Politics: Trump just revealed a huge weakness. It may prove fatal & white voters are turning on him

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Trump just revealed a huge weakness. It may prove fatal.
(Patrick Semansky, File)
By
Greg Sargent
Opinion writer
June 8, 2020 at 10:29 a.m. EDT

imrs.php

President Trump’s advisers are letting it be known that he is seriously considering a televised national address on race and national unity. When your paroxysms of laughter subside, consider the serious point here: This reveals just how badly Trump misread the politics of this moment, to a potentially fatal degree.
This misreading highlights a political vulnerability on Trump’s part that has been exposed by the seismic events of the past few months — pandemic, economic depression and, now, a level of civil ferment sweeping the country not seen in perhaps a half century.
What’s been exposed is this: Trump simply will not, or cannot, operate out of any conception of what’s good for the country — the whole country. Faced with enormous crises, he has tried to pretend they don’t exist, or has tried gaslighting us into disbelieving our own eyes and ears about them, or has used them as occasions to demagogue and incite hatreds in ways he believes will help his reelection.
AD


But all the gaslighting and demagoguery have failed. Indeed, they have only further exposed that vulnerability.
A new $20 million ad campaign from the Democratic super PAC American Bridge homes in on this very weakness.
The group is targeting mostly seniors in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania with spots such as this one, which features a Vietnam veteran who voted for Trump in 2016 but is now voting for Joe Biden, because Biden has “the good of the country in his heart”:

Default Mono Sans Mono Serif Sans Serif Comic Fancy Small Caps
Default Small Medium Large X-Large XX-Large
Default Outline Dark Outline Light Outline Dark Bold Outline Light Bold Shadow Dark Shadow Light Shadow Dark Bold Shadow Light Bold
Default Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%
Default Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%
'WI: Bet My Life' | Campaign 2020


In this pro-Biden ad by the American Bridge PAC, a Wisconsinite and Vietnam War veteran explains why he won't repeat his 2016 vote for Trump in November. (American Bridge PAC)
“I wouldn’t bet my life on the next three things that come out of Donald Trump’s mouth,” he says.
The crucial link drawn here is between Trump’s lack of concern for what’s good for the country and his uncontrollable lying. Precisely because Trump has no such concern, he constantly lies to the country about the challenges it faces.
AD


This point is driven home in another one of the ads, which features an elderly Pennsylvania woman talking about the novel coronavirus. Biden, she says, “would have come forward at the very beginning and told people the truth,” that “they had something really dangerous coming.”
By contrast, of course, Trump lied incessantly to downplay the threat, largely because he feared the truth would rattle the markets and imperil his reelection. Here again the nonstop lying is the direct outgrowth of lack of concern for what’s good for the country.
Trump’s lying has grave consequences
Bradley Beychok, the president of American Bridge, tells me the group’s research has discovered a type of Trump voter who doesn’t follow politics closely but has grown persuaded that “Trump only cares about himself” and that “he’s not the president they expected.”
AD


“Right now is a clear moment to hold Trump accountable for not operating in the best interests of the country,” Beychok told me.
Beychok noted that the scale of the crises rocking the country have driven this home even more starkly. On the coronavirus, for instance, his lying has crossed from something that could easily be tuned out into something that concerns countless Americans’ lives and economic survival.
“Where they used to just chalk this up to, ‘there he goes again,’ they’re thinking, ‘now I don’t have a job, now I don’t have any health care, I may be worried about my parents,'” Beychok told me. “He’s saying it’s all fine.”
Indeed, Trump just laughably spun the new jobs numbers as a “rocket ship” amid the most severe economic depression in nearly a century. Ludicrously, his campaign used those numbers to launch a $10 million ad campaign proclaiming “the great American comeback has begun,” even though Trump’s massive failures are a large reason we’re in such a deep economic hole.
AD


It’s precisely for this reason that Democrats believe the stretch between now and Labor Day may be extraordinarily critical. As Beychok told me, Trump is using his massive financial advantage “to recover,” and Democrats need to “make sure that doesn’t happen.”
The damage Trump has done to himself with his lies and failures on the coronavirus is already obvious. But it’s now becoming evident that he badly damaged himself with his response to the protests in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd, too.

Opinion | Trump's 'law and order' tendencies are straight out of Nixon's 1960s



As President Trump threatens to unleash the military on American cities roiled in civil unrest, it's clear that he's embracing his inner Nixon. (Joshua Carroll, Kate Woodsome/The Washington Post)
Trump badly misread the moment
A new CNN poll finds Biden leads Trump among national adults by 55 percent to 41 percent. Only 38 percent approve of Trump’s performance — down seven points in the past month — while 57 percent disapprove.

