Michael Brown- "THE BODY IN THE STREET" -left on the street for 4 ½ hours (New Video Adds Wrinkle )

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
54d3d0cf040a8_-_453949514_614-2cis41-large.jpg




The Body In The Street

CpbDz0YWEAAeHJD.jpg


"I support officer Wilson and he did a great job removing an unnecessary thing from the public"





photo_100_1424889420.jpg

by Charles P. Pierce | August 22, 2014 |http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/The_Body_In_The_Street



I keep coming back to what seems to me to be the most inhumane thing of all, the inhumane thing that happened before the rage began to rise, and before the backlash began to build, and before the cameras and television lights, and before the tear gas and the stun grenades and the chants and the prayers. I keep coming back to the one image that was there before the international event began, before it became a television show and a symbol in flames and something beyond what it was in the first place. I keep coming back to one simple moment, one ghastly fact. One image, from which all the other images have flowed.

They left the body in the street.

Dictators leave bodies in the street.

Petty local satraps leave bodies in the street.

Warlords leave bodies in the street.

A police officer shot Michael Brown to death. And they left his body in the street. For four hours. Bodies do not lie in the street for four hours. Not in an advanced society. Bodies lie in the street for four hours in small countries where they have perpetual civil war. Bodies lie in the street for four hours on back roads where people fight over the bare necessities of simple living, where they fight over food and water and small, useless parcels of land. Bodies lie in the street for four hours in places in which poor people fight as proxies for rich people in distant places, where they fight as proxies for the men who dig out the diamonds, or who drill out the oil, or who set ancient tribal grudges aflame for modern imperial purposes that are as far from the original grudges as bullets are from bows. Those are the places where they leave bodies in the street, as object lessons, or to make a point, or because there isn't the money to take the bodies away and bury them, or because nobody gives a damn whether they are there or not. Those are the places where they leave bodies in the street.

Bodies are not left in the streets of the leafy suburbs. The bodies of dogs and cats, or squirrels and raccoons, let alone the bodies of children, are not left in the streets of the leafy suburbs. No bodies are left in the streets of the financial districts. Freeze to death on a bench in the financial districts and you are whisked away before your inconvenient body can disturb the folks in line at the Starbucks across the street. But the body of a boy can be left in the street for four hours in a place like Ferguson, Missouri, and who knows whether it was because people wanted to make a point, or because nobody gave a damn whether he was there or not. Ferguson, Missouri was a place where they left a body in the street. For four hours. And the rage rose, and the backlash built, and the cameras arrived, and so did the cops, and the thing became something beyond what it was in the first place. And, in a very real way, in the streets of Ferguson, the body was still in the street.

***

The rage rises.

The very last march in which Martin Luther King, Jr. participated ended violently. He had come to Memphis to lend support to a strike by the city's sanitation workers. On March 28, 1968, King led a march in support of the striking workers. It did not end well.

King arrived late and found a massive crowd on the brink of chaos. Lawson and King led the march together but quickly called off the demonstration as violence began to erupt. King was whisked away to a nearby hotel, and Lawson told the mass of people to turn around and go back to the church. In the chaos that followed, downtown shops were looted, and a 16-year-old was shot and killed by a policeman. Police followed demonstrators back to the Clayborn Temple, entered the church, released tear gas inside the sanctuary, and clubbed people as they lay on the floor to get fresh air. Loeb called for martial law and brought in 4,000 National Guard troops. The following day, over 200 striking workers continued their daily march, carrying signs that read, "I Am a Man"... At a news conference held before he returned to Atlanta, King said that he had been unaware of the divisions within the community, particularly of the presence of a black youth group committed to "Black Power" called the Invaders, who were accused of starting the violence.
The backlash builds.

Whites, angered by the property damage to businesses during the aborted march, blamed blacks. The President of the Memphis Chamber of Commerce told the New York Times: "You can't take these Negro people and make the kind of citizens out of them you'd like."(sic). Rev. Lawson would later note that the nonviolence of thousands of black citizens who moved back to the church and their homes was lost in press accounts of the story.
A week or two later, Dr. King stepped out onto the balcony of his motel room in Memphis. A white man shot him through the neck and he died. They covered his body with a sheet. They did not leave it there on the balcony, blood pooling around it, for four hours.

***

In 1965, the editors of the National Review traced the violence of the Watts riots back to the baleful influence of Dr. King's various campaigns throughout the South.


