Mo'Nique trying AGAIN to convince us (or herself?) that SHE was the one who wanted an open marriage

Hotlantan

Beep beep. Who's got the keys to the Jeep? VROOM!
OG Investor
.
Mo’Nique Sets The Record Straight On Her Open Marriage In New Podcast: ‘It Was My Idea’

monique-and-sidney-hicks-0_400x295_61.jpg


They told you it was coming, and now Oscar winning actress Mo’Nique and her husband of close to 10 years, Sidney Hicks are setting the record straight about their “open marriage.”

In their new podcast, titled “Open Relationship”, the couple are opening up about the details of their marriage and clarifying what Mo’Nique meant in the past when she made headlines for referring to their relationship as “open,” sparking rumors about the pair that ranges from accusing them of being swingers to having marital trouble.

Apparently, none of the above are true. We listened to the very first podcast, which debuted today, and we’re breaking down the facts.

It All Started With An ESSENCE Interview
“In 2006, I did an article in ESSENCE magazine with Jill Scott saying that I was in an open relationship,” said Mo’Nique. “And when I tell you back then people lost their minds. Now when I first told Sydney that I told Jill that in the interview, [he said] 'Mama, that's gonna backfire on you.'”

Yes, Mo'Nique Has Been With Other Men
“A lot of people have asked what does it mean. Initially, when I asked for it, it was because I wanted to continue to see the gentlemen that I was seeing, and I felt comfortable telling my best friend…so when I sat down and said this is what I want initially it was because I wanted to still have sex with who I was seeing and I didn't want it to be where I was keeping anything from my best friend. That's how it initially started, and when I tell you the conversations that we've had, it has taken me to a different place where I'm not even thinking of another man sexually, but still open to it.” – Mo’Nique

It Was All Mo’Nique’s Idea, Not Sidney’s
“When you pull it up, and you [look] up celebrities in open marriage and you see Will and Jada, whoever the person is the author of that article they say well we can understand why they would be in a open marriage they're both beautiful people. When they start talking about Brad and Angelina, they said, ‘Well we can understand—they’re both beautiful people. The moment it got to my damn picture with my husband they said, ‘Oh, we hope Mo’Nique not gon’ let him just use her like that, because society looks at me and they see a woman that looks like [she] couldn't possibly have a man that looks like that if there was not something else involved in it…she's gonna let this man do anything he wants to do because she’s famous and she has money and now she can have whatever she wants, but she's gonna let the man use her and abuse her. No one knew it wasn't Sidney's idea to have an open marriage. It was mine. I want to say that again. It was not Sidney's idea to have an open marriage; it was mine.” – Mo’Nique

Mo’Nique’s Ego Got The Best Of Her
“Initially, when I said it, I had had the attitude of whoever makes the money, makes the rules. And, because I'm famous and I have the money I can do whatever I want to do. But then he said to me in the Bahamas, 'Well mama, you know if you can see other men, I can see other women.' I said, ‘Well, that's not what I was talking about because I am the famous one, not you, and I have the money; you can't do that. But what I had to learn was this thing called reciprocity. And that was very hard for me because my ego would get in the way…” – Mo’Nique

The Online Comments Hurt Them
“We're so closed off and we're so used to doing things the way people think we should do things, and we wanted to put it out there so that people understood it because when I tell you some of the Instagrams and some of the comments I was getting, daddy, I was having low self esteem I was having no self worth; I was trash. And, then everyone wanted to include God. ‘It's against God.’ ‘It's a big sin.’ And, ‘How could you say you love the Lord when you let your man lay with other women?’” – Mo’Nique

“Right! They didn't think about what would happen if you decided to lay with other men.” -- Sidney

Their Feelings Have Changed
“We're dealing with 11 years of being together and there’s the evolution of what an ‘open marriage’ means, because when you are a father and a mother of three children, there's not a whole lot of time to be doing a whole lot of slinging,” said Mo’Nique. “There's not a whole lot of Ménage à trois and all of that, in fact, none,” Sidney added. “But that's what people thought. They thought we were having these orgies, and I'm sorry daddy,” she told her husband.

This Is How They Define ‘Open Relationship’ Now
“So it's not just an open relationship from a sexual standpoint, it’s an open relationship in terms of dialogue that you're having with your spouse, your mate, your sons, your daughters, your mothers, your father, because we always hear ‘be someone important’ or ‘be yourself’ but that's only when its politically correct—when you've fallen into the boundaries of what people expect you to be as opposed to you being yourself when it is against the preverbal norm but what we find is against the norm is really the norm.

