Couple of issues:
Imagine you are a strategic planner based in Pentagon and has been tasked or given a job of coming up with different scenarios in regards to Iran...assuming its confirmed they already have a nuclear bomb.
What options do you think if implemented can or cannot work. I expect issues to do with NNPT or UN resolutions that could be adopted to justfy an invasion/war with Iran if need be
1. For the Obama administration, the prospect of a nuclearized Iran is dismal to contemplate— it would create major new national-security challenges and crush the president’s dream of ending nuclear proliferation.
2.But the view from Jerusalem is still more dire: a nuclearized Iran represents, among other things, a threat to Israel’s very existence. In the gap between Washington’s and Jerusalem’s views of Iran lies the question: who, if anyone, will stop Iran before it goes nuclear, and how?
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/the-point-of-no-return/8186/
Imagine you are a strategic planner based in Pentagon and has been tasked or given a job of coming up with different scenarios in regards to Iran...assuming its confirmed they already have a nuclear bomb.
What options do you think if implemented can or cannot work. I expect issues to do with NNPT or UN resolutions that could be adopted to justfy an invasion/war with Iran if need be
Last edited: