Missile shot at plane LAX

Makeherhappy

Potential Star
Registered
ANYONE HEAR ABOUT THIS?

Northeast Intelligence Network Investigates

Unconfirmed Report: Passenger Aircraft from LAX Possible Target of Missile?
The Curiously Vanishing News Story

by Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

28 November 2005: Under normal circumstances and in a perfect world, a possible "missile attack" against a commercial flight in the early morning hours after a holiday weekend would be a news story. A BIG NEWS story. Sadly, today's climate does not demand comprehensive reporting, and even on rare occasions when it does, no one seems to want to ask the "hard questions" anymore. Investigative reporting has taken a backseat to mere acceptance of inane explanations by official spokesmen who seem to know they won't have to be held accountable for their answers. Many in the American public seem to acquiesce, refuse to believe that the war on terror has reached America, or as radio personality and regular guest on Fox & Friends MANCOW said to me during a recent interview about the bombing at O.U., "I don't want to hear it." The latter, of course, was an apparent parody of the malaise of the public, making the point that many people simply don't want to hear what is really going on as long as their world is not directly affected.

That said, there is a "news story" that was broadcast on a few radio stations early this morning that detailed an alleged incident of a U.S. passenger plane departing from the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), enroute to the east coast, that (reportedly) "narrowly avoided being hit by a missile." The altitude of the flight at the time of the alleged incident was 6,000 feet and over the Pacific Ocean in a turn-and-climb pattern. According to news reports broadcast early this morning, officials dismissed this incident, even chalking the sighting up to a "flare" or a "bottle rocket," despite the obvious impossibility of either scenario. Interestingly, the details of the story remained vague until they apparently vanished from the media.

Since approximately 9:00 this morning, the Northeast Intelligence Network has received nine-(9) separate e-mails about this incident, yet aside from some very astute first person reporting at the very informative web site Free Republic, there has been no mention about this incident by anyone else on the Internet or in the media. Multiple posters on the Free Republic web site heard the same media reports cited by those who have sent e-mails to this agency, adding credibility to the initial news reports. Despite those fleeting news reports about a potentially devastating breach of national security and the possibility of a mass casualty event, there has been no media follow-up, and inquiries to the FAA by the Northeast Intelligence Network have not been answered as of this report.

The Northeast Intelligence Network is continuing to investigate this incident - hoping to obtain some type of "official" confirmation. In the meantime, rest assured that everything is normal in the world today, and let us know where we can get some of those "bottle-rockets on steroids" for the next July 4th holiday picnic.

Reports will be provided as information is developed.
 
I haven't heard it about, but I haven't checked any news sites yet. Man, if a fucking plane at LAX was narrowly missed by a fucking MISSILE..that shit will be on the news. You can't keep anything like that a secret at LAX. Have you ever been through that Airport? It is one of the busiest in the world.
 
December 01, 2005

Airline Missile Story Still Needs Some Digging

I'm not entirely satisfied with what I've been able to dig up on the LAX missile/contrail story.

Melanie Morgan of KSFO in San Francisco has a link to this report, which offers further information:

Reports surfaced yesterday regarding an ABC Radio News report that claimed a pilot of a plane outbound from Los Angeles International Airport bound for Chicago reported seeing a missile launched at the plane.

What we do know is this. The initial report carried on ABC News Radio reported that the flight was taking off from LAX (Los Angeles International Airport) to ORD (Chicago). The radio news report said the flight was American Airlines dlight 621.

However, American Airlines flight 621 does not fly into LAX. It goes from ORD (Chicago) to DFW (Dallas Fort Worth) to SNA (Orange County - John Wayne International).

To further complicate any investigation, a review of Passur data for Orange County Airport finds that data is unavailable for the time period when AA 621 would have been landing. Flight data is available for the days immediately preceeding and immediately following the reported incident.

A check of several fee-based systems shows the same missing time period. When I called American Airlines, I was told that flight data was not available from them either for that flight on November 27.

