TPB 1 - The Eagles of Rome composed by Enrico Marini of the Action, Adventure, Historical genres.
www.zipcomic.com
https://www.zipcomic.com/the-eagles-of-rome-issue-tpb-1 
https://www.zipcomic.com/the-eagles-of-rome-issue-tpb-2 https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/The-Eagles-of-Rome
SHC
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/germanic romans sex/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/450393112/#q450393112
https://hentaiera.com/gallery/430426/ https://hentaiporns.net/mitton-jean-yves-messalina-3-the-whore-of-rome-english/ 

https://myhentaigallery.com/gallery/thumbnails/25841
Read Inguinis - Slave Of The Pantheon comic porn for free in high quality on HD Porn Comics. Enjoy hourly updates, minimal ads, and engage with the captivating community. Click now and immerse yourself in reading and enjoying Inguinis - Slave Of The Pantheon comic porn!
hdporncomics.com
Every society in ancient times used slaves. There was no need to justify it because it was seen as a natural fact of life: if you had power, you had slaves. If you were powerless, you were a slave. A question like this presupposes the moral principles of today's Judeo-Christian society were known and wide-spread in antiquity, which was simply not the case.
https://www.quora.com/How-did-Ancient-Rome-justify-the-use-of-slaves
Roman Empire had Semite emperors like caracalla encouraging everyone to race mix as one and giving everyone Roman citizenship. It’s a good thing Germans managed to save Europe when they took down that pro-miscegenation empire. Germans were going to do it again in ww2 and save Europe a second time around, but shitalians (fake allies) destroyed that hope.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/racist didn't romans mixed/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/403239312/#403244339
Even many Romans emperors were Arabs or some other race, and Alexander the Great even encouraged Greeks to marry brown women. Millions of Africans and Asians got Roman citizenship
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/celtic women slaves romans/
In ancient times, the romans were astounded that the women of the celtic tribes accompanied the men to the battleground with the children, and would block off the retreat with their wagons, killing any men who tried to retreat, and then themselves and the children if they were defeated rather than be taken as slaves.
In this way the men knew that the very existence of the tribe itself was at stake for the fight, and it compelled them to amazing feats of bravery.
Numerous tribes were utterly destroyed forever in this way.
If what Dan Carlin says in his Celtic Holocaust episode is true, they did. They got an army of 300,000 strong together to repusle Caesar. Then he just had his soldiers built impenetrable defenses and waited. The Celts didn’t have the administrative capacity to make supply lines for an army of 300,000, so the Celts got hungry and went home. Caesar then picked them off one by one. I don’t know if reality was that simple, but IMO it often is.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/54650554/#q54654792
The problem with the Gauls/Celts is that they were rarely a united people, they were hundreds of different tribes with different allegiances.
Half of them allied with Rome against the other half.
If the Romans couldn't beat you, they bought you. That's how they defeated Hannibal, they bribed his Numidian allies to switch sides (which took away his light cavalry).
Answer (1 of 5): During the Punic wars - there was a great Calvary commander on the side of the Carthaginians who was half Carthaginian and half Numidian. The stupid Carthaginians never let him forget his Numidian heritage. He realized no matter how many victories he won them- he would only ever...
www.quora.com
https://historum.com/t/soviet-union...ience-after-catastrophic-defeat.197417/page-2
At then end of the day Rome bought Carthage's cavalry leaving Hannibal's forces light and so lost.
Reminds me of Sparta with Asian money paying more for oarsmen in ships enabling them to defeat the Athenians at sea.
https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/7391/did-the-celts-really-go-into-battle-naked
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/romans celtic mixed/page/4/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/330007940/#q330014597 https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/330007940/#330010397
Been saying this forever. Central Italians are the real Italians. I can’t put my finger on it but every person from central Italy has that look that’s undeniably Italian while northerners could potentially pass for Germanic and southerners could pass for other meds.
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=6396529 https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7323956
titobeansz DTIYS by Chroniki
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=8077959
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/celtic romans women/page/8/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/155973347/#q156002935
Roman historians joked that even Celtic women would beat a Roman man in unarmed combat.