They’re Still Happy
“This is not going to change the dynamic of our relationship, because I'm in love with this woman,” said Sidney. “I’ve been involved with someone for 33 years of my life, since we were kids. I've known her longer than I haven't known her, so when you start saying to yourself the spirit that you came into this universe with is the spirit that you're gonna exit this world with… are you going to be yourself through having an open conversation and an open dialogue and an open relationship?”

They didn’t stop there. Listen to the rest of the podcast here

http://www1.play.it/audio/monique-sidneys-open-relationship
http://www.essence.com/2016/01/15/m...-her-open-marriage-new-podcast-it-was-my-idea

08d31868-8480-a5ac-360b-55417d3b8d37.png
moniqueprecious.jpg.CROP.thumbnail-small.jpg
 
“This is not going to change the dynamic of our relationship, because I'm in love with this woman,” said Sidney. “I’ve been involved with someone for 33 years of my life, since we were kids. I've known her longer than I haven't known her, so when you start saying to yourself the spirit that you came into this universe with is the spirit that you're gonna exit this world with… are you going to be yourself through having an open conversation and an open dialogue and an open relationship?

Cats can justify anything. Eh, do you.
 
That's the tackiest load of bullshit I've heard this year. :bullshit:
Monique & her husband are just as fucked up as Steve Harvey & his wife.
These people are constantly trying to convince us why their marriages are so special.
- One couple is trying to tell us they're special because they EXCLUDE intimate relations with the opposite sex.
- The other couple is trying to tell us they're special because they INCLUDE intimate relations with the opposite sex.
At the end of the day; I don't believe either (this former King & Queen of comedy) is being genuine. And I doubt EITHER couple is truly as happy nor as secure as they want us to believe they are. :smh:

But hey; if it "works" for them, then so be it. :rolleyes:
 
there aint no way on GODs green earth id hit that....open marriage hell

that dude just married her to get to the pussy he didnt have access to at first
 
That's the tackiest load of bullshit I've heard this year. :bullshit:
Monique & her husband are just as fucked up as Steve Harvey & his wife.
These people are constantly trying to convince us why their marriages are so special.
- One couple is trying to tell us they're special because they EXCLUDE intimate relations with the opposite sex.
- The other couple is trying to tell us they're special because they INCLUDE intimate relations with the opposite sex.
At the end of the day; I don't believe either (this former King & Queen of comedy) is being genuine. And I doubt EITHER couple is truly as happy nor as secure as they want us to believe they are. :smh:

But hey; if it "works" for them, then so be it. :rolleyes:

Why?

Usually when people say this it's women saying it because they can't fathom themselves NOT being selfish. I think you're an alright guy but i don't see why them being like they are is so hard to believe. Different things work for different people.
 
Why does she feel the need to explain/justify her relationship with other people??? That's his/hee relationship, keep that shit to yourself, and be happy. Leaking this is like some play for her to get some sort of approval from her fans or some shit. Like "No, I was the pimp, not him..."
 
Why?

Usually when people say this it's women saying it because they can't fathom themselves NOT being selfish. I think you're an alright guy but i don't see why them being like they are is so hard to believe. Different things work for different people.

My answer:
Simply put, I've noticed a pattern in Hollywood & popular entertainment.
Often; celebrities who are very loud, public or preachy about their relationships are the ones who's relationships are built on the most shaky ground.
I believe that while these folks are (in public) verbally & visually very loving and intimate, that in private, they're actually doing all this to convince themselves.
Classic examples: Terry McMillan, Starr Jones & Sherri Shepard. (Yeah, I know it's just women listed here, but I couldn't quickly think of any men. Sorry.)
I personally feel that those celebrities who are more low key and more traditionally "guarded" about their relationships are more invested in them & have a better chance at making them work.
Celebrities like Steve Harvey (A comedian who fucked around on each of his ex-wives, but who has become a "relationship guru" and feels he can instruct women on what makes a relationship work.) are hypocrites.
As for Monique, I feel she's pushing far too hard to convince folks that she & her husband are so in love and committed to each other, all the while they go out & fuck other people. Then she goes overboard by telling people that this was all her idea.
(My personal belief is that it actually was HIS idea but that she's covering for him, in an attempt to not come across as desperate, needy or pathetic.)

Honestly; I'm very pro-marriage, pro-stable relationship and have a very live & let live attitude.

However; I just don't feel that these particular celebrities are being genuine and that they're doing this to sell books, movies, & to stay relevant in popular culture.
And (if) their relationships fail (and ultimately, I believe they will) they will simply blame the other party, and generate some stupid or frivolous reason to explain why it failed...

But hey; I openly admit it, I could be wrong, y'know... :dunno:
 
she's in an open relationship because she wanted to fuck other men, and then discovered it's cheaper to keep him.
 