I'd like to talk to anybody on the crew or who was a passenger on American Airline Flight 621 into Orange County in the early morning hours of either November 27 or 28. If you are such a person, or know of such a person, please email me with contact info and I'll get right back to you
 
eewwll said:
I haven't heard it about, but I haven't checked any news sites yet. Man, if a fucking plane at LAX was narrowly missed by a fucking MISSILE..that shit will be on the news. You can't keep anything like that a secret at LAX. Have you ever been through that Airport? It is one of the busiest in the world.
good reason to not report it
 
Makkonnen said:
good reason to not report it

Eyewitnesses Mokkonnen..at least hundreds if not thousands of people would have seen this..people on the plane..on the runway, in the terminals, driving through the airport? It's not about the airport reporting it..there is NO WAY that shit would not have hit the media...people would have been blogging, news sites would have gotten a hold of the story. There is no way that a missle gets shot at a plane in LA and it doesn't get leaked or reported by eyewitnesses at the minimum...and story hungry media will have made this a breaking new stories. It's impossible in this day and age to keep something like that secret. Information spreads too easily now.
 
Time will tell now, won't it.

Remember:

There have been reports of pilots seeing flying aircraft that couldn't be identified. They were told to hush.

Like I said, time will tell
 
Makeherhappy said:
Time will tell now, won't it.

Remember:

There have been reports of pilots seeing flying aircraft that couldn't be identified. They were told to hush.

Like I said, time will tell

This doesn't compare to some UFO situation. Also, these are always reported..even the dubious ones. However, in our current situation..with our "war on terrorism" if there were anything to substantiate a missile attack on a U.S. passenger plane, the Networks would fight to be the first to report it. If that shit happened, it would have been on the news TODAY.
 
Makeherhappy said:
Our government and our media, strange bed fellows.

We'll See

Not in this day and age. With podcasting, bloggers, floggers, independent news sites, forums,etc...the "mass media" is no longer dominated by a few dominant sources. It is impossible to kill a story of this nature with the countless means of distribution that currently exist.
 
Of course, I could be wrong - but I have to agree that if a missile came within as much as two days of a plane out of LAX, two or three CNN reporters and camera crew would have died stumbling over themselves trying to give us Breaking News. Sometimes the media and government do make the strangest of bedfellows ... but we know about that too ... for the same reasons.

QueEx
 
eewwll said:
Not in this day and age. With podcasting, bloggers, floggers, independent news sites, forums,etc...the "mass media" is no longer dominated by a few dominant sources. It is impossible to kill a story of this nature with the countless means of distribution that currently exist.

It's possible, but majority of the people don't do podcasting, look at blogs, independent news sights and forums.

The Mass Media (i.e., CNN, ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC, MSNBC and so on) are and will continue to be.

IMHO, I differ with the impossibility.

Time will tell.
 
Makeherhappy said:
It's possible, but majority of the people don't do podcasting, look at blogs, independent news sights and forums.

The Mass Media (i.e., CNN, ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC, MSNBC and so on) are and will continue to be.

IMHO, I differ with the impossibility.

Time will tell.

Even those media outlets that you mentioned don't the same interests and the U.S. is certainly no statist society by any stretch of the imagination. There are tens of millions of viewers of blogs and with 50k new blogs going live everyday. But the point is this..you ever read the book by Malcolm Gladwell..."The Tipping Point"?..the fact of the matter is that someone would have seen that missile and spread the story...it would have spread like a virus. The reality of the situation is that this didn't occur. Don't hold you breath waiting to get a confirmation. If this story has any substance, someone would have already broken it.even if just for self interest..because this would be a career making story break for some journalist or reporter. You haven't had it substantiated because there is no story here. When i was living in Cali last year..LAX was shout down several times over minor incidents because LA is one of the major ports of the U.S..if a fucking missile was shot at a plane, the entire airport would be closed no doubt. Sometimes one just has to use common sense here(even those common sense isn't so common)...this is one of the those that with a little thought can be dismissed because it doesn't add up. It would be different if it were a bomb threat...but a fucking MISSILE homie..you can't keep that a secret...At LAX there are always ten of thousands of people at that airport..a missle would be seen by thousands...even at 3 in the morning.
 