You are thinking about celts as depicted by Hollywood, so your vision of celts is biased. Celts and Gauls had quite brilliant civilizations, they mastered agricultur and blacksmithing and had a complete legal system. Their druids had knowledge in astronomy in medicine. Only thing is they were divided into several tribes (sometimes hostile with one another), so they obviously couldn't face the roman nation strong of millions of people. Gaul's chef Vercingectorix tried to unify gaullic tribes but it was too late and romans won. Then thr romans victors destroyed a lot of celts monuments to make the world believe that they were just savages. History is written by the victors, but nowadays serious historian are sure that those civilizations were more brilliant than what we are led to believe. Also fuck germans and nordics, they were dumb for real.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/celtic women slaves/page/7/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/161707222/#q161715128
I don't think it is. Romans were sick and degenerate, they took thousands of Celtic and Germanic girls/women from tribes they'd conquered as sex slaves. I have no doubt they'd use them for disgusting purposes as these.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/roman celtic barbarian/page/2/
Italians in the Roman era were a mix of Greek and northern European lineage.
Northern italian women were raped en masse by the Germanic and Celtic "barbarian" Visigoths. This is why northern italians have fairer features. Southern italians were raped en masse during the Moorish invasions. It is common for southern italians to have single digit north African admixture.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/celtic women roman empire/page/2/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/143581536/#143587421
When the Roman Empire conquered a place, they took the population (men, women and children) and sold them as slaves. It served as a prevention of a possible revolt, plus it made Romans rich. What you are seeing is slaves being brought to Rome's market in the background. At the spotlight are slave children and a Roman soldier is giving them treats, apples, as a form of compassion. The children have a fair skin and eyes, which suggest Celtic/Germanic/Slavic origin.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/143581536/#143587880
>be Rome
>local people are poor and hopeless
>they join the legion because they were promised to eventually get some land and money
>conquer some area
>most people still live like shit
>repeat
>profit
Ancient Roman society was even more abusive than Medieval feudals
Obviously it massively depends on the person you steal from but I can't imagine most people would go that far for an apple. Theft was common in Roman society, we have an abundance of curse tablets that curse people for theft in quite graphic ways. If a Roman man caught someone having stolen jewellery or in their house in the night, well, you know.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/ethiopians empire rome/page/1/
It pre-dates the US by about a hundred years. Bacon's Rebellion caused the creation of white identity, however the founders saw the utility in this and created the idea of the melting pot, where Europeans from most of Europe could move here, become "white" and have a cohesive ethnic identity in common, so that cooperation was possible. It was actually progressive for its day as it allowed Europeans that may have had traditional cultural strife, to come together under one shared ethnicity.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/racism didn't exist romans/
From what I read at least, racism like how we have today didn't exist back then. It certainly did, but in a different way, slavery too. They didn't even know what was north of Germania or south of Sudan. They knew China existed but only a few Romans out of millions ever met any Chinese. They also of course knew about the middle east and arab people, however the middle east wasn't nearly as brown and racially mutted as it is today. It wasn't too long before the romans when alexander had conquered a lot of it and white people were all over there, also many steppe peoples including the scythians were white as fuck with red hair according to roman/greek historians.
I don’t think race as we think of it today existed as a concept prior to the 19th century. Racism did begin before that in colonial regions, largely due to convenience factors due to slavery; and not due to the “scientific” rationals that occurred in the mid 19th century. The Iberian prejudice...
historum.com
Well, the Byzantines considered most other Europeans barbarians or at least beneath them. That's why Anna was reluctant to marry Vladimir, because the Rus' were considered barbarians, and not just the Russians, but other Slavs, for example the Balkan Slavs. John Kantakouzenos called the Serbs a poor people, and other Byzantines followed suit, however this was also motivated by politics in a large part.
Perhaps the most widespread victims of "racism" in a modern sense in medieval Europe were the Jews.
historum.com
These racist stereotypes (at least today they'd be considered racist) affected people who were Romanized such as Maximinus Thrax (of Thracian descent) who was considered a barbarian and the Roman general who lost against the Parthians at Elegia in 161 against the Parthians whose defeat was blamed on him being a "silly Celt" by Dio.
I also suspect the treatment of the Jews, Romani gypsies, and Irish could also be considered racism. Some have speculated that the rebellion of Thomas the Slav in the Byzantine Empire could have been because of discrimination of non-Greek ethnicities, but it is a very controversial idea. There...
historum.com
qJ_Nql0p8UA
https://www.google.com/search?q=were+middle+ages+racist+historum+site:historum.com&rlz=1C1QMKX_enUS1054US1054&oq=were&aqs=chrome.3.69i59j0i433i512j69i59l2j35i39j69i60l2j69i61.1499j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 ----->
https://historum.com/t/bantu-colonization-of-africa.194522/page-8
I don't think anyonehas mentioned that, in Ancient Roman civilisation, racism was basically unknown. Considering that the empire included North Africa, they surely must have encountered many black people, but there is no mention of any discrimination against them, in fact very little note of a person's skin colour.
