Movie News: Affleck ‘Batman’ Movie Would Have Gone into Arkham Asylum

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Ben Affleck’s ‘Batman’ Movie Would Have Gone into Arkham Asylum
BY MATT GOLDBERG JULY 31, 2019

SHARE TWEET


batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice-ben-affleck-slice-600x200.jpg


Ben Affleck’s solo Batman movie will remain a fascinating “What if?” in the annals of superhero movies. Affleck was attached to direct and star, but as the DCEU crumbled and fell apart, Affleck eventually departed the project, first handing directing over to Matt Reeves before leaving the role entirely where now a younger Robert Pattinson will wear the cape and cowl.

But what did Affleck have in store? His Live by Night cinematographer Robert Richardson was also attached to the project, and he’s recently been doing the rounds for Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood. On the HappySadConfused podcast [via The Playlist], Richardson revealed that Affleck’s Batman movie would have taken place inside Arkham Asylum, the institution for the criminally insane that houses the superhero’s rogues gallery when they’re not out doing crimes.

“He was going into the more insanity aspects…He was entering more into the Arkham, he’s going into where everyone was bad,” said Richardson. “That’s where we were going. I was very interested in that one.” But Richardson also notes, “There was a script, but not a loved script. There was a lot of work he was doing to it to change it.”

I think a Batman movie set in Arkham would be a nice change of pace for the franchise. Previous Batman movies have been largely about Gotham, and it makes sense because it’s large playground for the filmmaker (Burton, Schumacher) or it provides a metaphor for America (Nolan). But Arkham is, by its nature, claustrophobic, and it traps Batman inside with his foes. That’s part of what makes Batman: Arkham Asylum such a terrific video game.

We don’t know what Reeves has in store, but hopefully Affleck will go on the record some day to talk about his vision for what his solo Batman movie would have been and the obstacles in getting the script right.




Image via Warner Bros.


Image via Warner Bros.

 
What could have been: Ben Affleck's Batman would have explored "insanity," Arkham Asylum

William Hughes

7/31/19 6:12pm
Filed to: FILM
40Save
pufszrwx9bdlr55ojfrx.jpg

Ben Affleck’s standalone Batman movie has now been well-and-truly relegated to the “What might have been?” bins of history, derailed by what was, by all accounts, one man’s truly epic indifference to ever having to be the fucking Batman again. Still, there was a moment there where Affleck—who was originally also attached to write and direct the movie, and who is, it’s occasionally worth reminding oneself, an Oscar-winning director of not inconsiderable skill—was doing everything in his powers to keep his own flagging interesting in the project alive. Per IGN, his version of Batman was going to be less about costumed crimefighting, and more about how every single person living in Gotham City is some flavor of out of their minds.


This is per cinematographer Robert Richardson, who was working on the film with Affleck, and who talked about its tentative first stages with the Happy Sad Confused podcast this week. According to Richardson, the film would have been about “insanity,” and would have delved deep into Arkham Asylum, a.k.a. the world’s least secure mental health facility, where all of Gotham’s finest costumed psychopaths and murder clowns are sent.



Film audiences have seen Arkham before; it’s where Cillian Murphy’s Scarecrow hangs out in the first chapter of Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy. Still, it’s a rich setting—as a couple of very successful video games have proven—allowing writers to delve into Bruce Wayne’s chriopteran pathology, face off against numerous villain, and do all the other things that might hypothetically stop a guy like Affleck from walking off the set during a permanent smoke break and never coming back.

Alas, it was not to be, and so Matt Reeves has taken over the idea of a standalone Batman movie, with Robert Pattinson as his brooding, clown-punching muse. Meanwhile, Todd Phillips’ Jokerlooks to be taking up the mantle of “psychologically fucked-up Batman movie,” even if the Dark Knight himself never makes an appearance in the Joaquin Phoenix-starring flick.
 
I'm still upset at how they fucked all this up. I'm half and half on wanting to be held up in Arkham the whole movie. But we don't know if they would have built up to it. They could have told a weaving story with Batman in Arkham and something else going on in Gotham where Batman needed to be distracted in order to set up something bigger.

Would it have included/introduced someone new from the Batfamily?

Would it be like a horror film from the villains perspective where they played it like they were being hunted by Batman.
 
apparently...

they (DC/WB) wanted to go younger...


I don't understand, why you hired an A-list actor, who wants to do the role yet decide to go younger....Especially, when everyone gave Affleck major props for his portrayal of the character. It just dont make no fucking sense at all...
 
Back
Top