NBA Finals game 3. (when tied 1-1) game 3 winner ALWAYS wins the title.

Spectrum

Elite Poster
BGOL Investor
http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-100608/daily-dime

• In the 2-3-2 series format (since 1985), when the NBA Finals is tied 1-1, the winner of Game 3 has gone on to win the series on all 10 occasions.


• How important is Game 3 of the NBA Finals? In NBA Finals history, the series has been tied 1-1 on 32 occasions. The Game 3 winner has gone on to win 28 of those 32 series (87.5 percent).

• On the defensive end, Boston's magic number to win is 95. The Celtics are 12-0 when allowing 95 or fewer points this postseason. Boston is 1-6 when allowing 96 points or more.

• Many people thought Game 1 of the NBA Finals was a fairly ugly game after a combined 54 fouls were called on the two teams. In Game 2, there were even more fouls called. Referees called a combined 58 fouls in Game 2. There have been 112 fouls called in the first two games of the NBA Finals, the most in the first two games of the NBA Finals since 1996 NBA Finals (113 fouls -- 56 in Game 1, 57 in Game 2.)

• Remember that the Celtics were 3-0 at home against the Lakers in the 2008 NBA Finals, including the 39-point clincher in Game 6. Boston's averaging margin of victory in those three games was 18.3 points. Games 3, 4 and 5 will be played in Boston.

• The Lakers were just 23-18 on the road in the regular season, which was tied for third-best in the Western Conference and tied for sixth in the NBA. Los Angeles is 4-4 on the road in the postseason.

• The Lakers scored 94 points in Game 2's loss to the Celtics. It was the first time that the Lakers had failed to score at least 100 points in 11 straight games. Los Angeles had scored at least 100 points in every game since Game 1 of the conference semifinals against the Jazz and were 9-2 during that 11-game streak.

• In Game 2, the Lakers had 14 blocked shots, setting a NBA Finals record. Andrew Bynum had seven blocks and Pau Gasol had six as they became the first teammates in Finals history to each have five or more blocks in a game.

• In this series, Kobe Bryant is a combined 1-6 FG (four total points) in 54 possessions when guarded by Tony Allen or Rajon Rondo. Bryant had 42 touches in those 54 possessions. In 16 possessions when defended by Rondo in this series, Bryant has 14 touches but has not attempted a shot and scored zero points.

• Bynum had 21 points in Game 2 of the NBA Finals, which tied his postseason career high. He also had 21 points in Game 5 against the Oklahoma City Thunder in the first round. Bynum had seven blocks in the conference finals (six games) against the Suns. Bynum had six blocks in Game 2 against the Celtics in the NBA Finals.

• The Celtics had zero second-chance points in their Game 1 loss to the Lakers. In Game 2, Boston had 13 second-chance points.

• Ray Allen made an NBA Finals-record eight three-pointers in Game 2. Seven of those were of the catch-and-shoot variety, meaning no dribbles once he caught the ball.

• To put a little perspective on how phenomenal Allen's accomplishment was, our friends at Accuscore.com simulated the game 10,000 times: Allen hit seven consecutive three-pointers 11 times in 10,000 simulations, or 0.11 percent of the time. Allen hit seven in a row in the first half in just two of 10,000 simulations.

• Rondo had a triple-double for the Celtics in Game 2. It was the first triple-double in the Finals for a Boston player since Larry Bird had one in Game 6 in the 1986 NBA Finals. The last player to have a triple-double in the NBA Finals was Tim Duncan for the Spurs in 2003 (Game 6).

• Rondo is the barometer for the Celtics. In the 2010 postseason, when Rondo's plus/minus is +2 or better, Boston is 13-0. When it is +1, even or negative, Boston is 0-6.
 
expect to see this st the end of game 5

boston-celtics-2008-nba-champions_nc.jpg
 
I keep tryin to tell ya'll basketball is NOT a game of statistics...the only basketball stat that I have SEEN to be undeniable is:

No one comes back from 0-3 in ANY series EVER

Everything else is sportcenter stat junkie talk IMO

Don't get offended eewwll :cool:
 
I keep tryin to tell ya'll basketball is NOT a game of statistics...the only basketball stat that I have SEEN to be undeniable is:

No one comes back from 0-3 in ANY series EVER

Everything else is sportcenter stat junkie talk IMO

Don't get offended eewwll :cool:

Exactly...i hate stats like these
 
Lakers needed to win Game 2 badly......I don't see them winning any games in Boston. :smh:
If it were 08 yeah. But boston isn't spectacular at home. They couldn't finish the magic at home up 3-0. All LA will need to do is bring the same energy and tenacity they did in game 1. In game 2 boston matched LA, and the game was even until LA stopped ibeingj aggressive.

Can LA win game three? If they continue to push the ball inside and take advantage of their length and they stay away from foul trouble that can be enough to win if three of their guys get going.

So far it seems the refs will call the game equally bad, and not give too much of an advantage to the home team.

If LA loses gamej three they absolutely have to win games 4 AND 5.
 
Dallas vs Heat?(Not sure but thought Heat were down 2-0)
Lakers vs Sixers?(Don't think Lakers had a loss that whole playoffs until game 1 vs A.I. and the Sixers.)

It was hard not to root for A.I. in those finals

I mean damn his team was very outmatched and he willed them to that point and then they won that game I was like :eek::smh::confused::eek:
 


Don't get offended eewwll :cool:

Just so that you know because that is the second time you have written that. 1. Im just posting an interesting article ...nothing more nothing less 2. If I disagree with something that you write (as I have in the past), it is not because I have taken offense. This is not personal. If I object, Im just disagreeing with your entire premise or a particular point.
 
:lol::lol: Man i was watching the post game interviews and this nigga Kobe sounded just like lebron after they lost game 2 to the celtics.. " We have to win in boston" ... This stats don't mean much to this Boston team..
 
This is bullshit because the first game they were talking about how Phil Jackson wins game one and that he is 47-0 so this series should automatically be going to the Lakers. Now they are changing that shit because Boston won game 2. I'm not going by anything, I'm just going to watch the games and see what happens.
 
It does not make a difference. David Stern will give one game in Boston to the Cacs from LA and let the series be decided in game 6 and 7. If this was on the merits, the high compliment of cacs on the Lakers would cost them the title...
 
It does not make a difference. David Stern will give one game in Boston to the Cacs from LA and let the series be decided in game 6 and 7. If this was on the merits, the high compliment of cacs on the Lakers would cost them the title...

How's Stern's 3-PT shooting and defense??
 
Back
Top