*****JC Watts calls out his conservative kin on Jena issue*****

Mr. Met

So Amazin
BGOL Investor
http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20070924g

Politics 101: Do Republicans really hate black people?
By Hazel Trice Edney, NNPA Editor-in-Chief
September 24, 2007



Editor's Note: In 2004, Black people voted 89 percent for the Democratic presidential candidate and 10 percent for Bush. Some pundits argue that the Democratic Party is the best hope for African Americans, given the chilling Right Wing bent of Republicans. But some of the nation's most respected civil rights leaders say the faithfulness of Black voters is not rewarded by Democrats and not desired by Republicans. This two part series - "Politics 101" - seeks to explore both sides of both issues: Part I: Do Democrats Really Love Black People? and Part II: Do Republicans Really Hate Black People?


Part II

WASHINGTON (NNPA) - Only one of seven Republican candidates showed up for the NAACP presidential forum this summer. That one was Congressman Tom Tancredo (Colo.). All eight Democrats attended.

Not one Republican presidential candidate showed up at the National Urban League's summer conference. Four Democrats came.

All four top Republican candidates have declined to participate in the PBS-Tavis Smiley "All-American Presidential Forum" scheduled for Sept. 27 at historically Black Morgan State University. All eight Democrats attended the forum at Howard University.

Hate. It's an awfully strong word. Thesaurus.com describes it as being "to loathe," "to despise" or to "look down on contemptuously."

Yet, when considering Republican presidential candidates' apparent diversion to facing Black audiences and Black issues, even some of the most faithful Black Republicans say that "hate" - though strong - sometimes doesn't appear that far off.

"Hate is a strong word. But I can see how some might think that they do," says former U.S. Rep. J.C. Watts of Oklahoma. "I say this respectfully, but they're running very white voter demographic campaigns."

In an interview with the NNPA News Service, Watts, the former lone Black Republican in Congress, now a Republican strategist, did not tow the party line.

"Look who they are surrounding themselves with. Who are they listening to? Where are the African Americans in their inner circles?" he asks. "Where have the Republicans been on the Jena Six case?...Where are those same people that were crying fowl in the Duke rape case? Why have they not cried fowl in the Jena Six?"

This is not the first time that Watts has broken ranks with his overwhelmingly white counterparts.

As a member of Congress, he remained a supporter of affirmative action. Even now, he implies Republicans are hypocritical on affirmative action, a bread and butter issue in the Black community.

"How can Republicans say, 'We're opposed to affirmative action,' but then we're tweaking the tax code to help some corporation? How can you say you're opposed to affirmative action but, you've got 27 percent of the United States Army who are Americans of African descent, but you have the defense industry who spend less than one percent of their money with Black firms?...Again, when Black people peel the onion and see all of this, you think, 'Whoa, whoa. Something is wrong with this picture.'"

On the other hand, Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan signals that all is well between Republicans and African Americans.

"Republicans campaign with African-Americans the same that they campaign with other Americans. They talk about their values," Duncan says. He lists "lower taxes, less government, individual responsibility and a strong national defense" as Republican values.

Republican remedies are simply different, Duncan says.

He notes the wealth gap between the typical white family and the typical Black family.

"We lower that gap through economic opportunity...Closing the economic gap is a big part of this," he says. He says loans from the Small Business Administration, a focus on education through No Child Left Behind, and increasing funding to historically Black colleges and universities are tackling these problems.

Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers give no evidence of a closing economic gap between Blacks and whites. In the eight years of the Bush administration, the jobless rate for African Americans has remained consistently double that of whites. Also, a majority of Republicans consistently receive nearly all Fs on the NAACP Congressional Report Cards on economic and education issues.

Duncan says he has no influence on whether Republican presidential candidates speak to Black audiences. But, he says the reason they haven't is largely due to conflicts in priorities, scheduling and strategies.

No excuse, says Tavis Smiley, host of the All-American Forums being aired live by PBS at historically Black universities. He said the absence of the top four Republican candidates at the forum this week will reveal how they really feel about Black people.

Arizona Sen. John McCain, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson have all declined to attend.

Smiley says he will highlight their absences by frequently focusing on the empty podiums.

"The message we should take from this is that we are not a priority for them. That's the only message I know," Smiley says. "I think it's a fundamental lack of appreciation for the role that we play in America. I believe that their disrespecting Black and Brown folk by not appearing at these debates...is going to become a watershed moment in this campaign."