My answer:
Simply put, I've noticed a pattern in Hollywood & popular entertainment.
Often; celebrities who are very loud, public or preachy about their relationships are the ones who's relationships are built on the most shaky ground.
I believe that while these folks are (in public) verbally & visually very loving and intimate, that in private, they're actually doing all this to convince themselves.
Classic examples: Terry McMillan, Starr Jones & Sherri Shepard. (Yeah, I know it's just women listed here, but I couldn't quickly think of any men. Sorry.)
I personally feel that those celebrities who are more low key and more traditionally "guarded" about their relationships are more invested in them & have a better chance at making them work.
Celebrities like Steve Harvey (A comedian who fucked around on each of his ex-wives, but who has become a "relationship guru" and feels he can instruct women on what makes a relationship work.) are hypocrites.
As for Monique, I feel she's pushing far too hard to convince folks that she & her husband are so in love and committed to each other, all the while they go out & fuck other people. Then she goes overboard by telling people that this was all her idea.
(My personal belief is that it actually was HIS idea but that she's covering for him, in an attempt to not come across as desperate, needy or pathetic.)

Honestly; I'm very pro-marriage, pro-stable relationship and have a very live & let live attitude.

However; I just don't feel that these particular celebrities are being genuine and that they're doing this to sell books, movies, & to stay relevant in popular culture.
And (if) their relationships fail (and ultimately, I believe they will) they will simply blame the other party, and generate some stupid or frivolous reason to explain why it failed...

But hey; I openly admit it, I could be wrong, y'know... :dunno:

I only knew of Terry McMillan. The others i didn't care about.

Yeah Steve Harvey was just bullcrap from beginning to end. I couldn't understand why anyone would listen to him.

So with Monique you just don't want to believe that she could want a open relationship. I don't knock ya. It's your belief. I get it man.

I'm not pro marriage. I am pro relationship. I am pro balance. And i'm pro reason. Marriage isn't for reasonable people unless you want it to be. Relationships are needed and if you're mature absolutely they can work. I don't believe being with 1 person forever is for many people. Mostly men. But there's some women out there who feel the same way. There's alot of fuckery in this society in these days. I think some people just want to try something different and they think different because of circumstances. Every person in our relationship has crossed a threshold i like to think. Where they realize i don't have to do it the way society says i have to do it.
 
I only knew of Terry McMillan. The others i didn't care about.

Yeah Steve Harvey was just bullcrap from beginning to end. I couldn't understand why anyone would listen to him.

So with Monique you just don't want to believe that she could want a open relationship. I don't knock ya. It's your belief. I get it man.

I'm not pro marriage. I am pro relationship. I am pro balance. And i'm pro reason. Marriage isn't for reasonable people unless you want it to be. Relationships are needed and if you're mature absolutely they can work. I don't believe being with 1 person forever is for many people. Mostly men. But there's some women out there who feel the same way. There's alot of fuckery in this society in these days. I think some people just want to try something different and they think different because of circumstances. Every person in our relationship has crossed a threshold i like to think. Where they realize i don't have to do it the way society says i have to do it.

Unfortunately; no, I don't believe it.
And yes, you're 100% correct, there IS a lot of fuckery in today's society. And I believe this is just another serving of it.

Honestly; I believe that if this dude is so great and wonderful, there would be no need for them to "swing".
(Not saying that a happy, loving couple couldn't try swinging).

I just believe that after all these years of Monique advocating for the "big girls" and telling them they can have a man of their own and such, it seems like an unusual contradiction to say the least.
As I stated before; I personally believe it was HIS idea to have an open relationship and that Monique is saying it was her idea in order to save face.
-I believe that it's possible she might have caught dude cheating and is willing to allow it because she can't stop him.

-I believe that it's possible she will co sign his infidelity in public because, (perhaps) she's desperate for a relationship & to keep up appearances. (Keeping up appearances for her hardcore fans).

-I believe that it's possible that for all of her "He loves me because he loves big girls with hairy legs" bullshit, that she still shaves her legs regularly & has still lost substantial amount of weight.

-I mean; don't you find it a bit odd that Monique seems to be the ONLY sister who can find chubby chasers that love married, black women with hairy legs? :confused:
(Not a group in high demand I'm pretty sure).

-I'm sorry but I don't buy her lovely little story about wanting to see some other man and "being comfortable enough to tell her best friend"...:rolleyes:

Bottomline: Anything is possible. But; for the life of me, I'm just not buying THIS.
And as I said before, I could be wrong...:dunno:
 
Unfortunately; no, I don't believe it.
And yes, you're 100% correct, there IS a lot of fuckery in today's society. And I believe this is just another serving of it.

