Music Biz: Taylor Swift NEW ALBUM - Tortured Poets Department - the largest streaming week for an album ever,

p5ych3

Curry Is My God
BGOL Patreon Investor
It comes across like dude is against her or something, but I read it as dude saw a chance to make money hand over fist and jumped on it. I think I would have done the same thing.

His history in music goes way back.
 

mailboxpimp

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
They could sell her shit to whoever could afford to buy it. They didnt have to sell them back to her.
 

roots69

Rising Star
Registered
I remember Prince being adamant about artistic freedom and owning his own masters in his fight with Warner Brothers too.

Crazy how so many of these brilliant, genre-defining artists don’t even own their own work.

You aint kidding bruh.. For the longest I thought these artist had full control of their work, only to find out they dont.. And the low percent they earn off their own work is pure robbery!!
 

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
It's not crazy once you think about it.

When these artists were trying to get a break....they were broke and starving. They signed deals to live and to do their art. Record companies are footing the bill and want a return on their investment.

Simple.
Let's be Real, they don't want a return on their investment, they want their return on the money they waste on the people who didn't make it. The people who make at least three albums oh, they make their money back and then some

The general flip is, bomb ass first album, second album is okay, third album, greatest hits and you never hear from them fuckers again

(It's usually during the production for the second album or after a great second CD that the artist realizes they've been getting peanuts instead of money and their label has shafted them)

that's how it is for most people in the business if they're able to get past the first CD. The music business is a bigger pimp/hoe business than the pimp/hoe business

I'm not mad at Taylor Swift for doing this, and honestly more artists should
 
Last edited:

Ill Paragraph

Lord of the Perfect Black
BGOL Investor
It's not crazy once you think about it.

When these artists were trying to get a break....they were broke and starving. They signed deals to live and to do their art. Record companies are footing the bill and want a return on their investment.

Simple.

A “return on their investment” shouldn’t equal “I forever own everything you’ve ever created” though. The record companies have established a system of artistic indentured servitude.
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I'm a fan of her old stuff.

She has changed a lot... She wouldn't be able to do the old material justice today. It would be like karaoke.

1. a black man admitted he's a taylor swift fan...

2.
giphy.gif
:giggle:

3. At this point Swifts fanbase is so strong she could shit on wax and still go double platinum before anyone would admit it was wack.

Every label, including Big Machine, has a rerecord clause in its contracts with artists. The clause prevents the artist from rerecording on another label, or on their own, and marketing those rerecordings.

That clause usually has an expiration date, but even when it does there's another roadblock. It's called an original production clause -- and it prevents the artist from copying the OG version. So, when and if Taylor remakes her Big Machine tunes ... she will have to deviate from the first versions.

So, Taylor WILL get something -- she'll own her new master recordings -- but if she's just doing it for revenge ... it might not be a great play.
https://www.tmz.com/2019/08/21/tayl...d-masters-scooter-braun-purchase-big-machine/

see number 3

Let's be Real, they don't want a return on their investment, they want their return on the money they waste on the people who didn't make it. The people who make at least three albums oh, they make their money back and then some

The general flip is, bomb ass first album, second album is okay, third album, greatest hits and you never hear from them fuckers again

that's how it is for most people in the business if they're able to get past the first CD. The music business is a bigger pimp/hoe business than the pimp/hoe business

I'm not mad at Taylor Swift for doing this, and honestly more artists should

A “return on their investment” shouldn’t equal “I forever own everything you’ve ever created” though. The record companies have established a system of artistic indentured servitude.

artists should fuckin unionize or something....how that indusrty runs is just straight usury and mostly criminal.
 

nick581

Rising Star
Registered
Look What You Made Her Do! Taylor Swift Will Rerecord Her Old Albums
By Rebecca Alter

21-taylor-swift-new.w330.h412.jpg

Photo: Broadimage/Shutterstock


If you can’t beat ’em, rerecord ’em. According to a press release, Taylor Swift will announce plans to rerecord her entire six-album back catalog in an interview with Tracy Smith on this week’s episode of CBS Sunday Morning. In the interview, when Smith asks Swift whether she plans to rerecord her earlier songs to have control over the masters — which were recently bought by Swift’s nemesis Scooter Braun — Swift responds not only with an “oh yeah,” but even a “yeah, absolutely.”

