Pete Hegseth likely face impeachment charges soon for War Crimes… “Kill them All”

***in my Easy E's voice***

''You are now about to witness the strength of white privilege''

Ain't shit happening to anybody in this administration. It's fucking sickening

Fam use ur own voice

Nothing my not happen but this shit is laughable

How you going against everything you said in the past

Pete was against the shit he’s doing now
 
Wonder how many of those evil "drug traffickers" were...actually just folks tryna get home/escape gangs/deliver food-medical supplies..Folks that look remarkably like family.?

giphy.gif
 
Wonder how many of those evil "drug traffickers" were...actually just folks tryna get home/escape gangs/deliver food-medical supplies..Folks that look remarkably like family.?

giphy.gif


Probably each one of them was normal folks


Apparently the equipment(type of boats) and claims(drug trafficking) don’t line up to some people
 

Admiral denied Hegseth gave ‘kill everybody’ order in briefing to lawmakers​

12/04/25 03:00 PM ET
Defense
Navy Adm. Frank Bradley, the commander who oversaw the Sept. 2 strikes on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean, denied that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered his subordinates to “kill everybody” aboard the vessel during briefings to lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

The denial follows a report from The Washington Post last week that the Pentagon chief gave a spoken directive to “kill everybody” ahead of the U.S. military’s Sept. 2 attack against an alleged drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean, an operation where 11 “narco-terrorists” were killed.

Both Hegseth and the White House have denied that he gave such an order to Bradley, the commander of Joint Special Operations Command.

“Admiral Bradley was very clear that he was given no such order, not to give no quarter or to kill them all. He was given an order that, of course, was written down in great detail, as our military always does,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told reporters after the Thursday closed-door, classified briefing with Bradley and the Joint Chiefs of Staff chair, Gen. Dan Caine.

Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, gave the same account of Bradley’s testimony.


“The admiral confirmed that there had not been a ‘kill them all’ order, and that there was not an order to ‘grant no quarter,’” Himes said on Thursday.


Still, Himes said that he was “deeply” troubled by the Defense Department’s attack on Sept. 2, in which the U.S. military conducted four strikes, killing 11 and sinking the boat.

“I reviewed the video, and it’s deeply, deeply troubling,” Himes said. “The fact is that we killed two people who were in deep distress and had neither the means nor obviously the intent to continue their mission.”

Congress is looking into what the military’s reasoning was for ordering the second strike against the boat and what order Hegseth gave. Democrats are pressing the Trump administration to release the full video of the attack, along with written directives and orders from the Pentagon chief. President Trump has expressed openness for the video to be released.

Some legal experts have said that the attack would be a crime if the survivors were targeted, an argument that Cotton pushed back on after the briefing.

“The first strike, the second strike, and the third and the fourth strike on September 2 were entirely lawful and needful and they were exactly what we expect our military commanders to do,” Cotton said.
 
Wonder how many of those evil "drug traffickers" were...actually just folks tryna get home/escape gangs/deliver food-medical supplies..Folks that look remarkably like family.?

giphy.gif

It's safe to assume all of them. If you think about how many people in America fish just cause they like it, imagine how many people who live on an island do it as a food source and income.
 
It's safe to assume all of them. If you think about how many people in America fish just cause they like it, imagine how many people who live on an island do it as a food source and income.
Doubt there were drugs, but what can you say when you wipe out everything and leave no witnesses. The world is watching and this administration is not being held accountable, yet.
 
Doubt there were drugs, but what can you say when you wipe out everything and leave no witnesses. The world is watching and this administration is not being held accountable, yet.

Well there’s currently noise coming from the family of a deceased fisher


Alejandro Carranza, a Colombian fisherman.

images
 
The "Fishmaner" family (likely
Carranza family) is suing the U.S. (or seeking justice) because Colombian fisherman Alejandro Carranza was killed in a September 2025 U.S. military boat strike in the Caribbean; his family filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) alleging murder, not drug trafficking, by U.S. forces who mistook his fishing boat for a cartel vessel, a claim supported by Colombian President Petro and sparking debate over U.S. military actions.
Key Details of the Case:
  • Victim: Alejandro Carranza, a Colombian fisherman.
  • Incident: A U.S. military strike in the Caribbean on September 15, 2025, targeting suspected drug traffickers, but hitting Carranza's fishing boat.
  • The Complaint: Filed with the IACHR by U.S. attorney Dan Kovalik on behalf of the family, alleging the U.S. government committed murder and violated Colombian sovereignty.
  • Allegations: Carranza was fishing, not smuggling drugs, and his boat was adrift with distress signals, not displaying signs of a cartel vessel.
  • U.S. Response: The Pentagon states its actions comply with the Law of Armed Conflict, while President Trump claimed the strike targeted "narcoterrorists".
  • Colombian President: Gustavo Petro accused the U.S. of murder and violating sovereignty.
 
Back
Top