Official story unraveling for Boston marathon bombing

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
It’s now becoming clear that members of the Boston bomb squad had advanced notice of the horrific bombing that took place at the marathon today. As an eyewitness reports, once the bombs went off, officials began announcing, “this is just a drill!” This logically means they were all informed of the “bomb drill” beforehand. Otherwise, why would they respond with, “this is just a drill” ?

According to Local15TV.com, a University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach said there were bomb-sniffing dogs at both the start and finish lines, long before any explosions went off. He said:

“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

The official story of the bombing is that terrorists detonated two bombs at the marathon finish line and that the Boston bomb squad magically located a third bomb one mile away, identified the bomb, rigged it with explosives and initiated a “controlled explosion” all in less than an hour! (Absurd.)

The official story sounds like nothing more than a cover story.

Here are some of the facts we know so far

1) Bomb-sniffing dogs were present at the start of the race and the finish line, even before bombs went off.

2) The reported arrest of a “Saudi national” has now been retracted. Apparently that was a mistake published by the NY Post.

3) Instead, the mainstream media is pushing a new narrative that blames “right-wing extremists” for the bombing, even without a shred of evidence to back that up.

4) It is impossible for a bomb squad to have located, analyzed, rigged and detonated the third bomb in under an hour, especially when it was located one mile away, at the Kennedy Presidential Library.

See the map, below:
Boston_marathon_bombing_map.jpg


Why did the Boston bomb squad know all this in advance?

Given these facts, ask yourself: Who is the most likely culprit in the bombing?

The Boston bomb squad clearly had advanced notice of the presence of the bombs at the marathon, and they also had advanced notice of the location of the bomb at the Kennedy Presidential Library.

There are two reasonable explanations for this:

1) Someone called in a warning and threatened to bomb the event, which is why the bomb squad was on scene.

2) The bomb squad carried out the bombing as a false flag operation to achieve a political goal (unleashing TSA on the streets, blaming right wingers, increasing the bomb squad budget, etc.).

For explanation number one: If a credible threat had been called in, why didn’t the Boston police cancel the marathon or try to warn runners about the security threat? Is it their policy to allow people to jog right into a massacre they’ve already been warned about?

For the second explanation, there are all sorts of reasons why the Boston bomb squad might have placed the bombs at the marathon. It could have been a drill that went terribly wrong (i.e. no explosions were planned but they accidentally went off), or it could have been a deliberate attempt to terrorize the American people and justify armed TSA agents on the streets for all future sporting events.

This looks more and more like a planned event to justify a TSA lockdown

Although it’s still a bit early to know for certain, this looks more and more like a planned event that was deployed by the Boston bomb squad, called a “drill,” then used as a pretext for the President to call for TSA agents to be on the streets at all future sporting events.

And that, in turn, is the run-up to the TSA occupation of America, which has always been the goal of Obama. Remember that back on the campaign trail, he announced he wanted to build a “civilian national security force.”

Click here to watch the video where Obama says:

“We’ve gotta have a civilian national security force that’s just a powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded…”

The fastest way to build a domestic national security force is to stage domestic bombings as a pretext. More and more, that seems to be what unfolded today in Boston.

Remember, too, that DHS has now purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammunition to be used domestically, against the American people. (The number was 1.6 but has now been upgraded to over 2 billion.)

The real proof is in what happens next

Regardless of what you might think is behind this right now, the real proof will be found in what Obama calls for in response to the bombings.

If he calls for TSA on the streets of America to “keep everybody safe” at sporting events, then it’s all clearly a false flag rolled out for a political purpose. It was all a pretext to justify a TSA lockdown.

If the bombing is used to frame and blame veterans, patriots or “right-wing extremists,” then it’s clearly a false flag, too. Veterans and patriots have been severely demonized by the Obama administration as well as the leftist media.

If the administration avoids using the bombings to roll out its political agenda, then it might have legitimately been a random terrorist attack by a deranged individual. We’ll have to wait and see what Obama calls for in reaction to the attacks in order to know their true political purpose.


This article was posted: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 6:15 am
 
Bomb sniffing dogs at high profile. highly populated public events held in an uncontrolled open environment is nothing new. It seems the suspicion here is based heavily on that fact.

As for the "this is a drill" comment. Im sure they have ran emergency scenarios and walk throughs in preparation for a tragedy as such. That phrase could just be the language protocol in emergency situations used by those professionals.

I like a good conspiracy theory more than most but imma need more here...
 
Bomb sniffing dogs at high profile. highly populated public events held in an uncontrolled open environment is nothing new. It seems the suspicion here is based heavily on that fact.

As for the "this is a drill" comment. Im sure they have ran emergency scenarios and walk throughs in preparation for a tragedy as such. That phrase could just be the language protocol in emergency situations used by those professionals.

I like a good conspiracy theory more than most but imma need more here...

Consider the source (since you won't EVER get it from OP)
http://www.naturalnews.com/039928_Boston_marathon_bombings_official_story.html

A fringe nutjob being reblogged exclusively by other fringe nutjobs. Not calling OP one, but C&P the first line in Google and see what I mean.
 