On one hand it is natural and healthy instinct to mistrust outsiders/the unknown/ different. So part of it is inate instinct. However the prejudices and beliefs used to justify it are learned/taught. True, though I think the definition of who is 'outsider' is also learned - originally I...
historum.com
"Race" as we know it now, was not really a consideration back then, as I understand it. For instance, a black man - as we would call him now - was a member of Henry VII's court. Another such man, Giovanni Moro, was actually the Papal treasurer. There were also black men among the Spanish conquistadors.
https://historum.com/t/what-was-racism-like-during-the-middle-ages.127413/
Trying to develop an Imperial Empire based upon any type of "Racial Theory" is stupid. Very stupid. Because eventually, all Imperial Empires have to integrate said conquered peoples race into their empire and eventually that said race will be your leaders. Much of Rome's Emperors in the late 2nd Century were Arab as an example.
Isn’t that consensual? I think it is. After all, since the beginning the Christians accused the Jews of killing the Christ. I would not say so. I mean, there may be a common agreement that the Jews did not fare very well in ancient (and, later, medieval and early modern) Christian writings and...
historum.com
Ups! I confess that when I wrote Southern Europe, I didn’t think specifically in the case of Bulgaria, or the Balkans, but I was thinking about the Italian republics and as I said, the Iberian Peninsula. But interesting input, from a region that I don’t know much. Yes, “particularly among...
historum.com
That's because the "pagans" around today don't have any power. When they did, visibly practicing their religion was absolutely necessary socially, and often legally too. In fact the institutions of the state, and civic society were so closely intertwined that they were simply impossible to...
historum.com
I have become so hostile towards non-whites over the past two years it's really incredible. I will not speak to non-whites, I will not acknowledge them as human, I will not smile at them and I will not help them. I was grocery shopping a week ago and this disgusting African immigrant was desperately trying to start a conversation with me, I didn't respond or even look at him, as that would acknowledge him as a human. https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/whites get that fucking tribalism hostile/
The problem with this world view is that 90%+ of humans think in racist/tribalistic/dicrimnatory ways. So, you literally say that prettty much all humans are bad pople. It is in humans nature to think this way, and when you start to label human nature as bad and evil, well then you label humanity as bad and evil. Maybe in your small western bubble, people try their best not to think this way, but the reality is, that most of the world do. Humans are incredibly tribalistic and racist. Just look at pretty much all of africa, asia and south america, and europe as well. Look at the past. Just because in the last few decades, some people in the west have taken a stand against this type of thinking doesn´t mean it is still the default mode of thinking for the majority og humanity, and has been this way for hundreds of thousands of years. And probably will be for a long time. Ego by default, is a labeling mechanism for survival, and it labels in groups. This vs that, this group vs that group. It is one of the core aspects of human ego. Maybe you like to ignore this, but this is fact. We have the luxury to pretend we are kind, moral, non-racist people, only because we live in a society that heavily enforces it and since we live in luxury. As soon as that collapses, humans will resort back to their natural ways. Tribalistic people getting together in groups. Why? Survival. Some modern leftists try to supress their survival instict, and this will of course lead to that group dying out, becoming extinct, and some stronger group will take over.
https://www.google.com/search?q=romans+weren't+racist+site:www.reddit.com&sca_esv=569887179&rlz=1C1QMKX_enUS1054US1054&sxsrf=AM9HkKmaTFr0ZZ92PvW9h9t9CI9X6RCZOQ:1696186916732&ei=JMIZZcysLODbkPIPzpah-AI&start=10&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwjMzpPVxNWBAxXgLUQIHU5LCC8Q8NMDegQIAxAW&biw=1600&bih=789&dpr=1
Rome was extremely racist and ethnicist, as was almost any other state and culture at that era. It's just that their racism was different than ours. They hated their neighbors the most, until they got them incorporated into the empire and than started hating on their new neighbors. First Etruscan and other Italians, than those Punic filthes, later the Gaulic imbeciles, than Greek and Illyrian fags and at the end, the ones they couldn't subjugate, those dirty Germanic barbarians. I'm sure I've skipped a few, but that just shows how glorious the empire really was.
racial slurs roman empire
We're a very complex group of people who have many ingroups. For example, having an iPhone makes you part of an ingroup. Having White features makes you part of an ingroup. So does having a black purse. Hatred across these lines seem silly when they're taken it of context -- "You hate someone because they have a pink purse?"