Honestly; I believe that if this dude is so great and wonderful, there would be no need for them to "swing".
(Not saying that a happy, loving couple couldn't try swinging).

I just believe that after all these years of Monique advocating for the "big girls" and telling them they can have a man of their own and such, it seems like an unusual contradiction to say the least.
As I stated before; I personally believe it was HIS idea to have an open relationship and that Monique is saying it was her idea in order to save face.
-I believe that it's possible she might have caught dude cheating and is willing to allow it because she can't stop him.

-I believe that it's possible she will co sign his infidelity in public because, (perhaps) she's desperate for a relationship & to keep up appearances. (Keeping up appearances for her hardcore fans).

-I believe that it's possible that for all of her "He loves me because he loves big girls with hairy legs" bullshit, that she still shaves her legs regularly & has still lost substantial amount of weight.

-I mean; don't you find it a bit odd that Monique seems to be the ONLY sister who can find chubby chasers that love married, black women with hairy legs? :confused:
(Not a group in high demand I'm pretty sure).

-I'm sorry but I don't buy her lovely little story about wanting to see some other man and "being comfortable enough to tell her best friend"...:rolleyes:

Bottomline: Anything is possible. But; for the life of me, I'm just not buying THIS.
And as I said before, I could be wrong...:dunno:

Funny. I am not qualified to answer but I know polyamorous and people who have open relationships would laugh at some of your reasoning. Main reason is because your view on what constitutes a happy relationship is very limited.
 
I could see if this was somebody hot but her ol lumpy dumpy ass? So:hmm: He getting more benefits because his side pieces are spending her money and she can get side dick. Honestly it's not a bad idea to me but she is not attractive at all. I'd finger her every blue moon and bring all the fine bitches for her to eat their pussy as I fucked them, but not her. That would be my PLEASHARRRRRRo_O
 
Unfortunately; no, I don't believe it.
And yes, you're 100% correct, there IS a lot of fuckery in today's society. And I believe this is just another serving of it.

Honestly; I believe that if this dude is so great and wonderful, there would be no need for them to "swing".
(Not saying that a happy, loving couple couldn't try swinging).

I just believe that after all these years of Monique advocating for the "big girls" and telling them they can have a man of their own and such, it seems like an unusual contradiction to say the least.
As I stated before; I personally believe it was HIS idea to have an open relationship and that Monique is saying it was her idea in order to save face.
-I believe that it's possible she might have caught dude cheating and is willing to allow it because she can't stop him.

-I believe that it's possible she will co sign his infidelity in public because, (perhaps) she's desperate for a relationship & to keep up appearances. (Keeping up appearances for her hardcore fans).

-I believe that it's possible that for all of her "He loves me because he loves big girls with hairy legs" bullshit, that she still shaves her legs regularly & has still lost substantial amount of weight.

-I mean; don't you find it a bit odd that Monique seems to be the ONLY sister who can find chubby chasers that love married, black women with hairy legs? :confused:
(Not a group in high demand I'm pretty sure).

-I'm sorry but I don't buy her lovely little story about wanting to see some other man and "being comfortable enough to tell her best friend"...:rolleyes:

Bottomline: Anything is possible. But; for the life of me, I'm just not buying THIS.
And as I said before, I could be wrong...:dunno:

You have absolutely every right to feel this way. I respect you and i get it. You're open enough to say that different relationships can exist. You just don't believe her. Props all the way. :)
 
Funny. I am not qualified to answer but I know polyamorous and people who have open relationships would laugh at some of your reasoning. Main reason is because your view on what constitutes a happy relationship is very limited.

Not for nothing my friend, but you have absolutely no idea of what I believe constitutes a "happy relationship".
I have no particular problem with people who have an open relationship or who swing, as long as they're being honest & truthful.
However; for some reason, I just find the whole Monique thing to be "questionable".
We're talking about a woman who's own brother molested her when she was 7-8 years old.
So yeah; it's no stretch to believe that self esteem, trust and body image issues would be VERY prevalent with Monique and within her relationships as a result.
And for her to do "whatever it takes" to keep her man & maintaining a very public relationship, (including tolerating his lies, infidelity & bullshit) is not unbelievable...

But hey; I could be wrong... :dunno:
 
You have absolutely every right to feel this way. I respect you and i get it. You're open enough to say that different relationships can exist. You just don't believe her. Props all the way. :)

Thank you for accepting my different point of view... :)
(Even though I know you disagree...):D
 
:lol:..don't nobody give a good goddamn who she is or isn't fuckin'. On second thought, I could see where cats wouldn't want that to get out. In any case this shit is hilarious. Talk about taking yourself to seriously...
 
Back
Top