The CNN poll also finds that 67 percent say the criminal justice system favors whites over blacks, that 60 percent say sending in troops is unjustified and — importantly — that 65 percent say Trump’s response has been “more harmful."
AD

The CNN poll might be an outlier. But other recent high-quality polls have put Biden up by seven, eight, 10 and 11 points. And some of these polls have also confirmed that large majorities see the protesters’ grievances as legitimate and broadly disapprove of Trump’s response to them.
Meanwhile, new Marist polling finds that 67 percent say Trump’s response has “mostly increased tensions,” mirroring CNN’s findings.
Trump — who has worked to deceive the country about the true nature of these protests by threatening to send in the military to quell “domestic terror” — thought he could use them to foment hatred and fear, to win back wavering (white) swing voters. But he badly misread the politics of this moment.

That’s only further revealed by the amusing spectacle of Trump’s advisers suddenly scrambling to persuade us that he will now give an address on race and national unity. But such a speech would just amount to the ultimate in gaslighting from a president who has deliberately incited hate for years, all to benefit himself.
AD

And it’s likely to be received by the public as exactly that.
Watch more Opinions videos:
 
'A push against Donald Trump': Why some older women are turning away from the president
A new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows waning support among women over 45.
By
Kendall Karson
June 5, 2020, 4:01 AM
12 min read




Ad 1 of 1


00:05
















Copy and paste to share this video

Copy and paste to embed this video


5:00
Does President Trump have double standard for protests?ABC News’ David Wright reports on the president’s criticism of demonstrations across the U.S., despite his praise for overseas protests.
Over three years into his tenure in the nation's highest office and five months before the country weighs in on his re-election, President Donald Trump’s struggles with older women, an important voting bloc for November, appear more acute in the middle of twin crises.
In 2016, Trump tilted the election in his favor after narrowly winning a handful of battleground states, and partly by performing well among white women - and older voters - even against the first-ever female nominee. Four years ago, although Hillary Clinton won women overall by a 13-point margin, Trump only lost women over 45 by 3 points (47%-50%), and won over both white women and voters over 45 with 52%, according to national exit poll data.
But this cycle, Trump is not only trailing Biden nationally by 10 points among registered voters in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll released earlier this week, he’s also seeing waning support among women over 45. Biden is now leading Trump among this group by 17 points, compared to 9 in March, in the latest poll.

Lara Trump gives an interview after a gathering of Donald Trump for President Women for Trump coalition kickoff in King of Prussia, Pa., on July 16, 2019.
Lara Trump gives an interview after a gathering of Donald Trump for President Women for Trump coalition kickoff in King of Prussia, Pa., on July 16, 2019.The Washington Post via Getty Images, FILE
It’s a hurdle that is emerging as the coronavirus pandemic ravages the nation’s seniors and Trump's "law and order" vision of leadership is up against its most critical test of his presidency as the country is engulfed by nationwide protests over racial injustice and police brutality.
MORE: Advantage Biden, with risks; Trump disapproval grows: POLL
In follow-up interviews with nearly a dozen women over 45, who span the ideological spectrum and geographic map, that participated in the ABC News/Washington Post poll, including some who formerly voted for Trump the first time around, most are turned off by his abrasive demeanor, divisive rhetoric and the tweets.
Not 'presidential'
"I voted for Trump. I did not care for Hillary. She was just not the role model I wanted for the first woman president," said Shannon Gridley, 78, from Orlando, Fla. Orlando sits along Florida’s crucial I-4 corridor in central Florida, which is often seen as a bellwether in the battleground.
A path to victory for Trump this cycle is expected to run through Florida, where older voters have an outsize role in the electoral fortunes of candidates in the state. In 2016, Trump won Florida by just over 1 percentage point.
Gridley, who said she identifies along the "moderate avenue," has been voting since the 1960s, starting with President John F. Kennedy. She is currently a registered Democrat and is voting for Biden in the fall, but has historically voted for Republicans far more, she said.
Behind her 2016 decision, as she put it, was the notion that as an outsider, Trump might "shake things up."
"Well, by god, he has shook things up, that is for absolutely sure," she said. "He disappointed me pretty soon. I didn't like the way he talked. I didn't think he was professional. I did not think he was presidential. I just haven't agreed with much of anything that he's done."
Another female voter, Donna, who declined to share her last name, from Springfield, Mass., which sits in the western portion of the state, told ABC News she’s voted Republican in the last two presidential elections, saying of 2016, "I was not happy four years ago with either of the candidates, but Hillary Clinton was the worst of the two."
"I voted for Donald Trump and hoped that he would rise to the occasion," she said. "Obviously, he hasn't. He is a petulant, junior high mentality candidate, and I feel that our country can do far better than that."
MORE: Trump campaign, RNC to resume in-person campaigning next week for first time since pandemic hit
She is now backing Biden in November, she told ABC News.
Elizabeth Vath, too, voted for Trump in 2016. But the 75-year old Republican from Glen Mills, Pa., is siding with Biden, she said, "because of the fact that I didn't see Trump do what he promised to do. I voted for Trump because I thought he was going to do something better for our country."
"He’s lying," she continued. "He doesn’t keep his promises. He curses and he swears and the language just turns me off. I’m sorry, but I was never brought up that way."
Pennsylvania was one of the three key battlegrounds that put Trump over the top last cycle, where he defeated Clinton by the slimmest of margins - 0.7 percentage points. It is also home to a majority female population, and one that also skews older than the country, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau compiled by the Pennsylvania State Data Center at Penn State Harrisburg.
Even a supporter of the president, who is voting for him in November, said she is repelled by what she sees as his immaturities and offensive language.
"I personally cannot listen to him on TV. There are a lot of times I would like to smack him and say, you know, your mother should have taught you better than to talk like that," Suzanne Sloane, 53, from Kalamazoo County, Mich., told ABC News in a follow-up interview. "I cringe ... I want a person who can stand up and support our values and support our country without getting down to a five-year-olds’ level of name-calling."

