Judge sides with CNN... orders press pass to be reinstated

lightbright

Master Pussy Poster
BGOL Investor
Judge orders Trump administration to restore CNN reporter Jim Acosta's White House press pass
CNN White House reporter Jim Acosta (C) arrives for a court hearing in Washington, DC, on November 14, 2018.
  • CNN's legal challenge came in response to the Trump administration's decision last week to yank Acosta's "hard pass," which gave him access to the White House grounds, after Acosta clashed with the president at a news conference earlier that day.
  • In the process, the suit threw into stark relief Trump's increasingly fraught relationship with many mainstream media outlets, which he regularly decries as "fake news" and "the enemy of the people."

A federal judge on Friday granted CNN's request for a court order that would temporarily reinstate network correspondent Jim Acosta's White House press pass, which had been suspended indefinitely in the wake of a fiery exchange between the reporter and President Donald Trump a week earlier.

CNN's lawsuit, announced Tuesday, argues that Acosta's constitutional rights had been violated by Trump and five other members of his administration, as well as by the U.S. Secret Service. The other defendants include chief of staff John Kelly, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, deputy chief of staff Bill Shine and Secret Service Director Randolph Alles.

The legal challenge came in response to the Trump administration's decision last week to yank Acosta's "hard pass," which gave him access to the White House grounds, after Acosta clashed with the president at a news conference earlier that day. The suit underscored Trump's increasingly hostile relationship with many mainstream media outlets, which he regularly decries as "fake news" and "the enemy of the people."


CNN argued that the White House infringed on Acosta's free press and due process rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The network was asking for an order that would temporarily reverse the White House's suspension of Acosta's hard pass, until a final decision on the lawsuit was reached. CNN also wants "a declaration that the revocation of Acosta's press credentials was unconstitutional."

CNN asked the judge to quickly rule on the request for a temporary restraining order, arguing that "every day that passes without Acosta regaining his press credentials is a concrete injury."

Justice Department lawyers replied in a court filing that suspending the pass was "lawful" and that the White House held "broad discretion to regulate" journalists' access to the grounds.

Acosta has often used stark language to challenge the White House on its policies. At the most recent White House press briefing on Oct. 29, Acosta grilled Sanders on Trump's use of the phrase "enemy of the people" to describe the media.

"If you're going to stand there and continue to say there are some journalists and news outlets in this country that meet that characterization, shouldn't you have the guts, Sarah, to state which outlets, which journalists are the enemy of the people?" Acosta asked.

Trump has specifically targeted both CNN and Acosta for their coverage of him and his presidency. In January 2017, then-president elect Trump tore into Acosta at a news conference, saying "your organization is terrible" and "you are fake news."

The rift between Acosta and the White House widened substantially at a Nov. 7 news conference the day after the midterm elections, where Trump claimed victory even after Democrats regained majority control of the House.

During a lengthy question-and-answer period, Acosta rebuked Trump for referring to a caravan of Central American migrants as an "invasion," and asked if the president thought he was demonizing immigrants.

Trump became visibly agitated with Acosta when the reporter continued asking follow-up questions after Trump tried to move on to other reporters. A female White House staffer walked up to Acosta and tried to snatch the microphone from his hand, but Acosta initially refused to give it up. "Pardon me, ma'am," Acosta said as he continued to question Trump.

"I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN. And if you did it well, your ratings would be much better," Trump told him at the time. "You are a rude, terrible person," the president added.

CNN's court filing notes that the White House's initial account of the incident — which was also its initial justification for suspended Acosta's hard pass — was incorrect.

In a series of tweets Nov. 7, Sanders said the Trump administration will "never tolerate a reporter placing his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as a White House intern."





Video footage of the event does not show Acosta putting his hands on the woman, who had walked up to him and reached across his torso to grab the microphone.

Sanders then released a video, reportedly sourced from right-wing conspiracy site Infowars, which The Washington Post and other outlets said was doctored. White House counselor Kellyanne Conway on Monday denied that the video had been altered, but said that it had been "sped up" in the same interview.