For years now, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and his associates have been deliberately undermining the foundations of internal order in this country. With their rabble-rousing demagoguery, they have been cracking the "cake of custom" that holds us together. With their doctrine of "civil disobedience," they have been teaching hundreds of thousands of Negroes - particularly the adolescents and the children - that it is perfectly all right to break the law and defy constituted authority if you are a Negro-with-a-grievance; in protest against injustice. And they have done more than talk. They have on occasion after occasion, in almost every part of the country, called out their mobs on the streets, promoted "school strikes," sit-ins, lie-ins, in explicit violation of the law and in explicit defiance of the public authority. They have taught anarchy and chaos by word and deed - and, no doubt, with the best intentions - and they have found apt pupils everywhere, with intentions not of the best. Sow the wind, and reap the whirlwind. But it is not they alone who reap it, but we as well; the entire nation.
In 2014, the editor of the National Review traced the violence of the disturbances in Ferguson to the baleful influence of MSNBC.

You get the feeling that the enormous emotional investment in Ferguson from the left-from Eric Holder to MSNBC on down-reflects a nostalgia for the truly heroic phase of the civil rights movement. They (most of them, at least) can never be Freedom Riders, but they can write blog posts complaining that the police gear in Ferguson looks scary. They can never register voters in the Jim Crow South, but they can tweet dramatic pictures of tear-gas canisters going off. They can never march over the Edmund Pettus Bridge circa 1965, but they can do some cable hits. Ferguson is all they've got, so it must be spun up into a national crisis-our Gaza, our apartheid-to increase the moral drama.
They do not leave bodies in the street in Arlington County in Virginia, where the editor of the National Review grew up.

***

The story now seems to be about the "healing process" going on in Ferguson. The nights are quieter. The National Guard has pulled out. Some of the reporters have moved on to other things. There will be a funeral on Monday for the boy whose body was left in the street. It will be a dignified spectacle and it will be terrific television and it will be said to be "healing" the wounded place. Meanwhile, there are other people finding their healing in many different ways.

I support officer Wilson and he did a great job removing an unnecessary thing from the public.
An unnecessary thing.

The body they left in the street.

The body that, in so many ways, is still in the street.

An unnecessary thing.

The body they left in the street. For four hours. Ferguson, Missouri was a place where they left a body in the street. For four hours. And the rage rose, and the backlash built, and the cameras arrived, and so did the cops, and the thing became something beyond what it was in the first place. And, in a very real way, in the streets of Ferguson, the body was still in the street. What kind of place leaves the body of a boy in the street? What kind of country does that?

Dos Passos was correct.

All right.

We are two nations.

All right?



 
Last edited:
345yezs.jpg


Darren-Wilson.jpg


To avoid capital punishment Darren Wilson read the following allocution statement to the judge and court record as part of his plea deal with his attorney at his side.

OFC Darren Wilson: The chief of police and other officers of Ferguson Police Department in a conspiracy decided to commit a gruesome terrorist act that would inflict fear on the black residents of the town.

We were hoping that this incident would become national news and inflict terror on other African-Americans. We were in essence white supremacists that despised and look down upon the black residents of the town. Similar to the James Foley murder although distributed and freely available to everybody, the message was directed to Pres. Obama. My terrorist act was also directed to a person who used an alias similar to Michael Brown’s name to inflict fear and prevent him from speaking out.

OFC Darren Wilson: We noticed that Michael Brown had shoplifted before and capitalized on this predictable behavior to enact our complex scheme to commit murder. Since Ferguson, MO is a small town, we were quite aware of who Michael Brown was and I began to quietly surveil him for a number weeks to develop an opportunity that I and other co-conspirators in the police department can exploit to kill him.

OFC Darren Wilson: I was aware before approaching Dorian Johnson and Michael Brown that they had committed a minor shoplifting incident. However, I pretended to be unaware and knew I had lacked reasonable suspicion to detain them. After signaling to dispatch, that I was near by squelching the radio, who as planned announced a strong-arm robbery to over exaggerate the situation and help justify the use of deadly force.

Conveniently at just the right moment, although after much thought afterwards it is laughable that dispatch would just happen to broadcast this 'strong arm' robbery as I am near Dorian Johnson and Michael Brown, announced a 'strong-arm robbery' when it was just a minor shoplifting incident that did not warrant lethal force.

OFC Darren Wilson: I and other co conspirators planned that we had to broadcast the radio call as I was near to avoid the appearance of racial profiling. If I had approached them at another time, it would look like I was racial profiling, something we were trying to avoid.

OFC Darren Wilson: I now had reasonable suspicion that I could use to detain Dorian Johnson and Michael Brown that matched the description of the suspects. I backed up the car near Michael Brown and grabbed his shirt violently hoping that he would strike back to cause minor injuries to myself to show that I had justification to use deadly force. Michael Brown did strike back to flee from my grip. He did not reach for my weapon at all, he was simply trying to get away from this unusual encounter that I had premeditated.

