Is Obama finally going to stand against apartheid in Israel?

Art Vandelay

Importer/exporter
Registered


"An occupation that has lasted for almost 50 years must end... Israel cannot maintain military control of another people indefinitely. That's the truth."


Barack Obama’s top aide says Israeli ‘occupation’ must end
Dennis McDonough says the White House isn’t impressed with Israeli prime minister’s effort to backtrack on campaign comments.
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE
Politico
3/23/15


White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough made clear in a speech to a left-leaning Israel advocacy group that President Barack Obama isn’t letting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu off the hook for his dismissal of a two-state solution.

That stance, as well as Netanyahu’s suggestion also made in the closing days before last week’s Israeli elections that he’d approved settlements in contested territory in Jerusalem for the strategic purpose of changing the borders are “so very troubling,” McDonough told J Street’s annual conference in Washington. He called the pro-Israel group, which opposes some of Netanyahu’s policies, “our partner.”

McDonough added that the White House isn’t impressed by Netanyahu’s efforts since last Tuesday to backtrack on what he meant when he said there wouldn’t be a Palestinian state established so long as he’s prime minister.

“We cannot simply pretend that these comments were never made,” McDonough said.

McDonough said the Obama administration is well aware of the regional security problems Netanyahu referenced in explaining why he didn’t see a two-state solution as an imminent possibility. But he said Obama does not believe that is or could be reason to back off talks — and this is not simply matter of personal “pique” about Netanyahu, the chief of staff said.

“The United States will never stop working for a two-state solution and a lasting peace that Israelis and Palestinians so richly deserve,” he said.

McDonough then described the alternate to a two-state agreement: a one-state solution based on unilateral annexation and abandonment of democratic rights for Palestinians that, he warned, “would only contribute to Israel’s further isolation.” In other words, he said, more divestment, boycotts and efforts to delegitimize Israel in the international community.

“An occupation that has lasted more than 50 years must end,” McDonough said, one of several times he brought the crowd to its feet.

He reiterated that Obama remains committed to Israel’s security through investments in the Iron Dome missile protection system, which he said will never waver, and described negotiations with Iran over curbing its nuclear ambitions part of that commitment.

Though he didn’t specifically mention the prime minister, who denounced the negotiations in a controversial address to Congress last month, McDonough dismissed “an absolutist position [that] makes for good rhetoric.”

He went through the broad strokes of what a deal would entail, saying that if one is reached, Obama will work to bring the public and Congress on board and remain vigilant in monitoring the behavior of the Iranian regime.

“Even if a nuclear deal is reached, our concerns about Iran’s behavior and around the world will endure,” McDonough said.




Obama Says U.S. Won’t Rule Out Withholding UN Support for Israel
Bloomberg News
Mar 24, 2015


President Barack Obama refused to rule out the possibility of allowing a Palestinian push for statehood through the United Nations as part of a U.S. reassessment of its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“We’re going to do that evaluation,” Obama said at a news conference in response to a question on whether he would consider supporting Palestinian statehood at the UN. “We’re going to partly wait for an actual Israeli government to form.”

Such a move would represent a major shift in U.S. policy and trigger new tensions with Israel and between the Obama administration and Congress.

While other administration officials have said the U.S. would reevaluate its stance after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he won’t support the creation of a Palestinian state anytime soon, Tuesday’s White House news conference marked the strongest indication from the president of his intentions.

Obama’s comments also indicated that the administration plans to keep up pressure on Netanyahu, who has backed away from his original statements, made last week just before Israeli voters went to the polls.

Obama said that even though Netanyahu has sought to clarify his pre-election statements, the Israeli leader still set conditions for talks with the Palestinians that “would be impossible to meet anytime soon.”

That has cut off prospects for any negotiations which could trigger “a downward spiral of relations that will be dangerous for everybody,” Obama said.

“We’ll continue to engage the Israeli government as well as the Palestinians, and ask them where they are interested in going and how do they see this issue being resolved,” he said. “But what we can’t do is pretend that there’s a possibility of something that’s not there.”

While Obama did not detail how the U.S. might support Palestinian statehood at the UN, one option is to back a UN Security Council resolution saying a two-state solution would be based on Israel’s pre-1967 borders with Gaza and the West Bank as well as mutually agreed swaps of land.

The U.S. has thwarted that bid at the UN, which is opposed by Israel.


