Manafort's attorneys failed to properly redact their filing and reveal conspiracy with Kremlin

Don't forget... Manafort already got busted for violating his 'plea agreement' & passing info to Trump.

Which means that Manafort's lawyers know that the Feds are watching ALL of them CLOSER THAN EVER before.

So I wouldn't be surprised if they are STILL trying to 'communicate' to Trump via these mis-written court documents... by letting Trump know 'what' Mueller is (currently) investigating. :rolleyes:

When you can't do it directly.... do it IN-directly... and act like it was a mistake. :rolleyes:
 
President Obama was illegally wiretapping President Trump and other nefarious activities such as assassination and IP theft. Because he is being used as a proxy negro by whites, they aren't doing nothing about it.

I think Trump stepped into the same quagmire as Tavis, attacking proxy negro of whites leading to this being sic on him.

Without this special prosecutor, President Obama would be facing criminal Nixonian charges. Countries share intelligence all the time.

My SA example, a black person accusing their proxy white candidate that would enact land reform of criminal activity would jeopardize their whole scheme.
 
Last edited:
President Obama was illegally wiretapping President Trump and other nefarious activities such as assassination and IP theft. Because he is being used as a proxy negro by whites, they aren't doing nothing about it.

I think Trump stepped into the same quagmire as Tavis, attacking proxy negro leading to this being sic on him.

Without this special prosecutor, President Obama would be facing criminal Nixonian charges. Countries share intelligence all the time.

Where's the proof? Trump, the president, said it and didn't have a proof. Where's yours?
 

Sigh...Did you even read the article? It says the FBI "wiretapped" Manafort and Trump might have been caught in the wiretap. It doesn't say OBAMA wiretapped Trump. The FBI is an independent body. The entire justice department is supposed to be its own independent body from the executive branch. They initiated a wiretap because they were APPROVED for it by ANOTHER INDEPENDENT BODY. Reread everything i just wrote and go back to bed, wake up and reread it again.
 
Sigh...Did you even read the article? It says the FBI "wiretapped" Manafort and Trump might have been caught in the wiretap. It doesn't say OBAMA wiretapped Trump. The FBI is an independent body. The entire justice department is supposed to be its own independent body from the executive branch. They initiated a wiretap because they were APPROVED for it by ANOTHER INDEPENDENT BODY. Reread everything i just wrote and go back to bed, wake up and reread it again.

If these reports are accurate, it means U.S. intelligence agencies secretly surveilled at least a half dozen Trump associates. And those are just the ones we know about.

Besides Manafort, the officials include former Trump advisers Carter Page and Michael Flynn. Last week, we discovered multiple Trump “transition officials” were “incidentally” captured during government surveillance of a foreign official. We know this because former Obama adviser Susan Rice reportedly admitted“unmasking,” or asking to know the identities of, the officials. Spying on U.S. citizens is considered so sensitive, their names are supposed to be hidden or “masked,” even inside the government, to protect their privacy.

If President Obama was aware of the surveillance of a presidential candidate which is highly likely considering the National Security Advisor was involved than he can stop any illegal surveillance by terminating that employee. Something this high level would have gotten his approval.

Trump implied criminal Nixonian conduct leading to this retaliatory prosecution of his personal attorney leaking info on Stormy Daniels, Flynn, and Manafort.
 
Last edited:
Where Manafort get his lawyers from? who reccomended them clown mutherfuccas :lol:

So what do they mean that you can just copy and paste the text? I use adobe pro for redactions. It makes a clean black box over the redacted text. Are they saying that one can just copy and past the text independently of the redacted box on top of the text? If that’s true a whoooooolleeeee lot of muhfuckas are in trouble and will be spending today reading supposedly redacted text from opposition filings.........and Adobe is TOAST.

Technology isn’t always the best. An old fashioned black sharpie is still the way to redact. Period. Copy and paste that bitches.

When you can't do it directly.... do it IN-directly... and act like it was a mistake. :rolleyes:

My first thought.
 
Is this the smoking gun nail in the coffin?

How much more do we need.

This fucker GAVE Russians intelligence presidential polling data.

This the Cambridge analysis.

Bury Trump and all these fools already.

This is HUGE. Remember Sam Patten? He plead guilty to steering foreign funds to Trump's Inaugral and was an unregistered foreign agent currently cooperating with Mueller as part of his plea deal.

He has a long history with Klimnik and started a messaging strategy business with him a while back. He also worked at a US parent of Cambridge Analytica during the 2014 midterms. It's pretty likely he had continued contacts with them in the 2016 elections.

So here we have a clear line from Trump's own campaign chair, Russian intelligence and Cambridge Amalytica and this is only one fucking thread. I'm amazed daily by this bullshit :smh:
 
Latest news.... Deputy AG Rosenstein to step down after new AG confirmed. I'm guessing the Mueller mixtape is on its way. Or hoping at least...
 
If President Obama was aware of the surveillance of a presidential candidate which is highly likely considering the National Security Advisor was involved than he can stop any illegal surveillance by terminating that employee. Something this high level would have gotten his approval.

Trump implied criminal Nixonian conduct leading to this retaliatory prosecution of his personal attorney leaking info on Stormy Daniels, Flynn, and Manafort.

Where does your article say President Obama authorized surveillance? Isn't your article supposed to be the basis of your statements? Are you just inferring based off your own determination? You know...Since you hold a high level position in the federal government with multiple clearance to even have a clue what goes on...
 
Back
Top