Two days after Acosta lost his hard pass, Trump appeared to undermine the White House's official justification for its action. Acosta "was not nice to that young woman," Trump said, but "I don't hold him for that because it wasn't overly, you know, horrible."

The press secretary later softened her language, accused Acosta of having "physically refused" to give up the mic. The White House's court filing Wednesday only cited the more recent characterization.

In an interview with right-wing news site the Daily Caller published Wednesday, Trump said Acosta was "bad for the country," but said he wasn't certain if he would beat CNN in the lawsuit.

"Is it freedom of the press when somebody comes in and starts screaming questions and won't sit down?" Trump asked rhetorically.

CNN said in its legal challenge that the "pretextual and unabashed attempt to censor a reporter" viewed as a critic sets a chilling precedent. "It could be others also" who lose their press passes, Trump said Nov. 9.

A swath of major media organizations, including NBC News, The Washington Post and The New York Times came out in favor of CNN and Acosta.

"It is imperative that independent journalists have access to the President and his activities, and that journalists are not barred for arbitrary reasons," those outlets said in a joint statement. "Our news organizations support the fundamental constitutional right to question this President, or any President."

Fox News also came out publicly on CNN's side, to the surprise of some in the media. Trump has close friendships with many Fox personalities, especially right-wing commentator Sean Hannity, and regularly promotes the network's content.

"While we don't condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the president and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people," Fox president Jay Wallace said in a statement.

But conservative cable network One America News Network, which has reportedly become one of Trump's favorites for its flattering coverage of his presidency, filed a supporting document in CNN's case Thursday night supporting the White House over its media colleague.

Trump was "right on point" to call Acosta "rude" during the heated exchange at the news conference, OANN argued.

"While this narcissistic approach may serve Plaintiff's self-interests as entertainers or media figures and the network that profits therefrom, they do not serve the interests of the forum," OANN said.

--CNBC's Dan Mangan contributed to this report.


https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html



.
 
Last edited:
I love it when Trump does something stupid that he can't legally do but he tries to do it anyway. Then a judge smacks him in the mouth and tells him he can't do what he was trying to do.

It's like watching a spoiled kid throw a tantrum and then watching that same spoiled kid get spanked in the middle of the aisle
 
That first press conference back for Acosta is going to be MUST SEE TV. :lol::lol:

He should walk into the press gallery in slow motion with two beers like Steve Austin.

I'm picturing...

biDFHU0.gif


It would be pure Comedy if the Judge is one Trump picked.

He was :lol:
 
this is only a temporary ruling, but I believe that if CNN wins this case it's going to completely change the way that the White House is covered for the next decade.

Let's be clear, Trump did not start the policy of demonizing the mainstream press in favor of right-wing journalism. He simply took George w Bush's policies and cranked the volume past 11.
 
this is only a temporary ruling, but I believe that if CNN wins this case it's going to completely change the way that the White House is covered for the next decade.

Let's be clear, Trump did not start the policy of demonizing the mainstream press in favor of right-wing journalism. He simply took George w Bush's policies and cranked the volume past 11.
Who did u vote for?
 
Judge did Tr#mp’s bidding. Delayed the ruling as long as possible to help send a message. Even if unconstitutional, adding lag and friction to the process helps cost money and chill reporting.

If your media company does not have CNN pockets and recognition, whatyagonnado when they threaten you?
 
A federal judge on Friday ruled to immediately reinstate CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s White House press credentials in a victory for the cable news network and the media outlets that are supporting its lawsuit.

CNN’s victory was in response to a temporary restraining order asking for the immediate restoration of Acosta’s press pass. Its broader lawsuit concerns whether the White House’s decision to revoke his press pass was unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly, who was appointed by President Donald Trump last year, said CNN’s attorneys were likely to prevail in their argument that the White House had violated Acosta’s and the network’s First and Fifth Amendment rights.