What would drive an artist to rerecord six albums’ worth of work? In brief: At the end of June, two weeks after the release of LGBTQ-Ally track (not that LGBTQ-Allytrack) “You Need to Calm Down,” Swift updated her Tumblr with a personal, heartfelt message: that Braun, Kanye West’s former manager, had bought the masters to all of her past work from her longtime previous label, Scott Borchetta’s Big Machine Records. In the post, she explained why she’d left last fall for Universal: She did not want to sign a contract with Borchetta and have to work to earn back the ownership rights to her masters track by track. And now Braun — whom Swift calls an “incessant, manipulative” bully — has total ownership over her past six albums after acquiring Big Machine.

Fans were incensed on her behalf, and supporters like Kelly Clarkson chimed in with an idea: If she didn’t want to buy the masters back from Braun, why not rerecord the tracks altogether?


This would not be the first battle Swift has waged over issues of music ownership and artists’ rights: She has taken streaming services like Apple Music and Spotify to task over royalties in the past. Nor would Swift be the first artist to leave a record label and then rerecord her tracks to gain ownership; JoJo rerecorded her debut album after her old label Blackground removed it from streaming services last fall. The possibility of rerecorded versions of her old songs, especially in an age when listeners are less likely to keep older, physical manifestations of media that can be streamed and edited, raises some questions for Swifties: Will the old versions still be available? Will these new recordings of old favorites be 2019Lion King–level uncanny copies? Will she re-create that “Our Song”–era faux twang? One can only hope that Swift will go further into detail in her interview, which airs on CBS on August 25.

 

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
1. a black man admitted he's a taylor swift fan...

2.
giphy.gif
:giggle:
First of all, yes. I listen to Taylor Swift. No,I don't give a fuck. I'm a Black man that knows Taylor Swift, so what? Lol

I've driven the streets of Cleveland with my windows down bumping Taylor Swift and not giving a single fuck. You Belong with Me, Mean...IDGAF

This was me one day the Browns beat the Steelers and the Sunday Ticket switched to music after the game went off
 

Flawless

Flawless One
BGOL Investor
A “return on their investment” shouldn’t equal “I forever own everything you’ve ever created” though. The record companies have established a system of artistic indentured servitude.
If the album was a flop which a lot of them are the record company would have to eat the loss. so it balances it out.
 

Ill Paragraph

Lord of the Perfect Black
BGOL Investor
If the album was a flop which a lot of them are the record company would have to eat the loss. so it balances it out.

Even if you account for the cost of the development, recording, marketing and distribution of the artist/records, it doesn’t make sense that a company should own an artist’s work in perpetuity.
 
Last edited:

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend
New York Times Popcast or Rolling Stone Music Now (forget which of the two) did a good podcast episode about this earlier this spring or summer. Explained some of the legalities, etc.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Scooter Braun ‘Congratulates’ Taylor Swift on New Album
By Zoe Haylock@zoe_alliyah
23-scooter-braun-taylor-swift.w330.h330.jpg

Photo: Getty Images

Did Scooter Braun just genuinely compliment Taylor Swift? Or is he just taking a page from the “Regina George in sheep’s clothing”? After months of feuding with Taylor Swift and likely receiving thousands of hateful messages from Swifties, Scooter Braun reached out to her via Twitter, to let her know that he’s always been a fan. But first, he compliments himself for betting on her success. “Regardless of what has been said the truth is you don’t make big bets unless you are a believer and always have been,” he tweeted at 11:44 p.m. “Brilliant album with #Lover. Congrats @taylorswift13. Supporting was always the healthier option .” As opposed to feuding? As opposed to purchasing her life’s work? His pivot might have something to do with the fact that she’s decided to completely rerecord her entire discography (except for Lover,which she owns).

Ahead of Lover’s release, Swift announced on Good Morning America that she would be rerecording all of her previous albums so that she can own her work, not the guy who discovered Justin Bieber. Braun, who managed Kanye West during the “Famous” lyric debacle of 2016, purchased Taylor Swift’s former label earlier this summer, taking all of her masters with him. Now, he owns all of her songs except those on Lover. Swift responded with an open letter, detailing how she felt “grossed out” that someone who allegedly participated in canceling her now owns her entire life’s work. But after a couple of months of indirect feuding, maybe with Braun’s totally not passive-aggressive tweet, both sides can find some harmony.

@ViCiouS

Why is she continuing to spread this lie though?
 
Top