He continues, "We live in the most multi-racial, multi-ethnic America ever. No one should be elected president in 2008 - Black, white or Brown, male or female, Republican or Democrat - if they're not going to speak to every community of color in America. You shouldn't even be considered seriously as a candidate if you are leaving Black and Brown folk out of the conversation."

Shannon Reeves, executive director of the RNC's African-American Leadership Council, says his job is to make sure that kind of conversation happens between Blacks and Republicans.

"I'm dealing with a five-year strategic plan to build relationships and to begin to identify and to have an advocacy group of leaders within the Republican Party to advocate on behalf of the African-American community," he says.

Reeves, who was at the NUL convention where there were no Republican candidates, is making rounds among Black organizations, "Not preaching to people, but saying, 'How can the party be relevant in your life and in the lives of your organizations and your members'?" he says.

He says he is also working with state and local development for the RNC, helping Republican officials to learn "how to have relationships with communities like ones you've never lived in so that within the next 10 years the Republican Party landscape will look totally different than the way it looks today."

Watts is sharply critical of such advisory positions by Black Republicans.

"I really don't care to do those advisory committees anymore because I think they're hogwash. I think they're cosmetology. It took me eight years to realize that," he says.

In the past, the Republican Party has formed leadership and advisory councils to not only advise Republicans, but recruit them, especially young Blacks.

Ashley Etienne, 29, a media strategist and communications specialist with the Dewey Square Group, a consultant to several Democratic campaigns, says she has compared both parties.

"I was raised to be aware of the policies of both parties," says Etienne. "I think the Democratic Party is more concerned with the issues that are more important to our community. But, I think that there needs to be more of a dialog between the Black community and the Democratic Party. I mean that's without a question."

Even some Blacks who became Republicans are now coming back to the Democrats.

Terone B. Green, 46, who has been an active and outspoken Virginia Republican for about 12 years, says he has finally had enough.

"I don't see the Republicans doing anything to develop and promote young African Americans for positions or for appointments," he says. "It's not about hate, but it's clearly racism. People are just comfortable with people who look like them. You only see them reach out when they need other demographics to help them with their win."

Green says he is leaning toward Sen. Hillary Clinton after quitting the Republican Party two months ago after years of speaking out against perceived biases within the Party.

Love or hate, Republicans must wake up, says Watts.

"As much as we would love to have a color-blind society, we are very naãve to think that we are," says Watts, an ordained minister. "And I'll go a step further. We are very naãve to think that we're ever going to get there. And I don't think that's a bad thing. God didn't mean for us to be a color-blind society. God didn't mean for all of us to be White or to be Black. God is the author of another person's skin color. So, if diversity of color is okay for God, it ought to be okay for Republicans."×
 

Fuck him. He's irrelevant.

Had PLENTY of time and resource to make a difference on the Hill and fucked it away playing "House Nigga" for the Republican Party.

Even if he were absolutely right I STILL wouldn't heed a WORD of what he has to say.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
 
Why do Black people deal with either party. Now, I am not saying that a black person can't choose to identify with one or another party, but it seems to me that it would be more reasonable to identify with people or organizations who represent your interests. Maybe the problem is the two party system and the winner takes all elections.
 
this reminds me of that part from The Grinch when his little atrophied dried up piece of shit heart starts to grow into something real.

the most poignant thing he pointed out is the hypocrisy of complaining about Affirmative Action while changing the game for corporations.

but he's still The Grinch.
 
Why do Black people deal with either party. Now, I am not saying that a black person can't choose to identify with one or another party, but it seems to me that it would be more reasonable to identify with people or organizations who represent your interests. Maybe the problem is the two party system and the winner takes all elections.

WTF??
 
Why do Black people deal with either party. Now, I am not saying that a black person can't choose to identify with one or another party, but it seems to me that it would be more reasonable to identify with people or organizations who represent your interests. Maybe the problem is the two party system and the winner takes all elections.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
We Black people need to vote on the issues, not by race. But also if the person that we want to get in doesn't get in. We shouldn't take a a vacation on the issues until the next election. If we kept the elected officials feet to the flames no matter who it is, we'd get more of our requests met. Thats how other groups do it. From christaian consevatives to gays, to the hispanic community.

Now black people get the fuck up, school up on the issues and give 'em hell.
 
No doubt about the content, but the Louisiana Weekly needs a proofreader: See, you "toe" the line, meaning you step closely enough that your big toe, or more correctly the longest part of your shoe hits a line in a military formation. It is not "tow the line".