Northeast Intelligence Network = Alarmist group that uses fear to control the masses.
When TWA Flight 800 went down off the coast of Long Island there were reports that people saw fire trails heading towards that plane. These people had to be looking in that area of the sky at a certain time to see this. These stories made the news. If any sort of missile was launched near LAX we definitely would've heard about this from average people, the number of people that frequent that airport is too great. We've learned here @ BGOL that ALL SOURCES AND STORIES MUST BE CONFIRMED BY CREDIBLE AGENCIES.
That is all.
 
I think the real story is that something like this can even be discussed as a possibility. In the 90's if you mentioned stuff like massive terrorists attacks like 9/11 or missiles shooting down planes in the U.S. it would have just been blown off because things of that nature didn't happen here. Times have certainly changed.
 
eewwll said:
I think the real story is that something like this can even be discussed as a possibility. In the 90's if you mentioned stuff like massive terrorists attacks like 9/11 or missiles shooting down planes in the U.S. it would have just been blown off because things of that nature didn't happen here. Times have certainly changed.


I respectfully disagree.

I remember back in junior high school, that if a plane broke DC air space it would be shot done, but we see that's not the case.

The reference to the 90s. Their were countless number of movies in the 90s that referred to terror attacks, only problem is, the american movie industry always had us winning in the end.

""You" the people", have become confused about the truth, and they took advantage of "your" confusion. Not to say you personally, but "you" the mass.

Plus gov't cover is a bad disease.
 
Makeherhappy said:
I respectfully disagree.

I remember back in junior high school, that if a plane broke DC air space it would be shot done, but we see that's not the case.

The reference to the 90s. Their were countless number of movies in the 90s that referred to terror attacks, only problem is, the american movie industry always had us winning in the end.

""You" the people", have become confused about the truth, and they took advantage of "your" confusion. Not to say you personally, but "you" the mass.

Plus gov't cover is a bad disease.

Sometimes you really crack me up man...seriously. Did you just respond about movie content? I'm speaking about reality. The reality of the matter is that pre 2000, terrorists attacks were things that happened in other countries..not the U.S. Come back to reality man...it's pointless to even discuss things with you if were are dealing in reality and you are posting replies about movie content. There were all types of things that happened in the "movies of the 90's" shit man. I've speaking on the reality of "world events"...in this realm...not cinema. The fact of the matter is that the U.S. has rarely had to deal with attacks within it's borders. For a majority of the world..this is a reality. Geography has played it's role because we are locked within two friendly nations;however, ideologically.the U.S. has never been so despised worldwide. I don't mind if you disagree..or respectfully disagree...but don't use movies as support for issues that deal with objective reality and real events.
 
actually prior to 2000 the world trade center was blown up as was the olympics and oklahoma city

the media/political machine's version of terrorist attacks changed after 9-11 but not the reality of it- every few years some shit will jump off

most people dont say shit about smaller terrorist activity like cubans killin in miami etc
 
Makkonnen said:
actually prior to 2000 the world trade center was blown up as was the olympics and oklahoma city

the media/political machine's version of terrorist attacks changed after 9-11 but not the reality of it- every few years some shit will jump off

most people dont say shit about smaller terrorist activity like cubans killin in miami etc

There was a minor exposion in the basement of the parking lot NEXT to the world trade. It wasn't blown up. Oklahoma City wasn't a terrorist attack in the sense of a foreign terrorist attack like 9/11...none of those individual were U.S. citizens Also, the level of destruction wasn't even remotely comparable..apples and oranges Makkonnen.
 
eewwll said:
There was a minor exposion in the basement of the parking lot NEXT to the world trade. It wasn't blown up. Oklahoma City wasn't a terrorist attack in the sense of a foreign terrorist attack like 9/11...none of those individual were U.S. citizens Also, the level of destruction wasn't even remotely comparable..apples and oranges Makkonnen.
okay so the first world trade center attack was minor and wasn't conducted by terrorists and was not an act of terrorism in reality

oklahoma city wasnt a terrorist attack that happened in this country

my bad I stand corrected - I will use the updated eewwll versions of the words "Reality" and "terrorist/terrorism" from this point forward ;)

This country was founded by terrorists through acts of terrorism and that was also pre-2000.
 