I haven't seen an "official" story yet. It seems they're still putting it together as it just happened. In fact, the most recent article I've seen says the FBI and local authorities are still searching for clues with no claims of responsibility from any groups, including right wing extremists (though in this country, they tend to be the ones who do this kind of thing).

If it was reported in the NY Post, give it no credence.

I'm sure the Boston Marathon gets bomb threats. I don't see how that's unusual for there to be bomb sniffing dogs on hand just in case. Pro wrestling events get bomb threats.
 
Consider the source (since you won't EVER get it from OP)
http://www.naturalnews.com/039928_Boston_marathon_bombings_official_story.html

A fringe nutjob being reblogged exclusively by other fringe nutjobs. Not calling OP one, but C&P the first line in Google and see what I mean.

You mean BGOL the home of the conspiracy theorists isn't buying it ?

Just damn I thought you silly mofokrs would have at least gone 15 pages with this...... bait

And you stopped it before even the first this is how Obama will get to use drones on American soil posts


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


http://www.infowars.com/official-st...idence-points-to-bomb-squads-prior-knowledge/
 
You mean BGOL the home of the conspiracy theorists isn't buying it ?

Just damn I thought you silly mofokrs would have at least gone 15 pages with this...... bait

And you stopped it before even the first this is how Obama will get to use drones on American soil posts


BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


http://www.infowars.com/official-st...idence-points-to-bomb-squads-prior-knowledge/


I knew you were up to something.
Shame on you, ballscout.:smh:


:lol::lol:

But you know they're coming.
 
Press conference airing right now, they are reporting that 2, AND ONLY 2 devices were present yesterday, and those are the two that exploded, the third device was something that the police "detonated" using a water cannon BUT WAS NOT AN EXPLOSIVE, it was deemed suspicious and treated as such.

There are NO unexploded devices remaining.

This is all of course if you choose to believe the Democratic Governor of Massachusetts Deval Patric.
 
It seems the status quo is to believe WHATEVER the government tells you and the police are always right.

Of course, for a black man, why would he EVER believe the government or the police, under any circumstances?

What exactly gives the government and the police any credibility, regarding anything, when it comes to black people?

Yet, black people are supposed to blindly believe the government and the police?

Interesting.
 
Press conference airing right now, they are reporting that 2, AND ONLY 2 devices were present yesterday, and those are the two that exploded, the third device was something that the police "detonated" using a water cannon BUT WAS NOT AN EXPLOSIVE, it was deemed suspicious and treated as such.

There are NO unexploded devices remaining.

This is all of course if you choose to believe the Democratic Governor of Massachusetts Deval Patric.

I heard they were killing the "unexploded devices" story last night on MSNBC.
If there was an "official" story this quick, then that's a reason to be suspicious.

It seems the status quo is to believe WHATEVER the government tells you and the police are always right.

Of course, for a black man, why would he EVER believe the government or the police, under any circumstances?

What exactly gives the government and the police any credibility, regarding anything, when it comes to black people?

Yet, black people are supposed to blindly believe the government and the police?

Interesting.

Do you have some contrary evidence? Since there isnt' much to go on, I'm not sure what it would be contrary to but it seems like you wanted to say something.
 
It seems the status quo is to believe WHATEVER the government tells you and the police are always right.

Of course, for a black man, why would he EVER believe the government or the police, under any circumstances?

What exactly gives the government and the police any credibility, regarding anything, when it comes to black people?

Yet, black people are supposed to blindly believe the government and the police?

Interesting.


A luscious bitch she is, true
But it's not nice to fool mother nature
The proud mother of god like all ho's
Is jealous of her own shadow
So who is this young Vic Tanny bitch
Who wish to be queen for a day?
Who would sacrifice the great grandsons and daughters
Of her jealous mother
By sucking their brain
Until their ability to think was amputated
By pimping their instincts
Until they were fat, horny and strung-out
In her neurotic attempt to be queen of the universe
Who is this bitch?
 
Y'all got it wrong.. it was Chris Dorden flying a drone from the movie theatre in Aurora while watching the behind the scenes footage of the Hollywood production of the staged Sandy Hook shooting.. all ordered by Obama. Smh, y'all blind!
 
Y'all got it wrong.. it was Chris Dorden flying a drone from the movie theatre in Aurora while watching the behind the scenes footage of the Hollywood production of the staged Sandy Hook shooting.. all ordered by Obama. Smh, y'all blind!

 
I heard they were killing the "unexploded devices" story last night on MSNBC.
If there was an "official" story this quick, then that's a reason to be suspicious.



Do you have some contrary evidence? Since there isnt' much to go on, I'm not sure what it would be contrary to but it seems like you wanted to say something.

Contrary evidence of what? No one knows anything, yet the State-run media has already talked about a black man, an Arab, and police and government agents are using this as an excuse to increase police state activities.

So, what is your supporting evidence that any of this is necessary or true? Do you know it was a bombing, other than what the government and police told you?

---

It seems you have determined already who you are going to believe and who you are going to ridicule without any facts, whatsoever.

At least I am honest enough to state that any government or police "version" will not serve the interests of black people.

However, you are clear that the government and police come first, and that black people either believe their "version" or should be ridiculed.
 
Back
Top