OFC Darren Wilson: Since Dorian Johnson was present, I had a witness that would predictably go to the media and say that I executed him which I did. As Michael Brown broke away and after feeling that enough visible injuries were present on my body, I began to shoot at him with one bullet grazing his arm. He turned around realizing he had no other choice but to surrender with his hands up and I continued to discharge my weapon even though I was not in imminent danger. This execution would be witnessed by Dorian Johnson and possibly other people in the vicinity. These conflicting accounts of the incident would predictably bring national media attention to a common occurrence in America, which is the use of deadly force by law enforcement.

OFC Darren Wilson: As planned with other officers and the police chief in the department, we left the deceased in the streets for four hours to create anger and bitterness in the community. It also provided an opportunity for onlookers to videotape this murder that I committed that would be posted to YouTube. Just as other terrorist groups post their gruesome acts online.
 
Last edited:


Moderator's Note:


For anyone not paying close enough attention, the so-called "Allocution" above is not an actual confession.
It is, at best, at this time, the poster's (Cointelpro's) own version of what 'might have' happened.


 
Last edited:
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ucjgjWnF1xE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I had a bunch of people swarm and follow me today, I must have hit a nerve with this post. I have seen this pack behavior, multiple people involved in a scheme to attack my vehicle. Hopefully, the investigation is looking at other pieces of garbage that assisted Darren Wilson. It just does not look like a spontaneous event.
 
Last edited:

New witnesses come forward in Michael Brown shooting
Two new witnesses are speaking out about what they saw following the shooting death of Michael Brown.​


<iframe src='http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_hayes_eblock_140911_306650' height='500' width='635' scrolling='no' border='no' ></iframe>

 


New Witness Tape

A new tape, which has not been verified by NBC News, appears
to show the moments right after Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown.


<iframe src='http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_sharp_dblock_140911_306619' height='500' width='635' scrolling='no' border='no' ></iframe>



Will grand jury see new Mike Brown shooting tape?


 

Why are new Ferguson witnesses different?​

In the Rewrite, why are two new witnesses to Michael Brown’s death with similar
stories to other witnesses we’ve heard from being treated as more trustworthy?



<iframe src='http://player.theplatform.com/p/2E2eJC/EmbeddedOffSite?guid=n_lw_Erewrite_140911_306772' height='500' width='635' scrolling='no' border='no' ></iframe>


 
After looking at the facts of the case and investigating, it looks like this cop was trying to make a sick point. The police unknowingly are used by white supremacist in key political positions as tools of genocide through long term separation of men and women in a target group. This separation is created through the arbitrary enforcement of drug laws which pose no danger as much as somebody drinking or smoking in their home. They pose more danger to themselves.

I have made the link through extensive research on the matter and posted a thread. Rather than shooting people in the head and throwing them in a pit like the Nazi did the Jews, police are used to tie you up in prison with other men during your prime reproductive years.

Darren Wilson, a white supremacist, knew of this plot against other ethnic and minority groups. He saw that it was not working, incarcerating individuals and I had exposed this tactic publicly. He decided to go 1940's German style and just execute somebody with a gunshot to the head and body.


execution_of_a_jew_in_a_nazi_death_camp_by_shitalloverhumanity-d5mq1lr.jpg


1zbrvy0.jpg
 
Last edited:


"After looking at the facts of the case and investigating, it looks like this cop was trying to make a sick point", etc., etc.



You could be right in every respect, but you seem to make some rather bold conclusions in your post above without sharing with the readers the "facts or "reasoning" behind those conclusions. That is: you say that you've looked at the facts; and you say that you've conducted an investigation and the situation "looks like . . ."

Before I can begin to accept any of your conclusion, especially the first one, i.e., that the "cop was trying to make a sick point", don't you think that we (or at least I) am entitled to know what what you consider to be "the facts"; what your so-called investigation consisted of; and what, if any, factual (as opposed to conclusory) findings did you make based on that investigation ???

So, how about first talking about that investigation and what you contend the facts really are ???

I'm not trying to get you to write a scholarly article here, I just want to know whats underneath so that I know you're not just talking out of the side of your neck.



 


Not only do we have targeted enforcement of laws for arbitrary crimes such as smoking pot that will incarcerate you for years.

If the opportunity presents itself, they will blast you like a Nazi and throw you in a pit if given a chance.

tumblr_mbteijMGqe1r9khx4o1_500.jpg
 

New documentary suggests different story in Michael Brown case



A new documentary suggests Michael Brown did not rob a convenience store in Ferguson, Mo. before he was fatally shot in 2014 by police.