2 You don't cry fowl, but you do "cry foul" as in, you do not say "bird" when makes an infraction, you say "foul!" when an infraction is made.

As someone in the media, I don't think these mistakes are fatal, but, the Louisiana Weekley needs some help. I mean, as I was taught at three major North Amerian outlets, "it's the small things".
 
No doubt about the content, but the Louisiana Weekly needs a proofreader: See, you "toe" the line, meaning you step closely enough that your big toe, or more correctly the longest part of your shoe hits a line in a military formation. It is not "tow the line".

2 You don't cry fowl, but you do "cry foul" as in, you do not say "bird" when makes an infraction, you say "foul!" when an infraction is made.

As someone in the media, I don't think these mistakes are fatal, but, the Louisiana Weekley needs some help. I mean, as I was taught at three major North Amerian outlets, "it's the small things".
"Tow The Line" is an acceptable variation of the original phrase "Toe The Line". In fact, I think I read once that it's actually the American version of the phrase.

It implies to pull a belief or notion. You'll see it more and more in American writing.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
 
No doubt about the content, but the Louisiana Weekly needs a proofreader: See, you "toe" the line, meaning you step closely enough that your big toe, or more correctly the longest part of your shoe hits a line in a military formation. It is not "tow the line".

2 You don't cry fowl, but you do "cry foul" as in, you do not say "bird" when makes an infraction, you say "foul!" when an infraction is made.

As someone in the media, I don't think these mistakes are fatal, but, the Louisiana Weekley needs some help. I mean, as I was taught at three major North Amerian outlets, "it's the small things".





threaddirection.jpg






:smh::smh::smh:
 
Why do Black people deal with either party. Now, I am not saying that a black person can't choose to identify with one or another party, but it seems to me that it would be more reasonable to identify with people or organizations who represent your interests. Maybe the problem is the two party system and the winner takes all elections.


co sign !
 
Well there must be a way out else we'll be screwed forever!!!


Where are the Hispanic organizations?????

Are they talking unity only when their interests are being discussed????

ACTUALLY ,,TODAY I WAS HAVING A DISCUSSION WITH A HISPANIC GUY
HE IS A PASTOR. WE TALKED
ABOUT THE PARALELLS THAT WE SHARE AS DIFFERENT RACES...THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR.
SO I DONT THINK THERE WILL BE A REMEDY IN THAT DIRECTION.
HOWEVER THEY ARE ON A UNIFYING MISSION CONSTANTLY
THEY HAVE TO OVERCOME THE ISSUE OF IGNORANCE AND SELF HATE TO THE SAME DEGREE IF NOT MORE THAN US.

THE DIFFERENCE IS THEY ARE COMING FROM A POSITION OF LEARNING TO BE MORE AGGRESSIVE AND WE ARE COMING FROM BEING TOO ARROGANT.
I THINK THEY HAVE THE UPPER HAND BECAUSE THE ADJUSTMENT WILL BE EASIER FOR THEM IN A NATURAL SENSE AND MORE APPRECIATED WHEN THEY REALIZE THEIR FULL POTENTIAL.

THE FACT IS
SOMETHING IS GOING TO CHANGE SOONER THAN LATER
PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDE OF THE ISLE HAVE GROWN TIRED AND ARE GOING TO DEMAND SOME FORM OF CHANGE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
 
7818.gif


The Ugly Side of the G.O.P.

ts-herbert-190.jpg


by BOB HERBERT

Published: September 25, 2007


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/o...orials and Op-Ed/Op-Ed/Columnists/Bob Herbert

I applaud the thousands of people, many of them poor, who traveled from around the country to protest in Jena, La., last week. But what I’d really like to see is a million angry protesters marching on the headquarters of the National Republican Party in Washington.

Enough is enough. Last week the Republicans showed once again just how anti-black their party really is.

The G.O.P. has spent the last 40 years insulting, disenfranchising and otherwise stomping on the interests of black Americans. Last week, the residents of Washington, D.C., with its majority black population, came remarkably close to realizing a goal they have sought for decades — a voting member of Congress to represent them.

A majority in Congress favored the move, and the House had already approved it. But the Republican minority in the Senate — with the enthusiastic support of President Bush — rose up on Tuesday and said: “No way, baby.”

At least 57 senators favored the bill, a solid majority. But the Republicans prevented a key motion on the measure from receiving the 60 votes necessary to move it forward in the Senate. The bill died.