Obama also refused to comment when asked about a Wall Street Journal report on Tuesday that U.S. officials were upset Israel had spied on negotiators involved in talks over Iran’s nuclear program, and used that information to argue against the emerging deal.

Israeli officials have denied the charge.

“Someone has an interest in creating conflict and blowing an even fouler wind” into U.S.-Israel relations, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said, according to audio clip supplied by his office. “Israel would never spy on the Americans.”
 
GOP senator: Obama puts whole world on fire by speaking against Israel’s occupation
PressTV.ir (Iran)
Tue Mar 24, 2015


A pro-Israeli Republican senator has accused US President Barack Obama of putting the entire world on fire for allowing White House officials to speak against Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian lands.

Lindsey Graham, potential Republican presidential candidate, made the remarks on the Senate floor on Monday, after White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough called on Israel to end its “50-year occupation” of the West Bank and East al-Quds (Jerusalem).

Graham condemned the speech by McDonough on Israel, saying the White House chief of staff used the language of Hamas.

"The language used by the chief of staff of the president of the United States is exactly what Hamas uses," Graham said. "Today the chief of staff of the president of the United States used language that has been reserved for terrorist organizations [sic]."

The South Carolina senator suggested that Israel is not occupying the West Bank but rather just maintaining law and order there.

Is Israel “occupying the West Bank” or is it “there to make sure the West Bank doesn't turn into Gaza?" Graham asked.


"The chief of the staff of the president of the United States is looking at a world completely different than the one I am viewing,” said the senator, who along with John McCain, are considered by analysts as the “biggest lackeys for the Israel lobby in the entire United States Senate.”

Graham warned the Obama administration that if it does not veto anti-Israel resolutions at the UN Security Council, "Congress will recalculate how we relate to the United Nations."

"Wake up and change your policies before you set the whole world on fire,” he warned the US president. “Please watch your language. ...You're making everything worse, and now you've added fuel to the fire.”...

In a war in 1967, Israel captured the West Bank and East al-Quds. Since then, Tel Aviv has continued to expand its illegal settlements there. The issue has become a major obstacle for the efforts to establish peace in the Middle East.

The UN and most countries regard the Israeli settlements as illegal. The settlements are subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbids construction on occupied lands.

McDonough said Netanyahu’s rejection of a Palestine state as well as his approval of illegal settlements in the occupied territories for the strategic purpose of changing the borders are “so very troubling”.

He censured Israel for its settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territories, warning that it “would only contribute to Israel’s further isolation.”

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.
 
Long answer, nope.
Short answer, nope.

Obama does just enough on the topic of racial inequality to look like he's doing something, but is largely doing nothing.


He has one more year to show and prove... But he'll probably coast.
 
I hope he goes out with a bang!
It would be nice if he bombed the shit out of IsFake his last few months and passed on a war with that fake ass country to the next Prez. :lol:
 
I'll say this. He will probably do more than any other president before (has done) or after him.
 
Y'all keep wanting an FOI member as president. Obama is seen by whites as a pro black radical who hates Jews, yet you niggas want him to be something he aint. Obama is a great president and person. Deal with it .
 
Im not jumping out the window just yet, however this is farther than ANY U.S Prez has ever went when it comes to Israel before!

:bravo:

Maybe he's laying the ground work to earn that Nobel Prize before walking out the door in 2016.

First step is to let Netanyahu know he done fucked up with all that disrespect and racism.

Next let Israeli Party factions know that he (and America) wont be getting in the way of the International Criminal Courts when Palestinians bring those war crimes charges against Israel.

This will possibly cause the left and center right parties to side with the zionist party allowing them to form a government and cut the yahu off from becoming prime minister thus getting a left leaning Gov in Israel that Obama can work with for a peace deal.


The Brotha is moving the chess pieces!
 
he should start with Apartheid Police inside Amerikka first
For the "America first" bitches, it really is more about "stop supporting" than "stand against." America is Israel's #1 enabler. Obama hasn't been a bystander-- he's been an accomplice.
 
The Palestinian Israeli situation is too complex for most Americans to understand. Most believe Israel is in the right based on bullshit like the movie the Ten Commandments and other Biblical based propaganda. I saw a documentary on Public TV a few weeks ago that actually put the situation into a different light..It's a few years old. I think it's called Valentino's Ghost. If you are as student of history particularly European Colonialism WWI/WWII most of what you find here isn't new but there are some other little tidbits that make it worth watching.
 
