Military heads, is this possible

[Mask]

 

[Mask]

I ask this because I just saw what happen in a month long bombing mission against Yemen.

In the end we decided to stop bombing them because it was casting way to much and it didn’t stop them.


These 3 nations ain’t no fucking Yemen.

 

[TimRock]

"heads". That "s" matters

 

[Mask]

"heads". That "s" matters

wtf you talking about it’s there

 

[Rah]

The answer is no.

Military shouldn’t be an option to deal with all 3 & maintain the current rules based order.

 

[catdaddy]

Not at the same time.

 

[yureeka9]

America trying to fight India, China and Russia is like a male lion taking on three leopards. One on one the leopard doesn't stand a chance but if he ever calls a friend the lion better start looking for an escape route.

 

[World B Free]

The United States is full of hubris and the hubris is high before a fall 'cause the Winter of the US's discontent is coming.

 

[easy_b]

Trump bullshit brought us to this point

 

[Mask]

The United States is full of hubris and the hubris is high before a fall 'cause the Winter of the US's discontent is coming.

Yea I see where you going with this..

 

[WorldEX]

The answer is no!! Not even one of them one on one.

The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Bay of Bigs Invasion, and the War in Afghanistan. LST!

You need booths on the ground to win a war.

 

[Mask]

America trying to fight India, China and Russia is like a male lion taking on three leopards. One on one the leopard doesn't stand a chance but if he ever calls a friend the lion better start looking for an escape route.

excellent picture painted

Many seem to feel two of the three is actually lions but idk

 

[Mask]

The answer is no!! Not even one of them one on one.

The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Bay of Bigs Invasion, and the War in Afghanistan. LST!

You need booths on the ground to win a war.

Yes Washington just had an interesting bombing campaign against Yemen. After a month they said fuck this is costing to much and they ain’t letting up on attacking us

 

[Mask]

Not at the same time.

ok so one on one will work?

 

[Mask]

The answer is no.

Military shouldn’t be an option to deal with all 3 & maintain the current rules based order.

Is “Rules based order” really a thing?

 

[dbluesun]

Supposedly the US military can take on two Opponents at the same time
In this instance,if no one goes nuclear,then I think we could do two if one is Russia

 

[Rah]

The answer is no!! Not even one of them one on one.

The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Bay of Bigs Invasion, and the War in Afghanistan. LST!

You need booths on the ground to win a war.

Warfare is changing, especially with the additional cyber & space domains. Using non-kinetic capabilities to effect an adversary before they mobilize is upon us.

 

[Rah]

Supposedly the US military can take on two Opponents at the same time
In this instance,if no one goes nuclear,then I think we could do two if one is Russia

I’ve never read that in doctrine. Where did you read that?

 

[Rah]

Is “Rules based order” really a thing?

Yes

 

[World B Free]

Is “Rules based order” really a thing?

"Rule based order" is the US/Israel tellin' mofos what to do and they listen, it's really no rules except what the US and Israel says and that's it. It's really a "chaos-based order" rooted in a fervent White Supremacy.

 

[dbluesun]

I’ve never read that in doctrine. Where did you read that?

i never read it either,that's why i used the word supposedly
i did hear it on a military analysis youtube channel
so you gotta take it with a grain of salt