N.A.A.C.P. Sues Georgia To Overturn Bill Limiting Voting Rights

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
N.A.A.C.P. Sues Georgia to
Overturn Bill Limiting Voting Rights

http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1f7VFE?ocid=sf
A coalition of civil rights groups led by the N.A.A.C.P.
have filed a federal lawsuit against Georgia officials
charging that a new law severely curtailing voting
access represents “intentional discrimination”
against the state’s Black voters.



a group of people standing in front of a building: Demonstrators protested new state-level voting restrictions at Liberty Plaza in Atlanta last week.

© Nicole Craine for The New York Times Demonstrators protested new state-level voting restrictions at Liberty Plaza in Atlanta last week.


The New York Times
March 30, 2021


The suit, dated March 28 and filed in the Northern District Court of Georgia, is the third case brought since Georgia’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, signed a G.O.P.-backed bill that:
prohibits the use of drop boxes,
requires proof of identity for absentee voting, and
makes it a crime to provide food or water to voters forced to line up outside of polling locations.


Opponents of the bill are mounting an all-fronts legal, legislative and political battle to roll back the law and others like it, state by state as Senate Democrats debate scrapping or suspending the filibuster rule to pass two sweeping electoral reform bills that would void state-level restrictions.

The law “is the culmination of a concerted effort to suppress the participation of Black voters and other voters of color by the Republican State Senate, State House, and governor,” wrote the attorneys from the Georgia chapters of the N.A.A.C.P. and several other groups, including the League of Women Voters, Common Cause and the Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda.

The plaintiffs argue that Mr. Kemp and other Republicans violated the First, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by seeking to limit the participation of Democratic voters who are a growing force in the state’s urban and suburban areas.

“Unable to stem the tide of these demographic changes or change the voting patterns of voters of color, these officials have resorted to attempting to suppress the vote of Black voters and other voters of color in order to maintain the tenuous hold that the Republican Party has in Georgia,” they added. “In other words, these officials are using racial discrimination as a means of achieving a partisan end.”

One of the defendants named in the suit is Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who had rebuffed former President Donald J. Trump’s efforts to overturn President Biden’s narrow win in the state.

The plaintiffs claim that “detailed records” on “the racial demographics of voting” maintained by his office were used to draft the legislation.

“As a result, the Georgia legislators and its elected officials are well aware of the implications of making decisions as to voting on racial and ethnic minorities,” they wrote.

The coalition, which includes Georgia’s Lower Muskogee Creek Tribe in the southern part of the state, also argued that the targeting of early in-person voting, absentee ballots and drop boxes discriminates against “Black, Latinx, Asian-American, members of Indigenous populations.”

Similar suits, making nearly identical legal arguments, were filed by Marc Elias, a top Democratic elections lawyer, and the Black Voters Matter Fund, a civil rights group, shortly after Mr. Kemp signed the law on March 25.

Republicans in Georgia and several other states considering similar laws have argued that restrictions are needed to address claims of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 elections, even though election officials in the state have repeatedly reported that there were few, if any, instances of fraud in last year’s balloting.




N.A.A.C.P. Sues Georgia to Overturn Bill Limiting Voting Rights (msn.com)
 

Attachments

  • 1617125826367.png
    1617125826367.png
    68 bytes · Views: 0

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
It is a shame that Civil Rights is being associated with increasing election security. You know how desperate and exploitable black people will get that will use any lapses for some scam.

I have seen how desperate these fools get scrambling to attack me after a high level position is announced. It is a fun experience being bartered like a slave. Look at the wealth that Byron Allen is generating from the opportunity he had to fight for in court that the NAACP and other Civil Rights huckster settled for only a couple of million dollars in donations.

The enemy is not Jim Crow, the enemy is us. I am getting all kinds of death threats and harassment because this lucrative opportunity is being take away.
 
Last edited:

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
We need to start tightening up election security, there is going to be cisgender/transgender, homosexual, bisexual, female candidates that will effeminately respond to an election loss looking for every flaw to question the outcome. You not going to see an Al Gore accepting the result and conceding defeat. They may call on or organize a group to attack the government.

5ea4fcc384a08c3ec169c56b_o_U_v2.jpg


I have noticed this behavior in business dealing with Apple, Tesla, Facebook and other Caucasian companies. You have to bring a heavy presence of lawyers to force them to engage in reasonable business conduct. Otherwise they will be calling you a patent troll, or coming up with some other elaborate reason for not fulfilling their obligations as a man. Apple is accused of patent infringement all the time.
 
Last edited:

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered




Roland Martin, Tariq Nasheed, professional athletes, civil rights organization that throw black business/people under the bus are speaking nervously when he spoke out on that show. He was using code words - "Doing for self" that made them look in the mirror on what they have been doing, they did not like what they saw. If you look at the video he did another show overexplaining and refuting these code words. Tariq Nasheed did a full background investigation on this 21 year old to discredit him and protect what he is doing.

You have all these entities, black CEO like Ken Chenault, Fortune 500 that deploy these tactics to undermine the black community are now attacking this law, not because of its substance, but to protect their tainted legacy of racial cannibalism.

black-boy-mirror-500x330-770x508.jpg


This young guy triggered this overreaction. If looking in the mirror makes you feel uncomfortable than maybe you should stop what you are doing?
 
Last edited:
Top