Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines"

mangobob79

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/news/id.27765/title.pharrell-addresses-legal-issue-with-marvin-gaye-s-estate-regarding-blurred-lines-

Pharrell regarding "Blurred Lines" controversy: "You can't trademark a groove."

Pharrell, who recently made his G I R L album available for streaming online, spoke with XXL about his legal battle with Marvin Gaye's estate over Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines."

"I have the utmost respect, the most, utmost respect for Marvin Gaye and his music and he is one of the patriarchs," Pharrell says in the interview. "He is one of the best. But here's the thing—you can't trademark a groove. If I play a song—which a lot of my new hip-hop, rap records are—that's done in 6/8 time signature, Charlie Parker's family is not going to sue me for that. Do you understand what I'm saying? If I do a salsa beat right now, I know that Ricky Martin's family is not going to come looking for me.

"That's what we're dealing with," Pharrell continues. "We're dealing with the idea that someone feels like a groove is proprietary, and it's not. Music is, and the notes are, and when you look at the sheet music, then you'd know. And just for a bit of humor, the percussion that I use on 'Blurred Lines,' aside from the music notation being completely different, completely different—the sheet music is available online, by the way—but the percussion, I was trying to pretend that I was Marvin Gaye, and what he would do had he went down to Nashville and did a record with pentatonic harmonies, and more of a bluegrass chord structure. So unfortunately there's no comparison between the minor, bluesy chords he was playing and my major, bluegrass-y chords, and that's very plain to see for anyone who can read music."

In 2013, "Blurred Lines" was at the center of legal discussions between Pharrell, Robin Thicke and Marvin Gaye's family. According to The Hollywood Reporter, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of "Blurred Lines" makers in a California federal court in August. “Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple adverse claims from alleged successors in interest to those artists," the lawsuit states. "Defendants continue to insist that plaintiffs' massively successful composition, 'Blurred Lines,' copies 'their' compositions."

On Monday (March 3), Pharrell spoke with HipHopDX about how he feels when he is referred to as a genius.

"A genius denotes someone who knows a lot on their own—self-contained," Pharrell said in the HipHopDX exclusive. "And I’m not. All of my work is a direct reaction to meeting all these very interesting people with whom I’ve collaborated. I’ve learned so much about their processes and who they were, and their vibes have inspired me. In that case, I just could not take authorship for my path. I know that I’ve elected to take some of the choices, turns and the direction that I’ve taken. But I know at the same time, there are these integral people in our lives from time to time who come in, give us direction and guide us. They tell us which way to go, and those are the people I feel like are just as much… They share the authorship for all of my successes...So I’m not comfortable in that. I would say I’ve had a lot of really, really, really good help. And I’m just thankful that people have seen something in me, and I was smart enough to allow them to guide me in the right direction. That’s the closest to that term I could ever come to. I’m smart enough to listen to other people, but nowhere near genius."

RELATED: Pharrell Williams Speaks Exclusively To HipHopDX On The Label Of Genius
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

"That's what we're dealing with," Pharrell continues. "We're dealing with the idea that someone feels like a groove is proprietary, and it's not. Music is, and the notes are, and when you look at the sheet music, then you'd know. And just for a bit of humor, the percussion that I use on 'Blurred Lines,' aside from the music notation being completely different, completely different—the sheet music is available online, by the way—but the percussion, I was trying to pretend that I was Marvin Gaye, and what he would do had he went down to Nashville and did a record with pentatonic harmonies, and more of a bluegrass chord structure. So unfortunately there's no comparison between the minor, bluesy chords he was playing and my major, bluegrass-y chords, and that's very plain to see for anyone who can read music."
He knows what he did, but he's riding out the technicality of not having done it. Basically, this is his defense...

 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I like how Pharrell handled this interview, but he still got that sound from "Got to Give it up". No amount of musical jargon explanation will inspire me to think of any other song than that one when I here "Blurred Lines".
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I like how Pharrell handled this interview, but he still got that sound from "Got to Give it up". No amount of musical jargon explanation will inspire me to think of any other song than that one when I here "Blurred Lines".

My man if I am beating on a desk and the tune is "Top Billin" by Audio Two and my homies are around rapping while being recorded they have no case. Interpolation vs sampling open/shut. P might make a donation out of the kindness of his heart tho.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I keep hearing this shit about 'Marvin Gaye's Family'. Last I checked Barry Gordy owned the publishing to all of the Motown songs before he sold the shit to EMI....
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I like how Pharrell handled this interview, but he still got that sound from "Got to Give it up". No amount of musical jargon explanation will inspire me to think of any other song than that one when I here "Blurred Lines".

