Interesting. Of course they're going to talk OJ. She's got my attention for this one.
Mark Fuhrman on Oprah today?
- Thread starter Upgrade Dave
- Start date
What "shocking revelation" could he possibly have?
Another reason I hate this women.
I don't see how anything he says at this late date can be "shocking" but I'm interested in him finally having an interview where he's not portrayed as some great detective that got scapegoated.
See, we don't know that because Oprah can be really schizophrenic with her interview styles. I don't see her being hyper-combative but I don't see her coasting either.
Nah.
I see her being lightweight with Fuhrman.
They will no doubt stick to the topic of "OJ" if anything.
I feel she'll give Dude a "pass".
Sticking to Juice will definitely be giving him a pass. A hard interview would be digging in on him on the racist views he held as a LAPD detective but that's not going to happen.
What the fuck could Mark Fuhrman say that would be remotely interesting?
Fuhrman committed perjury in a murder trial in which he was a leading investigator and got a $500 fine. Wow. Well one thing he and Oprah will have in common is that they both hate O.J. and are glad they finally got him in jail.
I for one don't think there was enough evidence to convict the man. No blood in the Bronco... initially. Missing blood from the vials. Over 75 investigation violations (blood removed from scene, trampling the scene, etc.). They missed a knife in the house! The blood on the sock went all the way through (which can't happen if he's wearing it) and it was moved. I could go on. I've smoke many white folks with my not guilty decision.
I for one don't think there was enough evidence to convict the man. No blood in the Bronco... initially. Missing blood from the vials. Over 75 investigation violations (blood removed from scene, trampling the scene, etc.). They missed a knife in the house! The blood on the sock went all the way through (which can't happen if he's wearing it) and it was moved. I could go on. I've smoke many white folks with my not guilty decision.
Why is he even on the show? This shit is why I usually do not watch her show. I can't imagine that he has done anything important or ground breaking to have this attention on him. And if she's just having him on to discuss OJ, shame on her
hope she retires soon
Why is he even on the show? This shit is why I usually do not watch her show. I can't imagine that he has done anything important or ground breaking to have this attention on him. And if she's just having him on to discuss OJ, shame on her
She will and make MO money on a her own network. Fuck OJ
Why is he even on the show? This shit is why I usually do not watch her show. I can't imagine that he has done anything important or ground breaking to have this attention on him. And if she's just having him on to discuss OJ, shame on her
Well...
Considering that the OJ Case was being called at the time "The Crime Of The Century" by practically every media outlet is I'm sure a major reason for her re-visiting it via Fuhrman.
Well, I hope there is something groundbreaking that comes from it and not just beating a dead horse. She really should be ashamed of herself if it is just a ratings getter. I will wait for the BGOL analysis & clips
Well, I hope there is something groundbreaking that comes from it and not just beating a dead horse. She really should be ashamed of herself if it is just a ratings getter. I will wait for the BGOL analysis & clips
I'll Dvr and laugh.
OK,so lemme be Devil's advocate...
Why was OJ in the Bronco,on the verge of suicide??...and please don't say he was so upset about the woman's death.
I always felt Fuhrman and crew tried to frame a guilty man.
For those interested, this is what they are gonna rehash.
http://www.oprah.com/showinfo/Former-LAPD-Detective-Mark-Fuhrmans-Stunning-Revelations
http://www.oprah.com/showinfo/Former-LAPD-Detective-Mark-Fuhrmans-Stunning-Revelations
I actually agree with this and it's not even playing devil's advocate. The Simpson verdict is why it's called "not guilty" and not "innocent".
I withhold judgement until I've seen the actual interview. I don't have high expectations so it's unlikely I'll be disappointed.
Actually it's Innocent till proven guilty, so if you are not proven guilty...
That's what the criminal justice system is based on but there is not "innocent until proven guilty" verdict and just there have been many innocent men found guilty and locked up, there are guilty men that go free.
He moved to Arizona?
because he knew he was being set up?
*cough* R Kelly
idaho
The timeline used by the prosecution doesn't work, imo. I wouldn't be able to get anywhere on time using it, let alone committing a murder beforehand and then catching a flight. Also, they've never established what happened to his blood stained clothes (unconfirmed on the dumping of a suitcase with his clothes by Kardashian) or the murder weapon even after private companies lent resources. They only came with blood on the socks at the foot of the bed and a "couple of drops" in the foyer. His drainage system was even tested and there was no blood found. Also, a 50+ year OJ killed two relatively young people by himself?
If he is indeed guilty, the LA police initially, and then the prosecution ended up fucking the case up.
I cant fuck with Oprah fam.. I just cant.
Any chance to make a black man look crazy, she's on it.
From all her films where the black man is always the predator, to her show where all the black men on it are homo, to having a motherfucker like Mark Fuhrman?
This bitch is coold, and is only interested in her ratings/paper. I can't even be mad at that per se.
But the shit comes at our (black males) expense.
Any chance to make a black man look crazy, she's on it.
From all her films where the black man is always the predator, to her show where all the black men on it are homo, to having a motherfucker like Mark Fuhrman?
This bitch is coold, and is only interested in her ratings/paper. I can't even be mad at that per se.
But the shit comes at our (black males) expense.
Century?????
WTF
So what happened to this shit?
How is this classified?
Those some serious scenes you posted there.
No problem. As far as the trial was concerned the Bronco 'chase' was not brought in the criminal trial because it's not pertainent to proving guilt or not. Hell I'd run if I thought I might be sent to jail. However, the case hadn't even started yet. He was free on bail until he did this dumb ass manuever. So the Bronco chase was not considered in either pro or con. Although it was used in the civil case.
If he was trying to escape then using his loud ass white Bronco while driving down the highway was not the way to do it. Use Al Cowlin's car or rent one, but don't drive that one. It wouldn't be the last time OJ would do something stupid. In fact it cost OJ his temporal freedom while the trial ensued. Regardless, the Bronco 'chase' is not evidence of guilt and was told to the jury not to be used to determine the verdict and not to be used by the attorneys.
So what?
You don't think OJ done it????
I thought this debate had been done and settled..
The timeline used by the prosecution doesn't work, imo. I wouldn't be able to get anywhere on time using it, let alone committing a murder beforehand and then catching a flight. Also, they've never established what happened to his blood stained clothes (unconfirmed on the dumping of a suitcase with his clothes by Kardashian) or the murder weapon even after private companies lent resources. They only came with blood on the socks at the foot of the bed and a "couple of drops" in the foyer. His drainage system was even tested and there was no blood found. Also, a 50+ year OJ killed two relatively young people by himself?
All of the stuff you posted is why I always have a shadow of a doubt and probably would have came to the same verdict.
But Juice could kill both of those people. I don't remember it being suggested he killed both at the same time but one at a time.
Century?????
WTF
So what happened to this shit?
How is this classified?
I concur, strongly. The OJ Trial was the "Trial of the Century", not "Crime". I think the brother misspoke.
When a person has to give blood multiple times because his initial sample came up half empty...how can anyone trust "forensic" evidence
Similar threads