Maybe he should focus on apartheid in America first.

You have to think a little deeper, sir.

This is the start of what his plan is for when he leaves office. He's representing America so he has to represent for all, not one over the other. So this is a precursor for what will come...if you ask me.

It's towards another country, so if he's successful in starting that process and makes real strides there...when he's done he can tell us that we need to look inward...who knows.

As the first black president, he has a weight on his shoulders that he's carrying not for us now, but for any future serious black presidential candidate. So far he's done an amazing job carrying that weight.
 
Im not jumping out the window just yet, however this is farther than ANY U.S Prez has ever went when it comes to Israel before!

:bravo:

Maybe he's laying the ground work to earn that Nobel Prize before walking out the door in 2016.

First step is to let Netanyahu know he done fucked up with all that disrespect and racism.

Next let Israeli Party factions know that he (and America) wont be getting in the way of the International Criminal Courts when Palestinians bring those war crimes charges against Israel.

This will possibly cause the left and center right parties to side with the zionist party allowing them to form a government and cut the yahu off from becoming prime minister thus getting a left leaning Gov in Israel that Obama can work with for a peace deal.


The Brotha is moving the chess pieces!

Not true... All Obama has done is talk so far, and not even with the same strength his chief of staff has. He has moved his lips, nothing else.

Obama, sadly, isn't even on the level of Bush... or Reagan. :smh::smh::smh:

Is Obama considering 'sanctions' on Israel?
A lot of partisan media outlets and Republican politicians appear to believe so.
By Dan Murphy, Staff writer
Christian Science Monitor
DECEMBER 8, 2014


In certain corners of the Internet – mainly at the intersection of Israel lovers and Obama haters – a thinly sourced claim holds that Barack Obama is considering "sanctions" against Israel over its expanding settlements in the West Bank.

Right-leaning publications and outlets like The Free Beacon, The Blaze, The Daily Caller and Fox News have all echoed this claim, citing "reports."

On Friday, Senator Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican, issued a statement on this "issue."

Recommended: How much do you know about Israel? Take the quiz
“Not only is the Administration rejecting new sanctions to end Iran’s nuclear threat, it's now reportedly developing sanctions against our closest ally, Israel," he said. "This move only worsens perceptions that the Administration treats our friends like enemies and our enemies like friends.”

Senator Kelly Ayotte, a New Hampshire Republican, issued a similar statement. And this morning Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for President George W. Bush, got in on the act.

Yet there is no evidence that Obama is considering sanctions on Israel. The original story that fired up these partisan voices ran in Israel's Haaretz and is titled "US mulls harsher action against settlement construction." The article cites unnamed Israeli officials claiming that "White House officials held a classified discussion a few weeks ago about the possibility of taking active measures against the settlements."

In concrete terms, what could this mean? According to those unnamed officials: "For example, the United States may refrain from vetoing condemnatory resolutions against the settlements in the UN Security Council. Or it could issue clearer instructions to American officials about the ban on cooperating with the settlements or funding activity in them."

Whether the Obama Administration is planning any changes in its stance on Israeli settlement construction – a thorn in the side of US mediation in peace efforts for generations now – is unclear. But even if the administration did decline to use its vetoes on Israel's behalf, or sought to block US government money from going to settlements in what is deemed occupied territory under international law, these measures wouldn't exactly be "sanctions."

Consider the economic sanctions on Iran that have been ratcheted up by the US since 2010. Here's how Brookings fellow Suzanne Maloney described them earlier this year:

Over the course of the past four years, however, the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions' impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran's political elites against the country's creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions.​

And just a year ago, Obama's White House was campaigning vigorously against a European Union plan to outlaw funding to Israeli settlement groups.

The US has been a steady funder of Israel since the country's independence. Since 1996 alone, the US has given $50 billion to Israel, most of that military aid. The earmark for this year was over $3 billion.

Reductions and delays in such aid have been rare in modern US history. You have to go back to Ronald Reagan, who halted delivery of cluster munitions to Israel between 1982 and 1988 for the last major step to curtail military aid (Reagan acted over concerns the munitions were being used illegally in the war in Lebanon). The last US financial rebuke to Israel was under President George H. W. Bush, who delayed the provision of loan guarantees to Israel in 1991 contingent on a freeze in settlement expansion. The following year the government of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin agreed to a freeze. The loan guarantees were delivered, though settlement expansion continued.