Kelly said he did not decide whether the White House violated the First Amendment, relying primarily on the Fifth Amendment in saying that Acosta’s and CNN’s right to due process was likely violated because the White House process for revoking his press pass was “shrouded in mystery.”

The judge also cited the “irreparable harm” to Acosta. The White House had argued that CNN could simply send other reporters in Acosta’s place, yet Kelly argued that it “does not make the harm to Mr. Acosta any less real.”

Under the ruling, Acosta will temporarily receive his press pass back, while the full lawsuit proceeds.

“We are gratified with this result and we look forward to a full resolution in the coming days,” CNN said in a statement. “Our sincere thanks to all who have supported not just CNN, but a free, strong and independent American press.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Friday that the White House “will temporarily reinstate the reporter’s hard pass.”

But in a statement, she also appeared to view the temporary ruling as a victory: “Today, the court made clear that there is no absolute First Amendment right to access the White House.”

Sanders added that “we will also further develop rules and processes to ensure fair and orderly press conferences in the future. There must be decorum at the White House.”

Trump also told reporters at the White House: “We want total freedom of the press. It’s more important to me than anybody would believe. But you have to act with respect when you’re at the White House.”

CNN on Tuesday sued the Trump administration for confiscating Acosta’s “hard pass,” which grants White House press pool reporters access to the White House, following a spat between the president and Acosta during a post-midterm elections press conference last week.

In a hearing in federal court on Wednesday, Justice Department attorney James Burnham said the president has the authority to ban reporters from the White House, The Washington Post reported.

Burnham also argued that Acosta can continue reporting on the Trump administration from outside the White House and noted that CNN has other reporters with White House credentials.

5bed0c5b3c00008e030eb967.jpeg

SHANNON FINNEY VIA GETTY IMAGES
A judge ruled in favor of CNN and reporter Jim Acosta.

In response, CNN attorney Ted Boutrous said the government had a “warped view” of the First and Fifth amendments.

“The government’s now taking the position that [the president] can do anything he wants,” Boutrous said, according to the Post.

After Acosta challenged Trump with questions on his anti-immigration rhetoric and the federal Russia investigation last week, Trump demanded Acosta sit down and called him a “terrible person” and “enemy of the people.”

During the exchange, Acosta also moved away when a female intern tried to take away the microphone he was using. The White House suspended Acosta’s credentials hours after the press conference, citing his behavior toward Trump and the intern.

Kelly on Friday seemed unpersuaded, calling the White House’s initial justification “of questionable accuracy” and “likely untrue.”

The White House later shifted its story to claim that Acosta was rude to reporters.

A group of prominent news organizations have expressed support for CNN’s lawsuit, including CNN competitor Fox News, which frequently provides favorable news coverage of Trump.

In a statement on Wednesday, Fox News President Jay Wallace said the network would file an amicus brief in favor of CNN’s “legal effort” with the U.S. District Court in Washington.

“Secret Service passes for working White House journalists should never be weaponized,” Wallace said in the statement.

“While we don’t condone the growing antagonistic tone by both the President and the press at recent media avails, we do support a free press, access and open exchanges for the American people,” he added.

The Washington Post, The New York Times, NBC News and The Associated Press also backed CNN’s lawsuit.

This story has been updated with more details on the ruling and reaction from the White House and Trump.
 
He’s Canadian and I’m not sure why he moved to this shitty ass place. I’m trying to go to Canada or NZ.

Yes I have to wait another 2 years before I can vote.

To answer your question, I moved here for school. I stayed in large part because despite all if its many MANY flaws America is probably the best place in the world to start an entertainment busines.
 
He’s Canadian and I’m not sure why he moved to this shitty ass place. I’m trying to go to Canada or NZ.

It has gotten much worse living in the U.S. with surveillance every fucking place, minders chasing you around all day.

They have weaponized the surveillance to fuck you mentally up. They need to come out of the closet, many people are escaping repressive regimes only to blindly walk into another one.
 
Back
Top