obviously the space race being kicked off by JFK is very much associated with Star Trek. It was also due to what we just discussed and linking it back to today. If we do indeed have a Federation, I think Kennedy’s words will be inscribed in their someplace. He kicked us off. And on a third level it is a slight nod to Star Trek Enterprise, in that we are not blind to the fact that going back to some of the more historical aspects of Star Trek that haven’t been covered in a while
It’s not everyday that I care to hear a producer wax on a teaser trailer, but Orci enhanced my take on it. Did you find the teaser to be too esoteric, too uneventful, or too, um, industrial? Do you feel that general audiences made the connection that it was for Star Trek, as there are quibbles from fans going about?
 
Seeing the ENTERPRISE in construction phase was AWESOME!

The teaser gave the ship an immense scope that you didn't actually realized on the TV series, and movies. Didn't come off like a little model.

Can't wait.
 
'Star Trek': Five facts

FACT ONE: Everything New Is Old Again Like Batman Begins and Casino Royale, this latest incarnation of Star Trek is a franchise re-start that goes back to Kirk, Spock and Bones' first days aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise. But instead of starting with a completely clean slate, Leonard Nimoy returns to the role of Mr. Spock to tie in the original cast with the new.

FACT TWO: Harold and Sylar Go to Starfleet Academy For the part of the young Spock, Heroes star Zachary Quinto will don the pointy ears. Chris Pine (Just My Luck) plays Kirk, Karl Urban (The Lord of the Rings) is Bones, Zoe Saldana will be Uhura, and funnymen John Cho and Simon Pegg are Sulu and Scotty. See the full crew in this photo slideshow.


FACT THREE: You're Dead, Jim William Shatner has publicly expressed his disappointment with not being included in the new film. But as any Trekker could tell you, Captain Kirk died fighting the evil Soran on the planet Veridian III at the end of Star Trek: Generations, the first movie that featured the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation.

FACT FOUR:
J.J. Loves the '60s This is the second movie J.J. Abrams has directed, and it's his second based on a television show from the 1960s. His first feature, Mission: Impossible III, was based on TV's Mission: Impossible that ran from 1966 to 1973. Coincidentally,
Leonard Nimoy had a starring role on both series.

FACT FIVE:
Christmas: The Final Frontier The new Star Trek won't beam up into theaters until December 25th. To bide your time until then, you can catch up on all of the old Trek adventures. All six television series and ten motion pictures are available now on DVD. And scroll down this page for an exclusive first look at the new teaser trailer.


 
Thanks for this. I saw this trailer as well and wasn't quite happy with what I saw. I did feel that the ship should have been built in space but I do agree that the parts could have been built on the ground. But constructing a ship of that size is a lot more difficult on the ground than it is in space.

Now showing the construction of this ship is minor. One of my biggest problems with Star Trek is continuity errors. The ship originally belonged to Captain Pike and Spock was his first officer first. I am hoping they at least keep that in order because I heard from a friend that JJ Abrams was going to toss some of the old Star Trek history out the door. If that is true or not we will have to wait and found out.

I may sound a bit harsh on this but its because I love this so much. I have just felt they should go forward in time with Star Trek not backwards. Enterprise went backwards to attempt to fill in gaps and look how poorly they did. Now they are going backwards in the movies. There are so many good books with stories stuff after Voyager its hard to find time to get through them all. I want to see Star Trek movies and series continue successfully but it seems no one knows how to take it in a good direction.
 
I may sound a bit harsh on this but its because I love this so much. I have just felt they should go forward in time with Star Trek not backwards. Enterprise went backwards to attempt to fill in gaps and look how poorly they did. Now they are going backwards in the movies. There are so many good books with stories stuff after Voyager its hard to find time to get through them all. I want to see Star Trek movies and series continue successfully but it seems no one knows how to take it in a good direction.

Cosign, That last episode of Voyager had me thinking they where going to continue going forward not backwards. I really want to know what happened to Starfleet after Voyager brought back all that new technology. I wanna see it on screen.
 
Thanks for this. I saw this trailer as well and wasn't quite happy with what I saw. I did feel that the ship should have been built in space but I do agree that the parts could have been built on the ground. But constructing a ship of that size is a lot more difficult on the ground than it is in space.

Now showing the construction of this ship is minor. One of my biggest problems with Star Trek is continuity errors. The ship originally belonged to Captain Pike and Spock was his first officer first. I am hoping they at least keep that in order because I heard from a friend that JJ Abrams was going to toss some of the old Star Trek history out the door. If that is true or not we will have to wait and found out.

I may sound a bit harsh on this but its because I love this so much. I have just felt they should go forward in time with Star Trek not backwards. Enterprise went backwards to attempt to fill in gaps and look how poorly they did. Now they are going backwards in the movies. There are so many good books with stories stuff after Voyager its hard to find time to get through them all. I want to see Star Trek movies and series continue successfully but it seems no one knows how to take it in a good direction.

Ditto! As I've always understood it, the weight of the saucer section would be too heavy under the gravity of Earth as are the weight of the warp engine nacelles on the connecting arms. Voyager is a completely different design and was touted for being a starship that could land on planets as one of its major differences along with using bio-nueral packs for faster ship reaction times.
 
Technology of Star Trek

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/fv1leW9En2E&rel=1[/FLASH]



 
I may sound a bit harsh on this but its because I love this so much. I have just felt they should go forward in time with Star Trek not backwards. Enterprise went backwards to attempt to fill in gaps and look how poorly they did. Now they are going backwards in the movies. There are so many good books with stories stuff after Voyager its hard to find time to get through them all. I want to see Star Trek movies and series continue successfully but it seems no one knows how to take it in a good direction.

Enterprise wasn't really a bad show, it just had too much competition on the days it aired. on Wednesday it was competing with Smallville in its prime and Stargate SG1 on Fridays. The should of aired the new episodes on Sundays at 7pm.
 
Back
Top