Is Obama mulling doing, well, something about settlements? Perhaps. But there's no evidence of anything approaching "sanctions" at the moment.
 
Long answer, nope.
Short answer, nope.

Obama does just enough on the topic of racial inequality to look like he's doing something, but is largely doing nothing.


He has one more year to show and prove... But he'll probably coast.


What he said!!!!!!!!!
 
The Palestinian Israeli situation is too complex for most Americans to understand. Most believe Israel is in the right based on bullshit like the movie the Ten Commandments and other Biblical based propaganda. I saw a documentary on Public TV a few weeks ago that actually put the situation into a different light..It's a few years old. I think it's called Valentino's Ghost. If you are as student of history particularly European Colonialism WWI/WWII most of what you find here isn't new but there are some other little tidbits that make it worth watching.

:cool:

 
The Republicans fucked up by bringing Netanyahu to ridicule and belittle Obama; they contended that it was their prerogative to invite the bugger to speak to Congress. Well, it is also the prerogative of the president to formulate foreign policy. What is more, they are dealing with a man who has now decided that he does not give a fuck about the GOP... They overplayed their hands. As for the US changing its relations with the UN, the GOP needs to be careful. When the UN was created, the US accounted for more than 50% of the world economy, and more than 60% of world production. Now the US is about 17% of the world economy, and about 5% of the manufacturing. The world can actually do without the US....The US economy is 80% plus based on goods and services, meaning that most of it speculative bullshit arising from its control of the world reserve currency through the dollar oil linkage....If the world decides to go with the Euro, the US will not be able to do shit about it. The US Congress would therefore be fucking with the UN at its own risk..But then again, the GOP extreme right lives in a world of delusion, where the likes of Ted Cruz and Scott Walker think they can win the US presidency...
 
RE-UP




ROADMAP TO APARTHEID
Israel Emulates South African Apartheid



Roadmap_to_Apartheid.jpg




Code:
http://hugefiles.net/zgtgnc0ofhhz






VIDEO
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media / Version 2
Codec ID : mp42
File size : 1.94 GiB
Duration : 1h 34mn
Overall bit rate : 2 927 Kbps
Width : 1280 pixels
Height : 720 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
AUDIO
Nominal bit rate : 195 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels




Award winning film that illuminates the truth about the nation of Israel that most people are not aware of. Roadmap to Apartheid is a film about why many Palestinians feel they are living in an apartheid system today, and why an increasing number of people around the world agree with them. This film delves into those issues, comparing the many similar apartheid laws and tools used today in Israel which correlate directly with apartheid-era South Africa. The audience will see what life is like for Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and inside Israel. Palestinians in the West Bank & Gaza must carry pass books just like Blacks under South African apartheid. There are "Israeli Only" highways which only Israelis are allowed to drive on in cars with special license plates. Gaza's borders are sealed by Israel & Egypt; You can not leave if you are a Palestinian. This film helps one gain a deeper understanding of the conflict with the help of respected analysts on the subject. Combined with archival material and anecdotes from South Africans, the film forms a complete picture as to why Israel is an apartheid state.


ibo9yh5nRQkyvK.jpg





362c56d6-49f6-4f5a-8536-e689b3d1f879.jpg



1701cc75-5edf-4ff6-963e-a21b512e31cf.png



65a7be11-8e41-409e-b113-b1b80e4f992b.jpg
 
Last edited:
I am going to check out the video. I do not know much about the political side of this. But we are witnessing the power of mind control right now.

The Middle East may still hold a lot of the truth of the identity of blacks. As a man we got to get control of our surroundings right here where we are at. If we are no help to ourselves, then we can be no help to others. Remember American tax dollars are sent to Israel to support what ever they do or want to do. And the American tax payers cannot do nothing about it. Tax dollars are for the controllers to do what they want to do.

Blacks in America should have been with a plan to unite and do their own thing.

http://oneblacknation.webs.com/

http://blacknation.vpweb.com/default.html
 
People still crying about Obama?

Figures.

Can anyone name just one American president who spoke more truth about the plight of the Palestinian people then Obama?
 
People still crying about Obama?

Figures.

Can anyone name just one American president who spoke more truth about the plight of the Palestinian people then Obama?
Even better. Can anyone point to how their tweeting and protesting have changed anything in Gaza except make them feel morally superior? The far left is just as fascist as the far right. they both want to wield political power and force their political views on everyone else without any concern on how they feel. And they both think they're right.
 
Back
Top