He knows this. He's just using a technicality since it wasn't a direct sample or remake. A paper thin line is what he's walking. Out of respect rather than legal obligation dude should settle. Marvin directly inspired him whether he admits it or not. This is a case of respect for the inspiration he provided rather than following the letter of the law.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

He knows this. He's just using a technicality since it wasn't a direct sample or remake. A paper thin line is what he's walking. Out of respect rather than legal obligation dude should settle. Marvin directly inspired him whether he admits it or not. This is a case of respect for the inspiration he provided rather than following the letter of the law.

The case has settled. My issue is how the corporations used the family of Gaye to go after a black producer. Google Jobete Music. The Gaye family don't own shit. This was an inside game and would have never made the news unless you put the Gaye Family in it.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I keep hearing this shit about 'Marvin Gaye's Family'. Last I checked Barry Gordy owned the publishing to all of the Motown songs before he sold the shit to EMI....
that doesn't exclude writer/composition royalties... Which Gaye's estate still collects...

yureeka9 said:
I like how Pharrell handled this interview, but he still got that sound from "Got to Give it up". No amount of musical jargon explanation will inspire me to think of any other song than that one when I here "Blurred Lines".
similar or like or influenced / inspired by is not the same as reproduced, copied or sampled ....
copyright only pertains to the latter 3 words. So legally speaking no cares if a song reminds you of another song because it "feels" similar.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

The case has settled. My issue is how the corporations used the family of Gaye to go after a black producer. Google Jobete Music. The Gaye family don't own shit. This was an inside game and would have never made the news unless you put the Gaye Family in it.
the suit is on going and has not been settled...

emi settled with the Gaye family because as publisher EMI was obligated to initiate the suit instead of the family
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

that doesn't exclude writer/composition royalties... Which Gaye's estate still collects...


similar or like or influenced / inspired by is not the same as reproduced, copied or sampled ....
copyright only pertains to the latter 3 words. So legally speaking no cares if a song reminds you of another song because it "feels" similar.

the case on going and has not been settled

Correct on both points sir. They settled with Sony, and the family still gets comp royalties.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Maybe they're trying to introduce "INSPIRATION" royalties. Get inspired by great music and great artists, be prepared to pay up.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Told y'all. Somebody steering that family wrong
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Maybe they're trying to introduce "INSPIRATION" royalties. Get inspired by great music and great artists, be prepared to pay up.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:boy u stooopid for that one!!!!
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Just goes to show that these cats today ain't doing shit original.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

:smh::smh::smh:

Lame as fuck and once the hype dies down I will enjoy watching some of his
best efforts go straight bootleg bait! :smh::hmm:

Cause basically "Integrity, Honesty and Respect" are not proprietary:cool::lol:
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

He knows what he did, but he's riding out the technicality of not having done it. Basically, this is his defense...

Pharrell is correct that you can't trademark a sound/groove.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

I like how Pharrell handled this interview, but he still got that sound from "Got to Give it up". No amount of musical jargon explanation will inspire me to think of any other song than that one when I here "Blurred Lines".

But you can't trademark a sound/groove. Sampling is actually using someone's content (actual musical notes) whether it be in a different key or tempo.

Having a similar style is not sampling because the notes are and composition are completely different. Pharrell's song only has Marvin Gaye feel to it which is why it reminds you of his music but it was not sampled.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Pharrell's problem is that he bit Marvin's entire shit and then claimed his hack job original music born from inspiration.

Bullshit.

Milk Dee can't claim Pac's ( Only God can judge me ) or Mary's ( Real Love ) in their entirety, but can damn sure claim that beat.

If Marvin were alive, he'd be well in his right to go after Pharrell's unorigonal shit.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

here's the thing—you can't trademark a groove.

"We're dealing with the idea that someone feels like a groove is proprietary, and it's not. Music is, and the notes are, and when you look at the sheet music, then you'd know.

These are my beliefs on this matter. I'm thinking the sheet music will make the difference.
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...tle-help-Jay-Z-delighted-Coachella-crowd.html





article-2609196-1D3A25DB00000578-452_634x497.jpg
article-2609196-1D3A25E700000578-935_634x434.jpg
article-2609196-1D3A25C400000578-763_634x931.jpg
article-2609196-1D3A25CC00000578-635_634x613.jpg
 
Pharell is right listen to all the south stuff i love all the south music but every song got that big 808 fast hi hats church bells and horns .all the producers bite off each other

Sent from my SPH-D710BST using Tapatalk
 
Re: Pharrell Addresses Legal Issue With Marvin Gaye's Estate Regarding "Blurred Lines

Dan the body on that dancer
 
Back
Top