Coach K Random Hero Registered Oct 7, 2010 #1 Now that Moss is gone, Welker and Tate are both gone in my league.....which one is worth the better look....Woodhead or Edelman?
Now that Moss is gone, Welker and Tate are both gone in my league.....which one is worth the better look....Woodhead or Edelman?
The Pope His Holiness Pope Francis Registered Oct 7, 2010 #2 you should be able to get both because woodhead is a rb and edelman is a wide receiver.but in yahoo leagues they have woodhead as a rb and wr.
you should be able to get both because woodhead is a rb and edelman is a wide receiver.but in yahoo leagues they have woodhead as a rb and wr.
RunawaySlave Zeitgeist BGOL Investor Oct 10, 2010 #3 they might be good short term, but unlikely to still be productive at the end of the season....if they're even playing. I'd look elsewhere
they might be good short term, but unlikely to still be productive at the end of the season....if they're even playing. I'd look elsewhere
youngfocus Youngfocus ya heard! Platinum Member Oct 10, 2010 #4 I dont really understand what's so good about a player that is a RB/WR. McCluster and Woodhead. In my leauge WR score the most pts. (ppr). IDk Edelman
I dont really understand what's so good about a player that is a RB/WR. McCluster and Woodhead. In my leauge WR score the most pts. (ppr). IDk Edelman
S Sango Rising Star Platinum Member Oct 10, 2010 #5 I'd go with Edelman, however the Patriots like a lot of mismatch plays underneath against linebackers (i.e. Faulk), so they may get experimental with Woodhead.
I'd go with Edelman, however the Patriots like a lot of mismatch plays underneath against linebackers (i.e. Faulk), so they may get experimental with Woodhead.