Makkonnen said:
okay so the first world trade center attack was minor and wasn't conducted by terrorists and was not an act of terrorism in reality

oklahoma city wasnt a terrorist attack that happened in this country

my bad I stand corrected - I will use the updated eewwll versions of the words "Reality" and "terrorist/terrorism" from this point forward ;)

This country was founded by terrorists through acts of terrorism and that was also pre-2000.

Well...that is another topic altogether. I don't think terrorism encapsulates the founding of the U.S..i think that conquer and genocide would be more appropriate. :yes:

updated eewwll version :lol: Seriously though. I don't think Oklohoma city and September 11th are the same beast at all. They are the same in terms of acts of violence...but the ideology and goals of those acts are very disctinct and nonrelated..that was my point.

But I know what you mean though..because "terrorism" means many things to many people..because depending on who you ask..Palestinians in Hammas are freedom fighters and Israel is the terrorist state.
 
eewwll said:
Well...that is another topic altogether. I don't think terrorism encapsulates the founding of the U.S..i think that conquer and genocide would be more appropriate. :yes:

updated eewwll version :lol: Seriously though. I don't think Oklohoma city and September 11th are the same beast at all. They are the same in terms of acts of violence...but the ideology and goals of those acts are very disctinct and nonrelated..that was my point.

But I know what you mean though..because "terrorism" means many things to many people..because depending on who you ask..Palestinians in Hammas are freedom fighters and Israel is the terrorist state.
just pickin with what u said- it seemed better than makeherhappy's movie of the 90's shit- hey maybe i can use his version of "reality" where delta force 5 starring billy blanks took out osama bin farook in 97
lmbao
 
Makkonnen said:
just pickin with what u said- it seemed better than makeherhappy's movie of the 90's shit- hey maybe i can use his version of "reality" where delta force 5 starring billy blanks took out osama bin farook in 97
lmbao


:lol: :lol:
 
eewwll said:
I think the real story is that something like this can even be discussed as a possibility. In the 90's if you mentioned stuff like massive terrorists attacks like 9/11 or missiles shooting down planes in the U.S. it would have just been blown off because things of that nature didn't happen here. Times have certainly changed.
I think that in a pre 9/11 world, the guy on the plane in Miami might still be alive! That is the change!
 
Djmarkxr7 said:
I think that in a pre 9/11 world, the guy on the plane in Miami might still be alive! That is the change!

I think you are obsolutely correct on that one :yes:
 
Well, its been over 7 months now and still not a shred of credibility to this story.
 
QueEx said:
Well, its been over 7 months now and still not a shred of credibility to this story.

You just wanted me to speak to you.

Those were the reports from different eyewitnes.

Glad to know you are keeping me in mind.

Thanks

Oh, and by the way, just because you haven't heard anything about it doesn't mean that it's not credible.

Eyewitness report seeing a missile around TWA flight 800, but those individuals were hushed.


:smh: :smh: :smh: :smh:
 
Man, its alright to question any and everything. But dwelling in the land of suspicion just seems unreasonable, to me. I commented because I had been waiting to see if anything half-assed credible would ever come of the article. I searched before I typed, and not a damn drop.

You kill me when you assume that I was taunting you. Trust me, thats no fun. I'd much rather deal with reality, which has enough of its own REAL problems and complexities, than waste time trying to incite the already incited over incredulous opinion.

And, while you're still holding on to hope, those TWA 800 missile theories have long been laid to rest. You might want to give it some too. While you're at it, also consider that eyewitness-testimony has been proven over and over the among the least reliable.


QueEx
 
Back
Top