A new documentary that debuted Saturday at a film festival in Austin, Texas — citing previously unseen footage — instead reports that there was a possible drug transaction Brown had with employees at the store during an earlier visit, The St. Louis Post Dispatch reported.

The film, "Stranger Fruits," suggests Brown first went to Ferguson Market and Liquor at about 1 a.m. and exchanged a marijuana with the store clerks for boxes of cigarilllos. Before leaving the store, Brown reportedly gave the boxes of cigarillos back to the store clerk to get at a later time.

“Mike did not rob the store,” a narrator in the film says.

“It was a misunderstanding,” Brown’s mother, Lezley McSpadden, says.

Jay Kanzler, an attorney for the convenience store and its employees, said that there was "no transaction."

“There was no understanding. No agreement," he told The New York Times. "Those folks didn’t sell him cigarillos for pot. The reason he gave it back is he was walking out the door with unpaid merchandise and they wanted it back.”

St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said it was "news" to him that Brown had visited the store earlier in the day.

In August 2014, Darren Wilson, a white police officer, fatally shot Brown, an unarmed black man. The case sparked national protests and fueled concerns over the use of force by police.


SOURCE: http://thehill.com/homenews/news/32...uggests-different-story-in-michael-brown-case


.
 
U.S.
New Ferguson Video Adds Wrinkle to Michael Brown Case



upload_2017-3-12_12-14-17.png
Newly disclosed surveillance video showed Michael Brown
making an early-morning visit to a Ferguson, Mo.,
convenience store on the day he was shot by a police officer
in 2014. A second visit by Mr. Brown to the store minutes
before he was killed had received much more attention.
Credit via “Stranger Fruit”



The New York Times
By MITCH SMITH
MARCH 11, 2017

But a second, previously unreported video from that same convenience store included in a new documentary is raising new questions about what happened in the hours before the shooting on Aug. 9, 2014.

The footage shows Mr. Brown entering the store, Ferguson Market and Liquor, shortly after 1 a.m. on the day he died. He approaches the counter, hands over an item that appears to be a small bag and takes a shopping sack filled with cigarillos. Mr. Brown is shown walking toward the door with the sack, then turning around and handing the cigarillos back across the counter before exiting.

Jason Pollock, a documentary filmmaker who acquired the new tape, says the footage challenges the police narrative that Mr. Brown committed a strong-armed robbery when he returned to the store around noon that day. Instead, Mr. Pollock believes that the new video shows Mr. Brown giving a small bag of marijuana to store employees and receiving cigarillos in return as part of a negotiated deal. Mr. Pollock said Mr. Brown left the cigarillos behind the counter for safekeeping.

“There was some type of exchange, for one thing, for another,” Lesley McSpadden, Mr. Brown’s mother, says in Mr. Pollock’s documentary, “Stranger Fruit,” which premiered Saturday at the South by Southwest festival in Austin, Tex., and examines the shooting from the family’s perspective.

But Jay Kanzler, a lawyer for the convenience store and its employees, strongly disputes that version of events, and said the new footage is unrelated to Mr. Brown’s later visit to the store.

“There was no transaction,” Mr. Kanzler said. “There was no understanding. No agreement. Those folks didn’t sell him cigarillos for pot. The reason he gave it back is he was walking out the door with unpaid merchandise and they wanted it back.”

Regardless of what happened at the store in the early-morning hours, the new security footage does not resolve long-simmering questions about Mr. Brown’s encounter with Officer Darren Wilson along a Ferguson street that day. Officer Wilson, who claimed that he feared for his life and had been assaulted by Mr. Brown, was cleared of criminal wrongdoing by a county grand jury and federal civil rights investigators. He resigned from the Police Department.

Mr. Brown’s death and the sometimes violent protests that followed raised broad questions about how police officers treat black people, both in the St. Louis area and across the country, and many remain steadfast in their belief that Mr. Brown was murdered.

Protesters were particularly offended by the Ferguson Police Department’s decision to release the video that showed Mr. Brown shoving the store clerk, perceiving it as part of an effort to defame and demonize the young man. Ms. McSpadden, who also spells her first name as Lezley, questioned why that tape was released publicly while her son’s earlier visit to the store had been kept quiet.

“They destroyed Michael’s character with the tape, and they didn’t show us what actually happened,” said Mr. Pollock, who spent more than two years in Ferguson conducting research for his documentary, and who questions the decision to not charge Officer Wilson. “So this shows their intention to make him look bad. And shows suppression of evidence.”

