If the running QB is all that, then why are they not winning super bowls??

tameytam

Rising Star
Registered
I'm a Ravens fan and they fassed out Joe Flacco for Lamar Jackson. Lamar hasent done shit but look good in the regular season and a no show in the playoffs like a Mike Dantonny team. If the running QB is the shit, why does Tom Brady have all the rings? This seems like a look good first and win second mentality.
 
A qb can do but so much.. you actually need other offensive weapons to help you out..like actually catching the ball, getting open, making the defense put less pressure on the qb cause there’s other threats.. having a rb that can actually give you at least 4 yds a carry..in any team sport you need at least some decent roll players to do it all... Barry sanders is the greatest rb ever but cause he pretty didn’t have a lot of help most of his career his team didn’t go far
 
One word, Defense. I can’t think of a super bowl team that won with a weak defense. I only been watching since 92 though. Russell won with a good defense and give Lamar one and he’ll have one also.

Russell and Mohoms are more scrambling QB's. They are not trying to run for yards like Lamar or Mike Vick.
 
Russell and Mohoms are more scrambling QB's. They are not trying to run for yards like Lamar or Mike Vick.
My point was both had a good defense and Lamar or any good QB with a good defense has a better chance of getting a ring. I don’t think ATL had a good D anytime Vick was there.
 
One word, Defense. I can’t think of a super bowl team that won with a weak defense. I only been watching since 92 though. Russell won with a good defense and give Lamar one and he’ll have one also.

Your right.. It comes down to Defense.. The D can put a spy on that qb and if that qb looks like hes going to make a run, that spy will be on his ass.. Plus those qbs cant take all those hits running with the ball and without the ball every game..
 
This the second thread you made bashing Lamar you funky CAC

You know it is some old Al Bundy looking cac too. :lol:

5cc8e0795799803ba041e57bce3cb600.jpg
 
Russell Wilson has a ring and should have had two....scrambling QBs ain’t winning the Super Bowl though?

Flacco, lol; luckiest son of a bitch in recent memory to get there and win it; granted he did win it but this act of God/mind fuck helped:

 
You acting like Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson were good QBs. Peyton Manning was straight ass in that Denver Super Bowl. Its a team game everyone needs to play their part. Also play callers need to change the script, what worked in week 10 may not work in the playoffs. And they need to see its not working and be ready to change it up. One issue stop with the leader of the team BS. That dude who was on winning teams in NE was not all cause of him. He had some no names receivers most of the time but you know what they caught the ball. They had a defense that scored plus stopped the other team. A kicker that won at least 4 Super Bowls, if I am correct and that QB was not on the field. Did he kick game winners cause the pocket QB got him in position or he is a kicker and did his job. Jim Kelly got Norwood and Christie in position and they missed the game winning kick. Was that cause of the pocket QB or a missed kick. Butler intercepted a pass against Seattle and that QB was not on the field. Was that because of a pocket passer or a defense call and defense player making a play.

To me when you say someone won the game unless its a blowout, its who made that final play to win the game. Many times that dude in NE was not on the field when the game was won.

Wait wasn't Jeff Hosteler a some what of a mobile QB.
 
If any of the scrambling quarterbacks had an offensive line worth shit they wouldn't have to scramble as much. Plus you have to stop the other team from scoring.
Correct they are not running cause they want to unless its a QB draw. They drop back say oh shit, then fuck it, run.
 
Back
Top