Demonstrators take a knee, June 2, 2020, in Philadelphia, during a protest over the death of George Floyd.
Demonstrators take a knee, June 2, 2020, in Philadelphia, during a protest over the death of George Floyd.Matt Rourke/AP
The Trump campaign did not respond to ABC News’ multiple requests for details about their strategy to bring this key demographic into the fold for the upcoming election.
Last year, the Trump campaign made its first major push for its "Women for Trump" coalition in August with a string of cross-country events to mobilize suburban women in key battleground states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio. The campaign launched the coalition focused on courting the women vote in July 2019.
Suburban women, in particular, represent a key voting demographic that was once the bedrock of the GOP but has been shifting away from the party in the Trump era.
In the 2018 midterms, when Democrats picked up 40 seats and the House majority, women accounted for 53% of voters, voting for Democratic House candidates by 60-39%. In 2019, in statewide and local contests in Virginia, Kentucky, Iowa and Pennsylvania, Republicans saw an erosion of support among suburban voters - and women in particular - allowing Democrats to overcome the allure of Trumpism. And the results were costly for Republicans.
This opposition could continue into 2020, and would be particularly damaging in battlegrounds across the electoral map, where a small shift in support could sway a state.
Trump’s troubles compounded by a nation in crisis
With dual crises now at the forefront of Trump's presidency, most of the women over the age of 45 that ABC News spoke with in follow-up interviews view the unfolding events as ripely exposing the unsettling and disqualifying aspects of Trump.
"His whole way to address the COVID-19 has been, excuse me, a s--- show," Donna said.
"Trump has been doing a rotten job with health care as well as with the epidemic. We can only pray and hope and vote," Vath said.
Pamela Cooper, 62, from Kannapolis, N.C., which sits in the suburbs of Charlotte, is supporting Biden in the general election, after having voted Republican up until Trump, because she said, "I think that he is definitely promoting racism."
"The pandemic is scary enough without the rioting," she said. "The only way to fight all of this is with love and understanding and compassion...violence against violence never works. These are just scary, scary times and we need a new leader."
Lynda, a voter who decided not to give her last name, from Kent County, Mich., which covers Grand Rapids and its suburbs and sided with Trump by a three-point margin in 2016, said she is "not impressed with Trump. I’ve got bitter feelings towards Trump. I’m not happy with the way he has dealt with his power and neglected the American people."
He is sowing division, she said, at a time when the country is looking for comfort and solidarity.
"He's supposed to be uniting everybody, not dividing everybody. He is supposed to be taking care of us," she said. "I think Trump should be more focused on the White House, the American people and leave Twitter alone."
A rejection of Trump, in their words
But the election still all comes down to Trump.
For the most part, the interviews with these women revealed that many see the contest as a referendum on his administration and his leadership, with most saying their decision is fueled by, as Donna said, "a push against Donald Trump," rather than a pull towards Biden.
"If Biden is the only Democrat, I will vote for Biden," Lynda said. "I wish I had another option but I don't at the moment."

Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden poses for a picture with Pastor of the Bethel AME Church, Rev. Dr. Silvester S. Beaman and attendees during a visit to the Bethel... more
Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden poses for a picture with Pastor of the Bethel AME Church, Rev. Dr. Silvester S. Beaman and attendees during a visit to the Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Delaware, June 1, 2020.Jim Bourg/Reuters
"There's nothing in particular about Biden," said Sarah Schrock, a self-identified independent that is currently registered as a Democrat to vote this year, from Lucas County, Ohio. "He’s the lesser of two evils."
"I’d rather vote against Trump than sit out," she added.
MORE: 'We have some form of hope': Why some Democrats are giving Trump high marks on coronavirus
One voter from Pima County, Ariz., Ruby, who refused to give her last name, casted her choice to pick Biden as binary, saying there is "only one reason" before adding, "I’m voting against Trump." She does not identify with either party.
Rorie Baker, 70, from Orange County, Calif., which was a GOP stronghold in blue California until 2018, is casting her ballot for Biden since "he’s the absolute opposite of Trump. Trump is an unbelievably incompetent man. He has no couth, no class."
But regardless of the outcome of the election, some of the women are deeply frustrated by the stark partisanship and discord rippling through the country.
"I'm more of a moderate," Sloane, the Trump-backer, said, "and I get left out."
"I just wish we had better choices," she lamented of 2020, before returning to 2016. "I'm frustrated that when the Republicans had 20 people to put out there, you had 20 people and no choice."
ABC News' Will Steakin contributed reporting.

 
Demands for Trump Removal Grow as 'Fascist' Speech Condemned as Declaration of War Against US Public
"Trump needs to be removed now, because after the massacre it will be too late."
by
Jake Johnson, staff writer

146 Comments

President Donald Trump walks away after making a statement in the Rose Garden on June 1, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's pledge Monday evening to deploy the full force of the U.S. military against demonstrators protesting the killing of George Floyd—and the president's authorization of police violence against peaceful protesters to clear the way for a photo-op—amounted in the eyes of lawmakers, rights groups, and commentators to "declaration of war" against the U.S. public that must result in Trump's removal from office.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) characterized Trump's remarks from the Rose Garden of the White House as a "fascist speech" that "verged on a declaration of war against American citizens" who have taken to the streets across the nation to condemn police brutality and racial injustice.
"The president of the United States tear-gassed peaceful protestors in order to clear the way for a useless photo-op outside the White House—just after vowing to activate the military against our own people. Lives and our democracy are in danger."
—Sen. Elizabeth Warren
"I fear for our country tonight and will not stop defending America against Trump's assault," Wyden tweeted.
Other progressive lawmakers similarly condemned Trump's address, during which the president vowed to deploy " thousands and thousands of heavily armed soldiers, military personnel, and law enforcement officers," to the streets of the nation's capital.
Following his speech, the president walked from the White House to St. John's Episcopal Church as police officers swinging batons and hurling tear gas canisters cleared the streets of peaceful demonstrators. The ACLU demanded an immediate investigation into the president's approval of "politically-motivated and life-threatening use of indiscriminate weapons" against the crowds of protesters.
After police officers and military personnel forcefully removed demonstrators from his path, Trump arrived at the church and hoisted a Bible for the cameras. The White House Monday night posted an edited video of the president's walk on Twitter which includes zero indication that, as Trump casually strolled to St. John's, protesters were being brutally attacked for his benefit.
"The president of the United States tear-gassed peaceful protestors in order to clear the way for a useless photo-op outside the White House—just after vowing to activate the military against our own people," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). "Lives and our democracy are in danger."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) slammed Trump for having "peaceful demonstrators viciously attacked."


"This is not a dictatorship," tweeted Sanders. "This is the United States of America. Our citizens have a constitutional right to peacefully protest. It's called the First Amendment."
Will Bunch of the Philadelphia Inquirer wrote in a column late Monday that Trump's speech in the Rose Garden represented "the moment we've been dreading since that escalator ride down Trump Tower five years ago this month—that's been slowly building brick by brick as Donald Trump tore down the rule of law, abused the presidency to enrich himself, and grabbed the bully pulpit of the White House to divide America with racism, sexism and xenophobia."
"Backed into a corner after his incompetence and distrust in science was trampled by a virus that's killed 105,000 Americans, compounded by 40 million unemployed, and now massive, chaotic protests over the police brutality and racism that he has nurtured instead of combating, the president of the United States declared war on the American people," Bunch wrote. "Donald Trump needs to go, and we can't wait until even November 3, let alone January 20, 2021."
Slate's Ben Mathis-Lilley also made the case for Trump's speedy removal from office, warning in a column Monday that "there is not much more room for the president's program of violence to keep escalating."
"Trump needs to be removed now," wrote Mathis Lilley, "because after the massacre it will be too late."


 
Don't underestimate these people, chaos is like energy drink to them
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BDR
It’s going to be a full fledge White supremacist speech... They have no other cards left to play...
 
Back
Top