At the same time that the Republicans were killing Congressional representation for D.C. residents, the major G.O.P. candidates for president were offering a collective slap in the face to black voters nationally by refusing to participate in a long-scheduled, nationally televised debate focusing on issues important to minorities.

The radio and television personality Tavis Smiley worked for a year to have a pair of these debates televised on PBS, one for the Democratic candidates and the other for the Republicans. The Democratic debate was held in June, and all the major candidates participated.

The Republican debate is scheduled for Thursday. But Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson have all told Mr. Smiley: “No way, baby.”

They won’t be there. They can’t be bothered debating issues that might be of interest to black Americans. After all, they’re Republicans.

This is the party of the Southern strategy — the party that ran, like panting dogs, after the votes of segregationist whites who were repelled by the very idea of giving equal treatment to blacks. Ronald Reagan, George H.W. (Willie Horton) Bush, George W. (Compassionate Conservative) Bush — they all ran with that lousy pack.

Dr. Carolyn Goodman, a woman I was privileged to call a friend, died last month at the age of 91. She was the mother of Andrew Goodman, one of the three young civil rights activists shot to death by rabid racists near Philadelphia, Miss., in 1964.

Dr. Goodman, one of the most decent people I have ever known, carried the ache of that loss with her every day of her life.

In one of the vilest moves in modern presidential politics, Ronald Reagan, the ultimate hero of this latter-day Republican Party, went out of his way to kick off his general election campaign in 1980 in that very same Philadelphia, Miss. He was not there to send the message that he stood solidly for the values of Andrew Goodman. He was there to assure the bigots that he was with them.

“I believe in states’ rights,” said Mr. Reagan. The crowd roared.

In 1981, during the first year of Mr. Reagan’s presidency, the late Lee Atwater gave an interview to a political science professor at Case Western Reserve University, explaining the evolution of the Southern strategy:

“You start out in 1954 by saying, ‘Niģģer, niģģer, niģģer,’ ” said Atwater. “By 1968, you can’t say ‘niģģer’ — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things, and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.”

In 1991, the first President Bush poked a finger in the eye of black America by selecting the egregious Clarence Thomas for the seat on the Supreme Court that had been held by the revered Thurgood Marshall. The fact that there is a rigid quota on the court, permitting one black and one black only to serve at a time, is itself racist.

Mr. Bush seemed to be saying, “All right, you want your black on the court? Boy, have I got one for you.”

Republicans improperly threw black voters off the rolls in Florida in the contested presidential election of 2000, and sent Florida state troopers into the homes of black voters to intimidate them in 2004.

Blacks have been remarkably quiet about this sustained mistreatment by the Republican Party, which says a great deal about the quality of black leadership in the U.S. It’s time for that passive, masochistic posture to end.


——————————————

The "Whites-Only" Sign on The GOP's "Big Tent"


2007-09-22-Jordan.jpg


by VERNON JORDAN

Published: September 21, 2007


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vernon-jordan/the-whitesonly-sign-on_b_65385.html

The candidates for the Republican party's presidential nod are building quite a track record--of snubbing prospective voters. This week the four leading candidates--Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, Rudolph Giuliani and John McCain--added the PBS-sponsored debate at Baltimore's historically-black Morgan State University to their "I'll-pass" list. That list now includes the National Urban League, Univision, the Spanish-language television network, the National Association of Latino Elected Officials and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. It's getting to be a long list.

But perhaps it's those of us who are dismayed by these displays of camapign cowardice that just don't get it.

Perhaps the GOP candidates are following the same script the Bush administration has used for governance: be irresponsible.

Or perhaps, they're developing a new paradigm for how a political party contests elections. Perhaps they want to test that you actually improve your chances of winning by snubbing entire groups of voters, and that in a nation whose voting pool is becoming more and more diverse, you make it clear you want just the votes of whites.

Republicans love to talk about Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan, presidents whom they hold up as having met the tests of greatness. Is this what Abraham Lincoln would do? Is this what Ronald Reagan would do?

Republicans also used to talk about their welcoming all Americans into the party of the "big tent." But actions speak louder than words. The actions of the Republican candidates make it clear the big tent has a whites-only sign over the entrance.





 

Fuck him. He's irrelevant.

Had PLENTY of time and resource to make a difference on the Hill and fucked it away playing "House Nigga" for the Republican Party.

Even if he were absolutely right I STILL wouldn't heed a WORD of what he has to say.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
Co-Sign 100%
 
Back
Top