The St. Louis County Police Department briefly mentioned Mr. Brown’s early-morning visit to the store in a lengthy report on the case, which tipped Mr. Pollock off to the existence of an additional video.

Sgt. Shawn McGuire, a spokesman for the county police, said in an email on Saturday that footage of the earlier encounter had not been released because it was not relevant to the investigation.

He added later that he could not confirm the video’s authenticity.

Spokesmen for the city of Ferguson and the St. Louis County prosecutor’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Saturday.
Mr. Brown’s parents have filed a federal lawsuit against Officer Wilson, the city of Ferguson and the former Ferguson police chief. A civil trial is scheduled to start next year.

A version of this article appears in print on March 12, 2017, on Page A22 of the New York edition with the headline: Release of Another Security Video Adds Details to Ferguson Timeline.



SOURCE: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/11/us/michael-brown-ferguson-police-shooting-video.html


.
 
Never Before Seen Michael Brown Footage Emerges
From the Day of His Death.
Police Say It’s ‘Not Relevant’



The new footage shows Brown entering Ferguson Market and Liquor shortly after 1 a.m. on the day he died. He approaches the counter, hands over what looks to be a small bag, and takes a shopping bag filled with cigarillos. Brown is then seen shown walking toward the door with the merchandise, then turning around and handing the cigarillos back across the counter before exiting the store.

Jason Pollock, a documentary filmmaker who acquired the new footage, says the tape challenges the police narrative that Brown committed a strong-armed robbery when he returned to the store around noon that day.

Pollock believes that the new video shows Brown giving a small bag of marijuana to store employees and receiving cigarillos in return as part of a deal.


Brown’s mother speaks on it. She also questioned why that tape was released publicly while her son’s earlier visit to the store was not.

“There was some type of exchange, for one thing, for another,” says Lesley McSpadden in the documentary.


The director says it is a clear suppression of evidence.

“They destroyed Michael’s character with the tape, and they didn’t show us what actually happened,” said Pollock, who reportedly spent more than two years in Ferguson conducting research for his documentary. “So this shows [the police’s] intention to make him look bad. And shows suppression of evidence.”

According to the New York Times, Sgt. Shawn McGuire, a spokesman for the St. Louis County police, said in an email on Saturday that footage of the earlier encounter had not been released because it was not relevant to the investigation.

He added later that he could not confirm the video’s authenticity.

A lawyer for the convenience store and its employees disputes that version of events, for obvious reasons.

“There was no transaction,” says Jay Kanzler. “There was no understanding. No agreement. Those folks didn’t sell him cigarillos for pot. The reason he
gave it back is he was walking out the door with unpaid merchandise and they wanted it back.”

Pollack said that he was tipped off to the new video because the St. Louis County PD briefly mentioned Brown’s early-morning visit to the store in a lengthy report on the case.



SOURCE: http://www.theroot.com/never-before-seen-michael-brown-footage-emerges-on-the-1793197639


.
 
There are other key information being left out to suggest Darren Wilson guilt.

Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, John Crawford, Walter Scott, and many others were a murderous terrorist spree by whites covered up by the government, as a poor attempt to silence somebody. They have used their media outlets controlled by them to launch a barrage of attacks, this goes in line with this same disgusting efforts; as well as daily harassment of this individual.

We have seen these tactics used during the Civil Right era of Dr. King where people were murdered to discourage protestors. This is nothing new.
 
The Body In The Street
I keep coming back to what seems to me to be the most inhumane thing of all, the inhumane thing that happened before the rage began to rise, and before the backlash began to build, and before the cameras and television lights, and before the tear gas and the stun grenades and the chants and the prayers. I keep coming back to the one image that was there before the international event began, before it became a television show and a symbol in flames and something beyond what it was in the first place. I keep coming back to one simple moment, one ghastly fact. One image, from which all the other images have flowed.

 
Ferguson was a wake up for some blacks in the area. They knew that they were trying to kill them. The beast seem to have back up but not given up. This dude here committed treason by telling some of what he know. I wonder if he is still alive. It seems to me he was a killer for them that talked to much.
 
Please post it.

.

The final bit of evidence of this being a coordinated terrorist murdering spree was the South Carolina massacre. As predicted in my post about Michael Brown and because nothing was done about this dog whistle murder by the Obama administration, it just embolden them to commit more heinous acts leading to the South Carolina massacre that was timed to when this person was going to be at an event.

Ben-Amy-Roof-Dylann-Roof-parents-7.jpg


It was an act of desperation by deranged and delusional whites looking to silence somebody whose work is already public knowledge.

I just don't understand it, when they want to do something, they don't face this level of interference and drama. Nine white people are not shot when somebody does something by a black gunmen.
 
Back
Top