Interest on Student Loans Gives Government $34 Billion a Year In Revenue

Lamarr

Star
Registered
As I've said before in previous threads, Govt doesn't have the capability to create wealth, it can only confiscate it through, Interest, Inflation & Income Taxes

Interest on Student Loans Gives Government $34 Billion a Year In Revenue

Even as the economy struggles to recover from the bursting of the sub-prime mortgage debt bubble in 2008 a new debt crisis over student loans looms on the horizon, and this time the federal government is actually profiting off of debtors. If a coming interest rate increase is not averted by Congress, millions of student borrowers could be thrown into default, with devastating consequences not only for themselves but for the economy as a whole.

At present, student loan debt stands at $1.1 trillion, more than all other consumer debt except for home mortgages. Some experts, including those at the Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Research, warn that student debt is a potential threat to financial stability that could depress demand for home mortgages and reduce consumption.

Meanwhile, the federal Department of Education is making big money from student loan payments. Its direct loan program yielded a $27.5 billion profit on loans made in 2011, $24 billion on loans made in 2012, and is expected to earn $33.5 billion on loans made in 2013. All told, over the last five years the government has earned $101.8 billion in profit from student borrowers, thanks to differences between the government's low borrowing costs and students' fixed interest rates.

If a doubling of the student loan interest rate scheduled for July 1, 2013, goes into effect, the rate will go from 3.4% to 6.8%, which would add thousands of dollars to the average student borrower's payments every year. The Obama administration has proposed making the interest rate variable, which would likely keep it low for several more years, and some in Congress have proposed simply keeping the 3.4% rate for another year. Nevertheless, a legislative fix is not inevitable, and the rate increase may go into effect.

“Higher education loans are meant to subsidize the cost of higher education, not profit from them, especially at a time when students are facing record debt,” argued Ethan Senack, higher education advocate at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (USPIRG), which released an issue brief on the subject.

The amount of profit being made by the Education Department on student loans surprised even those who follow higher education closely, including Terry Hartle, senior vice president of the American Council on Education, who told The New York Times that “If the numbers are accurate, the government will make more money on student loans than Ford makes on automobiles. Using student loans to create a profit center is not what anybody intended.
 
source: Media Matters


WSJ Ignores Facts To Blame Government For Student Loan Debt


A Wall Street Journal editorial blamed the federal government for an increase in student loan debt, ignoring higher levels of college enrollment and the effects of the economic downturn.

The Journal attributed an increase in student loan debt since 2008 to the "federal student-loan explosion" following the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which replaced government subsidies to private lenders with direct loans to students from the Department of Education. The Journal cited Federal Reserve Bank of New York data to claim the high levels of debt prove this new system has created "systemic risk":
The federal student-loan explosion means that this is the one giant exception to the needed consumer deleveraging that has occurred since the financial crisis. Americans have reduced their borrowing in most consumer markets. But U.S. student-loan debt increased 11% last year to $966 billion and has skyrocketed 51% since 2008, according to the New York Fed report. According to the Wall Street Journal, 43% of 25-year-olds had student debt in the fourth quarter of 2012, up from about 33% in the same period of 2008.

Talk about creating systemic risk.
But the Federal Reserve Bank of New York data that the Journal cites reveals that total student loan debt has steadily increased since 2005, years before the passage of the Affordable Care Act. The Federal Reserve attributed this upward trend in student loan debt to increased college enrollments and higher tuition rates.

nyfed-studentloandebt.JPG


The Journal also ignored how the economic recession affected current debt rates. A Center for American Progress (CAP) report found the recession to be "an important factor" in the growth of student lending:
The increasing cost of college has been a major reason for the growth of student lending, but the global economic recession of 2008 was also an important factor. Many households saw one or both parents lose their jobs, and many who still had jobs saw their wages cut, especially those with incomes of $30,000 or less who could least afford it. The result of these hardships was a decrease in savings by parents for their kids' college and more reliance on student loans by the students and the parents.
CAP also found that the financial crisis led to "a dramatic rise in college enrollment," resulting in more students borrowing to pay for school.

Furthermore, The New York Times Economix blog noted that unlike other forms of debt, which were forgiven when borrowers became bankrupt as a result of the financial crisis, "student loan debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy." The Washington Post reported that this has made it harder for older generations, including senior citizens, to pay off their own student loans debts or support younger students, particularly as the recession limited the number of well-paying jobs.
 
24000876-afd.gif


€500 Euros equals $652 US Dollars


What’s been happening since the early 1970's is that State Universities like the trendsetter California University System went from free ZERO tuition to it's current about $7,000 per semester. Many students from lower income and middle income families, especially with two, three kids or more could not afford to pay State University Tuition; forget about private universities. So PELL Grants and easy to get Government college money loans were approved by congress, in a bipartisan basis, with 99% of all legislators, regardless of part affiliation voting to offer easy cheap college money. When the Republicans became the RepubliKlans with the ascension of Reagan, the ideologues in the now republiklan party started to attack government funding of college education. They didn't like the "reality based" curriculum that was being taught, and they saw higher education as something that should mainly available to the affluent white people -especially white men. So interest rates were raised, fewer loans were forgiven, and Pell grants didn't increase in proportion with population growth. The Banksters saw an opportunity $$$$$$$$ and they started pushing college loans. Under BuShit the banksters were able to <s>Lobby</s> bribe lawmakers to enact laws that made it impossible to reduce college loan debt or discharge the debt (wipe it out) in a personal bankruptcy. You are stuck with that college debt for life. Then the junk college industry sprung up with the internet boom. Crafty con men & women using wall street funny money, bought small schools that had state accreditation, renamed them, advertised heavily, recruiting people desperate to attain what was advertised as a degree in a marketable profession (a job). Hundreds of thousands of people after enrolling in these 'for profit' private colleges and universities, — and receiving junk education, then realized that they had no recourse when they seek a refund of the tuition they borrowed with a student loan to attend the school. I’ll post a link for the video “College Inc.” which shows how this scam works. These scam schools are huge financial <s>contributors</s> bribers of the RepubliKlans in the house & senate, who have blocked any reform which mandates that the degree sold, must have some economic viability leading to a job and not be the total scam that too many of these schools produce. The bottom line is that America has decided to pimp it's college age kids for the economic gain of the elites. All the other so-called major western democracies do not have their youthful citizens saddled with massive college debts. Watch the video


il5sZO.png


il9HMu.JPG

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/04/entertainment/la-et-college-inc-20100504

Video Download Link
Code:
http://rapidshare.com/files/3494509470/CollInc.rar

watch video online link
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/collegeinc/



2894178_700b.jpg



“Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”

― Martin Luther King Jr.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top